Australia's population is expected to grow to over 40 million by 2063, with migration continuing to be the primary driver of growth. However, the source of this migration is set to change, with the bulk of new arrivals coming from Asia. The aging population will require more support in healthcare and aged care services to ensure Australians can enjoy a high quality of life well into their later years. The impact of an aging population on the economy and society will be felt over the coming decades. The proportion of people in the workforce will decrease, putting additional strain on those who are working, and increasing the demand for healthcare and aged care services.
Send us your wealthy and well educated, and we will find a place for them. America can have the poor huddled masses. When the dinosaurs were alive, the world was warmer, wetter and greener because of the higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Seems to me Australia will be and look less “European” in 40 years as the older population dies off. Natural population growth has been going backwards here for years. I venture to say that not only will the people on the whole appear different in the next fifty years compared to the last fifty years, the economy will be very different as well… I think more third world, if we continue on the present energy poor trajectory due to net zero stupidity!
Our economy is already incredibly uncomplex. Mining, agriculture, tourism, and education. Economic diversification would be welcome. But don’t sweat the future, Australia will continue to be wealthy.
@@MichaelYardney well it doesn't matter what you want or what you think Should happen..Those in power have a club..You are not in it.But you think you are up above the rest of us not realising you are no better off than anyone else.
The rise of Automation is not considered by both of these men. The need of a basic income issued by the government is predicted by many social and engineering experts. Some expect it to be needed within the next 10 years. So with the need for less people to produce more, a mining nation like Australia does not need 40 million people. Unemployment will be the challenge of the future.. too many people that no one with money needs.
I'm indian guy living in western sydney for 8 years and hardly see any Anglo Saxon ( Aussie) people around. A while back I got a job to find Native English speakers in Cbd .at Townhall there were big crowds. But I walked around for 1 hour and could not find any fir $100 survey 😮
Really enjoy the show! Sorry to say but the health of people is structurally going down. Look at all the cancer and obesity. All health issues that are created by the 'agenda'. If we are honest about the health situation things change a lot! 🙏
Cancer cases go up as a country gets healthier. As we get older cancers kill us instead of other diseases. Higher cancer rates initially are a good sign when looking at longitudinal historical data. Obesity is a real issue and a result of sedentary lifestyles, poor urban planning, and awful food.
@MichaelYardney denial of the DARPA bioweapon creating excess deaths and continuing. don't pretend you don't know michael, you rub shoulders with globalists in this country.
@@savrah EVERYTHING will change. Within ten years, the world will be unrecognisable.... Fuel shortages, people dying of metabolic diseases in a broken health system (it's already broken, can't see a doctor in under a month in Tasmania where I live and I now have to drive 65km each way to see one) and supermarket shelves will start emptying....
@@MichaelYardneyaussies are going to bali, thailand, malaysia, phillipines. I'm indian migrant and move between oz and india. Life is good in these countries nowadays..if you have dosh, ofcourse 😮
Just curious Michael, do you think it's a net benefit to society for house prices to constantly outgrow wages? I'm talking about the price to income ratios here. Is it fair that a young person's dollars buy so much less house than yours when you were young? You talk about government intervention being negative notions yet encourage negative gearing and government policies that inflate house prices.
@@MichaelYardney I indeed did. You have very interesting guests on and I applaud your work. But I'm curious to know why perpetual and large property price growth is a net benefit to Australian society at large?
Anyone can see in 10 years in fact Australia will be a barren concrete highrise slum perpetually firehosed with endless migrants driving mopeds delivering food.
Global oil production has declined since 2018, Australia produces very little oil that can be refined into liquid fuels and export contracts for natural gas and associated gas liquids almost exceeds production capacity. So very expensive gas and liquid fuels if at all available. By 2065 global warming will be pushing 3 C with south of the Tropic of Capricorn losing on average 11% of rainfall per decade from 1950. West of the Blue Mountains will be close to a desert. With very high fuel costs, low rainfall and high temperatures food will be both scarce and expensive. Transport will be limited to public transport and human powered for all but the very wealthy. Global population will already be in significant decline due to the combination of aging demographics and wide spread famine. That is not considering any major conflicts which will accelerate the worsening situation.
