Taylor Carman from 40:30 ff = important points about difference btwn H's ontotheology as history of metaphysics for H. and that which many others have in mind when saying N. eschews metaphysics. The question thus arises, is H's reading of Western metaphysics one which lays open the unthought (or at least evocatively describes it)? Or is Babich rather correct in pegging H's critique as one that unfolds at a comparatively shallow level which does not respond fully to N's "breaking apart' of metaphysics?
Does anyone know of program that could isolate the degrees of phonetic energy spent in performativity as pure self-presentation: objectifying itself as "phenomena as phenomnena" per actual delivered content per minute? I am serious about it for purely violent will to power reasons.
We never find the dasein or what is the true man of these philosophers. Like authors of any non fictional or historical writings, we can never know what influences or biased reasoning they had in their own concepts.
Analysis: These long phonetic investments: whether as multiplications of operations upon the phonemes "Ahhhhh" "Uhmmmm" vibrations in the air the want to elongate, and then cut. These fabric of "opening up space for thought" as the self-presentation of the work of thought none of them have acquiented themselves with, but rather been charioted through by others: undergraduates pushed out, and exploiters to be like future PhDs etc.
The Heidegger thing starts at 09:09.
Thanks for adding 9:09 back onto my life
thank you guys
I do like the sampling metaphor.
Taylor Carman from 40:30 ff = important points about difference btwn H's ontotheology as history of metaphysics for H. and that which many others have in mind when saying N. eschews metaphysics. The question thus arises, is H's reading of Western metaphysics one which lays open the unthought (or at least evocatively describes it)? Or is Babich rather correct in pegging H's critique as one that unfolds at a comparatively shallow level which does not respond fully to N's "breaking apart' of metaphysics?
WHY DO NOT HAVE SUBTITLES
What has happened to lecture 6, 7 and 9? i would really like to see the one on klossowski
Is there one about Klossowski? Checking their site it seems 6 is about Aimé Césaire, 7 about Sarah Kofman and 9 about Michel Foucault
English is my second language , so I face some difficult to follow you .
Could I ask you to add the subtitle to read what you say please
My respect
Does anyone know of program that could isolate the degrees of phonetic energy spent in performativity as pure self-presentation: objectifying itself as "phenomena as phenomnena" per actual delivered content per minute? I am serious about it for purely violent will to power reasons.
Superman picture !!!!!!!??
Jesus Velasco was a little hard to understand for me ?
We never find the dasein or what is the true man of these philosophers. Like authors of any non fictional or historical writings, we can never know what influences or biased reasoning they had in their own concepts.
These are god-like speakers who speak with so much pride that as though they know the entire world
projection
Baseless observation
Seek help 😅
These guys just don't see how language in any format has limits to describe or define God or the God of the Greek logos.
Analysis: These long phonetic investments: whether as multiplications of operations upon the phonemes "Ahhhhh" "Uhmmmm" vibrations in the air the want to elongate, and then cut. These fabric of "opening up space for thought" as the self-presentation of the work of thought none of them have acquiented themselves with, but rather been charioted through by others: undergraduates pushed out, and exploiters to be like future PhDs etc.
stop coughing into the mic
This is dead on arrival.
Leftists with Mac laptops. LOL
This youtube channel gives great insight in leftists brainwashing.
What's wrong with that?
heidegger was a nazi. just saying
leftists LOL
@@VoloBonjasocialism is when no mac 😂