Wouldn't be just a tech. That era would've punched him in his mouth..Rodman would've punched him in his mouth jus based off what I seen him do Malone fearlessly
Highly underrated team. Glad people are bringing them up. Warriors look around at the West and are overhyping themselves due to their lack of competition. All of this yapping wasn't happening in the Kobe, Dirk Duncan era.
Boston was the number one defense in the league they have the DPOY in Marcus Smart, Williams is an elite defender, Tatum and Brown also really great defender and a defensive coach... Kd play bad in a team without a Point Guard and a real coach... said that Curry against the number one defense average 30 and this warriors aren't even the 20% of the 2017 warriors... Kd in that team with that system is unguardable.
@@dnice4145 bro this Boston Celtic has 2 level DPOY defender and rest of the start are at least on Harper level on defense. That Bulls team got to game 7 against Utah with reggie as their best player… now add to that Kd and Steph and tell how me they could won.
The Bulls had a lot of role players who could hit outside shots. Their effectiveness was somewhat muted in the 90 which was a league where the defense was much tougher. Kukoc, Kerr, Wennington, Longely, etc. were all good outside shooters. In the current environment, those players would be MORE effective today than they were back in the day.
@@Thanosdidtherighthing yes shooting free open shoot... durant, kley and steph are totally on another level... hal of the nba today can shoot +37% on open shot...
No one else caught that he wanted the 98’ team…. he didn’t say 96’ or 93’ he picked the one all the kids do… The one season where MJ ran the regular season without Pippen and was visibly exhausted… Hilarious… I actually don’t think the Dubs win because he does not realize he is picking on one of the best defensive teams ever… Durant is not physical… If it’s old rules he and Curry are getting mugged… It would be a street fight and only one man could score in those conditions… MJ
MJ is not the only one that can score in that condition but the Bulls will win. KD would have both scottie and Rodman in his grill. Steph will have Harper running around trying to stop him and with MJ IQ passing lanes won't be to open. MJ probably would take Klay put of the game with his offense and defense in today's rules. It would be a close game thou
@@kalix975 huh? I don't know what point you're trying to make. Harper and Rodman couldn't be on the same court because of zone defense? How does that make any sense at all? Edited: spelling
Draymond assumes that GS would be the same team without the evolution and development that the game has gone through with the contribution that teams like Bulls and others made. The Bulls would be so much better today than they were in the 90's
@@jayplunks it’s funny because your the only one to mention this yet you get no likes, and nobody cares. they only care about what parts that they want to hear
Maybe, maybe not. But MJ is by leaps and bounds better than Steph Curry, better than KD and better than Klay. All great players. Also I'd take either, Horace Grant and Dennis Rodman over role playing Draymond Green any day of the week.
@@jeffsamuels2539 exactly but if they hand checking bulls by 50 because the warriors don't play defense and the bulls would certainly lock down the warriors they would be in their face the whole game so 3s mean long rebounds and fast break points. The warriors wouldn't stand a chance
No one can stop #23.. Rodman easily could avg. 20+ rebounds, warriors don’t even win 3 peat’s lol 🤣🤣🤣 Warriors soft like butters… Rodman would choked slams big mouth Draymond green….
They're the greatest comeback team in games in NBA history and are currently running by far the best record in winning 1 game away from home per series in playoff history. I can see Bulls winning, I just don't understand how Warriors are soft.
96 Bulls 6 rings two separate 3 peats Best defensive team of all time Pippin best defensive small forward of his era Dennis Rodman best defensive forward of any era Michael Jordan best defensive guard of any era 3 all time defensive hall of famers! Number 1 defensive team of the era It’s not even going to be close The Warriors would fold early Pippin guards Durant physically we all know how Durant responds with physical play and steph will be a turnover machine Jordan would make his life miserable!!!! Rodman gets draymon ejected by halftime!! Ok so I will throw you Golden state guys a bone your only hope would be the klay Thompson vs Ron Harper matchup!!!maybe just maybe klay can score 40ppg making up for steph curry getting entirely exposed and engulfed by Michael Jordan 😹☠️☠️☠️🏀🙀
@@michaelharris1254 He never gonna talk about the best regular season winning team ever because they choked in the finals 😂. That would probably be the team he would be more proud to brag about if they won even if the 2017 was more talented because it woulda been without having to add a top 3 player in the league while having a historic achievement with it. Now that team is held as one of the biggest chokers in the history of sports.
I don't think the Warriors would match up well with the Bulls if this game is played under traditional defensive rules from the past. I think the Warriors would find out real fast that the Bulls will not let this be a glorified shooting practice like most NBA games are today. The Bulls are just too athletic and versatile defenders on the wings that would disrupt Golden State. Also, the Bulls would just score on will on Golden State. I think a hypothetical seven game series the Bulls take this 4-1 or 4-2 at worst. Golden State is dominant in this era because of rule changes that favor offenses It is no different than in football where rules changes have started to favor offenses in that sport also. I would go even further and say that there are many teams in the 1980s and 1990s that were better than the Warriors if traditional defensive rules are allowed.
