Katos testimony is the perfect example of why this trial went on so long. So many pointless questions and other questions just not necessary in getting the details needed out of Kato. He was there for timeline and some set up of ojs demeanor and relationship with Nicole the last year. He shouldn’t have been on the stand more than two hours total.
Kato is so nervous. He must have been stressed out of his mind. It's very sad to see the terrible comments people make on here. Kato is a nice man, and he is gentle and polite.
kato has several podcasts on youtube about this case, he believes OJ did it and he talks about several other witnesses that the prosecution should have put on the stand. however, none of it wouldve mattered because the jury was never gonna convict they admitted it
@@lorraineb.4698 Brian Kalan never saw OJ Simpson either entering the house or on the walkway to the house. If he would have, Ms Clark would have asked him, Brian Kalan wouldn't lie; like he told OJ "I didn't see you go into the house, and OJ never questioned him beyond that point. I'm sure Ms Clark did,that's why she got frustrated with her own witness, because he wouldn't lie. As for these recent podcasts, he's become a liar and full of bull$#!+ making up stuff if he was ever a friend of Nicole Simpson, he sure as hell dosen't act like it. By sensationalizing the OJ saga 30 years later, because he was the worst witness besides Rosa Lopez and Mark Fuhrman and Detective Vannatter and the forensic grew Mr Fung and I quote, (how about that Mr Fung)...... There's more blame to go around then a merry-go-round, but what's the point? For 30 years they've been using this double homicide of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, who barely ever gets mentioned other then he was just a friend who was returning some glasses? ???? We'll never know his story as well in all this, a young man who should be alive raising a family living a full life, but like all the little people in "HOLLYWOOD" Ronald Goldman's life wasn't important enough to matter. Compared to OJ's and Nicole's made for TV lifestyle The rich and famous OJ Simpson and his abuse of Nicole Brown Simpson for 17 years..... It had all the makings of a Hollywood production, money, sex, drugs, spousal abuse and lots of partying . R.I.P🌹 Ronald Goldman🌹 Nicole Brown Simpson and 🌹OJ Simpson. The saga continues........
you have to understand she has to establish foundation and get him to nail down specifics because she knows what the defense is going to do, and kato understandably doesnt have total recall of the events over those 24 hours because he had no sleep the night prior and was just given the shock of his life
Some of these comments on here about Katos demeanor are so very rude and uncalled for! He wasn’t a freeloader, he paid rent at Nicole’s guest house and then O j was probably jealous of him and wanted to keep him under wraps and let him stay at his place rent free!! I feel for him that he had to be put in this situation!! You’re a good guy Kato!! And better looks and personality than most!!❤️🙏
Probably jealous ? Why would a [putative] jealous man allow another man to reside, let alone freely reside, in this selfsame [putative] jealous man's [own] residence ?!?!?! "You cannot revolt against a people whose values you share." - Dr. Amos N. Wilson Htptiwny [viz, May Peace & Blessings be unto You All]
He was not a freeloader! From what I’ve watched he is the most respectful honest person who was put into a whirlwind that he didn’t need to be in and had a killer starting at him the whole time. What a great friend to have!
Kato, must of been frightened out of his mind! Could you imagine being a homeless actor, couch surfing, living rent free in a Mansion's guesthouse, and then waking up one morning to four L.A. Detectives at your door, only to discover that you are right smack in the middle of a real life Murder Mystery, and the "Crime of the Century"? 😬😲
there is an interview on here of him on the today show with the goldman's. kato is kind enough to address their grief [kato lost a nephew in Iraq war and said he could hardly imagine the loss] but the goldmans barely turned in his direction.
No wonder folks hated this woman's guts.... Nitpicking....trying to get him in a lie....🤔 Making him seem a hostile witness, what a slow dragged out interrogation 🙄🙄🙄
it's not kato that's the problem. as we watch the trial it become so apparent very early that the prosecution was not up to the task of defeating the dream team" of lawyers. and then we sit and watch each day as the slowly declines. it's uncomfortable with this line of questioning because it appears she is simply trying to look like she's so up to the task when really what she is doing is making herself look desperate which, of course we know by now, she was.
Marcia was desperate for a win now she made millions of blood money , why would she even want a dime to do with OJ why write dam book her question so elementary give me a break
Yeah it seems a lot of her questions were designed to make herself look thorough. A lot of them just check off minor little facts that have little relevance. She gets somebody to describe where they are, then shows a big chart with that same thing labeled on it, see, i'm good at making charts! It's almost amateurish. Remember at this point they thought they had a slam dunk case.
Marcia was so harsh with her own witness, who is obviously a nervous wreck. The poor guy! We just loved him in SoCal back then…so full of good will. People helped him out because he was so much fun and a very kind guy. Such a cutie too!
same with Ron Shipp, OJ would throw his own mother under the bus to save his own arse, terrible how the "dream team" treated Ron, lange, vanatter, phillips kato and alan park the limo driver. these witnesses were dragged into this circus through no fault of their own, all because of OJ who sits over the smirking laughing and rolling his eyes oh and flirting with the jury
9:57 Marcia Clark-"Can you tell us what the weather was like that night?" Kato-"a little mist you know like a mist in the air not really a fog but more of a mist. not cloudy so much but a mist in the air." Marcia Clark-"uh huh uh huh...would you say it was misty?"
She had coached him for hours and hours and is a perfectionist, so anytime any of them wouldn't say exactly what she told them to say, she'd ask the most ridiculous questions. One of the most interesting things was her fascination with the Dogs, which had nothing to do with anything and didn't mean anything... other than the Dog saw something traumatic. Which she's very concerned about. So she's trying to make sure she knows exactly where the dog was the whole time, completely irrelevant info not worth 2 minutes in the trail and she spent likely 3 hours on it in total.
@@LyonsArcade The dogs could have more relevance than that. If they werent barking, it could indicate the dogs knew the people who were there. If it was a stranger, they would most likely be barking and acting out.
Hahaha i dont know why, but from the very begining, (maybe it was Marcia calling him out for being so clearly nervous and jittery), but I love their dynamic they have going on. Like they kinda annoy the hell out of each other, but not in a hatefulk way, almost in a respectful (idk f that's the right word) way.
Way to go, Marcia. Waste as much of the jury's time as possible. This is absurd. Where are you going with this line of questioning? I'll answer that. You're going straight to a not-guilty verdict.
WHY DID SHE INTERROGATE KATO PAST THE DEPARTURE OF THE LIMO? Useless and damning. F. Lee did a great job with the cross-ex. of Fuhrman; Shapiro did pretty well with Van Atter. I contend that Kato’s direct examination was the BIGGEST nail in the prosecution’s coffin.
@@joehopkins7475 too bad Kato didn't tell the full truth..ohh....he didn't technically lie....he just hid things that he saw that night....such as the REAL reason he didn't go all the way back behind the house after hearing the noise.
In the middle of questioning Kato about a phone conversation he was having she asked him what the weather was like. Marcia & Chris + Ito + Dream Team + Fhurman taking the 5th + L.A. = OJ on the golf course
I think she asked the weather question because the Limo driver mentioned OJ felt hot in the Limo and complained about it multiple times. On a brisk misty night
If you followed Alan Park's testimony, you would understand why she did that. OJ was complaining that it was "brutally hot" when he was in the limo heading to the airport. Alan even cranked the air conditioning and he was still sweating. By confirming through Kato that the temps were cool that night, it solidified that OJ was hot and sweating only because he was nervous and anxious - creating pretty strong evidence of a guilty conscience.
are you serious? every question an attorney asks has an ulterior motive and purpose. she asked about the weather because the limo driver said OJ was hot and sweaty and also it goes the fact that the glove lying in the pathway looked moist and wet because of the blood and the damp misty air and those factors will also shrink leather. jeez
Kati’s testimony was not the problem for the prosecution. Marcia’s irrelevant questions took the focus away from the state’s best evidence. Also, the officers’ suddenly decided that note taking was unimportant. How do two lead detectives fail to mention finding a glove in their report…”because the criminalist photographed or recovered it?” That seems odd.
Poor Kato, how many times has he had to repeat these same questions? I thought Marcia Clarke was quite rude towards him, considering he was her witness.
Lucy I think she’s just generally rude! Lol! Most prosecutors are pretty hard nosed. Juan Martinez who prosecuted Jodi Arias was tough as hob naked boots! Lol! He too was really aggressive with his own witnesses.
Brian Kalain was a typical person who took advantage of any situation that could benefit his no talent acting skills. Nicole's situation made it easier for Brain Kalain to manipulate her single confused feelings about her ex husband and the possibility of reuniting with him. Brain Kalain was that sympathetic ear to listen to a confused emotionally depressed woman who was reaching out to anyone, having multiple relationships experiences, and even reaching out to OJs friend Marcus Allen for a sexual relationship that went nowhere, except to make OJ furious and insanely jealous. That's why after their big falling out and then back on again relationship OJ moved Brian Kalain out of Nicole's position to his house so that she couldn't run around with her new friends none of which would be a good character reference for Nicole Brown Simpson. Brain Kalain was a freeloader who couldn't even stand up to Ms Clark and say exactly what he felt other then Nicole was a friend. He didn't even know her or OJ, but the prosecution made him their star witness who turned out to be a better witness for the defense team in the end.
that smirk on OJ's face and rocking his head back and forth hearing this testimony of his daughter being told Nicole had been murdered makes me sick. He was beyond narcissistic. His blood ran cold, and he deserved 2 life sentences, and eternity in hell is what he got! 🔥🔥
She's trying to pre-buttal the defense who are going to say Fuhrman had the glove in a bag in his jacket pocket. She knows that's coming so she's trying to get him say Fuhrman didn't have a jacket on, but Kato is telling the truth because he's honest. So then she changes it to ask about the Ties, to try to show that Kato's memory isn't that good. What's really going on is she is letting little things slip away, like that Jacket thing will come back to haunt her. The other detectives had already testified that Fuhrman didn't have a jacket on... but Kato is more believable, and Johnny Cochrane is more friendly. So Marcia and 4 likely crooked cops say he didn't have his jacket on but Kato, honest, loveable Kato says different.
