@watsimp1773difference between making a monster that has multiple outs and potentally can be beat over, even if it's obnoxious to do, vs a combo, that if not stopped *in standby*, will nearly auto lose you the game. On top of that, EEV can just be in the opening hand (like in the video) so Lab does not even have to overextend, they can just flip it.
What if the lab player didn't EEV, that kash hand was very strong. Plus are we all just gonna forget what kash was able to do in last few months? The zone locking, extra deck ripping, banishing your deck face down, and now they lose to EEV in one event EEV is the problem.
To answer your question at the end of this video and carry on the discussion - I don't think it's either of the options. It's not a necessary evil, nor is it too toxic - It is simply a symptom of a game that's been pushed to its absolute breaking point. Consider that the reaction to this footage has been the same as the reaction to similar tournie coverage that we've seen blow up over the last two formats. First, we had Tear 0 format, where we had footage of the absolute mess of chain link 10 turn 0 bullshit. After that, we had footage of Kashtira zone lock turboing the fuck out of a guy and denying him the ability to play. Konami has since SLAUGHTERED Tear, and curbed down Kashtira while also stopping the zone lock turbo line of play by banning Diablosis. My point in bringing up this is that even though the community called for action over what we were seeing, even when Konami DID take action, it didn't change ANYTHING, it simply passed it along down the line. Because no individual issue with any ONE specific card is the problem with this game. We already KNOW what the real problem with the game is, and that's massive powercreep pushing the game to be absolutely out of fucking control, and it's going to STAY out of control, because yugioh players are little babies that are utterly terrified of any kind of change despite constantly demanding it because the current format is ALWAYS ASS CHEEKS due to the aforementioned issues. it sucks to see, because the way I figure, Konami isn't ever going to change this unless one of two things happen - either we have a mass exodus of players that sends a very clear signal to sort this mess of a game out OR the community says fuck you, and bands together to play the game in a more balanced fashion - A community made and driven format that Konami basically can't ignore due to it's sheer size, popularity, and most importantly, potential profit. I don't have much faith that either of things will happen, but I hope it does. Seeing them kind of support Edison like it's a real format does get me excited, so who knows?
Idk it's things like this that make playing Yu-Gi-Oh! on a competitive level frustrating, because there isn't any counterplay to what just happens. You just have to accept it. Better players don't win all the time, I won a match vs. Shuping Xu because I topdecked into a double evenly matched, and then Eradicator'd him for 5 spells as well. Did I build my deck better? No. Did I play better? No. Did I win? Yes. This game has great potential but its sometimes moments like this that just make Yu-Gi-Oh! unfun for everyone involved.
It's a fair card. Nobody is clamoring for triple tactics talent to be banned, yet it's literally pot of greed, delinquent duo, and change of heart in one card. The card is a risky play and might have a very low payoff. Yes, it can ERADICATE your opponent if you pull it off right and their hand is vulnerable but its not consistent at all. Absolutely, it shouldn't be banned. Even limited would be ridiculous.
Back then it was harder to get the requirements to activate eev. Nowadays it's much easier to fulfill that condition. Appointer got limited then banned and that only rips 1 card from you hand plus the hand knowledge you get. Now imagine with eev its even worse you get hand knowledge and post side you will know what your opponent will have card type, potentially ripping 2 cards minimum from your opponents hand. With there being so many great spells in the game It need to get hit asap. Your not gonna tell its a fair card. Just my opinion.
big difference is it happens to work EXTREMELY well with a deck that genuinely can search it, set it, and activate the same turn set. At least tactics require a monster effect on your turn
@@masteronii-chan3958 people can play, just not how they want to. I think it’s it’s good to build a deck that can keep playing without spells if possible, even for at least a little while.
Playing Kashtira, a deck that many can call the BEST deck of the format, makes you the "one to beat", that's your waness. If you are heavily vulnerable to a card like EEV, you need to think if you just run with the risk or play against it by lowering your deck's optimal strategy. Here, the choice was "I'll take the risk".
Went to locals on Sunday and Monday: Sat across from Lab as Dinomorphia, went second, got EEV'd in Standby and played literally 2 non games. Monday, played Traptrix, got hard read-EEV call Spell outing my backrow removal and Prospy in two seperate matches, both against DM. This card just needs to fucking go, that's not a "Deck to beat" that's "Call the starter card or call the trap deck out, don't play."