@@eugenecaldwell9619 the bulls would still win. 3 1st team all defensive players. MJ would get 45ppg. The Bulls so call small line up would match up well with the Warriors. Harper, MJ, Pip, Step and Rodman. No blowouts, but Draymond and however else starts for them are almost self check players. Put Kukoc on Iggy or Draymond, Zaza etc. Rodman on the other simple.
A 73-9 team that got so scared of a team they had down 3-1 they had to add Kd shouldn't be respected at all in nba history, so it's irrelevant if they would beat the Bulls or not. Compare the 16' warriors to the bulls and then stick your chest out draymond
Yeah Kd warriors and warriors are two different teams. Kd warriors top 5 team in modern basketball history Showtime lakers Bird Celtics UnstoppaBulls Kobe Shaq lakers Kd Warriors.
@@kevben706 The fact that you even tried to compare that scenario lets me know how much a clown you are. Mj was in the midst of a comeback where he only played 17 regular season games and wasn't in basketball shape. They then traded will purdue for rodman after horace grant left for rebounding purposes. Rodman is nowhere near the player kd is, he's not better than the bulls best player, and he was traded there and didn't sign in free agency. Again, you're a clown
I'm a huge fan of the Warriors, recent past (with Durant) and present, but my money would be on the Bulls. To my knowledge the Warriors have never faced a defense with the talent and prowess of Jordan, Pippin, and Rodman. Also, consider what the Bulls were able to accomplish inside, with their 2 or 3 interchangeable big men who gave them plenty of points and rebounds, with the luxury of 18 accumulated fouls, if necessary.
I'm sorry but Steph, KD and Klay is way too much offense to handle for that Bulls team. The Pacers in 97-98 gave the Bulls all they could handle and that Pacers team was not even close to as talented as the 2017 Warriors.
@@marcbenitez5493 What bigs inside? Luc Longley and Bill Wennington weren't offensive threats like that. MJ was going to get his regardless. But he and Pip are not outgunning Klay, Steph and KD.
@@Hopper830 Here's my thing. In 2017, the only serious competition the Warriors had was Spurs and their best player got injured in G1 when the Spurs were up by a lot. Every other team in the West had injuries. Does that mean the Spurs would've won? I don't know, but reason people talk about '17 as being a goat team is because they only lost 1 game (same as '01 Lakers). If the series even goes 6, no one is saying that's the best team of all time. In 2018, that same GS team BARELY beat the Rockets. They also lost multiple games in earlier rounds to teams who were far inferior on paper. Then, of course, they beat the brakes off Cavs (their easiest series imo). You're telling me, that a team that never (and I mean NEVER) lost a series with homecourt, had an 8 year stretch of going 24-1 in playoff series, never lost a series when it was favored, and by that time had either 3, 4, or 5 rings is going to be worse than the Rockets? In '98, everyone had a great chance to knock off the Bulls cause drama and injuries, and STILL couldn't do it. Every other dynasty team in history has been knocked off for some reason or another, but the one team that didn't is going to be worse than the Rockets? Make it make sense besides you like the names on paper. Cause names on paper said 2016 or 2011 shouldn't have been close. Names on paper says Lakers should've made the playoffs last year. Names on paper says Brooklyn shouldn't have been swept last year. Names on paper said Mavs should've lost to the Suns. Cases of "names on paper" happen so often every year, it seems like it's a dumb way to judge. Difference with Bulls is there was NEVER a time when their "names on paper" disappointed. Only other team in NBA history that might have that same thing is Russell's Celtics.
A lesser version of the Warrriors literally just a beat a bettter defense than the bulls. 3 of greatest shooters ever, 2 of the greatest scorers ever. One of the best Defenders ever. Another elite defender in Iggy. Y’all need to stop with this Jordan idolatry
It's funny how he told durant they didn't need him but now he's using the 2017 warriors to compare to the Bulls. If KD wasn't needed why not compare the 2015 warriors to bulls? Bc he knows without KD they'd be destroyed.
They didnt need him to win a championship because they are that great. But to add kd on that team? Is a cheat code. Thats easy to understand. And the 2017 gsw is already in the conversation for the greatest team of all time. Of course he will use that team.
Drop the 2017 Warriors into the way-back time machine and have them play in the NBA Finals against the 83' 76ers, 84' Celtics, the 85' Lakers, the 89' Pistons, any 90's Bulls championship teams, and the early 2000 Lakers playing by the rules of that time period, and the Warriors don't win $hit!!! They would get beat up and bullied right off the court crying to mom and pop...those guys are mean, they hit me!
Truth...though I'd substitute the '86 Celtics with the healthy Bill Walton they had. That team could make it a half court game with the Warriors and the front court for the Celtics would probably be shooting about 70%...they would be picked apart without mercy.
The problem with that argument is Steph knows Jordan would clamp him, so he would never play iso. He would give the ball up to Draymond and start running around. You think Jordan or Pippen are going to be chasing him and Klay around for 10-15 seconds every possession fighting over screens? The Golden State offence forces an opposing defences to have near perfect communication to make sure they don't blow coverages or miss rotations. Teams of the previous generations haven't seen anything like it.