Brian Kalain knew exactly what he was doing playing the fence to make his irrelevant statements worth forcing the prosecution to make him their star witness, only to have it backfire on the prosecution as trying to get him to lie for them. It was obvious that Ms Clark's whole recross was about trying to lead this wishy washy witness into saying what she wanted hear,but all she got was frustrated. Jumping from non related questions, like was OJ sweating and then in the next sentence she's asking him about what Mark Fuhrman; "What was he doing in his room? If Ms Clark was the District Attorney's Office as one of best they chose the wrong person to be their lead prosecutor along with Darden. Just listen to her line of questioning asking Kato about OJs business associates as if he knows these people. All Kato knows is who called him at the time, he wasn't apart of OJs business practices. Ms Clark is way outside the questioning of Brian Kalain. She's cross examining her own witness now. No wonder she lost this case. Really: how many times did he go out to dinner with OJ, but she question him about OJs associates. If OJ was guilty, Ms Clark sure made him look innocent by getting a witness to lie double questioning him on the same questions even after he'd given an answer. Forcing a witness to lie was her biggest mistake. That's why she never used Kato's phone records to prove her timeline as to when Kato said he heard the noise at 10:40 PM instead she tried to fit Kato's statement into the limousine drivers timeline and phone records as if the limousine phone records would coincide with Kato's phone conversation with his girlfriend. That was another mistake, because all she had to do was produce Kato's phone records. But that would thrown their whole timeline off, but it didn't matter, because that was the point that the defense used against the prosecution's theory that OJ Simpson killed two people jumped over a fence crashing into a wall take a shower and clean up have luggage downstairs and ready to go in five minutes after Allen Park seen a dark figure entering the house 10:55 PM. "Impossible"
kato was stuck in terrible situation, being friends with the killer and the victim. also like you and most people, he doesnt have a photographic memory and no one remembers every detail of every minute of every day like these lawyers expected. kato has several podcasts he thinks OJ did it and also thinks Marcia messed up by not putting several witnesses on the stand. altho it wouldnt have mattered with this jury anyway
Defense lawyers want to build a good rapport with all parties in the courtroom. Prosecutors are often convinced the facts are going to get them through they forget being personable is a huge asset to persuading somebody to believe your "truth".
Defense lawyers are hired and prosecutors are assigned cases. Defense lawyers earn there money or they starve while prosecution lawyers are only concerned about there win/loss ratio
Marsha Clark: "How Many Detectives Were Wearing Ties?" Kato: "I'm Not Sure." Marsha: "You're Not Sure About The Number Of Ties, Or You Don't Know?" Kato: "Ahh...I Don't Remember How Many Were Wearing Ties." Marsha: "Would You Say All Of Them Were Wearing Ties?" Kato: "Ahh...I Don't Remember If All Of Them Were Wearing Ties, Or Just Most Of Them Were Wearing Ties." LOL...LOL...Marsha Clark Asks The MOST Ridiculous, Asinine, And DUMB Questions.
did OJ get his burger with mayo or no mayo? With pickles?? And what did you have for breakfast that day Mr kato? Was was the weather like that day did you have an urge to go surfing?
Actually it makes perfect since if you understand what foundations are and why counselors must lay them before jumping to certain questions. Jumping to points isnit allowed. Research foundations...
I like Marsha, but good lord her examination style is BORING. Imagine the fireworks if Juan Martinez had been prosecuting this case! I’d pay to see that.
If Kato, goes into the foyer at 11 something, with OJ, to look for the flashlight and "set the alarm' certainly he would notice there was blood on the floor in the foyer. But yet he doesn't notice it until the next morning, when the police detectives are escorting him out....confusing
John Smith- Vannatter took Simpson's blood sample to Rockingham but not to Bundy John. He knew the criminalist was still at Rockingham so decided to hand it to him personally, whether that was a bad decision on his part or not, the criminalist had already finished collecting the blood samples at Rockingham when Vannatter arrived back there, and was yet to start collecting the samples at Bundy. So the samples were already in the custody of the criminalist( still in the envelope and sealed tube) when he started collecting on Bundy. In that case you would have to think the criminalist also played a part in the planting theory. Of course the defence were going to use every possible chance to discredit the prosecution witness's ... that's their job and Vannatter handed them that one, but for it to become this big planting conspiracy that had to involve so many people is asking you to believe the ridiculous.
It sounds as if OJ was trying to make Kato the killer? The thump behind his room, the glove dropped, the alarm not set and having him do this for him. It sounds as if the police suspected Kato, OJ would have testified against him in a heartbeat. OJ's mind scrambled and tried to come up with a scapegoat, Kato was meant to be his fall guy. Clark is a useless prosecutor, the jury could not have followed her questioning, repeated innuendos.
I think Kato sincerely believed OJ was innocent that night. Kato didn’t even know what happened…his said his first thought was that OJ had been in a plane crash or something. Then when he heard Nicole died, he had no idea it was a murder. Kato was probably in severe shock for at least the day after the murders, and everything must have been surreal. It’s really a horrifying situation, esp for a regular nice guy just trying to find his way in life.
It does if Kato was high when he heard this and this is what he remembers. Weed was not legal then so it's not like he would be willing to admit he was high when he heard this. The fact that he would say 3 thumps sounded like an earthquake and his picture shook while on a phone...that is some serious high talk 😂 I believe OJ fell because it was dark in that area in his rush to get back in the house and probably stumbled again. Not farfetched.
Fuhrman the racist cop whom gets proven to be a true blue liar on the stand, had tampered with evidence prior, lost the evidence of a door in a previous trial and why oh why would OJ if he came from the Bronco off Rockingham, never mind why would 4 detectives leave two dead bodies at the real crime scene, not have the criminalist out nor the coroner and all go to give OJ notice.. If Ron left his place and did not get to Nicole's until just after 10 while Kato hear's a thump on a wall at 10:40 which is up the side of the house and no where near the front of the house.. then some how gets his golf bag leaves it out front, leave his backpack over by the other car and oh yeah after murdering someone he parks the Bronco under a lights where any neighbour could see him covered in blood and the tests for the blood wherein how much more did you miss like Vanadder or Lange both purely incompetent.. perhaps watch the whole trial and then look into the PI whom supposedly has the whole case.. but again why was the glove wet with blood when the bodies had dried blood at them at the exact same time.. but Furhman was beyond suspect.. and so much more.. just have you researched Furhman and his history as it isn't clean that's for sure plus being a total racist and got in trouble for tagging racial slurs on lockers.. and more
Go Kato I say after the trauma he went thru having a friend and her friend murdered and hearing his other friend the murderer coming from committing said murders
Poor Kato.. You can tell that Marcia Clark had coached him and he was trying to do good but when he said things she didn't like she would try and turn it around by putting words in his mouth. I also caught where he said all the detectives had jackets on... But I think that differs with what was said by Furhman. Didn't he say that he was not wearing a jacket?
The defense was saying Furhman had the glove in his jacket pocket, so the Prosecution said he wasn't wearing a Jacket, and I think all the other 3 detectives said he wasn't wearing a jacket.... but here's Kato, obviously honest as hell, saying he's pretty sure all 4 were wearing jackets. Just another example of the Detectives lying their ass off, doesn't necessarily mean he planted the glove but it does mean they're lying... AGAIN
@@LyonsArcade I agree. It was extremely obvious that those cops were covering for each other. It was disgusting to see and to know that really goes on in life.
Unessential questioning of a witness, if I didn't know better I would have guessed that this was her first case. Basically Ms Clark is leading her witness and the Judge and the defense is just letting her set herself up. Ms Clark's concern for Furhman whereabouts. Ms Clark's examination of the witness was terrible at one point she is arguing with the witness and then tried to make Kato a hostile witness,but the Judge is having none of that. She went over the questioning of this witness six times, same question until finally she asked about Kato's knowledge of OJ's personal affairs. Ms Clark blew this case right from the start.
@@Jim.Jim.32 I love it when Ms Clark was trying to get Kato to lie, hoping he would have said, call the police. Kato had already told her he was afraid about three times. They blew this case right from the start. She's leading the witness the entire time and not one objection from the defense. This back and forth questioning of Kato would be the beginning for every witness Ms Clark would direct cross examination. Looking back on this trial as bad as it was and all the lying the police were doing and Ms Clark trying to put words in the witnesses mouth was just terrible. It makes you wonder why Ms Clark is trying to defend the police instead of OJ Simpson! It's as if she's starting to realize maybe OJ didn't commit these murders, because now their defending the police and the way the evidence was collected. Ms Clark and Darden were the worst possible prosecutors to handle this case. It's one thing to get convections against a public defender of which 99% of her convictions came from, but when it came down to paid criminal defense lawyers and expert witnesses she and Darden failed big time. I've never seen a lawyer who continues to answer her own questions and judge ito just sets there and allowed it. The defense team rearly object to anything they just used Ms Clark's leading questions against their witness to get answers it's so funny to hear Ms Clark and Darden make objections to the very questions they asked their own witnesses. No wonder she stopped practicing law after this case, she came to the reality that she wasn't that good at all and judge ito wasn't going to help her either.......