Played against a Lab player (OCG), I got EEVed as a pure live twin deck user, took out 2 of my cards and 1 draw. Still beat him out with handtraps and combos. Still won. Skill issue
People fail to realize that if Tom opened a single hand trap the handrip just would not work. He also had the one counterplay that he did not go for: reading the Eradicator (why else would they Big Welcome in DP) and chain Cosmic to Big Welcome trying to snipe a 1/4 chance) DKB didn't even search it of Lady, it's just one of those unfortunate game where you draw no hand trap and your opponent draw the sacky one of that wins on the spot. Also in games where you allow Lady's search to go through once, you probably already lost the game *cough DBarrier cough*
EEV used to be balance by the monster tribute it needed. Now a days with things like Tear, Labyrinth, Bystial, quite a bit of the branded fusions. It just to easy to meet now.
@@Cybertech134 and in best of 3 matches you can spend the 1st round to see if they are spell or trap focus and then side deck the virus them for the other 2 rounds.
@@lightdragoon88 Yes, and that's why you make your deck less spell or trap focused so you aren't hit as hard by EEV. It's shoddy deckbuilding that's the problem, not EEV.
As a Labrynth Player, i think it goes Both ways. I dont particularly see it as an scenario to BUILD AROUND unless your deck solely relies on said Strategy. Such as only spell/trap. As proposed, had it not been ONLY spells, the result would had been very different, but is it too bad? Id say not really. Card is not a Nesesary evil PER SE. But its not the worst offender as of late. See... I like cool combos and Interactions. But i draw the line at the TEAMSAMX mentality of the "This Board is unbreakable and sets like 20 negates + towers." Theres absolutely no way all decks can play through that. And drawing the out is one in a million. Its hella hard to deal with fields like that. Skill issue maybe. But to THAT i say, if youre gonna cry wolf for EEV resolving after DOING FULL COMBO TO NOT LET THE OTHER PLAYER PLAY... Thats very childish. The Yugitubers are very vocal acainst Floodgate decks and Strategies because it doesnt allow their combos... But its okay for them to do so. "because they are proving a point" After doing the clasic Teamsam pro gamer move. Labbing is cool, i do enjoy, that can serve as a way to see potential threats, and yet they let them run its course for SCENARIOS LIKE THE ONE IN THE VID to happen. Middle ground in my opinion is... I think EEV should go, get it Banned. Give us an alternative then. And the problem with alternatives, is that Those tend to BE EXTREMELY FAIR while others are running at Full force with no stop. That is Yugioh saddly. Sometimes you cant choose who to play against. I dont like Pulling a War Tank against Kids fighting with Sticks. Every now and then i dust off my Ice barriers, and My Lavals to remember when simple Deck builds were Fun. Its not like i dont understand competitive, in fact, because i do, i can see The problem that a card like EEV posses. Just that i also think that they should Bann it along with hits to SOME OTHER CARDS that clearly are running Rampart.
This... The very reason why I don't to play any floodgate in Lab is because I don't want to be hit by it, is a game of two after all Haven't watched Kash player previous matches, but I read in another comment that he made 9 zone lock PLUS fragrance on a Rikka player... Maybe that's why the crowd cheered for EEV resolving Lingering floodgates shouldn't exist, period; cards like that (and Maxx C) where created on a different period where those conditions where hard to fullfil, but nowadays Traptrick + Lubellion, Arianna or Magician souls can do the trick Balanced cards like Evenly match (Devastating aftermath, yet still fair), Nib and Talents are a rare sight, and Konami only has eyes for cash cows the majority of the year... They made a preemptive hit to EEV on MD cause this happened on a big event, with some luck this gets banned Till then, we better pray for Lady to not getting hit, cause obviously she's the problem
@@Jyxero i think LADY while she is a Culprit, she isnt exactly the problem. Maybe im biased. But ive played a lot of it, and she has been outed way too much for my liking, because of interactions. I dont play Viruses on my decks, matter of fact i play Fair Labrynths. A more Pure Approach to it. (no Virus, No continuous Traps, no counter cards. Just Normal traps, of which i believe more than Half are archetype related) So i think im not exactly in a position to say that Shes fair. But she is a Boss monster on a deck that Doesnt inherently Sets Negates, but rather, likes to set Interruptions which may be seen as such. "Not negating" Ive seen generic boss monsters being used and abuse till no end with greater power that that of Lady. Only problem right now is that She enables Virus. So... Id rather let Virus Go, than Getting a COOL boss monster go. So, i Pray shes not Hit. I only have 2, but i would cry if she was hit to 1.
Lady isn't the problem, can't tell if they made it balanced or cause they forgot, but a "When" on her trap setting effect is huge, can't guess how many times those Ash interrupted your plays Are you a Furniture player too? Cause calling for normal traps only is a (based) good take... Just for curiosity sake, do you run an odd trap that isn't seen often but at least remains on your side cause is the trusty one? Or the funny tech that worked once? Have fun with the grind game, and may those Welcome resolve
Then ban floodgates; put a number on the amount of special summons in a turn, and hit turn 1 board building. There are more unfair cards in the game, currently, than EEV that should be addressed first
This happened to me only one time when lab was newly released, after that i always ran two copies of red reboot, it's an instant win against a random floodgate encounter or lab/eld.
