Moshe Safdie: How to reinvent the apartment building
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- In 1967, Moshe Safdie reimagined the monolithic apartment building, creating “Habitat ’67,” which gave each unit an unprecedented sense of openness. Nearly 50 years later, he believes the need for this type of building is greater than ever. In this short talk, Safdie surveys a range of projects that do away with the high-rise and let light permeate into densely-packed cities.
TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and much more.
Find closed captions and translated subtitles in many languages at www.ted.com/tra...
Follow TED news on Twitter: / tednews
Like TED on Facebook: / ted
Subscribe to our channel: / tedtalksdirector 
Наука
One of the coolest talks unexpectedly from an old man.. He really showered the nxt biggest revolution on our daily living architecture .
Hats off to his thinking.
I love the concept of open air apartment living and over 3hrs of sunlight measured during the winter solstice! Please build more!
I've walked around the perimeter and the main surface of Habitat 67. The feeling you get there is indescribable... I hope this kind of architecture is adopted in our path to sustainable housing and living.
I think it would be very inspiring, at the very least less depressing, to live in such buildings.
That they can be affordable as 'middle income housing', amazing.
I live in Singapore and I see that building everyday as I travel to school, its beautiful but expensive to get a unit there.
Bring it to Seattle WA. The city is having a hard time dealing with density problems but is early enough that there are economical feasible ways to build something like this. They could develop 100 city blocks of East Lake into one of this projects. It could double the amount of living spaces for the city, it would provide lake front properties and a brand new commercial zone. Just build from Leschi Park to Colman Park and build on top of the I-90. With the train station serving that area and a renovation of the I-90 this could become a solution for Seattle.
Somebody get me a meeting with Paul Allen I'll talk him into it. lol
***** does America not have yellow/amber intemediary lights between the red and green?
***** Hmm sounds interesting, but are you telling me people regularly run red lights in your home country because they get impatient for the green light to come? That is worrying. If there has been study done on the importance on knowing how long until a green light I would be interested to read it if you have a link.
Sorry I mistook you for an American I only assumed by the way you suggested in your post that the commenter contact the Seattle Representative.
He failed to mention the extremely high cost of his idea of economic housing, which is why 67 did not "proliferate". Low-end rent costs are almost $3,000 a month, high end buyouts are almost $2mil. He may (or may not) mean well with his intentions, but time has shown that his residential projects are only meant for the wealthy.
Those buildings are frankly beautiful. Large complexes with _layers_ and outdoor platforms, not just rooms packed in a block.
Great stuff. Sunlight and open space have great influences on our well being. Housing should be designed in a way to incorporate the necessary elements of nature, instead of being seen as a barrier to protect us from it.
normally people don't want to jump off their 20 story balcony mate.. and if they do it helps the density problem
There is no way we can reduce the amount of people in this world. I have 3 children myself and no one is going to stop me from having more. I love his concept of making every apartment building very unique in design. I would love to live at one of those places.
We're investing in one of his units..Montreal the Habitat 67 has a waiting list STILL in 2019!
Proliferate, god damn it.
***** I wouldn't have thought Faceless Men bothered with such trifles, but good luck!
That is scary high
Imagine having a party though... Soo many neighbors to warn... not to mention satisfy with sound levels etc... No thanks i prefer living in a solitary house :) Here i can't bother anyone ^^
Hmm, so you're saying that if i decided to one day bump up my stereo system (which i love to do from time to time just to zone out) nobody would be bothered because of some soundproofing of the building or something? It just seems that all the "apartments" are so close that somebody is gonna be bothered by it ;o not saying i dont love the design and the alternative! Just poking a few holes here :)
boogeyabse I understand where you're coming from. I grew up in apartment buildings in a crowded city similar to the Brazilian one he showed. Many apartments have a big room for parties, and there are community meetings to discuss any issues in the building. These result in rules such as no loud music after 11pm, no large parties/noise inside apartments, etc. It's obviously a bit annoying, but apartments aren't very big anyways. That's why we had the community room, which is large for medium-large sized parties, there's a kitchen and bathrooms, sometimes fun stuff like ping-pong table, etc. There is where we used to have BBQs, birthday parties, even yoga lessons! I know it's not the same as living in your own isolated house, but you learn to adapt and it's really not that bad at all.