@@dan2304 in fact, I've JUST heard Exxon released a report saying their depletion rate is now 15%.... Which means a halving of production every 4.5 years.... So by 2030 we'll have HALF the fuel we currently take for granted, and by 2035 A QUARTER..... This will have huge impacts on farming and crop yields...
@@Damnthematrixas a farmer myself, I can tell you things are already very difficult. But I'm determined to hold onto my land because I figure I have a better chance of future survival by owning land I can grow my own food and firewood on.
You honestly don't know what you are talking about. The sun rises tomorrow...Thats short term enough for you?..You don't know what the future holds you only THINK you do because you think you are onboard with the ''thought leaders'' who think they OWN the future but this could not be further from the truth.
Two minutes in - and you can tell it will be spruiking of "their" message... From the "property wealth creator" who believes that Australia will always be a very desirable country to immigrate to. But from where? Well, we know the answer. Australia is a legacy country largely by now, like many other ones. Really high tax and now record property prices. Second largest household debt to GDP in the wold. So, what's in store for new entrants to the country and tge market? Earn lower wage, pay all that you earn back in the way of 40 yr soon to be mortgage/rent, taxes, fees, charges, etc. Break even at the end of the month if you are lucky. Or get a second job. Eventually even those new migrants will be turning around and going back home. If you can't get ahead, what's the point of coming 😂?
You two are off the charts WRONG... I'd be surprised if Australia's population is 10 million in forty years time, when I would be 111... Have you never heard of Limits to Growth? We're bang on target to emulate the Club of Rome's standard scenario which has everything starting to collapse just about now. I'm going to leave more comments as dot points later.
The topic of discussion, ‘What will Australia look like in 40 years’ time, and why should we care?’, that Michael Yardley, and Simon Kuestenmacher are mulling over in this RUclips, stems from the Intergenerational Report, which was handed down by the Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, in August 2023. The Intergenerational Report is a highly detailed combobulation of economic, and demographic statistical data, which has been compiled by a virtual brigade of bean-counting, economic rationalists: attempting to predict what Australia might look like in 2063. At the commencement, Kuestenmacher laments why it was that, “forty years ago”, politicians, and planners, ostensibly in the major cities, lacked the vision to inaugurate, and implement major infrastructural developments back in the 1980s. He singles out Melbourne’s rail loop as a major example of their absence of foresight. Yardley conveys basic outlines of a few of the IGR’s (bleedingly obvious) findings such as: “Australia is going to be a very different country to the one we know today”. … “Australians are also expected to live longer” … “The population will significantly increase.” He tells us that “It took Australia over 200 years (229 years, from 1788, in fact) to reach a population of 25 million”. But in the ensuing 8 years (which includes the 20 months the borders were closed with Covid), it has “increased to be 27 million”: with 1.7 million of the increase coming directly from rampant immigration intakes. And by 2063, the report forecasts the population “will get to 40 million”. By the way, in the 2002 rendition of the IGR, it was predicted that Australia wouldn’t reach the 25 million population figure until 2037. However, the reality of affairs back then as, indeed, it most certainly is with the 2023 version of the IGR, is that they lied then: and are lying about it now. Kuestenmacher chimes in to say that, “Immigration makes up (at the very least) two thirds of our population growth. We can predict where migrants will come from … and, “immigration is a young person’s game”. However, he warns, “The world is running out of people of prime migration age”. He designates the prime age-groups for migrants being with people who are “between 18 to 39 years of age.” He ponders: “How many workers do we need to import from overseas to ensure we fill all of the vacancies in our most important sectors?” “Our industries are going to change. (currently) Australia’s economy is dependent upon mining”. And grieves that “We don’t manufacture enough (tangible) goods.” With respect to there being a diminishing number of people to recruit - due to low fertility rates - to migrate to Australia (and other countries, too) he specifies that Britain, and Europe, cannot meet our needs. Which means that, virtually all of Australia’s future immigrants “will be sourced from Asia”. No doubt, both Yardley and Kuestenmacher’s definition of ‘Asia’ would certainly incorporate India/the Subcontinent. However, whilst the Subcontinent might be right alongside Asia, the reality is that, the Subcontinent (India/Nepal/Bhutan/Bangladesh) incorporates distinctively different societies to those in Asia. This conclusively prevails with the cabal of vogues of