@@amrithbharadwaj4945 yea they would unless they switch everything then what Cavs didn’t switch anything and had no where near the defenders MJs bulls have
@@lebronsthebest6 The teams in 90s didn't switch either. So if the Bulls can magically learn how to play that level of off ball defence, then I guess Steph and KD could also magically put on some extra muscle without going to the gym and play better defence and deal with the physicality
I rly don’t understand how people can go back and watch the games back then and say they think those guys can beat the best teams of today especially the 2017 Warriors. The game is always evolving and getting better but older people love there era and will never accept that guys today are sooo much more talented and skilled then guys before.
@@nickbutler7550 is it not true are guys not more talented nowadays then 30 years ago. This goes for any sports Football, Baseball, hockey, soccer even track guys are running much faster now then they were before it’s called evolution so yes if u pluck a team from 30 years ago and put them against a team now then they would lose. If u give them time to evolve in this era then maybe it would be different but then the whole Bulls team would have to change cause there not gonna have some of the guys on there team because it wouldn’t fit this era. This argument is dumb in general but overall a team back then wouldn’t be able to beat a team now because guys are more talented now.
@@marcusyosif1041 different doesn't equal better. The ony difference is that there are more three-pointers taken. Don't get caught up in the moment. The Bulls would bully them. This new Era is soft and fragile. Draymond himself would get worked by Rodman. Nice try though youngster. Good day to you.
The Utah jazz starting backcourt averaged 20 points a game combined and took the bulls 6. I promise you steph and klay won't averaged 20 points combined. Warriors beating the bulls man. Sorry
@@vitezjura nope but they do have kevin durant who averaged way more points in the finals that Malone did. Sorry but the warriors have way better players than the jaz did who took them 6
@@jermainelaw1077 Is that how we do it? The tempo and scores were slower in those 90ties finals compared to how GS and Cavaliers played to someone avereging more doesn't tell the whole story. Malone was also MVP player averaging 30 while being a lot more physically intimidating and dirty than Durant. They also had stockton who was their main offensive setup guy and one of the best playmakers and for shooting they had Hornacek. Now didnt the rockets with CP3 and Harden take this GS 7 games? So I guess they are better than 90 Bulls too by your logic. Or maybe, all Bulls have to do is put harper and Kerr on Curry to harass him whole game like they did vs Stockton, let Rodman or Pippen handle Durant and Jordan Klay and see what happens to their offense.
@@vitezjura the tempo of the game was different, but that didn't make Stockton and jeff h average 10 a game. Granted they were older, but were much easier for the bulls to defend. The rockets did take the 2018 warriors to seven, but like I've said on so many occasions the rockets style of play was the only way to beat the warriors. Jack up a bunch of 3's and hope they fall. Think about it, they missed 27 str8 against the warriors but never switched up they're style of play. The lived and died with d'antoni's system. No one else had the talent to beat them but only one team played like the rockets and it almost worked. The 2017 warriors were on another planet, and way more talented than tha jazz team. I get that jordan is the goat and a mythical creature but thinking they could have stopped that 2017 warriors is crazy. They would have triple teamed mj(no illegal defense in today's game) and forced the rest to beat them. They would have played a box and 1 or triangle and 2 like the raptors did against curry once when durant was out and klay in game 3 and 6.
@@jermainelaw1077 Well lets look at it this way: rebounding - advantage Bulls, post game - advantage Bulls, defense - advantage Bulls, 3 point shooting - advantage GS Warriors. Attacking the basket and driving - advantage Bulls, dunking over people - advantage Bulls, playmaking - advantage Bulls. Are you serious? You think having better 3 point shooters is enough for GS to win? You want me to continue? Physicality - advantage Bulls, playing through contact - advantage Bulls, coaching - advantage Bulls, the bench - advantage Bulls. Being more clutch - advantage Bulls, taking it personal - advantage Bulls, mental fortitude - advantage Bulls. Dominating the decade - advantage Bulls.
It's amazing that the real star on the Warriors doesn't run his mouth, but the weakest link runs his big mouth. At this point Draymond is desperately seeking recognition.
@@jayplunks When Curry and Klay were injured last season (not the immediate past season) Draymond failed miserably. On the other hand, when Draymond was injured, Curry singlehandedly carried the team. Put a really great defender, facilitator and someone who scores at least 10 points per game and the Warriors will walk over teams. Take Draymond to any other team and his career would have been a joke.
@@harryale 2020 Green was playing with Rookies and Wiggin. 2yrs laters those same rookies and Wiggin won the chip in under 7games arch series. Lebron took HOF talent to the 12th seed but because he can score. But dump on Green tho
I'll take the Bulls but none of these arguments prove anything. Yes MJ never lost in the finals but neither did the Warriors with KD (healthy). And saying that today's teams were baffled by the Golden State offence but that the Bulls were used to it is just false. Nobody ever extended the defence like Steph. The geometry of the court in a half court set itself has changed. You didn't have to guard shooters at 35-40 feet. Very few teams played at this pace, very few teams had such a pick and roll heavy offence and rarely did any team play five out or had such off ball movement. That the Bulls had three of the best defenders in their position is the only good argument that was made.