I live in a high rise building and have a massive stereo system and trust me, no one can hear it. Any high rise building made in the last few years has concrete walls within the apartment and the floors and walls. Not live in crappy old buildings where everything is dry wall. People won't ever hear you because it is SO soundproof its almost unbelievable.
There is always a apartment for people like you and that are able to live in such beautiful complexes..
The sort of luxury apartment with social people are mostly family members and socialized people like friends etc.
And yeah, listening hard music shouldn't be an issue since the walls are pretty sound barricade proof (most of the time)
Or you need to look elsewhere pal.
i'd love to live in that kind of place! looks cool
Yes, this is what the entire world needs, better creative ideas to improve on mistakes and repetitiveness and costs.
But it comes with a lot of baggage and probably economical reasons too since there is no way to build these complexes fast enough..
And managing apartments in new ways also requires to re manage the entire city.
I live in Singapore with that giant building at the end of the video with the longest pool and all the life and its a hotel, not a living place.
That looks like a fall risk. How do you make an open environment so high in the air?
Fences.
Simply...Don't fall?
That was beautiful!
If those buildings become a thing I might rethink my hatred of cities.
Brilliant!
I think a lot f the problem lies in building with straight lines and ninety degree angles and blocky structures. There was an experiment where test subject were asked questions that would test their logical thinking and the participants would draw straight lines or curvy lines wen drawing straight lines, the participants were less creative, less spontaneous, and thought more objectively about the questions. The people sketching curvy lines were more creative, thinking outside the box, giving answers that were very abstract. They concluded that it was more creatively stimulating to draw rounded shapes than straight lines.
To make designing buildings more creative and solve problems of living more forward thinking, buildings should be designed with curves, blended components, and irregular shapes; not cubes, lines, and flat planes.
They give this guy 5 minutes but the nth guy who wants to moan about global warming and offer no solutions...?
This is amazing
we should pay attention to what he is offering.
0:49 - "So, Let's design a building ..."
How about let's reduce how many people there are on the Earth.
You've got the power to reduce that number by one. If you wish you can do it.
Easiest way to lower the number of children that women have is to educate women and raise their quality of life. Mexico went from 6 children per women to 2.1 in about three decades by raising their quality of life. Europe has done such a good job of raising the quality of life of women that many countries are losing population or depend on immigration to replenish work forces. Canada and the USA are so dependent on immigration to replenish their work forces that if either one of those countries doesn't increase the number of immigrants in the next ten years they won't have enough workers to sustain their older population. Even China and India are stabilizing their population and in the next decade will start to lose population. Help a women be better that's the answer.
I don't think the problem is with our population. The Earth was not created equal and neither are we. It's all about resources and how you put it to use. Before Saudi Arabia found their rich oil deposits, they were extremely poor and did not have the sort of luxury they have today. Now look at them, they have several of the world's most iconic buildings. Similarly, if poorer countries found extremely valued resources on their land now, they could change in matter of years. However it may be, they aren't getting worse, they're just developing much slower because of the little resources they have to work with. And it wouldn't help if the leader of those countries have no vision and don't know how to capitalize on valuable resources.
Kai Chen We are taking action but just very slowly. A lot of rich people are actually doing great things with their money but even with their charity, ending poverty related issues isn't an easy task. People like Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are actually planning to donate 80% of their wealth to charity after they pass away, they want their future generations to work for their wealth instead of inheriting it.
Women's rights=population control.
I'd love a building like this is Melbourne. Is there a purpose for the white design? Instead of a natural wood finish.
Are there any cost considerations?
The problem is that central planning doesn't work. He cannot create a city that will work, because his idea isn't what other people want. It can only grow organically.
so dope
I want to see some more angles of that pool. No way could I live in that.
unique design
Now that is some swimming pool!
awesomeeee
i was a bit confused by the word habitat
Build that stuff in Manhattan now!
This is good but cities need to be easily expandable. I get the feeling that building onto this thing might be bit difficult
horizontal expansion of cities bring forth mobility problems, which are by far the worse a big city can have. pollution, energy missuse, time wasted, accidents, etc.
