SooMin Can't Believe It..

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 июн 2024
  • Original Video: • 독방에 갇힌 24인, 내 승부욕이 저것까...
    #triples #트리플에스 #soomin #seoyeon #badgewar
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 35

  • @mina.imnida
    @mina.imnida 19 дней назад +16

    yall its 15 if it follows algebraic PEMDAS (Scientific Calculator) due to distributive law where you have to multiply joint parenthesis equations first
    and its 0 if it follows arithmetic PEMDAS (Basic Calculator)

  • @8ligh7
    @8ligh7 25 дней назад +17

    If we strictly follow the operations order via the PEMDAS initialism then the answer is indeed 15, as we always multiply first before dividing. I get why Seoyeon thought that was the answer.
    Smartphone/online calculators however give 0 as the answer. They are actually following a slightly more complex system which still uses the same PEMDAS idea but with an added condition of left to right precedence for equal priority operations, those being mutiplication/division and addition/substraction. So that's why 0 is the correct answer, as you would divide first before you multiply in this equation.

    • @infinit2867
      @infinit2867 21 день назад +3

      Brackets are the highest order of operations so you must finish whatever’s in the bracket first which means you have to do 2(4) first which will be 8 then 16-8/8=15

    • @8ligh7
      @8ligh7 12 дней назад +1

      I'm pretty sure that's incorrect. The whole point of brackets/parentheses being first is to finish the calculations of what is only inside them first, the order of operations doesnt care that there's a 2 just beside them outside. For this calculation to follow that order the notation needs to have been 16-8/(2(2+2)).

    • @infinit2867
      @infinit2867 11 дней назад

      @@8ligh7 Whenever you finish a equation in a bracket and get the resulting number, which, in this is 2, you will always have to bring the number out first above everything, making it the highest order

  • @HALJJAKK
    @HALJJAKK 22 дня назад +3

    김수민 너무 귀여워 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

  • @green.sparks
    @green.sparks 7 дней назад +1

    This is 15, ain't no way.. 2(4) is one variable.. You have to fuse them first before solving the rest of the equation. Calculators are not 100% accurate

  • @miptachudin9700
    @miptachudin9700 17 дней назад +4

    How it is 0 ?
    I thought in math anything in ( ) would be the first priority.
    So the answer should be 15

    • @bana-nice
      @bana-nice 15 дней назад

      when they solved the ( ) they confused it with multiplying the number beside it and not simplifying the original equation first, that's why they got 0

  • @user-fc1jl7fl1k
    @user-fc1jl7fl1k 17 дней назад

    둘 다 맞음

  • @Blitz_Beast
    @Blitz_Beast Месяц назад +19

    This is why parents shouldn't help their children with their schoolwork
    Edit: following the order of operations the correct answer is actually 15.... The prompter actually got it wrong and Seoyeon was right.... Nvm, always listen to mom

    • @muhammadzulfikriarsyad1711
      @muhammadzulfikriarsyad1711 21 день назад +2

      Actually 0 was the right answer,
      16-8:2(2+2) = you can also write it like this 16-8:2x(2+2)=
      So do the section first, 16-8:2x(4)=
      After that because the multiplication and distribution having same power so prioritize the left side first..
      So, 16-4x(4)= then do multiplication 16-16= 0
      That's why the answer 0

    • @infinit2867
      @infinit2867 21 день назад +5

      @@muhammadzulfikriarsyad1711 if you use a calculator and type in the exact question it will be 15. The reason being brackets are the highest order in operations so you always have to finish whatever’s in the bracket which also means you have to do 2(4) first as you have to bring the number in the bracket out first so it will become 16-8/8 which will then be 16-1=15

    • @arthstg
      @arthstg 21 день назад +3

      @@infinit2867 agree, i dont understand why this still not been corrected even now in primary school. i'm electrical engineering graduates, every paper, books and journal i see doing things like that.
      if there is no symbol separating number and bracket, means its a part of the bracket which is 1st priority also. for example a(b+c) = (ab+ac) not a x (b+c).
      we having even more confusion using / because most of the time everything after that symbol is one line untill there is space. for example a/b+c = a/(b+c) if you want (a/b)+c you should put the space a/b + c

    • @infinit2867
      @infinit2867 21 день назад +2

      @@arthstg thankfully my country and sch got this right

    • @fathanyusrizal
      @fathanyusrizal 17 дней назад

      ​@@arthstg Actually u're wrong. If u pay attention, (ab + ac) = a x (b+c), just put any integer or real number and u will get the exact same answer. And u can't do the (ab+ac) in this case because there were no brackets at 2(2x2) so 2(2x2) means 2 x (2x2). There will always be * there, written or not. It will be different if the case was 16-8÷(2(2x2)) then u can do the brackets first. Math equation can be written in many ways, but the result will always be the same, no matter what. Because math is universal. If 16-8÷2(2x2) has different answer than 16-8÷2x(2x2) then the world will fail. (Sorry i just use my logic since my memory of fact isn't that good. I wanted to mention the Math Rules but i can't remember them lol (i'm not into math nowadays))

  • @dokdo-is-korean-territory
    @dokdo-is-korean-territory 21 час назад

    15가 맞는데... 수포자가 pd인가 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ

  • @FwuqYT
    @FwuqYT 15 дней назад +4

    Last time Soomin is trusting unnie 😅
    For anyone confused, look up BODMAS or PEMDAS depending on country but simply the order you should do the equation is inside brackets, divide, multiply then subtract:
    2+2 = 4
    8÷2 = 4
    4(4) = 16
    16-16 = 0

  • @SirSX3
    @SirSX3 18 дней назад +7

    16-8÷2(2+2)
    = 16-8÷(4+4)
    = 16-8÷8
    = 16-1
    = 15
    The producers are wrong.

  • @GiselleGonsalves
    @GiselleGonsalves 11 дней назад

    According to bordmass rule and calculater and google
    16-8÷2(2+2)
    16-4(2+2)
    16-4(4)
    16-16
    =0

  • @Ijo3
    @Ijo3 20 дней назад +7

    The answer is 0 and only 0 wtf are yall yapping 😭

    • @babyapple_
      @babyapple_ 18 дней назад +5

      no

    • @Ijo3
      @Ijo3 18 дней назад +1

      @@babyapple_ smh...... Im just disappointed atp

    • @jem3706
      @jem3706 14 дней назад +4

      No kid go back to school

    • @enderflames9669
      @enderflames9669 11 дней назад

      nope, because 2(2+2) should be done first. They are together, it shouldnt be split up into seperate steps, but instead have the 2 be distributed in to form (4+4). Hence why the actual answer should be 15.

    • @Ijo3
      @Ijo3 11 дней назад

      @@enderflames9669 no 2(2+2) in this is not factorisation u still need to stick with bodmas so u need to do the one in the bracket no matter what

  • @gurijang2422
    @gurijang2422 26 дней назад +12

    저거 답이 틀린 거임... 결론은 문제가 성립 안 함.... 문제 자체가 틀려서 답이 없다가 정답

    • @doneace
      @doneace 22 дня назад

      진짜임!?