It all comes down to which rules they will be allowed to play. The NBA changed the rules so that you could play tougher defense in the playoffs and we see what happens to KD Kyrie Irving and James Harden when other teams are allowed to play some defense they all look mediocre in this year's playoffs. The same thing will happen to Steph and clay if you allowed to play tough defense against them.
@@gerominomohican1565 And on the flip side, the lack of physicality and lesser contact has allowed more freedom of movement and the game is faster and the athletes are conditioned for that. So, if KD and Steph wouldn't be able to contend the physicality that previously existed, then I could also argue that nobody from the 90s would be able to keep up with Steph and Klay's movement and stop them raining down 3's
I like your last sentence. Their defense is soo overlooked. And more importantly, what's most overlooked? Coaching. Phil would have killed Kerr. Wait.. damn...Kerr was on the team then 😂
@@amrithbharadwaj4945 True the game was much slower pace back then. The players would have gotten much leaner to be more athletic in todays game. Todays game is very simple, if you make more 3s you win the majority of the time. Those bigger players like pippen, barkley, malone, mourning shaq etc. would have man handled alot of these skinny wig players. The guards of that era were tough asf as well.
@@gerominomohican1565 it really doesn't come down to that in this case. Of course there would have to be adjustments either way but I dont care what rules you use that Warriors team ain't running the bulls of the court or the jazz.
@@dpistons149 How? They took 12 3s per game in 98. How could they possibly beat the Warriors taking 12 3s? Stay at home on Kerr, don't guard Rodman, don't guard Harper, don't guard Longley outside of 15 feet, send doubles at Jordan in the post. 2017 Warriors aren't losing to swing-swing to Toni Kukoc.
@@DaggerMan11 With defense. Pippen on KD. 6 ft 6 Harper on Klay. Jordan on Curry. Rodman on Draymond. Rodman could double of Draymond. They were the greatest defensive team of all time or at least one of them. Keep it close and let Jordan win it at the end.
@@dpistons149 But defense is a team game, not about individual matchups. How will the Bulls defend PnR when one or more of Kerr, Kukoc, Longley, or Wennington is involved? Will they trap? How will they guard the short roll? In the 90s teams didn't have to cover 400+ square feet of territory on 4 on 3s. If Rodman doubles off Draymond, how will Chicago defend DHOs on the perimeter? Again, that's not something they had to do. And if Jordan has to chase Steph around for 40 minutes, that's going to take a toll on his offense. He never had to defend a player like Steph.
@@jooson2826 Tf are you talking about? At least 3 players averaged 20 on the 2017 Warriors. The 2022 Warriors are more similar to the Bulls than the 2017 team.
I’m 44 and I have been watching basketball since 1985 (Sixers Fan) and the best team I’ve ever saw is the 2017 Golden State Warriors. This isn’t recency bias it’s truly how I feel. I’m not sure who would win. Oh yeah Mr. Triple Single Draymond needs to be quiet. I’m tired of him.
I have been watching basketball as long as you have and I can honestly say that I have seen multiple teams from the 1980s and 1990s and the Lakers from the early 2000s that were better than the Warriors especially when traditional defense was allowed. Golden State is clearly the best team under the modern rules but if they had to play under the old rules I can see them struggling against multiple talented teams from years gone by.
Come on. It's Draymond Green. What the hell else is he going to say No? The bulls would destroy us by 20. Of course he's going to put over his team like this. This is not much to write home about. I'm honestly getting sick and tired of hearing about the bulls in about who they would beat and who they wouldn't beat.
The bulls would not beat them by 20 😂 who’s scoring besides Jordan? Pippen was an average scorer at best if you watched basketball (equivalent of Kevin Love w/ Bron offensively). If the bulls were to beat warriors they would’ve had to locked em up w/ physical defense (which is almost impossible because of spacing Warriors allowed). I agree w/ Draymond on this case.
Bulls in 5. The 17 Warriors almost lost to James Harden 🤣 Listen MJ would avg 60 points. Rodman avg 30 rebounds per game Pippen avg quadruple double: 20p, 10 reb, 15 assists, 10 steals and 5 blocks And KD announces he's joining the Bulls after game 5 at the press conference
That’s not true. The 17 Warriors almost ran the table. The only playoff loss they had THAT YEAR was to the Cavs in the FINALS Warriors VS Blazers 4-0 Warriors VS Jazz 4-0 Warriors Vs Spurs 4-0 Warriors VS Cavs 4-1
Draymond has a podcast so everything he says is to get clicks and an instant reaction. He is so overrated as a player and delusional to think he’s as good as Steph or Clay but he knows how to stir the pot.