That condominium in Singapore? Not affordable. Even though it counts as middle-income housing, buyers are mostly higher middle-income earners.
Half the students in a nearby school would live in the same building lol
Saw that one in Montreal in 1967. Apartment is the worse place to live. People was not meant to be closed in or packed together like a snow ball.
Thanks for your likes and comments , you can message me on my email address moshesafdie91@gmail
Brilliant idea, love the contact with nature part.
But the buildings, in my opinion, are extremely ugly.
I kept thinking Peach Trees from the movie Dredd
SINGAPOREEEEE
there's buildings like this in Jerusalem
Earthquake + long pool on the roof = surfing
Concrete and glass. Ancient architecture ages gracefully, but these concrete and glass boxes look terrible when they age.
Looks like something someone would make in MineCraft.
They really need to let these speakers talk for a time more appropriate to what they have to say.
Why?
How could those buildings possibly be middle income housing. Plop one down in a Australia and the realtors will make it luxury housing.
Plop 500 down and it's devalued.
Sadly, I would argue that Safdie still doesn't under stand the urban experience. They are just very big suburban constructions.
That isn't the longest pool in the world.
then what is?
The pool at San Alfonso del Mar is a little over a kilometer.
DizzyDisco93 Maybe he meant longest pool in a building?
MegaEpicLlama I think that's the case. It's the longest pool I know of that sits on top of a building.
I live in Montreal and the habitat 67 is an example of non practical housing. Everyone who lives there does so because of name, but heating of the units is comparable to a house in the country with none of the benefits of a fireplace. Also neighbors are so close and can overlook your property that there is no privacy from several angles. Also this unit was poorly placed as it not close to anything. This is what not to do as a heritage site that can't be destroyed like the Olympic stadium which has parts of the roof collapsing every so many years.
I´m not sure..to me this looks like Le Corbusier´s Paris Plan 2.0
the thing is that he is only doing what a fabelas, or informal housing, have been doing for almost a decade, I can see a lot af problems like a desconection between the public espace of the city and his project, like makind an island. and that is not a solution
Housing of the commons, coming to a foreclosure and eviction moratorium near you.
Something that can change the course of human self destruction and that can be done today.
come youtube firsyly,cann't understand it.
Very progressive thinker.
Losing mobility is the entire point of the high-density religion. They don't want peopel to move distances, they want people to be close to everything they do.
As a scientist and engineer I can't help but think these things are kind of cool, but I can also see a bit of arrogance in pushing nature to its limits to serve man when in most cases these kinds of engineering are not really needed. Technology becomes its own excuse, and we all know that the real driver of technology is at the heart of things, war.
no, the real driver of technology is basic scientific research, which is often government funded, which is often justified in the name of security. We can continue to advance technology without war.
Why did you waste my time with what is a stupid statement.
You said:
-- technology is basic scientific research, which is often government funded, which is often justified in the name of security.
Security is just a warm and fuzzier name for war.
You're wasting your own time arguing against strawmen you create. I didn't say technology is basic scientific research. I said the real driver of technology is basic scientific research (not war). I said it's often justified in the name of security - maybe if you were't such an idiot jumping to conclusions you would realize that means I don't necessarily agree with it. and then you conveniently leave out the rest of my comment in which I reiterate and underscore the fact that war and technological advancement are not inextricably linked. You pretend to care about the truth and then you misrepresent my comment. Don't be such a fucking idiot. Stop and think.
ending on rehashed Honolulu blight's much ::pfft::
"Middle income housing"
,👏👏👏
Good ideas and everything, but horrible blocky designs.
Lol
"We can't sustain suburbs"
That is false.
i think after ww3 maybe this ll be happen
... just 3x more expensive. Idiot or DISINGENUOUS. My opinion.
As soon as I saw his design - GTFO! Those things are UGLY.
Same thing happened when I saw you! Lol jk.
seems a bit gay and naive. putting a few plants here and there only creates an illusion of eco-friendliness or sustainability.
Not informative.
One of the coolest talks unexpectedly from an old man.. He really showered the nxt biggest revolution on our daily living architecture .
Hats off to his thinking.