ethnicities, cultures, and, most certainly so with religions. Apropos to that, Kuestenmacher made a slight reference to the resentment that Australians of Anglo/European [AE] heritages have towards the mass intakes of immigrants from non-Anglo/Europeans and, non-Christian cradles. But he shrugs that off as being a case of ‘Tough Luck’ because the agenda is already set in stone. This is in spite of how the millions of immigrants from AE cradles have radically TRANSMOGRIFIED a collective of 120 suburbs and electorates in Sydney, and Melbourne over the past 20-25 years. It is abundantly clearly evident he believes it doesn’t matter if (essentially) Australia’s major cities morph into becoming cabals of ethnocultural, and religious tribes in the ensuing decades: just so long as the GDP keeps increasing. In response to that, Yardly queries how Australia will fare in future times when we have to compete with other countries to attract migrants to propel their GDPs. Kuestenmacher answers this with: “As long as we are seen as a stable, safe and rich country it will put Australia ahead of the US, that looks a bit bonkers.” Other nations that will be seeking unending intakes of featherless bipeds from Asia, and the Subcontinent in the coming decades exists with Canada, and Europe, the US, and the UK. But because countries like China, South Korea, and Japan, also have low fertility rates means these societies will soon be incapable of supplying migrants. Therefore, it is patently obvious that the mainstay-contender in future scenarios to supply migrants to Western nations will be India, and other countries in the Subcontinent. However, taking into account the reliable data from demographic researchers under the canopy of the UN, telling us that ‘India’s fertility rates in the past 15 years, has dropped from 3.5 births per woman, to 2.1’. Thus, in a mere 25 years, India will begin having to confront comparable social, and economic detriments, which are currently afflicting Western and, advanced countries in north Asian countries, too. Because at that point, India will duly have diminished numbers of young people to support its elderly population But well before that situation comes to fruition, around 2035, Australia will be inundated with up to 3 million immigrants from India. In the vicinity of 600,000 of that contingent are destined to colonise the emerging third city, known as Bradfield, in the southwestern environs of Sydney. Bradfield, will snake up 23kms north from the emerging airport at Badgerys Creek, which is projected to be open in 2026, to within 6kms of Penrith’s CBD. Over the past 5 years a bevy of politicians, and the big movers-and-shakers within business organisations, have been gloating about the “hundreds of thousands of jobs that will transpire in this corridor”. However, what is conveniently neglected to be said by any of these cliques championing this budding economic wonderland is that, the industries destined to arise in the Bradfield corridor will overwhelmingly be financed by Indians: and, in turn, so too, will the employees working in these businesses. The mainstays of these businesses will be in the high-tech, IT, and pharmaceutical manufacturing sectors. To gauge the massive extent of this re-colonisation agenda, prevails with how three properties within the Bradfield corridor have already been acquired to build three temples capable of catering for at least three thousand Hindu worshippers at any given time. Tragically, Kuestenmacher, and Yardley, and, indeed, every other partisan who are unconditionally committed to the Big Australia agenda, look at this through their fanciful pecuniary-type kaleidoscope. But, at no point, do these economic rationalist/bean-counters ever consider the severe sociological consequences that will inevitably come to bear upon Australia from drawing in millions of Indian immigrants. And this is already the case with the Parramatta area, where in less than two decades, tens of thousands of Indians have usurped the AE ethnocultural groups who preceded them. The culmination of it being is that they have established culturally-insular colonies/enclaves.
Australia will probably be population of 60 to 80 million people and the ethnic makeup will probably be 80% Asian ancestory, mainly Chinese and Indian ancestory and 20% european and other ancestory. Australia will look like any other ASian country like Singapore or Malaysia and have an Asian culture. Australian traditions like ANZAC day and Aussie sports like AFL football will probably die out as Australia becomes more ASian
ECONOMICS: the debt crisis is caused by the lack of SURPLUS ENERGY. We're reaching the point people can't service their debts and going bankrupt. Record numbers of businesses are folding as I write.
You should try being a farmer. The only reason we hang on to our land is because we want to be able to take care of ourselves later. People opting to build houses in their backyards are just making themselves more vulnerable.
Australia's population is expected to grow to over 40 million by 2063, with migration continuing to be the primary driver of growth. However, the source of this migration is set to change, with the bulk of new arrivals coming from Asia.