Shooting 3s doesn't mean making 3s. Pippen is eliminating whoever he guards. Rodman and Jordan are doing the same. At the same time MJ is hanging 40+ every game. The Bulls easily win by 4 possessions.
So you telling me that Rodman gets put in a high pick and roll with curry curry won’t cook him mj chasing curry and klay won’t get tried cause they won’t stop moving so all the bull is just super human and have unlimited stamina no and these player is used to get double team so one all time great defender gon to just take him out the game no does make sense then we don’t even talk about the bench full of shooter on the warriors you can’t leave nobody open and it’s non stop moving they gon get tried and get smoked
@@kapxlotpj5008 You telling me that you believe Rodman would struggle in a high pick in roll is you telling me you don't know bball to the extend you think and/or never watched him defend. Rodman is one of the first to be able to legitimately guard 1-5.
@@blakhistury 1-5 in the 90s not today's players were there's movement better handles and shooting were you have to guard 5 feet beyond the 3pt line constantly.
Jordan will shut down Curry Pippen would limit KD Ron Harper would limit Thompson Rodman will frustrate Draymond etc. Ain't no one on the warriors shutting down Mike. I get it iggy Is a good defensive guy but Jordan would have did him in. And the bulls had shooters Kerr Kukoc jud B etc. To match that. You all don't get it do you. The bulls had the best player in the Game with no Debate All Defensive player in Pippen the Best Rebounder in Rodman and all of them made the all Defensive 1st team. Kerr had the best shooting percentage.
MJ never lost in the Finals, he was smart enough to loose in the first round. I guess in your minds that is better( better to never qualify in the olympics than get silver medal)
you miss the point when people make that statement. Its similar to a clutch gene concept....but i dont expect you to understand lol with that stupid comment.
Just from a starter point of view, I’m taking Warriors players 3 to 2 in the lineup. You can’t make me believe the greatest and 2nd greatest shooter, with the supposed greatest scorer ever or best since Jordan couldn’t beat the bulls.
It all comes down to which rules they will be used if they played. The NBA changed the rules this year so that you could play tougher defense in the playoffs and we see what happens to KD Kyrie Irving and James Harden when other teams are allowed to play tough defense, they all looked mediocre in this year's playoffs. The same thing will happen to Steph and clay if you allowed to play tough defense against them.
I think the Warriors would've had an even bigger advantage with 90s rules. Obviously modern teams are much more adept at running PnR. Imagine Steph/Durant or Steph/Draymond PnR with 90s illegal defense rules in place. It would be an open shot for one of the best shooters ever literally every time. And teams didn't switch hunt in the 90s. If they wanted the ball in Jordan's hands, he'd have to deal with Iguodala all game. And Iguodala is allowed to be physical on Jordan. Good luck. Name one defender in the 90s that Jordan faced who matched Iguodala's combination of size, athleticism, physicality, motor and IQ?
@@SuperSonic_868 Answer my question: Name one defender in the 90s that Jordan faced who matched Iguodala's combination of size, athleticism, physicality, motor and IQ? Instead of being condescending, how about you talk basketball for a change?
@@DaggerMan11 how bout Dennis Rodman, Alvin Robertson, Rolando Blackman, Gerald Wilkins, Nick Anderson, Stacey Augmon, Eddie Jones, Ron Harper, and others. He would have no problem with Andre Iguodala. Mike would average over 40 on the Warriors.
@@bcjclj But you're just naming players. These aren't actually players who answer the question. Dennis Rodman didn't have Iguodala's lateral movement in the 90s. He was exclusively defending bigs by then. Robertson is 6'3" and peaked in the 80s. Wilkins was a poor defender; you're just naming him because he's tall. Nick Anderson was also a poor defender, had short arms and was a middling lateral mover. Stacey Augmon had nowhere near Iguodala's strength, motor, or IQ. Eddie Jones and Harper both weighed no more than 200 lbs, and Harper's lateral movement was compromised by his knee injury. Iguodala is around 225.
I hate how these guys cherry pick examples to make their case like how the Bulls swept Shaq and Penny's team; the Penny that was just in his third year. They make it seem like he was an all-time great in his prime that was swept. Or saying that Jordan's 6-0 in the Finals, so he's probably going to remain undefeated if he played in any other Finals, and the Bulls had to go through all these great teams to win it all. Please, Jordan couldn't get out of the East the first 6 years of his career (3 of which was with Pippen). I don't care if Pippen was only a 3 year starter; in this equation he was an all time great like Penny was. Only reason Jordan is undefeated is because all the teams that kept beating him in the East got old, and the great Western teams all got old too. If Worthy and Scott had been healthy during Jordan's first Finals, he may be 5-1.
To be fair Penny was on pace to becoming one of the best players of all time. Also, in MJs early years the East was stacked with some of the best teams of all time such as the Celtics. That is why context and understanding the history of what was going on at the time is paramount.
@@jasonh5547 that's my exact point. Being on pace to become something is not being something, and they are using Jordan's Bulls sweeping the Shaq and Penny led Magic as a prime example of how unstoppable the Bulls . It's an example of them using history without context to craft a narrative that's untrue. And again, they were saying how stacked the East was, but in reality, the East had gotten old, and MJ couldn't beat the great teams of the 80's, and he feasted on the good teams of the 90's.