Kato is brilliantly smart. He outsmarted Marcia Clark the entire time he was on the stand. He took her out of her game. He frustrated her, and he basically Dominated her at every turn along the way. It takes a smart man to play dumb and Kato deserved an Oscar for his performance.
what? kato agreed that he had more acting jobs since the murder than he had in the past 10 years? he listed half a dozen. so.....what did he do for income?
Good question. I think OJ looked after him. before that he babysat their kids. But of all those shows he mentioned getting, I don't think any of them actually ended up in production. Like the animated show or the movie with him as the leading man. Probably had something to do with the verdict and the perception that he had sort of helped OJ, or at least not aided the prosecution
you idiot. it's been proven that he was on the phone when the noise happened. i guess you think kato and the girl that he was talking to were a part of the conspiracy. i can tell your a racist. do you even know that kato made a fortune, due to oj's evil ways and that oj is now a poor man in prison and that he's been reduced to begging for his freedom.
BOB OVER she’s not a racist....she’s saying that Kato is lying. If you’d have thought about what Deb was saying before you got your knickers in a twist, you’d see that! How is she racist? Why do some people say that when there’s no basis for it? I can tell you are racist just by your response to something completely benign of racism! Btw, I don’t agree with Deb, I think Kato is telling the truth, and OJ is guilty! But, just because my opinion differs......I suppose I’m a racist, right?
Marcia's biggest problem with Kato is that she kept basically making him guess on the witness stand. When a witness says he's not sure and you push him by saying something like, "but if you had to guess," you now have put the witness in a corner, and chances are they are going to get details wrong. And if one of those details that is wrong goes against your case, you are also now in a place where you have to discredit your own witness and go through more pointless details to impeach your own witness. I get that the law is precise and that lawyers often have to establish foundation for things they wish to bring in later. A question about which detective was there may be the foundation for bringing that detective to the stand. And an occasional point is okay to emphasize, such as Did you see his hand? Did it appear to have any cuts on it? When done correctly, the repetition of this question reinforces how many times the witness actually saw his hands and also the fact that the witness didn't see any cuts. But when you do that with every. single. detail. the repetition loses ALL of it's power and merely becomes one more annoyance that the jury doesn't want to hear. I listen to a ton of trials for fun. I love listening with Emily D. Baker. I watched the majority of the Depp v Heard case. Heck, I've even watched trials about some extremely boring procedural topics that would probably bore most people to death. And yet the most boring trial I have ever witnesses has always been the trial of the century - OJ Simpson. Every time I've tried to watch it over the years when I get to Marcia's cross-examination I just can't get through it because it is so tedious. I'm sorry, but if after all the trials I have watched this is the most painful for me to watch that's pretty good evidence that this repetitive questioning isn't just Marcia "doing her job" or just "laying the foundation." Don't get me wrong, on a technical level she is doing that. But there comes a point when you have to remember you aren't just making the case for the judge that certain evidence deserves to come in. You are ultimately trying to make the case to the jury that the evidence proves the defendant is guilty (or innocent.). I may disagree vehemently with the way the defense in the case portrayed the evidence, but at least I HAD to listen. When a lawyer gets too bogged down in the details, it is extremely easy for the audience, aka the jury, to lose the entire plot of what you are saying. I guess putting it simply, Marcia was so obsessed with winning every tiny little battle that didn't matter that she didn't care about winning the war. And with a fairly sexist judge who wasn't controlling the courtroom, it didn't matter how many of her t's that she crossed and how many of her i's that she dotted, she wasn't going to win even the little battles, either, no matter how much she probably deserved to win them. In contrast, the defense learned to pick their battles. The defense can partially be summed up by a comment from OJ that is often repeated. The defense had Judge Ito dead to rights and intended to call him out and rake him over the coals for something in the trial, and OJ told his defense team not to call him out on it. It sounds like legally they were 100% right and would have won that battle. But OJ pointed out to his legal team that the Judge is essentially the father of the jury, and that no matter how right they may have been, attacking the jury's father was not a good idea. So the defense chose to loose the battle, and ultimately it contributed to them winning the war. Marcia really needed to take a step back and realize she has a mountain of evidence. Sure, some battles are worth fighting, but not every battle is worth fighting. Taking a step back and asking maybe 25% of the questions that she asked may have meant that some of her evidence would have been excluded, but it would also have meant that the jury would have a much better chance of understanding the evidence that was included. She doesn't need Kato to be absolutely certain about details that he SAYS he doesn't know. She needs to commend him for his honesty and encourage him NOT to give answers except to the things that he does know and focus on the important parts of his story. If the defense challenges her that she hasn't established the exact position of Door X, THAT is when she can get into the ridiculous details, but make the defense ask for those details and let the jury get mad at the defense for wasting their time and bogging them down with a bunch of useless foundation questions. I don't think the defense was stupid enough to do that, but if they are let it happen. You are prepared with the explanations. The jury is not made up of legal experts that are grading you for dotting all of your legal i's and crossing all of your legal t's. Sure, the judge is supposedly grading you on that, but he's checked out anyway. That's a losing battle. I think Marcia also seems to not understand that there are two kinds of witnesses - those who track time based on clocks and calendars, and those who track time based on events and how they relate to each other. The limo driver is a classic clock and calendar guy, and it's clear Marica loved that because she saw that as being a credible witness. Kato is clearly an events guy. It is a HUGE mistake to ask Kato to estimate times. However, you can definitely have him tell events and say, "I had this conversation after my first call with Rachel and before my second call with Rachel." Then, introduce evidence of his phone bill and say, "it says your first call with Rachel ended at 11:00 pm and your second call with Rachel started at 11:20 pm. Based on this evidence, is it fair to say this occurred between 11:00 pm and 11:20 pm?" That gives Kato an easy yes based on independent time markers. Now he can tap into his real memory instead of trying to pretend he actually records times and days as he experiences life. She set him up for massive failure every time she tried to force him to testify to something that he didn't know when it would have taken almost nothing to reframe the questions based on things he did know. He was a Prosecution witness. There is no excuse for not know what your own witnesses knows and doesn't know ahead of time, especially one as important as Kato. Yes, the irony of the length of my answer criticizing Marcia for not getting to the point is not lost on me. But there are two key differences. 1) I doubt anyone will actually read this whole thing, so it is me writing out my understanding for me, not me trying to convince a jury, and 2) even though I have a tendency to ramble, I still think I am making my points more directly than Marcia did. There is nothing wrong with a long question or long answer if it actually has a purpose. But focusing on unnecessary details is exactly how many amateur story tellers get themselves in trouble.
No, he's a moron. Period. And a complete jerk. I've encountered him myself. "Gentle soul" my butt. An arrogant punk who thinks he's better than you....is what you will meet if you encounter him one on one OUTSIDE the public eye. True colors abound.
OMG, “did you go to the bar area” “do you recall sitting on that bar stool” “so it was that particular stool” “where was Detective Vanatter sitting” “is that on the opposite side of you” “are you sure” What the fuck are all these irrelevant questions??? Marcia Clark was boring to the extreme, not to mention ridiculously annoying!!!! And she was the lead prosecutor???? I think I could have asked the relevant questions in one tenth of the time!!!!!
If you are not a lawyer or a judge, your opinion about her line of questions is irrelevant. Just because you are annoyed doesn't mean she has to adjust her questions to accommodate you.
i love Kato he is so funny...I think he's nervous because he wish he didn't have to be involved...he wont't even look over toward the defense side...all that walking why wasn't none of the blood walked/stepped in by none of them
Erin St. apparently you wasn’t listening to the same damn thing I was. Evidently they said there was blood on that property as well so WHEN they walked up to Kato there was NO blood but then miraculously it appeared when they walked later so HOW since you know? Don’t comment under my post if you don’t know what I’m saying or what your talking about!!!
He's nervous because he knows more than what he told the court and the Jury under oath. He saw OJ himself when he went and looked behind the house after hearing the thumps. He's admitted it to people he knows. That's the real reason he only went part of the way back to investigate the noise. Oh he was scared alright. Scared because he saw a naked OJ who ditched his clothes come out of the daggumed bushes and say "go let the limo driver in you id!ot!"
Interesting interlude there, and a bit telling imo. First KK says Weiztman called and he thought OJ was also on the line. Was asked, and didn’t remember a 3rd person in on the call. But suddenly, he remembers Kathy Randa, and insinuates she may have initially made the call. Seems a bit deceptive to me? That must’ve been a very interesting conversation.
Lol, keyboardist tough guys. This guy thrust into high profile case with relationships with both victims and accused while being grilled by Marcia!👌 This poor guy did well all things considered.
Yeah like, imagine you're in your 20s and you're just having a chill, lowkey night, just like any other night and then suddenly your exact moments of the last 10ish hours become the most defining moments of your entire life. Fuck that. I can barely remember what I've done in the last 5 hours. If someone walked in and said "Robert Downey Jr just murdered 5 people outside your house. Where were you?" I'd be fucked.
O.J TOOK KATO TO MACDONLDS TO TRY AND CREATE AND ALIBI FOR HIMSELF, BUT NOBODY KNOWS WHERE SIMPSON WAS FROM 9;35 till 10:55 thats almost 1 and 1/2 hour to murder nicole and ron bingo GUILTY!
Oj offered it. Likely out of jealousy as Kato had first asked Nicole to live in her extra guest house. She said yes and he was going to pay like five hundred a month to live there, but Oj offered him to live in his bungalow for free. You realize they were all friends and buds right? And OJ offered it....not schmoozed.
His story behind closed doors is quite different than his story under oath. I gotta hand it to him. He didn't exactly "lie". He just didn't tell you everything he really "saw" when he and looked behind the house after hearing the thumps.