If anything like all cards in the card pool. It’s unexpected. Frankly no one was thinking about EEV. Opportunity just turned out like this. This is the same game where once upon a time Blue-Eyes of all decks was meta. So frankly speaking seeing this happen shows that in Yugioh anything could happen. Both players were good sports and while we all want to win if you can’t enjoy the game regardless of win or lose, is it really worth it in the end? Now if we see a deck running around with all the different virus traps. That would be funny to see. Plus lots in the community were sick of kashtira. So call this ironic justice for last format.
Crowd would have went wild if the Big Welcome got hit by Ash and the Lab player lost because of it, but no one would care then because Ash is a "fair" card. There isn't anything wrong with EEV and there are far worse and more oppressive cards in the game.
Chain Called by, Gravedigger, Chain Hole (Normal traps, so can be set by Lady) or the Solemn Strike opponent used Cosmic on Floodgates like Cactus bouncer are a thing, but Konami gives a damn about it cause it's bad, and rarely used, but imagine if someone tops with it, cause opponent didn't prepared Extra for it or didn't draw the out EEV is worst cause not only is a lingering effect, but last for 3 turns, more than enough to finish the game... And sure, opponent could just Unicorn and go back to business, (Wouldn't be drawn, only added, so wouldn't pop the field), but didn't happened, so eyes are now over that card But till bigger fishes like TCOBO or Gozen are hit, Konami will chase small fries until players asks for blood / justice
it's a 3 card combo I believe. Deck these day should be able to win if he/she have a 3 card combo. And the reason din kha able to do it, because he draw eradicator. It is a fairly balanced card. There are tons of cards that need to be addresed first BEFORE we talk about eradicator
Nowadays having a 2500Atk dark monster is simply to likely to have. (That's almost any mid/end boss monster of almost any deck.) It's too good. The crush cards in general are just really unfun, when they resolve and really hit you. They are in a way the worst kind of floodgate. I had once a match, where someone pretty much used all existing kinds of crush cards against me, and I basically lost my entire hand and every card I drew the next few turns.
EEV is absolutely acceptable. It encourages balanced deck building or siding. And solitaire players with crazy end boards (me included) have very little room to criticize that card.
IMO a card that give even a slight chance of not letting your opponent play the game should be banned, this card is going to be limited in Master duel just for this reason and because it's a best of 1 format LOL
"Best" of all is that Lady wasn't even included, he just hard draw it & set Welcome & EEV... No need to Welcome, Lady chain, Cooclock on hand, GG And by best I mean maybe she won't be hit by Konami's own mistakes, of overlooking old cards in current environment, or did people forgot about the Protos incident? What about Herald Drytron? Or the deck that somehow uses fusions on clearly a Gimmick puppet deck EEV isn't a necessary evil, but I speak as a casual, while on tournament people will "Call by" their family if their deck allows to... $$$$ at stake make people go wild Konami will hit EEV on MD, as "repercution"; surely that means the floodgate is handled and they won't go for Lab hits, right? right?
Ok in standby, with no board whatsoever, EEV declare spell, response? None because you have no board and no Crossout? Congrats, get bent. Draw the out.
Bro there is no consistent out for 5 set As u see if ever Kastira player has Epsilon side it gonna get solemned, the only way out is blind quick S/T removal which is not actually the possible good out
Let's be real EEV is a bad card your not going to hand wipe for 6 everytime the Kash player was just salty and if konami were to hit a card it would be lady since it can IDK SEARCH ANY NORMAL TRAP CARD JUST BECAUSE PRO PLAYERS COMPLAINS ABOUT A CARD DOESN'T MEAN THERE RIGHT ALL THE TIME and this is coming from a combo player.
@@nightwish7074 if that's the case skill should go, Anti spell should go those cards make a more compelling case to get banned. just because a pro player said it doesn't make it right 🤷🏿♂️
@@awwready_28 at least Anti spell can be killed by an MST - Cosmic Cyclone - Twin Twisters Not saying that it should stay, bc floodgates are problematic, but Continous Trap floodgates at least can be contested while EEV and D Barrier cannot
Then Evenly should go, every floodgate should go, thats why western yugioh gets borring, players just cry and want everything ban... Meanwhile in Japan we have max c challenge
@@gawrshurab1035I agree but tcg does a horrible job managing this I love and continue to love ocg but if we can't transition to that then tcg needs to change something up
The card is undeniably toxic, and realistically should be banned. It likely hasn’t been because it hasn’t seen widespread usage or success, but the potential will always be there, and it’s concept is just unhealthy for the game
Having to put EEV and Crossout in the side JUST because it's being played now is fucking obnoxious. More so that there's an entire deck that gets to, in Standby, just set it and pop it. They guess right? Your starter/extender/searcher is gone, and more than likely in multiples. No Crossout? Well then, you're fucked.