The aging population will require more support in healthcare and aged care services to ensure Australians can enjoy a high quality of life well into their later years. The impact of an aging population on the economy and society will be felt over the coming decades. The proportion of people in the workforce will decrease, putting additional strain on those who are working, and increasing the demand for healthcare and aged care services.
Send us your wealthy and well educated, and we will find a place for them. America can have the poor huddled masses. When the dinosaurs were alive, the world was warmer, wetter and greener because of the higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.
@@DavidLockett-x4b thanks for watching our video
Seems to me Australia will be and look less “European” in 40 years as the older population dies off.
Natural population growth has been going backwards here for years. I venture to say that not only will the people on the whole appear different in the next fifty years compared to the last fifty years, the economy will be very different as well… I think more third world, if we continue on the present energy poor trajectory due to net zero stupidity!
@sallyjohnson5985 thanks for watching our video and your comment
Our economy is already incredibly uncomplex. Mining, agriculture, tourism, and education. Economic diversification would be welcome. But don’t sweat the future, Australia will continue to be wealthy.
@Inspireworkshop I agree We’ll remain the best place in the world with queues of people wanting to live here
@InspireworkshopYou need to get your medication checked.If you are not taking any you clearky should be as your are hallucinating
@@MichaelYardney well it doesn't matter what you want or what you think Should happen..Those in power have a club..You are not in it.But you think you are up above the rest of us not realising you are no better off than anyone else.
The rise of Automation is not considered by both of these men. The need of a basic income issued by the government is predicted by many social and engineering experts. Some expect it to be needed within the next 10 years. So with the need for less people to produce more, a mining nation like Australia does not need 40 million people. Unemployment will be the challenge of the future.. too many people that no one with money needs.
@tonytanou thanks for watching and your intersting thoughts - yes challenges as well as opportunities ahead
Totally agree!
I'm indian guy living in western sydney for 8 years and hardly see any Anglo Saxon ( Aussie) people around. A while back I got a job to find Native English speakers in Cbd .at Townhall there were big crowds. But I walked around for 1 hour and could not find any fir $100 survey 😮
Thanks for watching our video
Another excellent episode!!
@areyouforrealestate thank you
Really enjoy the show! Sorry to say but the health of people is structurally going down. Look at all the cancer and obesity. All health issues that are created by the 'agenda'. If we are honest about the health situation things change a lot! 🙏
You make a good point - we definitely have some issues ahead of us
@@MichaelYardneyalready here Michael you been in denial
@emp731 denial of what?
Cancer cases go up as a country gets healthier. As we get older cancers kill us instead of other diseases. Higher cancer rates initially are a good sign when looking at longitudinal historical data. Obesity is a real issue and a result of sedentary lifestyles, poor urban planning, and awful food.
@MichaelYardney denial of the DARPA bioweapon creating excess deaths and continuing. don't pretend you don't know michael, you rub shoulders with globalists in this country.
Great topic again Michael and Simon!
Thanks it’s a crystal ball into our future
Thank you!
I have left it late ⏰ great video Micheal! The goose hasn’t presented himself yet !
It’s above his paygrade CookieMonster-wy4qb
The goose will gobble gobble your cookies for brunch anytime
@@emp731 he’s landed 🛬 🌈🌈🧱🧱🍪🍪🧀
@MichaelYardney look at these two kittens...Talking about the king 🤴
@@emp731 u have mpostor syndrome!
Nothing will change.
Everything changes
@savrah did you watch our chat - a lot will change
@emp731 - not everything
@@MichaelYardneyeverything yardney
@@savrah EVERYTHING will change. Within ten years, the world will be unrecognisable.... Fuel shortages, people dying of metabolic diseases in a broken health system (it's already broken, can't see a doctor in under a month in Tasmania where I live and I now have to drive 65km each way to see one) and supermarket shelves will start emptying....
Australia will be the SEA hub. Overtaking Singapore.
@charleswilson8038 Very likley correct
How about asking if we want or need a population of 40million people.
@lisanorris7436 thanks for watching our chat - I thought we explained the reasons our population will grow
@@MichaelYardney 2025 is a depopulation year according to the Deagel report....Just because you have reasons doesn't mean anything.
we need to change our education - teach kids life skills and must do army!!