@@bassacoustic1549 oh you haven't. Trust me. It's a long story. For a truncated version, there is a vid on my chnnel called "OJ Simpson - A Different Story". It's about 6 or 7 videos from the top. Go check it out.
I think he’s smart, too. He was in shock, grieving, terrified…Marcia Clark must have made him feel like one wrong word and she’d convict HIM of everything! He’d never been in court, knew nothing about Law. He was an LA party boy being an LA party boy. He probably didn’t know the riots were happening the night they occurred because he was behind some velvet rope with a starlet or two. He was the least equipped person in the entire courthouse to be in the middle of a double murder.
0:56 - 0:58 somewhere... Ok, that was weird. The way Clark says "Defen-daant".. the first time i thought she had just been hanging around Darden too much and being impressionable, (as some people are) but TWICE?? ... seemed deliberate.. i thought the defense were the only ones playing games like that lol Edit: 1:14:58 and again, i think this is the 4th .. wth
Smdh.... I don't know how he kept his composure with her... all of these repetitive, dumb ass, irrelevant questions!! I'm sure the jury was over there asleep by this time!! I'm surprised she didn't ask what color underwear was he wearing? What type? What size... the brand name, etc...?😖😫🙄
Why question Kato about his acting work? She should have focused on the blood drops in the foyer. I think she’s out of questions but is determined to be “longer winded.” 80% of her questions clouds the case.
How did Kato make money ? Because he was having trouble getting acting jobs before the trial right ? Did OJ look after him ? Also of all those shows he mentioned getting, I don't think any of them actually ended up in production. Like the animated show or the movie with him as the leading man. Probably had something to do with the verdict and the perception that he had sort of helped OJ, or at least not aided the prosecution.
Imo there is just too much staging going on. So they have us belive he killed two people dropped a glove and hat. Went home knocked on katos wall and dropped other glove on purpose? So he is basikally setting himself up and tieing himself to the murders.
He accidentally dropped the gloves..c'mon everyone knows he did it..geez he may as well as admitted it in is book and interview if I'd done it bc he knows he can't be tried again
if he had the other blood soaked glove with him, why wasn't the inside of the bronco a bloody mess vs drops of blood. and by the time he got back to the house wouldn't he realize he had only one glove? wouldn't he make sure not to drop the match to the glove he wore to nicole's. everything else done with precision but then sloppy moves at the same time? i don't think he's 100% innocent either but little things about this case nag at me.
He hid the clothes and the murder weapon forever, to the point they've never been found, but oh unlucky him, he left one glove at the crime scene and then the other exact match at his house. He dropped one at one location and then one at the other, perfectly tying the two together, but hid every other thing including the murder weapon FOREVER and people believe that is how it happened. Me? not so much.
There are many interviews even on RUclips with Marcia Clark, Mark Furman and others which give MUCH insight to details the public may not have known or paid attention to even with cameras in the courtroom. These answer many questions and provide more details THEY knew/saw that the public was not privy to.
@@amann399 I don't think it matters. The biggest part of everything was how oj had no bruises on his body. The Goldman guy had put up a fight and had his knuckles bruised badley. Whoever killed them was not alone and not oj. Definitely someone that knew oj and his wife and had access to both of their homes. They knew where to go on both property's.
Katos testimony is the perfect example of why this trial went on so long. So many pointless questions and other questions just not necessary in getting the details needed out of Kato. He was there for timeline and some set up of ojs demeanor and relationship with Nicole the last year. He shouldn’t have been on the stand more than two hours total.
Kato is so nervous. He must have been stressed out of his mind. It's very sad to see the terrible comments people make on here. Kato is a nice man, and he is gentle and polite.
He knew OJ. I wonder if he saw the shadowy figure that likely was OJ that night when Parks saw it. But kept quiet but maybe not.
kato has several podcasts on youtube about this case, he believes OJ did it and he talks about several other witnesses that the prosecution should have put on the stand. however, none of it wouldve mattered because the jury was never gonna convict they admitted it
he has repeatedly said he was trying to remember truthfully what happened. I can't imagine how nerve wracking that had to be.
@@lorraineb.4698 Brian Kalan never saw OJ Simpson either entering the house or on the walkway to the house.
If he would have, Ms Clark would have asked him, Brian Kalan wouldn't lie; like he told OJ "I didn't see you go into the house, and OJ never questioned him beyond that point.
I'm sure Ms Clark did,that's why she got frustrated with her own witness, because he wouldn't lie.
As for these recent podcasts, he's become a liar and full of bull$#!+ making up stuff if he was ever a friend of Nicole Simpson, he sure as hell dosen't act like it.
By sensationalizing the OJ saga 30 years later, because he was the worst witness besides Rosa Lopez and Mark Fuhrman and Detective Vannatter and the forensic grew Mr Fung and I quote, (how about that Mr Fung)......
There's more blame to go around then a merry-go-round, but what's the point?
For 30 years they've been using this double homicide of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, who barely ever gets mentioned other then he was just a friend who was returning some glasses? ????
We'll never know his story as well in all this, a young man who should be alive raising a family living a full life, but like all the little people in "HOLLYWOOD" Ronald Goldman's life wasn't important enough to matter.
Compared to OJ's and Nicole's made for TV lifestyle The rich and famous OJ Simpson and his abuse of Nicole Brown Simpson for 17 years.....
It had all the makings of a Hollywood production, money, sex, drugs, spousal abuse and lots of partying .
R.I.P🌹 Ronald Goldman🌹 Nicole Brown Simpson and 🌹OJ Simpson. The saga continues........
“And Mr. Kato, what brand of tie were the detectives wearing”
-Marcia Clark
And for clarification, were they bow-ties or regular ties, if you recall?
And what color were the ties?
And how would you describe the ties?
Marcia questioning is absolutely terrible .
you have to understand she has to establish foundation and get him to nail down specifics because she knows what the defense is going to do, and kato understandably doesnt have total recall of the events over those 24 hours because he had no sleep the night prior and was just given the shock of his life
Just hearing Marcia Clark in all these questions...it is know wonder why they never really proved to the jury 100%!
Some of these comments on here about Katos demeanor are so very rude and uncalled for! He wasn’t a freeloader, he paid rent at Nicole’s guest house and then O j was probably jealous of him and wanted to keep him under wraps and let him stay at his place rent free!! I feel for him that he had to be put in this situation!! You’re a good guy Kato!! And better looks and personality than most!!❤️🙏
Probably jealous ?
Why would a [putative] jealous man allow another man to reside, let alone freely reside, in this selfsame [putative] jealous man's [own] residence ?!?!?!
"You cannot revolt against a people whose values you share." - Dr. Amos N. Wilson
Htptiwny [viz, May Peace & Blessings be unto You All]
The comments seem to be spot on from what I am reading.
Freeloader
Kato is gay
He was not a freeloader! From what I’ve watched he is the most respectful honest person who was put into a whirlwind that he didn’t need to be in and had a killer starting at him the whole time. What a great friend to have!
Kato, must of been frightened out of his mind! Could you imagine being a homeless actor, couch surfing, living rent free in a Mansion's guesthouse, and then waking up one morning to four L.A. Detectives at your door, only to discover that you are right smack in the middle of a real life Murder Mystery, and the "Crime of the Century"? 😬😲
Agreed. I think he handled it to the best of his abilities
@@uziclippe Exactly! I sincerely doubt any of us would do much better than Kato..
He didn't deserve all the hate directed at him. What else did they expect him to do?
@@johnperrigo6474 You know how folks are, they NEED a whipping boy,😏 But, it put Kato in a better financial situation soon after 🤗
Minx Minx - Watching this now as opposed to when I watched the trial 25 years ago, I now realize how scared Kato Kaelin was on the witness stand.
Kato is a gentle soul. You can tell. He’s one of those non aggressive type of people. Rare these days, unfortunately.
Pommie bears it was a different time badk then....WAY different attitude this country had
John Michael yes..I remember. Others would disagree though. I’m often told on here.
there is an interview on here of him on the today show with the goldman's. kato is kind enough to address their grief [kato lost a nephew in Iraq war and said he could hardly imagine the loss] but the goldmans barely turned in his direction.
Yes, drugs are super effective and numbing.
@@joehopkins7475 Kinda rude to assume drugs if the person is kind isn't it?
No wonder folks hated this woman's guts.... Nitpicking....trying to get him in a lie....🤔 Making him seem a hostile witness, what a slow dragged out interrogation 🙄🙄🙄
it's not kato that's the problem. as we watch the trial it become so apparent very early that the prosecution was not up to the task of defeating the dream team" of lawyers. and then we sit and watch each day as the slowly declines. it's uncomfortable with this line of questioning because it appears she is simply trying to look like she's so up to the task when really what she is doing is making herself look desperate which, of course we know by now, she was.
no what she's trying to do is put together a timeline
Marcia was desperate for a win now she made millions of blood money , why would she even want a dime to do with OJ why write dam book her question so elementary give me a break
Yeah it seems a lot of her questions were designed to make herself look thorough. A lot of them just check off minor little facts that have little relevance. She gets somebody to describe where they are, then shows a big chart with that same thing labeled on it, see, i'm good at making charts! It's almost amateurish. Remember at this point they thought they had a slam dunk case.
Marcia was so harsh with her own witness, who is obviously a nervous wreck. The poor guy! We just loved him in SoCal back then…so full of good will. People helped him out because he was so much fun and a very kind guy. Such a cutie too!
OJ is a smug SOB.