Just play fewer spells and more monsters. What's fucking obnoxious is people not realizing that you actually need to make better deckbuilding decisions.
@@Cybertech134 Yes, play more bricks and extenders to dodge one fucking card, so when you have the one searcher in hand and 4 extenders/handtraps you can really go "Alright, set 1, go."
@@Cybertech134 Random Chance is already a factor, and blowout handtraps like Droll and Shifter are things already. There's too many lingering effects for this shit to be actually fun to sit across from, because EEV is not just imhaling bad draws, it's inhaling entire strats just because it's a strong read. The same reason Maxx "C" is still gone over here, your Consistencey without Risk goes out the window when the current game enviroment is "Out my board". Ok I'll out your board "Wait a minute, out my board with 2 cards." Um, ok? "Droll after your starter, response?" Yeah game 2
@@larv23 What you're not realizing here is that EEV isn't the problem. It's the combo decks that will end you the following turn if you get interrupted. Take away build-a-board combo decks and this isn't nearly an issue. EEV has been out forever, but now it's working cause you think you somehow should be able to play a combo deck that has a high chance of opening a hand of all spells and get away with it without being punished for your shitty deckbuilding.
@@Alessandro-rn8tp yet the same EEV it played can be used against it. You could make that argument for most staples in the game so should those be banned as well?
@@Alessandro-rn8tp nope because combo decks also use it so it doesn't do anything to stop combo decks. If anything combo decks gain more momentum from it than rogue decks just because of the power level
DKB is mad innovative deck building wise. Not just talking about this particularly event. I think he was one of the first with the fur hire runick deck …
I hate how the crowd claps and the commentators are so excited. That kind of yugioh deserves 0 applause and 0 excitement, it was actually a pathetic demonstration of one of konamis many, many mistakes. Literally took 0 skill to flip EEV, dinky boy didn't deserve to be the champ. Dinks skill consisted of this the entire tournament: FLIP FLOODGATE. Wow, I'm just so impressed. Fix your game konami...
To be "fair", Kashtira is way more hated with their in-build of banish face-down, from deck, field or extra zone, and don't forget the good old zone lock + Macro... Who doesn't love Macro? (Just overlook that rare Methaphys player)... that could explain why the cheer happened But another explanation is that the game is being played as Konami intended, or why so many negation and floodgates still exists and are encouraged? Fk floodgates, literally are the non spormanship representation of this game, as that opponent will do anything is needed to win
Are you under the impression that combo players just deserve to have their hyperconsistency be mandated by Konami? You know there's a risk to having your deck rely on so many spells to be consistent, right? It's called a trade-off.
Imagine being in game 3 of finals and listening to a crowd go wild as you get your entire hand ripped in draw phase
The fact he was such a good sport about though was hilarious, he was just like, oh well I guess I’m not the national champion
Glorious.
@watsimp1773difference between making a monster that has multiple outs and potentally can be beat over, even if it's obnoxious to do, vs a combo, that if not stopped *in standby*, will nearly auto lose you the game. On top of that, EEV can just be in the opening hand (like in the video) so Lab does not even have to overextend, they can just flip it.
It's one par with how I feel when I turn 1 Royal Tribute someone and discard all pendulums 😂
Imagine getting negated 3 times and then having your entire monster zones blocked. Oh wait, thats just the actual current format.
What if the lab player didn't EEV, that kash hand was very strong. Plus are we all just gonna forget what kash was able to do in last few months? The zone locking, extra deck ripping, banishing your deck face down, and now they lose to EEV in one event EEV is the problem.
How bout both are the issue? Ya no screw both of those guys
To answer your question at the end of this video and carry on the discussion - I don't think it's either of the options. It's not a necessary evil, nor is it too toxic - It is simply a symptom of a game that's been pushed to its absolute breaking point.
Consider that the reaction to this footage has been the same as the reaction to similar tournie coverage that we've seen blow up over the last two formats. First, we had Tear 0 format, where we had footage of the absolute mess of chain link 10 turn 0 bullshit. After that, we had footage of Kashtira zone lock turboing the fuck out of a guy and denying him the ability to play. Konami has since SLAUGHTERED Tear, and curbed down Kashtira while also stopping the zone lock turbo line of play by banning Diablosis.