@vmura thanks for watching our video
$100 bucks says dystopian sh. It hole. Where you will own nothing, not even your health, be extremely miserable and starving
@rozzziee that would be a real shame and your $100 would be worthless
@MichaelYardney and it is on path to happen. I suggest either taking a stand or leaving. Australia is dying and there is no future
@rozzziee where would you go to?
@@MichaelYardneyaussies are going to bali, thailand, malaysia, phillipines. I'm indian migrant and move between oz and india. Life is good in these countries nowadays..if you have dosh, ofcourse 😮
@@hesh2892 110%. What future is left in Australia, nothing. It's something all the boomers don't seem to understand....
Just curious Michael, do you think it's a net benefit to society for house prices to constantly outgrow wages? I'm talking about the price to income ratios here. Is it fair that a young person's dollars buy so much less house than yours when you were young?
You talk about government intervention being negative notions yet encourage negative gearing and government policies that inflate house prices.
@danumbert7983 DId you watch this video about Demographics?
@@MichaelYardney I indeed did. You have very interesting guests on and I applaud your work. But I'm curious to know why perpetual and large property price growth is a net benefit to Australian society at large?
@@danumbert7983 Thanks for watching - I really don’t think we suggested anything of the sort in our discussion - did we?
We will all be speaking mandarin
assisted dying - What?
@vmura •really?
Exit international
Anyone can see in 10 years in fact Australia will be a barren concrete highrise slum perpetually firehosed with endless migrants driving mopeds delivering food.
No it won't..Australia has massive potential and all the BS will stop..
@InfinityIsland2203 thanks for watching our video
110%!!!
Hahahaha right after you take your 16th mc poker that has Australia leading the way in turbo cancer
It’s that already, just a pathetic unproductive country
Global oil production has declined since 2018, Australia produces very little oil that can be refined into liquid fuels and export contracts for natural gas and associated gas liquids almost exceeds production capacity. So very expensive gas and liquid fuels if at all available. By 2065 global warming will be pushing 3 C with south of the Tropic of Capricorn losing on average 11% of rainfall per decade from 1950. West of the Blue Mountains will be close to a desert. With very high fuel costs, low rainfall and high temperatures food will be both scarce and expensive. Transport will be limited to public transport and human powered for all but the very wealthy. Global population will already be in significant decline due to the combination of aging demographics and wide spread famine. That is not considering any major conflicts which will accelerate the worsening situation.
@dan2304 thanks for watching our video and your comment
@@dan2304 in fact, I've JUST heard Exxon released a report saying their depletion rate is now 15%.... Which means a halving of production every 4.5 years.... So by 2030 we'll have HALF the fuel we currently take for granted, and by 2035 A QUARTER.....
This will have huge impacts on farming and crop yields...
@@Damnthematrixas a farmer myself, I can tell you things are already very difficult. But I'm determined to hold onto my land because I figure I have a better chance of future survival by owning land I can grow my own food and firewood on.
Straya 🇦🇺
Yea?
Disagree with most of this. False growth, with importing user drivers etc.
@monsel97 thanks for watching, but don't shoot the messenger - we discuss the findings of the Intergenerational report
@MichaelYardney I wasn't shooting anyone, Michael. I just said that I disagree.
@@monsel97 Monica - I really appreciate you watching and commenting - please don't hold back sharing your views
This is almost like ABC news😂
grantourismo0109 thanks for watching - we hope you learned something new
2064 this country will be an Anglo minority.
@user-hf7rv8nh1j Thanks for watching
Australia will probably be 80% Asian
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN 4 MONTHS let alone 40 years
@emp731 makka it's much easier to know what's ahead in the future rather than in the short term
You honestly don't know what you are talking about. The sun rises tomorrow...Thats short term enough for you?..You don't know what the future holds you only THINK you do because you think you are onboard with the ''thought leaders'' who think they OWN the future but this could not be further from the truth.
Two minutes in - and you can tell it will be spruiking of "their" message... From the "property wealth creator" who believes that Australia will always be a very desirable country to immigrate to. But from where? Well, we know the answer. Australia is a legacy country largely by now, like many other ones. Really high tax and now record property prices. Second largest household debt to GDP in the wold. So, what's in store for new entrants to the country and tge market? Earn lower wage, pay all that you earn back in the way of 40 yr soon to be mortgage/rent, taxes, fees, charges, etc. Break even at the end of the month if you are lucky. Or get a second job. Eventually even those new migrants will be turning around and going back home. If you can't get ahead, what's the point of coming 😂?