@@Hienieken Penny was already arguably one of the best perimeter players in the league and was a superstar by then. I have always felt that if the MJ Bulls had been out of the equation and Shaq had stayed in Orlando and Penny had not had injury issues that Orlando would have been a dynasty. I will say this that the Bulls in 1996 were unstoppable. MJ as GOAT arguably had his biggest will to win drive that year.
Depends on which era's rules. The rules of today wouldn't allow the bulls to play high defense. MJ and Scottie would foul out in the first quarter of today's league. Golden State would out shoot the Bulls hands down. On another note, if MJ had the greatest team of all time then how is He the GOAT?? That means He was supposed to go 6-0. I don't see the hype of the 6-0 argument if you have the best team.
You still can play defense, did you watch the Celtics this season? Today's rules would make Jordan go SAVAGE on those drag queens. And for your other question, Jordan had the greatest team of all time because of his presence on those teams: The presence of the best and greatest and most dominant player of all time.
@@TheLionaaa In MJ's era you could get away with hand checking. MJ would hold the offense player in place using his off hand and swat at the ball. That wouldn't fly in today's league. Again MJ would foul out in the 1st quarter. So many steals back them would've been called foul today. This henders players today from giving their all on defense because they are trying hard to avoid a foul call.
His team was overwhelming better than any team in the 90s. Pacers had 1 HOFer, Knicks had 1, The Cavs had no HOFers, The 76ers had 1 HOFer, The Suns had 1 HOFer, The raptors had no all stars. The only noteworthy oponent was the Jazz w/ 2 HOFers. Jordan had a cake walk in this 90s era. Lebron faced teams w/ at least 3-4 HOFers and every team w/ at least 2. This is why I have Lebron as my Goat.
Wtf are you talking about. MJ is the best player they weren’t the best without MJ And yes it comes down to rules. Playing with hand check, bulls win by 20. Playing without hand check Jordan scores 70 and bulls win by 20
I'd have to disagree with these guys, simply because they are middle aged men trying to hold on to the past and keep it sacred. Those Bulls would have gotten ran out the gym. Plus that version of the Bulls were old. Michael Jordan was 35, and the 2017 Warriors were young greyhounds.
You say that like there weren't teams in the 90s that were putting up over 110 PPG. 1993: Highest scoring offensive team was Charles Barkley's Suns at 113.4 PPG. 2017: Highest scoring offensive team was Steph Curry's Warriors at 113.5 PPG. '91 Nuggets were dropping 119.9 PPG '92 Warriors throwing up 118.7 PPG And since they were doing it with far fewer 3's, that means MORE running up and down the court.
@@johndarius18 Nobody is questioning Jordan, but his supporting cast would get clobbered. Ron Harper had bad knees and could barely jump, Dennis Rodman can't shoot, and Scottie Pippen would get killed by Kevin Durant. Durant is a matchup nightmare for any player in the history of the game. So let's not elevate these guys as the messiah on all of basketball just because you have this love affair with Jordan. Yes, Jordan would get his numbers, but the Bulls never seen offense like this before. Pippen admitted himself Durant can't be stopped. Rodman would foul out trying to stop Durant.
@@jameswarner300 Jason Tatum & the Celtics stopped Durant. In fact they accomplished this by playing a 90's style of physical defense! Surely this destroys your argument.
all those bigs and star players chris is talking about were on separate teams. calling their names in bunches makes it seem more loaded than what it was. truth is a lot of em needed more help
Durant Klay and Steph will have Bulls players running thru screens all game. I think Klay and Draymond match up well with Jordan and Pippen. While KD will have to go at it with Rodman which is no east feat. But Steph Curry is in this game. Warriors just seem to much to handle. Steph and Durant are elite shot creators and off ball scorers. Klay might be the BEST off ball scorer. 39 points on like 6 dribbles or something stupid like that. Warriors were a glitch in the system
stick to zone to force them to make outside shots rodman on offense would be a liability just play box and one on jordon Draymond and Klay can double him without worrying about rodman making shots . Jordon would be forced into facilitating to pippen lol and we know hes not a great scorer. even if Jordon has a big game, he will be tired by the 4th 98 jordon was much older you could see that in the Utah jazz series as it took everything, he had to muster up 40 points
Once again, Michael Jordan is so mythologized that he's become a superhero for middle aged men. And the bulls might as well be the Avengers with the way people talk about them. 2017 Warriors would absolutely beat the Bulls. Stop it.
Bro. Michael Jordan might as well be Zeus to these guys. If you never did any research and only listened to the old heads, you'd think MJ never lost a game.