Kato did a honest job on the stand.
same with Ron Shipp, OJ would throw his own mother under the bus to save his own arse, terrible how the "dream team" treated Ron, lange, vanatter, phillips kato and alan park the limo driver. these witnesses were dragged into this circus through no fault of their own, all because of OJ who sits over the smirking laughing and rolling his eyes oh and flirting with the jury
I can't see the point or relevance to most of the questions Clark is asking here.
9:57 Marcia Clark-"Can you tell us what the weather was like that night?"
Kato-"a little mist you know like a mist in the air not really a fog but more of a mist. not cloudy so much but a mist in the air."
Marcia Clark-"uh huh uh huh...would you say it was misty?"
Lol
Uh huh uh huh
She had coached him for hours and hours and is a perfectionist, so anytime any of them wouldn't say exactly what she told them to say, she'd ask the most ridiculous questions. One of the most interesting things was her fascination with the Dogs, which had nothing to do with anything and didn't mean anything... other than the Dog saw something traumatic. Which she's very concerned about. So she's trying to make sure she knows exactly where the dog was the whole time, completely irrelevant info not worth 2 minutes in the trail and she spent likely 3 hours on it in total.
@@LyonsArcade The dogs could have more relevance than that. If they werent barking, it could indicate the dogs knew the people who were there. If it was a stranger, they would most likely be barking and acting out.
Hahaha i dont know why, but from the very begining, (maybe it was Marcia calling him out for being so clearly nervous and jittery), but I love their dynamic they have going on. Like they kinda annoy the hell out of each other, but not in a hatefulk way, almost in a respectful (idk f that's the right word) way.
Marcia asked a lot of irrelevant questions here.
Romulan2469 what happens when you get a call during a call? fuck that gotta do with anything of anything
Were the detectives wearing ties? Did you say OJ's plane or the plane? Who the hell cares. No wonder he was set free.
why she never asked where OJ went after McDonald's... after returning home
Marcia, treated Kato as if he was a hostile witness, (which he wasn't). Unbelievable..
Yes she did very respective dame old dame old she Marcia died not make sense
Way to go, Marcia. Waste as much of the jury's time as possible. This is absurd. Where are you going with this line of questioning? I'll answer that. You're going straight to a not-guilty verdict.
WHY DID SHE INTERROGATE KATO PAST THE DEPARTURE OF THE LIMO? Useless and damning. F. Lee did a great job with the cross-ex. of Fuhrman; Shapiro did pretty well with Van Atter. I contend that Kato’s direct examination was the BIGGEST nail in the prosecution’s coffin.
@@joehopkins7475 too bad Kato didn't tell the full truth..ohh....he didn't technically lie....he just hid things that he saw that night....such as the REAL reason he didn't go all the way back behind the house after hearing the noise.
@@sdssteward You’re killing me! What is your source? Is there a book you can recommend to me?
@@scarlettphoenix7024 yep..Ron's Revenge by Chris Todd.
@@sdssteward Thank you!!
Kato was the most honest guy in the witness stand.
the lawyers are milking this for all the billable hours they possibly can
Lol, OJ still owes all his lawyers and roughly 90% of the 30 million dollars granted to the Goldman family.
Let's not even speak about the poor Goldman family..their son was at the wrong place at the wrong time..O.J. even said so
OJ’s own team didn’t get compensated completely. OJ moved to FL & screwed them.
@ThurgoodJenkinz lol didn't pay them though lol
In the middle of questioning Kato about a phone conversation he was having she asked him what the weather was like. Marcia & Chris + Ito + Dream Team + Fhurman taking the 5th + L.A. = OJ on the golf course
@John Smith - Are you for real?
I think she asked the weather question because the Limo driver mentioned OJ felt hot in the Limo and complained about it multiple times. On a brisk misty night
If you followed Alan Park's testimony, you would understand why she did that. OJ was complaining that it was "brutally hot" when he was in the limo heading to the airport. Alan even cranked the air conditioning and he was still sweating. By confirming through Kato that the temps were cool that night, it solidified that OJ was hot and sweating only because he was nervous and anxious - creating pretty strong evidence of a guilty conscience.
are you serious? every question an attorney asks has an ulterior motive and purpose. she asked about the weather because the limo driver said OJ was hot and sweaty and also it goes the fact that the glove lying in the pathway looked moist and wet because of the blood and the damp misty air and those factors will also shrink leather. jeez
Kati’s testimony was not the problem for the prosecution. Marcia’s irrelevant questions took the focus away from the state’s best evidence. Also, the officers’ suddenly decided that note taking was unimportant. How do two lead detectives fail to mention finding a glove in their report…”because the criminalist photographed or recovered it?” That seems odd.
Poor Kato, how many times has he had to repeat these same questions? I thought Marcia Clarke was quite rude towards him, considering he was her witness.
Lucy I think she’s just generally rude! Lol! Most prosecutors are pretty hard nosed. Juan Martinez who prosecuted Jodi Arias was tough as hob naked boots! Lol! He too was really aggressive with his own witnesses.
Agree
I don’t think she was rude at all! Just doing her job!
Brian Kalain was a typical person who took advantage of any situation that could benefit his no talent acting skills. Nicole's situation made it easier for Brain Kalain to manipulate her single confused feelings about her ex husband and the possibility of reuniting with him. Brain Kalain was that sympathetic ear to listen to a confused emotionally depressed woman who was reaching out to anyone, having multiple relationships experiences, and even reaching out to OJs friend Marcus Allen for a sexual relationship that went nowhere, except to make OJ furious and insanely jealous.
That's why after their big falling out and then back on again relationship OJ moved Brian Kalain out of Nicole's position to his house so that she couldn't run around with her new friends none of which would be a good character reference for Nicole Brown Simpson.
Brain Kalain was a freeloader who couldn't even stand up to Ms Clark and say exactly what he felt other then Nicole was a friend. He didn't even know her or OJ, but the prosecution made him their star witness who turned out to be a better witness for the defense team in the end.
poor KATO?
A lot of dorks trashing Kato here, i wonder if they could be perfectly calm when first time in the stand. judgamental fools
emiliano martin ferreyra that would be ON the stand.
emiliano martin ferreyra Agreed. Not to mention knowing the testimony was being beamed around the world.
Kato, was frightened out of his mind!! Marcia, was treating him like he was a hostile witness.
Marcia is so Fucktard!!
It's no wonder that the Fuckin Bastard was found Not Guilty!!
John Smith nice try Johnny boy, no likes for you
Marcia: Do you remember the exact moment you hung up the phone? Bored the whole jury out their wits.... 🙄
Listening to this you'd think Marcia Clark is cross examining him for the defense.
It’s like pulling teeth trying to get clear answers from Kato.
Put yourself in his place!!😢
I understand him fine
Maybe ur just a slow bitch
@@KeyNotKeishaMe too
He gave thorough and thoughtful and honest answers. Excellent witness and good person.
that smirk on OJ's face and rocking his head back and forth hearing this testimony of his daughter being told Nicole had been murdered makes me sick. He was beyond narcissistic. His blood ran cold, and he deserved 2 life sentences, and eternity in hell is what he got! 🔥🔥
Who cares what the detectives were wearing? Most of her questions are asinine.
Thinking the same thing
"Were they all wearing coats? and ties? are you sure?"
What the fuck does any of that matter Marcia was miserable at her job
Lol... He testified they were all wearing coats so now we are back to Furman hiding the glove in his suit coat again...
Yup. She wastes so much time....the jury is 😴
They ask questions like that to determine what level of memory the witnesses are at. Little details can tell a lot...
She's trying to pre-buttal the defense who are going to say Fuhrman had the glove in a bag in his jacket pocket. She knows that's coming so she's trying to get him say Fuhrman didn't have a jacket on, but Kato is telling the truth because he's honest. So then she changes it to ask about the Ties, to try to show that Kato's memory isn't that good.
What's really going on is she is letting little things slip away, like that Jacket thing will come back to haunt her. The other detectives had already testified that Fuhrman didn't have a jacket on... but Kato is more believable, and Johnny Cochrane is more friendly. So Marcia and 4 likely crooked cops say he didn't have his jacket on but Kato, honest, loveable Kato says different.
Everyone from both sides needs to be careful asking Kato questions because his answers can be unpredictable.
Brian Kalain knew exactly what he was doing playing the fence to make his irrelevant statements worth forcing the prosecution to make him their star witness, only to have it backfire on the prosecution as trying to get him to lie for them. It was obvious that Ms Clark's whole recross was about trying to lead this wishy washy witness into saying what she wanted hear,but all she got was frustrated. Jumping from non related questions, like was OJ sweating and then in the next sentence she's asking him about what Mark Fuhrman; "What was he doing in his room? If Ms Clark was the District Attorney's Office as one of best they chose the wrong person to be their lead prosecutor along with Darden. Just listen to her line of questioning asking Kato about OJs business associates as if he knows these people. All Kato knows is who called him at the time, he wasn't apart of OJs business practices. Ms Clark is way outside the questioning of Brian Kalain. She's cross examining her own witness now. No wonder she lost this case. Really: how many times did he go out to dinner with OJ, but she question him about OJs associates. If OJ was guilty, Ms Clark sure made him look innocent by getting a witness to lie double questioning him on the same questions even after he'd given an answer. Forcing a witness to lie was her biggest mistake. That's why she never used Kato's phone records to prove her timeline as to when Kato said he heard the noise at 10:40 PM instead she tried to fit Kato's statement into the limousine drivers timeline and phone records as if the limousine phone records would coincide with Kato's phone conversation with his girlfriend. That was another mistake, because all she had to do was produce Kato's phone records. But that would thrown their whole timeline off, but it didn't matter, because that was the point that the defense used against the prosecution's theory that OJ Simpson killed two people jumped over a fence crashing into a wall take a shower and clean up have luggage downstairs and ready to go in five minutes after Allen Park seen a dark figure entering the house 10:55 PM. "Impossible"
kato was stuck in terrible situation, being friends with the killer and the victim. also like you and most people, he doesnt have a photographic memory and no one remembers every detail of every minute of every day like these lawyers expected. kato has several podcasts he thinks OJ did it and also thinks Marcia messed up by not putting several witnesses on the stand. altho it wouldnt have mattered with this jury anyway
@@micheller7509 Right
@@kennethcharles1386Very true … He outsmarted Marcia Clark the entire time. Kato played her like a fiddle
Marsha Clark is irritating. I don't know why she had to be hostile towards Kato.