@olenanewton364 thanks for watching, but don't shoot the messenger - we discuss the findings of the Intergenerational report
"Property and wealth creation expert". LOL! Goodbye.
Deep down he knows, but saying it is not going to make him more money now is it, unless he concentrates on selling acreage.
@squeaker19694 thanks but I have never sold "real estate" - that's not what we do
Sadly wont be a nice place to live in
I hope you are wrong
In 40 years when weve completely overun and destroyed the natural environment will we still be banging on about economic growth?
@squeaker19694 I hope you are wrong
You two are off the charts WRONG... I'd be surprised if Australia's population is 10 million in forty years time, when I would be 111...
Have you never heard of Limits to Growth? We're bang on target to emulate the Club of Rome's standard scenario which has everything starting to collapse just about now.
I'm going to leave more comments as dot points later.
Denial is a powerful defence against fear.
The topic of discussion, ‘What will Australia look like in 40 years’ time, and why should we care?’, that Michael Yardley, and Simon Kuestenmacher are mulling over in this RUclips, stems from the Intergenerational Report, which was handed down by the Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, in August 2023. The Intergenerational Report is a highly detailed combobulation of economic, and demographic statistical data, which has been compiled by a virtual brigade of bean-counting, economic rationalists: attempting to predict what Australia might look like in 2063.
At the commencement, Kuestenmacher laments why it was that, “forty years ago”, politicians, and planners, ostensibly in the major cities, lacked the vision to inaugurate, and implement major infrastructural developments back in the 1980s. He singles out Melbourne’s rail loop as a major example of their absence of foresight.
Yardley conveys basic outlines of a few of the IGR’s (bleedingly obvious) findings such as: “Australia is going to be a very different country to the one we know today”. … “Australians are also expected to live longer” … “The population will significantly increase.”
He tells us that “It took Australia over 200 years (229 years, from 1788, in fact) to reach a population of 25 million”. But in the ensuing 8 years (which includes the 20 months the borders were closed with Covid), it has “increased to be 27 million”: with 1.7 million of the increase coming directly from rampant immigration intakes. And by 2063, the report forecasts the population “will get to 40 million”.
By the way, in the 2002 rendition of the IGR, it was predicted that Australia wouldn’t reach the 25 million population figure until 2037. However, the reality of affairs back then as, indeed, it most certainly is with the 2023 version of the IGR, is that they lied then: and are lying about it now.
Kuestenmacher chimes in to say that, “Immigration makes up (at the very least) two thirds of our population growth. We can predict where migrants will come from … and, “immigration is a young person’s game”. However, he warns, “The world is running out of people of prime migration age”. He designates the prime age-groups for migrants being with people who are “between 18 to 39 years of age.”
He ponders:
“How many workers do we need to import from overseas to ensure we fill all of the vacancies in our most important sectors?”
“Our industries are going to change. (currently) Australia’s economy is dependent upon mining”. And grieves that “We don’t manufacture enough (tangible) goods.”
With respect to there being a diminishing number of people to recruit - due to low fertility rates - to migrate to Australia (and other countries, too) he specifies that Britain, and Europe, cannot meet our needs. Which means that, virtually all of Australia’s future immigrants “will be sourced from Asia”. No doubt, both Yardley and Kuestenmacher’s definition of ‘Asia’ would certainly incorporate India/the Subcontinent.
However, whilst the Subcontinent might be right alongside Asia, the reality is that, the Subcontinent (India/Nepal/Bhutan/Bangladesh) incorporates distinctively different societies to those in Asia. This conclusively prevails with the cabal of vogues of ethnicities, cultures, and, most certainly so with religions.
Apropos to that, Kuestenmacher made a slight reference to the resentment that Australians of Anglo/European [AE] heritages have towards the mass intakes of immigrants from non-Anglo/Europeans and, non-Christian cradles. But he shrugs that off as being a case of ‘Tough Luck’ because the agenda is already set in stone. This is in spite of how the millions of immigrants from AE cradles have radically TRANSMOGRIFIED a collective of 120 suburbs and electorates in Sydney, and Melbourne over the past 20-25 years.
