Solving a rational equation that requires factoring (Precalculus)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
  • How to solve a rational equation step by step! Algebra tutorial!
    Get a 1.618 t-shirt 👉 bit.ly/1618shirt
    Use "WELCOME10" for 10% off
    Shop my math t-shirts & hoodies on Amazon: 👉 amzn.to/3qBeuw6
    -----------------------------
    I help students master the basics of math. You can show your support and help me create even better content by becoming a patron on Patreon 👉 / blackpenredpen . Every bit of support means the world to me and motivates me to keep bringing you the best math lessons! Thank you!
    -----------------------------
    #math #algebra #mathbasics

Комментарии • 11

  • @Sg190th
    @Sg190th Год назад +9

    4:30 I love the AC method better for this. AC = 105 B = 22 Two numbers add up to 22 also multiply to get 105. Those two numbers would be 7 and 15.

  • @kamarinelson
    @kamarinelson Год назад +3

    I was taught to explicitly state extraneous solutions back in algebra 1 at every step. That way, we never forget the discontinuity which can sometimes disappear.

  • @BlaixenU_
    @BlaixenU_ Год назад +5

    couldnt you make the denominators the same like this?
    x(x+2)/(2x+5)(x+2) - (x+5)(2x+5)/(x+2)(2x+5) = 1

    • @epsi
      @epsi Год назад +6

      You could, but things get messy, and you will need to remove the denominator later anyway.
      Also, be careful with inline representations of fractions:
      Is 1/2x equivalent to
      1/(2x) = (1/2)(1/x)
      as a human might believe, or is it
      (1/2)x = x/2
      as required by the order of operations?
      As an example, x=4:
      1/(2•4) = (1/2)(1/4) = 1/8
      vs.
      (1/2) • 4 = 4/2 = 2 .
      Nobody seems to agree on which is correct, so it's better to put a denominator in parentheses/brackets when that denominator contains multiplication, even if context makes it obvious:
      x(x+2)/((2x+5)(x+2)) - (x+5)(2x+5)/((x+2)(2x+5)) = 1

    • @BlaixenU_
      @BlaixenU_ Год назад +3

      @@epsi thats p interesting. Thanks for taking time out of ur day to teach me smth new :)

    • @beaverosa5831
      @beaverosa5831 Год назад +1

      @@epsi I did this. It was pretty tedious, and took a long time to expand, but i still got the right answer :D

    • @epsi
      @epsi Год назад +1

      @@beaverosa5831
      Yes, i did the same.
      Then i saw the video and was very unhappy with that approach lol

  • @yesyesyes671
    @yesyesyes671 10 месяцев назад +1

    4:38 why cant you use the quadratic formula?

  • @gta4everrr
    @gta4everrr 8 месяцев назад

    Another way to solve it is move the (x + 5)/(x + 2) to the right side, convert 1 to (x + 2)/(x + 2), add, then cross multiply:
    x / (2x + 5) = (2x + 7) / (x + 2)
    x^2 + 2x = 4x^2 + 24x + 35
    3x^2 + 22x + 35 = 0
    (3x + 7)(x + 5) = 0

  • @mikerain8343
    @mikerain8343 10 месяцев назад

    Hello just want to ask if it's ok to interchange the final result, what I mean is if we let the right side of the equation be on the left side, is the sign, could it be affected? Or is it really ok to interchange without changing the sign. Tnx

  • @brahimouahab3022
    @brahimouahab3022 Год назад +1

    coll