FULL TESTIMONY: Idaho Attorney General investigator Asmir Kararic testifies in Chad Daybell trial

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 май 2024
  • #eastidahonews #daybell #truecrime
    Idaho Attorney General investigator Asmir Kararic testifies in the Chad Daybell trial. Here is her testimony from May 21, 2024.
    Watch in the video player above.
    ► Support East Idaho News: www.eastidahonews.com/donate/
    ► Subscribe to East Idaho News: ruclips.net/user/Eastidahone...
    ► Get East Idaho News merch: www.eastidahonews.com/shop/
    ► Download our free app: marketplace-redirect.doapps.co...
    ► Like us on Facebook: / eastidahonews
    ► Follow us on X: / eastidnews
    ► Follow us on Instagram: / eastidahonews
    ► Subscribe to our free newsletter: www.eastidahonews.com/newslet...

Комментарии • 7

  • @WhistlePuffler
    @WhistlePuffler 19 дней назад

    Wondering how long deliberation will take?

  • @Fancyfox24
    @Fancyfox24 25 дней назад +6

    What nonsense is this? The defense seems to have no witnesses with anything important to say.

    • @aimeefriedman822
      @aimeefriedman822 25 дней назад +2

      Not even one helped Chad. His own kids made the entire family viewed as detached and inhumane even more.

    • @amyboon8541
      @amyboon8541 25 дней назад +2

      I completely agree, Emma is clearing covering and lying for her father. The no emotion and monotone as she answered the questions were clearly rehearsed and lies.. shameful, absolutely shameful

    • @amyboon8541
      @amyboon8541 25 дней назад

      ​@@aimeefriedman822 completely agree.

    • @ainokea911
      @ainokea911 24 дня назад

      Are they going to call witnesses that they let go come back. I read in the comments Melanie Gibb. I didn't listen to this part. But I did here Emma Daybell's name being mention. The prosecution wants to bring her back on.

    • @aimeefriedman822
      @aimeefriedman822 24 дня назад +1

      @@ainokea911 From what I understood listening was there was something in Emma's testimony and questioning , that led to the Prosecution feeling there was an opening to bring up a subject the judge previously said, couldn't be brought up. That would require some man (forget who) to come back and Hermosillo to come back for questioning. The juge said yes to both but also said he could change his mind on point or at the moment, depending upon further questioning.
      It was not just during Emma's questioning, there was a separate issue for bringing back Hermosillo.