He must have been more favorable to the prosecution in his earlier testimony and then backed off once he got to trial.
Why do prosecutors have no personatly and defense lawyers do?
Glow Bright watch the Jodi Arias trial for the most awesome closing argument from a prosecutor I’ve ever heard.
Defense lawyers want to build a good rapport with all parties in the courtroom. Prosecutors are often convinced the facts are going to get them through they forget being personable is a huge asset to persuading somebody to believe your "truth".
Defense lawyers are hired and prosecutors are assigned cases. Defense lawyers earn there money or they starve while prosecution lawyers are only concerned about there win/loss ratio
Because the burden of proof lies on the prosecutor who represents "the people" of society. Toughest job, seriously.
because defense gets to choose their clients and dictate their fees . Prosecution gets none of those things
I loved how the question was sustained and kato answers it anyway even when marcia changes the question lol rebel
yea I noticed that too lol.
I love this guy.
This hypothetical if a black indigenous man and awhite man are in the same house 🏠 who does the house belong too??
Marsha Clark: "How Many Detectives Were Wearing Ties?" Kato: "I'm Not Sure." Marsha: "You're Not Sure About The Number Of Ties, Or You Don't Know?" Kato: "Ahh...I Don't Remember How Many Were Wearing Ties." Marsha: "Would You Say All Of Them Were Wearing Ties?" Kato: "Ahh...I Don't Remember If All Of Them Were Wearing Ties, Or Just Most Of Them Were Wearing Ties."
LOL...LOL...Marsha Clark Asks The MOST Ridiculous, Asinine, And DUMB Questions.
She’s wasting a lot of time, I wish Ito would tell her to move it along!!!!😩
The noises must have been really loud because he was really freaked out! Gosh O.J. could you have tried to be a little more quiet?!!
I think he had a broken fall against the house
@@lorraineb.4698 MAKES SENSE
I just don't get it. She was asking dump questions that had nothing to do with the case.
Marcia Clark Asks The Most Stupid And Most Redundant Questions Of Any Prosecutor I've Ever Heard.
Some of these questions were unneeded
Agree poor Kato! He must regrets living rent free.
Lol!!!😆
everything comes at a price
Nope 🌟 Not at all 🙏 A blessing it was 🙏
@@kimmyfreak200 The PRICE for Kato was how much went IN HIS POCKET after the OJ thing$$❗
@@blessedmslady7016are you serious i4dont think he talked to OJ after he was arrested or when was acquitted he moved out very soon
Kato was the most honest witness
I agree.
@Mathew Perry - Kato knew/knows more than he had ever told. I get it. He is scared.
Hillccs or was he????
Maryann G I’ve heard this
Agree
did OJ get his burger with mayo or no mayo?
With pickles??
And what did you have for breakfast that day Mr kato?
Was was the weather like that day did you have an urge to go surfing?
Cmon you gotta get it with pickles and mayo, go full out!
So annoying right. He handled it better then I could have
Kata treated OJ to McDonald’s but then gets labeled a freeloading guy
Actually it makes perfect since if you understand what foundations are and why counselors must lay them before jumping to certain questions. Jumping to points isnit allowed. Research foundations...
@@TheMagician86 the OJ fan club doesnt understand law or strategic questioning and also never notices when the defense uses the same tactics lol
Marcia was desperate
Kato knows more than he is willing to say and he refuses to look over by the defense.
Tend to agree
Perhaps
He answered everything honestly. Grow some common sense.
I like Marsha, but good lord her examination style is BORING. Imagine the fireworks if Juan Martinez had been prosecuting this case! I’d pay to see that.
Dam the hamburger and the thumps
If Kato, goes into the foyer at 11 something, with OJ, to look for the flashlight and "set the alarm' certainly he would notice there was blood on the floor in the foyer. But yet he doesn't notice it until the next morning, when the police detectives are escorting him out....confusing
Augford P. Doggie that's why they say detective furham might have framed him
maybe in excitement helping OJ leave he honestly did not notice it at that dark hour ?
Nicole - So where do you think Fuhrman got Simpson's blood from to plant in the foyer when Simpson is still in Chicago?
That is why he wasn't convicted the blood was all planted.
John Smith- Vannatter took Simpson's blood sample to Rockingham but not to Bundy John. He knew the criminalist was still at Rockingham so decided to hand it to him personally, whether that was a bad decision on his part or not, the criminalist had already finished collecting the blood samples at Rockingham when Vannatter arrived back there, and was yet to start collecting the samples at Bundy. So the samples were already in the custody of the criminalist( still in the envelope and sealed tube) when he started collecting on Bundy. In that case you would have to think the criminalist also played a part in the planting theory. Of course the defence were going to use every possible chance to discredit the prosecution witness's ... that's their job and Vannatter handed them that one, but for it to become this big planting conspiracy that had to involve so many people is asking you to believe the ridiculous.
I can’t believe Kato answering “I can’t remember “ to some of these questions. He must’ve been high.
Wow Kato was a total hottie, and has aged very well!
It sounds as if OJ was trying to make Kato the killer? The thump behind his room, the glove dropped, the alarm not set and having him do this for him. It sounds as if the police suspected Kato, OJ would have testified against him in a heartbeat. OJ's mind scrambled and tried to come up with a scapegoat, Kato was meant to be his fall guy. Clark is a useless prosecutor, the jury could not have followed her questioning, repeated innuendos.
I think Kato sincerely believed OJ was innocent that night. Kato didn’t even know what happened…his said his first thought was that OJ had been in a plane crash or something. Then when he heard Nicole died, he had no idea it was a murder. Kato was probably in severe shock for at least the day after the murders, and everything must have been surreal. It’s really a horrifying situation, esp for a regular nice guy just trying to find his way in life.
U sound like u look… a damn fool
OJ had Nicole's blood all over his socks.
No he really didnt and those socks werent in ojs @@vickijohnson9704bedroom the first time they checked they weren't there until later
@@vickijohnson9704lol the criminalists saw no socks when he took the pictures of the house then there were pictures of bloody socks there
a guy who mumbles and fumbles, stutters and stammers, so... let's give him a RADIO SHOW!!! truth stranger than fiction...
Stupid comment!!
If OJ fell on the side of the house, it would be 1 thump. So he got up and banged against the wall another 2 times? Doesnt make sense
It does if Kato was high when he heard this and this is what he remembers. Weed was not legal then so it's not like he would be willing to admit he was high when he heard this.
The fact that he would say 3 thumps sounded like an earthquake and his picture shook while on a phone...that is some serious high talk 😂
I believe OJ fell because it was dark in that area in his rush to get back in the house and probably stumbled again. Not farfetched.
@@welchlessexactly
Detective Fuhrman did not plant anything anywhere
Fuhrman the racist cop whom gets proven to be a true blue liar on the stand, had tampered with evidence prior, lost the evidence of a door in a previous trial and why oh why would OJ if he came from the Bronco off Rockingham, never mind why would 4 detectives leave two dead bodies at the real crime scene, not have the criminalist out nor the coroner and all go to give OJ notice.. If Ron left his place and did not get to Nicole's until just after 10 while Kato hear's a thump on a wall at 10:40 which is up the side of the house and no where near the front of the house.. then some how gets his golf bag leaves it out front, leave his backpack over by the other car and oh yeah after murdering someone he parks the Bronco under a lights where any neighbour could see him covered in blood and the tests for the blood wherein how much more did you miss like Vanadder or Lange both purely incompetent.. perhaps watch the whole trial and then look into the PI whom supposedly has the whole case.. but again why was the glove wet with blood when the bodies had dried blood at them at the exact same time.. but Furhman was beyond suspect.. and so much more.. just have you researched Furhman and his history as it isn't clean that's for sure plus being a total racist and got in trouble for tagging racial slurs on lockers.. and more
Yes yes yes!!!
She's using this cross examination at trial like she's trying to find out information for the first time. What a waste!
I feel like the prosecution had to dumb down for the jury
LOL. probably
Kato was paid a $100,000 for a coloring book.
Go Kato I say after the trauma he went thru having a friend and her friend murdered and hearing his other friend the murderer coming from committing said murders
Kati was born on March 9, 1959 in Wisconsin. He was 36 years at the time of the trial.
I never saw anyone ask so many questions like that that would drive anyone crazy, she wants to know every single thing he did step by step SMH
42:27 And people actually think the cops sprinkled this blood. Ridiculous.
Fuhrman was directly asked under oath if he planted evidence against OJ and he pled the fifth. That was the end of the case.
Poor Kato.. You can tell that Marcia Clark had coached him and he was trying to do good but when he said things she didn't like she would try and turn it around by putting words in his mouth.
I also caught where he said all the detectives had jackets on... But I think that differs with what was said by Furhman. Didn't he say that he was not wearing a jacket?