Look folks , there's no damn way the 90s Lakers , Blazers , Suns , Sonics , Jazz , or Magic even compare to the 2 3 4 or 5 All Star 3 ball Sharp Shooting Superteams like the 1999 - 2017 Spurs , 2011 Mavs , 2012 - 2016 Thunder , 2004 or 2005 Pistons , 2008 - 2010 Lakers , 2008 - 2010 Celtics , 2011 - 2014 Heat , 2015 - 2019 / 2022 Warriors . The Warriors lost to a Great team / Great Player Lebron James in the 2016 Finals folks . The 2015 - 2018 Cavs weren't the suck 92 Blazers . The 2015 - 2018 Cavs could have won 4 Straight Finals against any other team if it weren't for the Warriors being there 4 Straight Finals in those years . Let's not act like Jordan ever faced the same team with an All Time NBA GOAT candidate in the Finals 4 Straight years . The 2016 / 73 - 9 Warriors were the Greatest Team ever to not win a Ring . Major Injuries derailed them in the Finals primarily . The 2017 Warriors are the Greatest Superteam , ever going 16 - 1 in the Post Season . They won 65 games , they led in Offense and Defense all Season . They had the Best All Around Shooting / Defending Backcourt ever in Curry , Thompson . They had 3 of the Greatest Shooters Ever / Curry , Klay , Durant . They had a Top 6th man / 2 Way Player Andre Iguadala . They had a Top DPOY candidate from 2015 - 2017 / 2016 DPOY Winner Draymond Green . They had 3 Good all Around Centers in Green , McGee , Looney that could Score , Rebound , or Defend well . They had the Greatest Small Ball Death Lineup of All Time / Curry Klay Durant Iguadala Green . They had a loaded Bench of Good All Around Players that could have been Starters on other teams . There's nobody on the 90s Bulls that could have covered or Shot Blocked KD's Jumpers or 3 ball . The Bulls weren't good enough defensively to chase the Splash Bros or Durant around for 48 minutes . Luc Longley would be on an island in Pick N Roll switches covering Curry on 3s ? That would be an automatic bucket for Curry on 3s or to the Bucket for layups .There's no damn way Jordan or Pippen are dunking on a prime KD , Green , or McGee either as Shot Blockers in the Paint . Who on the 90s Bulls are stopping McGee or KD Lob dunks ?
So why didn’t the 2017 Warriors beat the all time record of 96 bulls or the 2016 warriors 😂. What space do you have to shoot for the Warriors with Harper Jordan Pippen and Rodman locking you down
I grew up watching 90s basketball, but i'm not a 90s fanboy. The reality is the difference in spacing and style of play would be huge. Anyone who says different is wishful thinking. The Bulls played in an era where 6 3s a game was considered a lot for a TEAM. There is no evidence they would be able to defend a team with 3 prolific 3 point shooters.
The warriors won 2 championships and went 73-9 and got to the without Kevin Durant which was their best player. The warriors with Kevin Durant were untouchable without an injury all this bs 90s nonsense about the rules is a tired argument.
The bulls wouldn’t be able to keep up with golden state they got 3 scorers who can go for 30 every night bulls only got mj as only real scorer yeah they defense was great but the spacing and movement with 3 main guys who can shoot like that they never faced anybody as close to gs.
Draymond is the gift that continues to give. Warriors wouldn't win. Bulls better defensively & would limit 3pt shooting of Steph/Klay. Draymond must believe Bulls were just about the Triangle Offense, but them was was a beast on the break! Jordan & Pippen on the wings was a nightmare for opposing teams. Draymond would be a non-factor defensively & self check on the offensive end. Bulls in 6
Draymond would be watching from the locker room every game after he got his second tech against Rodman 😂
In the first half of the first quarter
@@TheLionaaa Ohhh the mind games he would play 😂.
Wouldn't be just a tech. That era would've punched him in his mouth..Rodman would've punched him in his mouth jus based off what I seen him do Malone fearlessly
@@mpoydras95 Rodman would be smart enough to get him to punch him in the mouth and get him suspended lol.
@@datsapaddlin6449 true..he was a professional physical and mental agitator lol
Draymond is pretty confident he can beat Jordan and the Bulls with his triple single.
🤣🤣🤣Is that you Charles Barkley?
I don’t even think the 2017 warriors beat the 2004 Spurs.
Highly underrated team. Glad people are bringing them up. Warriors look around at the West and are overhyping themselves due to their lack of competition. All of this yapping wasn't happening in the Kobe, Dirk Duncan era.
If Jason Tatum did that to Durant, I'd hate to see what Pippen or Rodman would do to him.
Boston was the number one defense in the league they have the DPOY in Marcus Smart, Williams is an elite defender, Tatum and Brown also really great defender and a defensive coach... Kd play bad in a team without a Point Guard and a real coach... said that Curry against the number one defense average 30 and this warriors aren't even the 20% of the 2017 warriors... Kd in that team with that system is unguardable.
@@matteoughetti1320 that Celtics team couldn't hold a candle defensively to any bulls team from the 90s.
@@dnice4145 bro this Boston Celtic has 2 level DPOY defender and rest of the start are at least on Harper level on defense. That Bulls team got to game 7 against Utah with reggie as their best player… now add to that Kd and Steph and tell how me they could won.
