A very interesting perspective on the creation story. I appreciate the way you've blended the story literally and mythologically. Thank you for sharing your insights, Peter.
As Christopher Hitchens said, either all religions are true; only one of them is true (and I’d add, that counts for denominations within religions), or none of them are true. And since most believe *their* denomination is the *true* religion, we have a decent clue about the reality.
The theory of evolution is rational also if we think about our planet or even universum. We do not know, how many phases there are different processes of matter and life in our galaxy.
You are entitled to believe whatever you think best but no amount of belief ever made something a fact. You are simply offering an opinion which is not supported by the evidence. Biologically, we cannot have derived from a single pair of humans within the timescale of the bible. We should also question why your god would create Adam with DNA that so closely matched that of the primates and why we share errors in that DNA with the higher apes, not only in the code itself but in the exact multiple locations on the genes. This can only have occurred through a shared common ancestor. If we then try to make logical sense of the whole tale of Genesis 2 etc, we find so many problems that show us it simply cannot be true.
I am sorry Peter. I dont share your explanation. You appear to be injecting your own opinions of creation on your viewers but opinions need to make sense. You are confusing me. There is either a creator or not. If God is omnipotent then he did not need to use dust to create Adam. He could have wished him into existence. These biblical claims makes sense to people who are too lazy to learn and analyze existing data that refutes these made up stories. It appeals to primitive ,simple minded people.
A very interesting perspective on the creation story. I appreciate the way you've blended the story literally and mythologically. Thank you for sharing your insights, Peter.
As Christopher Hitchens said, either all religions are true; only one of them is true (and I’d add, that counts for denominations within religions), or none of them are true. And since most believe *their* denomination is the *true* religion, we have a decent clue about the reality.
The theory of evolution is rational also if we think about our planet or even universum. We do not know, how many phases there are different processes of matter and life in our galaxy.
and was Visu, Jupiter, Zeus myth or real... afterall they all have the same level of fact
Adam and Eve are mere characters from the Jewish/Christian/Islamic FAIRY TALE.
Please stop taking this myth seriously.
You are entitled to believe whatever you think best but no amount of belief ever made something a fact. You are simply offering an opinion which is not supported by the evidence.
Biologically, we cannot have derived from a single pair of humans within the timescale of the bible. We should also question why your god would create Adam with DNA that so closely matched that of the primates and why we share errors in that DNA with the higher apes, not only in the code itself but in the exact multiple locations on the genes. This can only have occurred through a shared common ancestor.
If we then try to make logical sense of the whole tale of Genesis 2 etc, we find so many problems that show us it simply cannot be true.
Nonsense. It's all God's fault, and none of it is true anyway. 😂
I am sorry Peter. I dont share your explanation. You appear to be injecting your own opinions of creation on your viewers but opinions need to make sense. You are confusing me. There is either a creator or not. If God is omnipotent then he did not need to use dust to create Adam. He could have wished him into existence. These biblical claims makes sense to people who are too lazy to learn and analyze existing data that refutes these made up stories. It appeals to primitive ,simple minded people.
It's all bollocks Peter. Hiw did ya get to your age without realising that😂😂