The defense was saying Furhman had the glove in his jacket pocket, so the Prosecution said he wasn't wearing a Jacket, and I think all the other 3 detectives said he wasn't wearing a jacket.... but here's Kato, obviously honest as hell, saying he's pretty sure all 4 were wearing jackets. Just another example of the Detectives lying their ass off, doesn't necessarily mean he planted the glove but it does mean they're lying... AGAIN
@@LyonsArcade I agree. It was extremely obvious that those cops were covering for each other. It was disgusting to see and to know that really goes on in life.
I want to go to McD's with Kato and OJ... in a swagy ride... extra pickles, beeyotch!
lol!!
Sounds like a bit much for a "wellness" check...
Yep
This video makes me wonder why he was so hesitant to remember anything. He can’t be that out of it.
He isn't " out of it", his friend was just murdered by one of his other friends. The man is nervous, how could he not be?
Unessential questioning of a witness, if I didn't know better I would have guessed that this was her first case. Basically Ms Clark is leading her witness and the Judge and the defense is just letting her set herself up. Ms Clark's concern for Furhman whereabouts. Ms Clark's examination of the witness was terrible at one point she is arguing with the witness and then tried to make Kato a hostile witness,but the Judge is having none of that. She went over the questioning of this witness six times, same question until finally she asked about Kato's knowledge of OJ's personal affairs. Ms Clark blew this case right from the start.
Yep. She wanted Kato to say he heard the thumps at 1050 and not 1040 to give them more wiggle room on their timeline. Judge Ito told her to stop LOL
@@Jim.Jim.32 I love it when Ms Clark was trying to get Kato to lie, hoping he would have said, call the police. Kato had already told her he was afraid about three times. They blew this case right from the start. She's leading the witness the entire time and not one objection from the defense. This back and forth questioning of Kato would be the beginning for every witness Ms Clark would direct cross examination. Looking back on this trial as bad as it was and all the lying the police were doing and Ms Clark trying to put words in the witnesses mouth was just terrible. It makes you wonder why Ms Clark is trying to defend the police instead of OJ Simpson! It's as if she's starting to realize maybe OJ didn't commit these murders, because now their defending the police and the way the evidence was collected. Ms Clark and Darden were the worst possible prosecutors to handle this case. It's one thing to get convections against a public defender of which 99% of her convictions came from, but when it came down to paid criminal defense lawyers and expert witnesses she and Darden failed big time. I've never seen a lawyer who continues to answer her own questions and judge ito just sets there and allowed it. The defense team rearly object to anything they just used Ms Clark's leading questions against their witness to get answers it's so funny to hear Ms Clark and Darden make objections to the very questions they asked their own witnesses.
No wonder she stopped practicing law after this case, she came to the reality that she wasn't that good at all and judge ito wasn't going to help her either.......
Marcia treated him awful.
He's not drinking water like a fiend today.
Kato is brilliantly smart. He outsmarted Marcia Clark the entire time he was on the stand. He took her out of her game. He frustrated her, and he basically Dominated her at every turn along the way. It takes a smart man to play dumb and Kato deserved an Oscar for his performance.
what? kato agreed that he had more acting jobs since the murder than he had in the past 10 years? he listed half a dozen. so.....what did he do for income?
Good question. I think OJ looked after him. before that he babysat their kids. But of all those shows he mentioned getting, I don't think any of them actually ended up in production. Like the animated show or the movie with him as the leading man. Probably had something to do with the verdict and the perception that he had sort of helped OJ, or at least not aided the prosecution
Provided coc**ne for N and OJ.
If Kato was so afraid by that thumping noise why would he go outside to put the alarm on? Something's not right about his story!
you idiot. it's been proven that he was on the phone when the noise happened. i guess you think kato and the girl that he was talking to were a part of the conspiracy. i can tell your a racist. do you even know that kato made a fortune, due to oj's evil ways and that oj is now a poor man in prison and that he's been reduced to begging for his freedom.
BOB OVER she’s not a racist....she’s saying that Kato is lying. If you’d have thought about what Deb was saying before you got your knickers in a twist, you’d see that! How is she racist? Why do some people say that when there’s no basis for it? I can tell you are racist just by your response to something completely benign of racism! Btw, I don’t agree with Deb, I think Kato is telling the truth, and OJ is guilty! But, just because my opinion differs......I suppose I’m a racist, right?
Something not right about Kato story especially the 3 thumps he was high
Why would 3 thumps replicate an earthquake, he keeps bringing it up and telling everyone he speaks to on the phone
@@pommiebears - LOL
Marcia's biggest problem with Kato is that she kept basically making him guess on the witness stand. When a witness says he's not sure and you push him by saying something like, "but if you had to guess," you now have put the witness in a corner, and chances are they are going to get details wrong. And if one of those details that is wrong goes against your case, you are also now in a place where you have to discredit your own witness and go through more pointless details to impeach your own witness.
I get that the law is precise and that lawyers often have to establish foundation for things they wish to bring in later. A question about which detective was there may be the foundation for bringing that detective to the stand. And an occasional point is okay to emphasize, such as Did you see his hand? Did it appear to have any cuts on it? When done correctly, the repetition of this question reinforces how many times the witness actually saw his hands and also the fact that the witness didn't see any cuts. But when you do that with every. single. detail. the repetition loses ALL of it's power and merely becomes one more annoyance that the jury doesn't want to hear.
I listen to a ton of trials for fun. I love listening with Emily D. Baker. I watched the majority of the Depp v Heard case. Heck, I've even watched trials about some extremely boring procedural topics that would probably bore most people to death. And yet the most boring trial I have ever witnesses has always been the trial of the century - OJ Simpson. Every time I've tried to watch it over the years when I get to Marcia's cross-examination I just can't get through it because it is so tedious. I'm sorry, but if after all the trials I have watched this is the most painful for me to watch that's pretty good evidence that this repetitive questioning isn't just Marcia "doing her job" or just "laying the foundation." Don't get me wrong, on a technical level she is doing that. But there comes a point when you have to remember you aren't just making the case for the judge that certain evidence deserves to come in. You are ultimately trying to make the case to the jury that the evidence proves the defendant is guilty (or innocent.). I may disagree vehemently with the way the defense in the case portrayed the evidence, but at least I HAD to listen. When a lawyer gets too bogged down in the details, it is extremely easy for the audience, aka the jury, to lose the entire plot of what you are saying.
I guess putting it simply, Marcia was so obsessed with winning every tiny little battle that didn't matter that she didn't care about winning the war. And with a fairly sexist judge who wasn't controlling the courtroom, it didn't matter how many of her t's that she crossed and how many of her i's that she dotted, she wasn't going to win even the little battles, either, no matter how much she probably deserved to win them. In contrast, the defense learned to pick their battles. The defense can partially be summed up by a comment from OJ that is often repeated. The defense had Judge Ito dead to rights and intended to call him out and rake him over the coals for something in the trial, and OJ told his defense team not to call him out on it. It sounds like legally they were 100% right and would have won that battle. But OJ pointed out to his legal team that the Judge is essentially the father of the jury, and that no matter how right they may have been, attacking the jury's father was not a good idea. So the defense chose to loose the battle, and ultimately it contributed to them winning the war.
Marcia really needed to take a step back and realize she has a mountain of evidence. Sure, some battles are worth fighting, but not every battle is worth fighting. Taking a step back and asking maybe 25% of the questions that she asked may have meant that some of her evidence would have been excluded, but it would also have meant that the jury would have a much better chance of understanding the evidence that was included. She doesn't need Kato to be absolutely certain about details that he SAYS he doesn't know. She needs to commend him for his honesty and encourage him NOT to give answers except to the things that he does know and focus on the important parts of his story. If the defense challenges her that she hasn't established the exact position of Door X, THAT is when she can get into the ridiculous details, but make the defense ask for those details and let the jury get mad at the defense for wasting their time and bogging them down with a bunch of useless foundation questions. I don't think the defense was stupid enough to do that, but if they are let it happen. You are prepared with the explanations. The jury is not made up of legal experts that are grading you for dotting all of your legal i's and crossing all of your legal t's. Sure, the judge is supposedly grading you on that, but he's checked out anyway. That's a losing battle.
I think Marcia also seems to not understand that there are two kinds of witnesses - those who track time based on clocks and calendars, and those who track time based on events and how they relate to each other. The limo driver is a classic clock and calendar guy, and it's clear Marica loved that because she saw that as being a credible witness. Kato is clearly an events guy. It is a HUGE mistake to ask Kato to estimate times. However, you can definitely have him tell events and say, "I had this conversation after my first call with Rachel and before my second call with Rachel." Then, introduce evidence of his phone bill and say, "it says your first call with Rachel ended at 11:00 pm and your second call with Rachel started at 11:20 pm. Based on this evidence, is it fair to say this occurred between 11:00 pm and 11:20 pm?" That gives Kato an easy yes based on independent time markers. Now he can tap into his real memory instead of trying to pretend he actually records times and days as he experiences life. She set him up for massive failure every time she tried to force him to testify to something that he didn't know when it would have taken almost nothing to reframe the questions based on things he did know. He was a Prosecution witness. There is no excuse for not know what your own witnesses knows and doesn't know ahead of time, especially one as important as Kato.
Yes, the irony of the length of my answer criticizing Marcia for not getting to the point is not lost on me. But there are two key differences. 1) I doubt anyone will actually read this whole thing, so it is me writing out my understanding for me, not me trying to convince a jury, and 2) even though I have a tendency to ramble, I still think I am making my points more directly than Marcia did. There is nothing wrong with a long question or long answer if it actually has a purpose. But focusing on unnecessary details is exactly how many amateur story tellers get themselves in trouble.