My point in bringing up this is that even though the community called for action over what we were seeing, even when Konami DID take action, it didn't change ANYTHING, it simply passed it along down the line. Because no individual issue with any ONE specific card is the problem with this game. We already KNOW what the real problem with the game is, and that's massive powercreep pushing the game to be absolutely out of fucking control, and it's going to STAY out of control, because yugioh players are little babies that are utterly terrified of any kind of change despite constantly demanding it because the current format is ALWAYS ASS CHEEKS due to the aforementioned issues.
it sucks to see, because the way I figure, Konami isn't ever going to change this unless one of two things happen - either we have a mass exodus of players that sends a very clear signal to sort this mess of a game out OR the community says fuck you, and bands together to play the game in a more balanced fashion - A community made and driven format that Konami basically can't ignore due to it's sheer size, popularity, and most importantly, potential profit. I don't have much faith that either of things will happen, but I hope it does. Seeing them kind of support Edison like it's a real format does get me excited, so who knows?
Idk it's things like this that make playing Yu-Gi-Oh! on a competitive level frustrating, because there isn't any counterplay to what just happens. You just have to accept it.
Better players don't win all the time, I won a match vs. Shuping Xu because I topdecked into a double evenly matched, and then Eradicator'd him for 5 spells as well. Did I build my deck better? No. Did I play better? No. Did I win? Yes.
This game has great potential but its sometimes moments like this that just make Yu-Gi-Oh! unfun for everyone involved.
It's a fair card. Nobody is clamoring for triple tactics talent to be banned, yet it's literally pot of greed, delinquent duo, and change of heart in one card. The card is a risky play and might have a very low payoff. Yes, it can ERADICATE your opponent if you pull it off right and their hand is vulnerable but its not consistent at all. Absolutely, it shouldn't be banned. Even limited would be ridiculous.
Back then it was harder to get the requirements to activate eev. Nowadays it's much easier to fulfill that condition. Appointer got limited then banned and that only rips 1 card from you hand plus the hand knowledge you get. Now imagine with eev its even worse you get hand knowledge and post side you will know what your opponent will have card type, potentially ripping 2 cards minimum from your opponents hand. With there being so many great spells in the game It need to get hit asap. Your not gonna tell its a fair card. Just my opinion.
@@masteronii-chan3958people run the spells to keep recycling their 15 monsters and 12 hand traps in their deck.
@@EhrgeizZF many decks can't play when their spells are discarded
big difference is it happens to work EXTREMELY well with a deck that genuinely can search it, set it, and activate the same turn set. At least tactics require a monster effect on your turn
@@masteronii-chan3958 people can play, just not how they want to. I think it’s it’s good to build a deck that can keep playing without spells if possible, even for at least a little while.
Playing Kashtira, a deck that many can call the BEST deck of the format, makes you the "one to beat", that's your waness. If you are heavily vulnerable to a card like EEV, you need to think if you just run with the risk or play against it by lowering your deck's optimal strategy. Here, the choice was "I'll take the risk".
Went to locals on Sunday and Monday:
Sat across from Lab as Dinomorphia, went second, got EEV'd in Standby and played literally 2 non games. Monday, played Traptrix, got hard read-EEV call Spell outing my backrow removal and Prospy in two seperate matches, both against DM.
This card just needs to fucking go, that's not a "Deck to beat" that's "Call the starter card or call the trap deck out, don't play."
Played against a Lab player (OCG), I got EEVed as a pure live twin deck user, took out 2 of my cards and 1 draw. Still beat him out with handtraps and combos. Still won.
Skill issue
@@larv23Skill issue
Balerdroch eradicatior is such a nice interaction. Tribute for cost, comes back next turn if there's a field spell
People fail to realize that if Tom opened a single hand trap the handrip just would not work.
He also had the one counterplay that he did not go for: reading the Eradicator (why else would they Big Welcome in DP) and chain Cosmic to Big Welcome trying to snipe a 1/4 chance)
DKB didn't even search it of Lady, it's just one of those unfortunate game where you draw no hand trap and your opponent draw the sacky one of that wins on the spot.
Also in games where you allow Lady's search to go through once, you probably already lost the game *cough DBarrier cough*
EEV used to be balance by the monster tribute it needed. Now a days with things like Tear, Labyrinth, Bystial, quite a bit of the branded fusions. It just to easy to meet now.
It's balanced by deckbuilding decisions. It was only that powerful cause of how many spells his opponent was playing.
@@Cybertech134 and in best of 3 matches you can spend the 1st round to see if they are spell or trap focus and then side deck the virus them for the other 2 rounds.
@@lightdragoon88 Yes, and that's why you make your deck less spell or trap focused so you aren't hit as hard by EEV. It's shoddy deckbuilding that's the problem, not EEV.
@@Cybertech134 unless you are playing super heavy, you will be using spells and/or traps.
@@lightdragoon88 Nobody is saying use zero spells or traps. I'm saying use fewer of them so your deck isn't hit so hard by one card.