It is abundantly clearly evident he believes it doesn’t matter if (essentially) Australia’s major cities morph into becoming cabals of ethnocultural, and religious tribes in the ensuing decades: just so long as the GDP keeps increasing. In response to that, Yardly queries how Australia will fare in future times when we have to compete with other countries to attract migrants to propel their GDPs. Kuestenmacher answers this with:
“As long as we are seen as a stable, safe and rich country it will put Australia ahead of the US, that looks a bit bonkers.”
Other nations that will be seeking unending intakes of featherless bipeds from Asia, and the Subcontinent in the coming decades exists with Canada, and Europe, the US, and the UK. But because countries like China, South Korea, and Japan, also have low fertility rates means these societies will soon be incapable of supplying migrants.
Therefore, it is patently obvious that the mainstay-contender in future scenarios to supply migrants to Western nations will be India, and other countries in the Subcontinent. However, taking into account the reliable data from demographic researchers under the canopy of the UN, telling us that ‘India’s fertility rates in the past 15 years, has dropped from 3.5 births per woman, to 2.1’.
Thus, in a mere 25 years, India will begin having to confront comparable social, and economic detriments, which are currently afflicting Western and, advanced countries in north Asian countries, too. Because at that point, India will duly have diminished numbers of young people to support its elderly population
But well before that situation comes to fruition, around 2035, Australia will be inundated with up to 3 million immigrants from India. In the vicinity of 600,000 of that contingent are destined to colonise the emerging third city, known as Bradfield, in the southwestern environs of Sydney. Bradfield, will snake up 23kms north from the emerging airport at Badgerys Creek, which is projected to be open in 2026, to within 6kms of Penrith’s CBD.
Over the past 5 years a bevy of politicians, and the big movers-and-shakers within business organisations, have been gloating about the “hundreds of thousands of jobs that will transpire in this corridor”. However, what is conveniently neglected to be said by any of these cliques championing this budding economic wonderland is that, the industries destined to arise in the Bradfield corridor will overwhelmingly be financed by Indians: and, in turn, so too, will the employees working in these businesses. The mainstays of these businesses will be in the high-tech, IT, and pharmaceutical manufacturing sectors.
To gauge the massive extent of this re-colonisation agenda, prevails with how three properties within the Bradfield corridor have already been acquired to build three temples capable of catering for at least three thousand Hindu worshippers at any given time.
Tragically, Kuestenmacher, and Yardley, and, indeed, every other partisan who are unconditionally committed to the Big Australia agenda, look at this through their fanciful pecuniary-type kaleidoscope. But, at no point, do these economic rationalist/bean-counters ever consider the severe sociological consequences that will inevitably come to bear upon Australia from drawing in millions of Indian immigrants. And this is already the case with the Parramatta area, where in less than two decades, tens of thousands of Indians have usurped the AE ethnocultural groups who preceded them. The culmination of it being is that they have established culturally-insular colonies/enclaves.
Australia will probably be population of 60 to 80 million people and the ethnic makeup will probably be 80% Asian ancestory, mainly Chinese and Indian ancestory and 20% european and other ancestory. Australia will look like any other ASian country like Singapore or Malaysia and have an Asian culture. Australian traditions like ANZAC day and Aussie sports like AFL football will probably die out as Australia becomes more ASian
@johnschannel449 thanks for watching our video and your comment
The Hospitals will start rejecting patients and or Specialists Medical Insurance wont cover people Over 70 so ⌛. The Giver movie writ large
@leonie563 Do you really think that could happen?
ECONOMICS: the debt crisis is caused by the lack of SURPLUS ENERGY. We're reaching the point people can't service their debts and going bankrupt. Record numbers of businesses are folding as I write.
@Damnthematrix thanks for watching our video
@@MichaelYardney is that all you can say?
@@Damnthematrix sorry if I disappointed you in my response, I'm actually on vaction, but still trying to keep up
You should try being a farmer. The only reason we hang on to our land is because we want to be able to take care of ourselves later. People opting to build houses in their backyards are just making themselves more vulnerable.
@@squeaker19694 Thanks for your comment - I don't envy farmers - a hard life