Overview: 02:19 What will you do after this session? 04:07 Why Quantum Computing (part 1) 07:10 Superposition and Entanglement 20:38 Why Quantum Computing (part 2) 26:40 Bits vs. Qubits 29:38 Quantum State 36:36 Quantum Gates and Circuits 40:05 IBM Q Experience 44:44 Microsoft Q# 50:20 Entanglement 54:46 Teleportation 56:52 Quantum Algorithms Overview
Erratum: The slide at 28:45 that shows the matrix representing the combined state of 6 qubits is wrong. Six bits can represent 2^6=64 values, so the matrix needs 64 values. The matrix I show you in the slide has 12 values, which does not make any sense: 12 is not a power of two. It should have 8 values for 3 qubits, 16 values for 4 qubits, or in this case: 64 values for 6 qubits.
Alhamdulila, jazakallah and thank you for your information and kindness in sharing this with us. I am inspired to learn more and do what I can to help push this quantum concept forward. Your explanation of exponential magnification was 'very conceptualizable' - we are informed that salaat prayer in a group of 3 or more people receives 27 or more times reward, which I understand is an exponential magnification (given 3 to the power of 3 is 27). Given the state of AI, with neural networks designed on the functioning of the human brain, and the advancement of administration of entanglement, do you see us ever replicating such exponential magnification via electronics, or is that reward mechanism only confined to the spiritual realm, or the sole right of the universes' Most Awesome Entangler?
Hi, and thank you for your kind words. It is still too early to answer your question. Quantum computing today is still struggling with its physical implementation of a qubit. There are many different approaches to combining qubits together to achieve a combined entangled state, and there are many different kinds of quantum objects that are able to hold a quantum state. The electron and the spin property is just one example of such an object. Also, photons and their polarization property are a possible candidate, just like many others. In order to replicate and reach the complexity of a human brain, we will probably need thousands or even millions of qubits. I hope we (the human race, not me specifically) will achieve quantum computers with hundreds or thousands of stable qubits in the next decades. These quantum computers will help us solve some very specific problems, and help us to add some simulation power to existing models in medical science or machine learning. We not only need the qubits, but also a useful algorithm that uses those qubits. Fully simulating the brain or the human body will probably be out of reach for a long time, or even forever (which is my personal opinion, I'm not a physicist or fortune-teller, unfortunately :-)).
@@djohnnie thank you for the detailed response, I am again inspired and remain in awe of the greatness of the Most Awesome Creator who is able and loving enough to make me and you and our human family and give us the ability to ourselves create things with our so seemingly complex and effective brains and bodies, let alone the infinitely endless physical world in which we find ourselves. The lack of engagement with this presentation tells me firstly that you are furthering the cutting edge of understanding this world and it's energy processes, which is beyond the scope of most minds on this platform, and maybe also that yt AI is calculating that this knowledge is precious and is not for promotion.. Perhaps some kind of artificial jealousy? Anyway, I intend to use it to learn more and pass on the love to others, and to this end I may reach out to you for further advice and insight. Thank you again, your work is very helpful and definitely appreciated greatly. I look forward to working with you and others via some form of entanglement..
Overview:
02:19 What will you do after this session?
04:07 Why Quantum Computing (part 1)
07:10 Superposition and Entanglement
20:38 Why Quantum Computing (part 2)
26:40 Bits vs. Qubits
29:38 Quantum State
36:36 Quantum Gates and Circuits
40:05 IBM Q Experience
44:44 Microsoft Q#
50:20 Entanglement
54:46 Teleportation
56:52 Quantum Algorithms Overview
Erratum: The slide at 28:45 that shows the matrix representing the combined state of 6 qubits is wrong. Six bits can represent 2^6=64 values, so the matrix needs 64 values. The matrix I show you in the slide has 12 values, which does not make any sense: 12 is not a power of two. It should have 8 values for 3 qubits, 16 values for 4 qubits, or in this case: 64 values for 6 qubits.
Alhamdulila, jazakallah and thank you for your information and kindness in sharing this with us. I am inspired to learn more and do what I can to help push this quantum concept forward. Your explanation of exponential magnification was 'very conceptualizable' - we are informed that salaat prayer in a group of 3 or more people receives 27 or more times reward, which I understand is an exponential magnification (given 3 to the power of 3 is 27). Given the state of AI, with neural networks designed on the functioning of the human brain, and the advancement of administration of entanglement, do you see us ever replicating such exponential magnification via electronics, or is that reward mechanism only confined to the spiritual realm, or the sole right of the universes' Most Awesome Entangler?
Hi, and thank you for your kind words. It is still too early to answer your question. Quantum computing today is still struggling with its physical implementation of a qubit. There are many different approaches to combining qubits together to achieve a combined entangled state, and there are many different kinds of quantum objects that are able to hold a quantum state. The electron and the spin property is just one example of such an object. Also, photons and their polarization property are a possible candidate, just like many others. In order to replicate and reach the complexity of a human brain, we will probably need thousands or even millions of qubits. I hope we (the human race, not me specifically) will achieve quantum computers with hundreds or thousands of stable qubits in the next decades. These quantum computers will help us solve some very specific problems, and help us to add some simulation power to existing models in medical science or machine learning. We not only need the qubits, but also a useful algorithm that uses those qubits. Fully simulating the brain or the human body will probably be out of reach for a long time, or even forever (which is my personal opinion, I'm not a physicist or fortune-teller, unfortunately :-)).
@@djohnnie thank you for the detailed response, I am again inspired and remain in awe of the greatness of the Most Awesome Creator who is able and loving enough to make me and you and our human family and give us the ability to ourselves create things with our so seemingly complex and effective brains and bodies, let alone the infinitely endless physical world in which we find ourselves. The lack of engagement with this presentation tells me firstly that you are furthering the cutting edge of understanding this world and it's energy processes, which is beyond the scope of most minds on this platform, and maybe also that yt AI is calculating that this knowledge is precious and is not for promotion.. Perhaps some kind of artificial jealousy?
Anyway, I intend to use it to learn more and pass on the love to others, and to this end I may reach out to you for further advice and insight. Thank you again, your work is very helpful and definitely appreciated greatly. I look forward to working with you and others via some form of entanglement..
Time stamps would be nice
mistery?