As a Labrynth Player, i think it goes Both ways.
I dont particularly see it as an scenario to BUILD AROUND unless your deck solely relies on said Strategy.
Such as only spell/trap.
As proposed, had it not been ONLY spells, the result would had been very different, but is it too bad?
Id say not really.
Card is not a Nesesary evil PER SE.
But its not the worst offender as of late.
See... I like cool combos and Interactions.
But i draw the line at the TEAMSAMX mentality of the
"This Board is unbreakable and sets like 20 negates + towers."
Theres absolutely no way all decks can play through that.
And drawing the out is one in a million.
Its hella hard to deal with fields like that.
Skill issue maybe.
But to THAT i say, if youre gonna cry wolf for EEV resolving after DOING FULL COMBO TO NOT LET THE OTHER PLAYER PLAY... Thats very childish.
The Yugitubers are very vocal acainst Floodgate decks and Strategies because it doesnt allow their combos...
But its okay for them to do so.
"because they are proving a point"
After doing the clasic Teamsam pro gamer move.
Labbing is cool, i do enjoy, that can serve as a way to see potential threats, and yet they let them run its course for SCENARIOS LIKE THE ONE IN THE VID to happen.
Middle ground in my opinion is...
I think EEV should go, get it Banned.
Give us an alternative then.
And the problem with alternatives, is that Those tend to BE EXTREMELY FAIR while others are running at Full force with no stop.
That is Yugioh saddly.
Sometimes you cant choose who to play against.
I dont like Pulling a War Tank against Kids fighting with Sticks.
Every now and then i dust off my Ice barriers, and My Lavals to remember when simple Deck builds were Fun.
Its not like i dont understand competitive, in fact, because i do, i can see The problem that a card like EEV posses.
Just that i also think that they should Bann it along with hits to SOME OTHER CARDS that clearly are running Rampart.
This... The very reason why I don't to play any floodgate in Lab is because I don't want to be hit by it, is a game of two after all
Haven't watched Kash player previous matches, but I read in another comment that he made 9 zone lock PLUS fragrance on a Rikka player... Maybe that's why the crowd cheered for EEV resolving
Lingering floodgates shouldn't exist, period; cards like that (and Maxx C) where created on a different period where those conditions where hard to fullfil, but nowadays Traptrick + Lubellion, Arianna or Magician souls can do the trick
Balanced cards like Evenly match (Devastating aftermath, yet still fair), Nib and Talents are a rare sight, and Konami only has eyes for cash cows the majority of the year... They made a preemptive hit to EEV on MD cause this happened on a big event, with some luck this gets banned
Till then, we better pray for Lady to not getting hit, cause obviously she's the problem
@@Jyxero i think
LADY while she is a Culprit, she isnt exactly the problem.
Maybe im biased.
But ive played a lot of it, and she has been outed way too much for my liking, because of interactions.
I dont play Viruses on my decks, matter of fact i play
Fair Labrynths.
A more Pure Approach to it.
(no Virus, No continuous Traps, no counter cards.
Just Normal traps, of which i believe more than Half are archetype related)
So i think im not exactly in a position to say that Shes fair.
But she is a Boss monster on a deck that Doesnt inherently Sets Negates, but rather, likes to set Interruptions which may be seen as such.
"Not negating"
Ive seen generic boss monsters being used and abuse till no end with greater power that that of Lady.
Only problem right now is that She enables Virus.
So... Id rather let Virus Go, than Getting a COOL boss monster go.
So, i Pray shes not Hit.
I only have 2, but i would cry if she was hit to 1.
Lady isn't the problem, can't tell if they made it balanced or cause they forgot, but a "When" on her trap setting effect is huge, can't guess how many times those Ash interrupted your plays
Are you a Furniture player too? Cause calling for normal traps only is a (based) good take...
Just for curiosity sake, do you run an odd trap that isn't seen often but at least remains on your side cause is the trusty one? Or the funny tech that worked once?
Have fun with the grind game, and may those Welcome resolve
The card is okay, if you lose agaisnt it it's just...
Skill Issue
Then ban floodgates; put a number on the amount of special summons in a turn, and hit turn 1 board building.
There are more unfair cards in the game, currently, than EEV that should be addressed first
This happened to me only one time when lab was newly released, after that i always ran two copies of red reboot, it's an instant win against a random floodgate encounter or lab/eld.
If anything like all cards in the card pool. It’s unexpected. Frankly no one was thinking about EEV. Opportunity just turned out like this. This is the same game where once upon a time Blue-Eyes of all decks was meta. So frankly speaking seeing this happen shows that in Yugioh anything could happen. Both players were good sports and while we all want to win if you can’t enjoy the game regardless of win or lose, is it really worth it in the end? Now if we see a deck running around with all the different virus traps. That would be funny to see. Plus lots in the community were sick of kashtira. So call this ironic justice for last format.