He's not a dummy. He's just a gentle soul
a dumb gentle soul
No, he's a moron. Period. And a complete jerk. I've encountered him myself. "Gentle soul" my butt. An arrogant punk who thinks he's better than you....is what you will meet if you encounter him one on one OUTSIDE the public eye. True colors abound.
You are a nasty person and I don't believe you
OMG,
“did you go to the bar area”
“do you recall sitting on that bar stool”
“so it was that particular stool”
“where was Detective Vanatter sitting”
“is that on the opposite side of you”
“are you sure”
What the fuck are all these irrelevant questions??? Marcia Clark was boring to the extreme, not to mention ridiculously annoying!!!!
And she was the lead prosecutor????
I think I could have asked the relevant questions in one tenth of the time!!!!!
If you are not a lawyer or a judge, your opinion about her line of questions is irrelevant. Just because you are annoyed doesn't mean she has to adjust her questions to accommodate you.
Some of these questions were ridiculous
OJ tried to get Kato to lie for him, he wasn't home and was trying to get Kato to give him a alibi
and again.
i love Kato he is so funny...I think he's nervous because he wish he didn't have to be involved...he wont't even look over toward the defense side...all that walking why wasn't none of the blood walked/stepped in by none of them
Maybe because they weren't at the house where the murder happened
Plus he was high on coke.
Erin St. apparently you wasn’t listening to the same damn thing I was. Evidently they said there was blood on that property as well so WHEN they walked up to Kato there was NO blood but then miraculously it appeared when they walked later so HOW since you know? Don’t comment under my post if you don’t know what I’m saying or what your talking about!!!
Kato was definitely comic relief during this never-ending, depressing trial.
He's nervous because he knows more than what he told the court and the Jury under oath. He saw OJ himself when he went and looked behind the house after hearing the thumps. He's admitted it to people he knows. That's the real reason he only went part of the way back to investigate the noise. Oh he was scared alright. Scared because he saw a naked OJ who ditched his clothes come out of the daggumed bushes and say "go let the limo driver in you id!ot!"
lol, darden's literally rubbing off on her 56:14
Lmao I'm dead 🤣
What the heck does that have to do with 2 innocent people being brutally murdered
So.... Vanatter does take notes?
Interesting interlude there, and a bit telling imo. First KK says Weiztman called and he thought OJ was also on the line. Was asked, and didn’t remember a 3rd person in on the call. But suddenly, he remembers Kathy Randa, and insinuates she may have initially made the call. Seems a bit deceptive to me? That must’ve been a very interesting conversation.
If there was blood in the Foyer, why did they muddy the crime scene by letting people in?
Lol, keyboardist tough guys. This guy thrust into high profile case with relationships with both victims and accused while being grilled by Marcia!👌 This poor guy did well all things considered.
Yeah like, imagine you're in your 20s and you're just having a chill, lowkey night, just like any other night and then suddenly your exact moments of the last 10ish hours become the most defining moments of your entire life.
Fuck that. I can barely remember what I've done in the last 5 hours. If someone walked in and said "Robert Downey Jr just murdered 5 people outside your house. Where were you?" I'd be fucked.
O.J TOOK KATO TO MACDONLDS TO TRY AND CREATE AND ALIBI FOR HIMSELF, BUT NOBODY KNOWS WHERE SIMPSON WAS FROM 9;35 till 10:55 thats almost 1 and 1/2 hour to murder nicole and ron bingo GUILTY!
Didn't Oj call Paula around 10.00
Hell no
Can not remember e time this is crazy Marcia dame old question
Where were you Dominick between 9:35 and 10:55? BINGO, GUILTY
Kato asked to go with OJ,OJ didn't ask him to come
I always wondered why he had a Van Halen hair-do? ....and how the hell he schmoozed his way into OJ's guest house with it.
Oj offered it. Likely out of jealousy as Kato had first asked Nicole to live in her extra guest house. She said yes and he was going to pay like five hundred a month to live there, but Oj offered him to live in his bungalow for free. You realize they were all friends and buds right? And OJ offered it....not schmoozed.
You should actually listen to the trial and get your own question answered.
It was the 90s in Southern CA. Everybody had hair like that. Kato was practically a clone. I live there and I remember…I loved that hair! 😂
I never believed Kato. But I believe his original story.
His story behind closed doors is quite different than his story under oath. I gotta hand it to him. He didn't exactly "lie". He just didn't tell you everything he really "saw" when he and looked behind the house after hearing the thumps.
@@sdsstewardwhat did he originally say about that? Not sure I ever heard
@@bassacoustic1549 oh you haven't. Trust me. It's a long story. For a truncated version, there is a vid on my chnnel called "OJ Simpson - A Different Story". It's about 6 or 7 videos from the top. Go check it out.
Poor keto caught in the cross fire.
Marcia, if Kato can't remember move on.
Cmon oj grilled him on what he told the cops I don't beilive that part of the teatimony
Of course he DID come on now and SO would you..geez
we know that OJ is a blabber, I was surprised to hear very little from KK about his conversations with OJ.
true
He's actually smart. And yes Marcia Clark was treating Kato like he was the murderer. Her demeanor contributed to OJ being aquitted.
He loved the attention.
Kato is the furthest thing from smart. Marcia is RIGHT behind him for putting him on the stand.
Smart ? lmbao
I think he’s smart, too. He was in shock, grieving, terrified…Marcia Clark must have made him feel like one wrong word and she’d convict HIM of everything! He’d never been in court, knew nothing about Law. He was an LA party boy being an LA party boy. He probably didn’t know the riots were happening the night they occurred because he was behind some velvet rope with a starlet or two. He was the least equipped person in the entire courthouse to be in the middle of a double murder.
0:56 - 0:58 somewhere... Ok, that was weird. The way Clark says "Defen-daant".. the first time i thought she had just been hanging around Darden too much and being impressionable, (as some people are) but TWICE?? ... seemed deliberate.. i thought the defense were the only ones playing games like that lol
Edit: 1:14:58 and again, i think this is the 4th .. wth
Good grief I don't know how Marsha kept her composure with kato.
Smdh.... I don't know how he kept his composure with her... all of these repetitive, dumb ass, irrelevant questions!! I'm sure the jury was over there asleep by this time!!
I'm surprised she didn't ask what color underwear was he wearing? What type? What size... the brand name, etc...?😖😫🙄
@@Twp205 exactly
Seriously jacki B? I thought he was a very good witness who tried hard to answer her questions honestly.
they saved another riot. they knew he'd cop it in the civil trial. 20 yrs on he wears his karma. poor kids
24:42 objection! Come on Kato, that’s why you thought there was an earthquake cause you were high
Why question Kato about his acting work? She should have focused on the blood drops in the foyer. I think she’s out of questions but is determined to be “longer winded.” 80% of her questions clouds the case.
How did Kato make money ? Because he was having trouble getting acting jobs before the trial right ? Did OJ look after him ?
Also of all those shows he mentioned getting, I don't think any of them actually ended up in production. Like the animated show or the movie with him as the leading man. Probably had something to do with the verdict and the perception that he had sort of helped OJ, or at least not aided the prosecution.
He had odd jobs and savings account.
He was supposed to be on Eek the Cat, but Fox put the kibosh on it later.
Kato is a nice looking guy. He had that Fabio Lanzoni look about him. He could have done romance novel covers.
God, this guy sounds like an 8 year old kid
He is very naive doesn't know much he probably lived a sheltered life
Kato and the thumping thumping thump, and Marcia really??? same friggen questions over and over, little or no answers,,Kato was like🤪🤪🤪🤯🤯🥴🥴🥴
Imo there is just too much staging going on. So they have us belive he killed two people dropped a glove and hat. Went home knocked on katos wall and dropped other glove on purpose? So he is basikally setting himself up and tieing himself to the murders.
He accidentally dropped the gloves..c'mon everyone knows he did it..geez he may as well as admitted it in is book and interview if I'd done it bc he knows he can't be tried again
if he had the other blood soaked glove with him, why wasn't the inside of the bronco a bloody mess vs drops of blood. and by the time he got back to the house wouldn't he realize he had only one glove? wouldn't he make sure not to drop the match to the glove he wore to nicole's. everything else done with precision but then sloppy moves at the same time? i don't think he's 100% innocent either but little things about this case nag at me.
He hid the clothes and the murder weapon forever, to the point they've never been found, but oh unlucky him, he left one glove at the crime scene and then the other exact match at his house. He dropped one at one location and then one at the other, perfectly tying the two together, but hid every other thing including the murder weapon FOREVER
and people believe that is how it happened. Me? not so much.
There are many interviews even on RUclips with Marcia Clark, Mark Furman and others which give MUCH insight to details the public may not have known or paid attention to even with cameras in the courtroom. These answer many questions and provide more details THEY knew/saw that the public was not privy to.
@@amann399
I don't think it matters. The biggest part of everything was how oj had no bruises on his body. The Goldman guy had put up a fight and had his knuckles bruised badley. Whoever killed them was not alone and not oj. Definitely someone that knew oj and his wife and had access to both of their homes. They knew where to go on both property's.
Wtf... vanatter said the kids only made it to the driveway with Al and he told them to leave because it was a crime scene...
both were June 13th However , Vannatter's was in the A.M. , Kailen's was in the P.M....when everyone started gathering there.
Marcia cross examination was textbook what not to do. I could’ve cross examined Kato better than that with no experience.
why she keep clearing her throat
Tanisha Williams she had a cold during trial. It happens.
I wondered why Marcia kept clearing her throat
@@dixiedeed4918 - part of the conspiracy?
Tanisha maybe she has the Corona Virus, just kidding
Cigarette smoker
Never mention brad Roberts
Those questions r irrelevant
He was scared of OJ.