Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
How neurotechnology could endanger human rights | Allan McCay | TEDxSydneySalon
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 авг 2024
- The impressive recent advances in neurotechnology, led by investment from some of the worlds’ most powerful companies and militaries, offer incredible opportunities from everything from the metaverse to medical treatments. But this technology will also have many implications that we aren’t prepared for. Could this technology be used in sentencing, or criminal justice? How will employers use it to continue the trend of workplace surveillance? And who will have access to the data being captured once we have these devices implanted in our heads? In this talk, Allan McCay argues that existing legal protections and definitions such as The Universal Declaration of Human Rights are no longer fit for purpose if we take into consideration the ethical, legal and social problems that will come from this technology.
Allan McCay is the Deputy Director of The Sydney Institute of Criminology and an Academic Fellow at the University of Sydney's Law School where he coordinates the Legal Research units and lectures in Criminal Law. In connection with his work on neurotechnology, criminal law and human rights, Allan has been named as one of the most influential lawyers of 2021 by Australasian Lawyer. He is also a member of the Minding Rights Network which is an international group of scholars who are working on addressing the challenges to autonomy, mental privacy and mental integrity coming from emerging technologies.
He is a member of the Management Committee of the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at the University of Sydney. And is also an Affiliate Member of the Centre for Agency, Values, and Ethics, at Macquarie University. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx
It really does give a lot of food for thought. Even if we just think about popular and seemingly harmless technologies such as AIs, does Chat GPT impacts the right to work if big publications don't need writers anymore? Does it impact the right to access education when an already flawed education system values workload and meeting deadlines over actual education? I know it seems like a stretch, but technology has proven to have overstretched itself. Congratulations on such a well-given talk!
Great comment! I also thought about this topic! We can think about how we as a society should regulate some theoretical neurotechnologies, but on the same level, we should take action in the case of AI use.
It's amazing how most neurorights discourse amounts to either Too Much Too Soon, or Too Little Too Late.
I have a serious emergency in my life. Someone is using this exact technology on me to stalk me in various ways and make others believe i am mentally ill.
Try and remember something you had to learn as a child, something that seems so easy to you now you don’t even give yourself credit for having learned it. Learning to walk, to speak… What else did you work to achieve in your early years of life?
Take a moment to witness that young person who tried hard. Even now, years later, value that effort. Because that same power is still in you, to do this now.
0:45 Love you TEDx Talks! 💖
Dont we already know that our cell phones & our computers read our thoughts & phone conversations !! Evident by the ads that pop up !! 😅😮😮
To anybody thats reading this i hope you have a great day 😊❤
Hi five, Diego! You're an awesome person. 👍
@@archangelmichael1978 thanks 😀😀
The use of neurotechnology raises complex ethical questions that must be considered. While the technology has seemingly endless potential for helping people with neurological disorders such as epilepsy and Parkinson's disease, it also raises concerns about human rights violations. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights created after World War II prevents further human rights abuses, but it did not anticipate the development of technologies that can read and stimulate brain activity. I strongly feel that the ethics of neurotechnology need to be carefully considered, especially as newer technologies develop at a rapid pace. We cannot forget either that the use of neurotechnology additionally has the potential to create super soldiers and to increase workplace surveillance on employees, which raises further ethical concerns. While the tremendous upside of neurotechnology needs to be acknowledged, ethical oversight is essential to prevent human rights violations.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Abuse needs updating, to include Neuroscience Technologies being experimented on Non-consenting Citizens Worldwide, as a serious radiating crime. Neuro Law against these non-consenting neuroscience, criminal practising research, & study crimes, needs to be implemented into the Laws of every Countries Government Worldwide ASAP.
Been happening to me since atleast 2016 and still happening to current date
Making money is an action. Keeping money is behavior. Growing money is knowledge
Even with the current dip in the market I'm still glad I can smile 😊back at my portfolio of $12500 built from my weekly trade.
Same here, a transformations of €4000 to a €15,400 in just two weeks, She really the best.
Making money is participation. Keeping money is lack of social experience. To Grow Money Value requires that everyone pay their taxes.
That is the corect logical translation of finance literacy.
I will leave her number just below this comment
+1
And the ability to understand there is more UNknown Then Known. Is Wisdom. And is responsible for the pursuit of learning and discovering alternate forms of hypothesis. AI has came to put a cap on that infinite pursuit....to say "we think we've learned it all..and can pass down this knowledge to machine" is the only scary thing of AI
AI today...is only as smart as society is today put together via the internet. Therefore....IF...AI didn't come out yet..a 2050 year human being would be smarter then a 2023 AI. ~food for thought
Stuff that was rocket science back then is now basic knowledge. Car engines are high school. The knowledge of the internet "AI" today...is elementary to a human in 2050...if AI was never released...since we capped are knowledge early...just like relying gps making people forget the city streets of were they grew up...AI will eliminate the hunger for alternate hypothesis in science discovery
Thank you for new intersting Tech,...Time tells most😍🌏
just a question:
in web exist termin "stalking" for example, it is like a paralell for monitoring bad behavarior with neuro-interfaces. what we can do with just old stalking in old web protocols?
i mean server analyze data, bad-hackers, etc... I mean we like a humanity not can make it 100% safe(really i think but even not 10%))
With an independent department of defense (IDD) there is no concern of any miscommunication or technical malfunction. Any individual (I) has their Academics and Medical information protected by the IDD everytime, every single interaction to each other in public social (PUS) and Private social (PRS) goes through IDD back To ..I
I to IDD to PRS
PRS to IDD to I
I TO IDD to PUS
PUS to IDD to I
PUS to IDD to I To IDD To PRS
PRS to IDD to I To IDD to PUS
Everything is checked and secured.
There is no fear for concern for panic attacks of Private or Political influence or mismanagement.
If there is, it is only in their domain of function.
The independent of defense requires a council to guide, support and assist the private, public and the independent groups and individuals.
Scary .
Yo anyone reading this I hope you have an average day. 👍
And a mediocre day to you too. ;)
Good. ❤❤❤
I tend to agree with this gentleman. As an aside, more than half the comments in this section make no sense at all. I apologize to the presenter.
Hmmmmmmm
Cruelty Squad vibes.
First comment ❤
🤔 hmmm interesting.😏
1 view