Crowd would have went wild if the Big Welcome got hit by Ash and the Lab player lost because of it, but no one would care then because Ash is a "fair" card. There isn't anything wrong with EEV and there are far worse and more oppressive cards in the game.
Chain Called by, Gravedigger, Chain Hole (Normal traps, so can be set by Lady) or the Solemn Strike opponent used Cosmic on
Floodgates like Cactus bouncer are a thing, but Konami gives a damn about it cause it's bad, and rarely used, but imagine if someone tops with it, cause opponent didn't prepared Extra for it or didn't draw the out
EEV is worst cause not only is a lingering effect, but last for 3 turns, more than enough to finish the game... And sure, opponent could just Unicorn and go back to business, (Wouldn't be drawn, only added, so wouldn't pop the field), but didn't happened, so eyes are now over that card
But till bigger fishes like TCOBO or Gozen are hit, Konami will chase small fries until players asks for blood / justice
it's a 3 card combo I believe. Deck these day should be able to win if he/she have a 3 card combo. And the reason din kha able to do it, because he draw eradicator. It is a fairly balanced card. There are tons of cards that need to be addresed first BEFORE we talk about eradicator
That’s what I’m talkin’ about, baby. Eradicator keeps me X-0 all day!
THAT'S SO REAL
He will be having nightmares for years
Nowadays having a 2500Atk dark monster is simply to likely to have. (That's almost any mid/end boss monster of almost any deck.) It's too good. The crush cards in general are just really unfun, when they resolve and really hit you. They are in a way the worst kind of floodgate. I had once a match, where someone pretty much used all existing kinds of crush cards against me, and I basically lost my entire hand and every card I drew the next few turns.
EEV is absolutely acceptable. It encourages balanced deck building or siding. And solitaire players with crazy end boards (me included) have very little room to criticize that card.
IMO a card that give even a slight chance of not letting your opponent play the game should be banned, this card is going to be limited in Master duel just for this reason and because it's a best of 1 format LOL
imagine malding over eradicator of all cards. deckbuild better or play a different deck
Keep up the content man you have good quality videos
Thanks man! I was swamped the last couple of weeks so expect weekly uploads at a minimum :D
"Best" of all is that Lady wasn't even included, he just hard draw it & set Welcome & EEV... No need to Welcome, Lady chain, Cooclock on hand, GG
And by best I mean maybe she won't be hit by Konami's own mistakes, of overlooking old cards in current environment, or did people forgot about the Protos incident? What about Herald Drytron? Or the deck that somehow uses fusions on clearly a Gimmick puppet deck
EEV isn't a necessary evil, but I speak as a casual, while on tournament people will "Call by" their family if their deck allows to... $$$$ at stake make people go wild
Konami will hit EEV on MD, as "repercution"; surely that means the floodgate is handled and they won't go for Lab hits, right? right?
It's not a bug, it's a feature.
Yes but big welcome also summons the tributed monster from GY... So it's not as much as a loss
Understandable, but he needs to get himself into another big welcome, which will take a whole other turn of dodging an ash blossom/Belle and setup
One word: Edison
Dont touch my eev, has done nothing wrong. Just deal with it or draw the out
Yea west yugi players cry a lot for anything being just a lil strong, i mean.. the other dude was playing fking Runik...
Ok in standby, with no board whatsoever, EEV declare spell, response? None because you have no board and no Crossout?
Congrats, get bent. Draw the out.
@@larv23 Bro could have Ashed the Big Welcome and that would have won him the entire set, does that mean Ash is busted??
your cards literally trash. learn some skill and actually get good at the game
Bro there is no consistent out for 5 set
As u see if ever Kastira player has Epsilon side it gonna get solemned, the only way out is blind quick S/T removal which is not actually the possible good out
Let's be real EEV is a bad card your not going to hand wipe for 6 everytime the Kash player was just salty and if konami were to hit a card it would be lady since it can IDK SEARCH ANY NORMAL TRAP CARD JUST BECAUSE PRO PLAYERS COMPLAINS ABOUT A CARD DOESN'T MEAN THERE RIGHT ALL THE TIME and this is coming from a combo player.
As a non-Kash player, EEV needs to go. It's literally just IO.
