Skeptics using Plantinga's argument against skepticism in reverse against believers reminds me of how Bugs Bunny would switch pronouns on others to win the argument, "You!", "no you!", "no me!", "no me!", "Ok, your right"
Naturally speaking, how would the Holy Spirit repair our sensu divinitatis ? Would it be something we could see on a MRI ? I wonder what he would say to such wonderings
Skeptics using Plantinga's argument against skepticism in reverse against believers reminds me of how Bugs Bunny would switch pronouns on others to win the argument, "You!", "no you!", "no me!", "no me!", "Ok, your right"
What is the relationship between "properly basic belief" and common-sense realism?
Naturally speaking, how would the Holy Spirit repair our sensu divinitatis ?
Would it be something we could see on a MRI ?
I wonder what he would say to such wonderings
Is Platinga's argument of basic beliefs related at all to Newman's illative sense (in An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent)?
This guy looks like Count Dankula.
This gentleman has obviously not been in my state. It is questionable how many properly operating minds are actually here.