@@nightwish7074 if that's the case skill should go, Anti spell should go those cards make a more compelling case to get banned. just because a pro player said it doesn't make it right 🤷🏿♂️
@@awwready_28 at least Anti spell can be killed by an MST - Cosmic Cyclone - Twin Twisters
Not saying that it should stay, bc floodgates are problematic, but Continous Trap floodgates at least can be contested while EEV and D Barrier cannot
Then Evenly should go, every floodgate should go, thats why western yugioh gets borring, players just cry and want everything ban... Meanwhile in Japan we have max c challenge
@@gawrshurab1035I agree but tcg does a horrible job managing this
I love and continue to love ocg but if we can't transition to that then tcg needs to change something up
Ariana search, set 5. I would have scooped right then lol
i don't think it should be banned its not that bad there's a lot worst and this card actually helps not every deck
Top 5 anime moments
Pfft, filthy casuals. Your eev only works for 3 turns? Mine lasts for 38 😎
Those who get this reference are the real Gs
The card is undeniably toxic, and realistically should be banned. It likely hasn’t been because it hasn’t seen widespread usage or success, but the potential will always be there, and it’s concept is just unhealthy for the game
Having to put EEV and Crossout in the side JUST because it's being played now is fucking obnoxious. More so that there's an entire deck that gets to, in Standby, just set it and pop it. They guess right? Your starter/extender/searcher is gone, and more than likely in multiples. No Crossout? Well then, you're fucked.
Just play fewer spells and more monsters. What's fucking obnoxious is people not realizing that you actually need to make better deckbuilding decisions.
@@Cybertech134 Yes, play more bricks and extenders to dodge one fucking card, so when you have the one searcher in hand and 4 extenders/handtraps you can really go "Alright, set 1, go."
@@larv23 Are you under the impression that you just "deserve" to have hyperconsistency without risk?
@@Cybertech134 Random Chance is already a factor, and blowout handtraps like Droll and Shifter are things already. There's too many lingering effects for this shit to be actually fun to sit across from, because EEV is not just imhaling bad draws, it's inhaling entire strats just because it's a strong read. The same reason Maxx "C" is still gone over here, your Consistencey without Risk goes out the window when the current game enviroment is "Out my board".
Ok I'll out your board
"Wait a minute, out my board with 2 cards."
Um, ok?
"Droll after your starter, response?"
Yeah game 2
@@larv23 What you're not realizing here is that EEV isn't the problem. It's the combo decks that will end you the following turn if you get interrupted. Take away build-a-board combo decks and this isn't nearly an issue. EEV has been out forever, but now it's working cause you think you somehow should be able to play a combo deck that has a high chance of opening a hand of all spells and get away with it without being punished for your shitty deckbuilding.
EEV is a necessary evil in the game due to floodgates and trap decks change my mind
dude the deck that was playing it is ITSELF a trap deck
@@Alessandro-rn8tp yet the same EEV it played can be used against it. You could make that argument for most staples in the game so should those be banned as well?
@@kevinlee5753 are you also used to say "Maxx c keeps combo decks in check"?
@@Alessandro-rn8tp nope because combo decks also use it so it doesn't do anything to stop combo decks. If anything combo decks gain more momentum from it than rogue decks just because of the power level
Did he really say one of the greatest deck builders? Bruh is playing a trap deck what you mean
DKB is mad innovative deck building wise. Not just talking about this particularly event. I think he was one of the first with the fur hire runick deck …
It is Fur Hire Spright Runick bro and no one thinking about that
Not to mention he also invented Naturia Runick as well during tear format. X-0 after 11 rounds of Swiss at YCS Dortmund last year
It being repeatable and searchable is the issue so get rid of it
This was RNG
Personally, I agree, just facilitating a discussion :)
It's a card game.
NOWAY Yugioh is RNG OMG
Branded Fusion is worse, they should ban Branded Fusion
I hate how the crowd claps and the commentators are so excited. That kind of yugioh deserves 0 applause and 0 excitement, it was actually a pathetic demonstration of one of konamis many, many mistakes. Literally took 0 skill to flip EEV, dinky boy didn't deserve to be the champ. Dinks skill consisted of this the entire tournament: FLIP FLOODGATE. Wow, I'm just so impressed.
Fix your game konami...
To be "fair", Kashtira is way more hated with their in-build of banish face-down, from deck, field or extra zone, and don't forget the good old zone lock + Macro... Who doesn't love Macro? (Just overlook that rare Methaphys player)... that could explain why the cheer happened
But another explanation is that the game is being played as Konami intended, or why so many negation and floodgates still exists and are encouraged?
Fk floodgates, literally are the non spormanship representation of this game, as that opponent will do anything is needed to win
Are you under the impression that combo players just deserve to have their hyperconsistency be mandated by Konami? You know there's a risk to having your deck rely on so many spells to be consistent, right? It's called a trade-off.
He just got lucky, if his opp opened fenrir or unicorn hes ded
Such a fair and balanced card.
That’s a damn good balance. I’m tired of seeing one spell card shoot off a combo that’s ends a board with 4 interruptions turn one. 🤘🫨