@@matteoughetti1320 The Bulls has three DPOY level defenders: Jordan, Pippen AND Rodman. Before we even get to Harper.
Durant is old and coming off an injury. This is like saying the LeBron that lost to the Suns last year is the same as LeBron in 2013.
The Bulls had a lot of role players who could hit outside shots. Their effectiveness was somewhat muted in the 90 which was a league where the defense was much tougher.
Kukoc, Kerr, Wennington, Longely, etc. were all good outside shooters.
In the current environment, those players would be MORE effective today than they were back in the day.
I think a lot of people are stuck in the past and don't understand how much the game evolved
Add Jud Buechler who shot over 40% from 3-point range in 4 different seasons while also being a very reliable mid-range shooter for the Bulls.
@@koraanjamar how many points did he average?
@@kholiday456 I mean Kerr technically has the highest 3pt% in nba history lol
@@Thanosdidtherighthing yes shooting free open shoot... durant, kley and steph are totally on another level... hal of the nba today can shoot +37% on open shot...
Yea he just picks the worst version of the bulls vs the best version of the warriors. Come on bro lmao that's an unfair comparison
I agree with you Jordan carried that 98 squad thru that run. Pippen's back was a mess that season.
No one else caught that he wanted the 98’ team…. he didn’t say 96’ or 93’ he picked the one all the kids do… The one season where MJ ran the regular season without Pippen and was visibly exhausted… Hilarious… I actually don’t think the Dubs win because he does not realize he is picking on one of the best defensive teams ever… Durant is not physical… If it’s old rules he and Curry are getting mugged… It would be a street fight and only one man could score in those conditions… MJ
MJ is not the only one that can score in that condition but the Bulls will win. KD would have both scottie and Rodman in his grill. Steph will have Harper running around trying to stop him and with MJ IQ passing lanes won't be to open. MJ probably would take Klay put of the game with his offense and defense in today's rules. It would be a close game thou
He mentioned the '98 Bulls because he was watching the '98 Bulls.
@@choosenone20901 harper can't share the court with rodman, zone defense exist
@@kalix975 huh? I don't know what point you're trying to make. Harper and Rodman couldn't be on the same court because of zone defense? How does that make any sense at all?
Edited: spelling
@@jonathandepue629 I agree, the zone would actually make playing defense easier.
Draymond assumes that GS would be the same team without the evolution and development that the game has gone through with the contribution that teams like Bulls and others made. The Bulls would be so much better today than they were in the 90's
Thank you
Draymond said after "this is why its dumb to compare eras" .....That is what these guys left out.
@@jayplunks it’s funny because your the only one to mention this yet you get no likes, and nobody cares. they only care about what parts that they want to hear
@@williamgray9692 I seen no one talking about it too and was straight baffled lol
That’s not the point. Take the 90s bulls as they are and take the 2017 warriors as they are…who wins. That simple
Maybe, maybe not. But MJ is by leaps and bounds better than Steph Curry, better than KD and better than Klay. All great players. Also I'd take either, Horace Grant and Dennis Rodman over role playing Draymond Green any day of the week.
Depends on the rules. If they playing with hand check bulls win by 20. If they not playing with hand check then Jordan scores 70 and bulls win by 30
This is cap. You acting like 1 player, Jordan, neutralizes all the other players on the Warriors team.
@@jeffsamuels2539 exactly but if they hand checking bulls by 50 because the warriors don't play defense and the bulls would certainly lock down the warriors they would be in their face the whole game so 3s mean long rebounds and fast break points. The warriors wouldn't stand a chance
@@tari8134 I never said that. MJ is a better individual player than any of them. That's what I meant.
@@eightiesbaby1980 the warriors do play defense lmao
No one can stop #23.. Rodman easily could avg. 20+ rebounds, warriors don’t even win 3 peat’s lol 🤣🤣🤣 Warriors soft like butters… Rodman would choked slams big mouth Draymond green….
They're the greatest comeback team in games in NBA history and are currently running by far the best record in winning 1 game away from home per series in playoff history. I can see Bulls winning, I just don't understand how Warriors are soft.
PREACH!!!
zone defense stopping 23
@@kalix975 pippen,Jordan and Phil Jackson and Rodman are to smart to be stopped by zone defense
@@practiceyourart they don't have toughness and all they do is shoot 3s and Rodman would have dismantled draymond green
Nostalgia is a hell of a drug
96 Bulls 6 rings two separate 3 peats
Best defensive team of all time
Pippin best defensive small forward of his era
Dennis Rodman best defensive forward of any era
Michael Jordan best defensive guard of any era
3 all time defensive hall of famers!
Number 1 defensive team of the era
It’s not even going to be close
The Warriors would fold early
Pippin guards Durant physically we all know how Durant responds with physical play and steph will be a turnover machine Jordan would make his life miserable!!!!
Rodman gets draymon ejected by halftime!! Ok so I will throw you Golden state guys a bone your only hope would be the klay Thompson vs Ron Harper matchup!!!maybe just maybe klay can score 40ppg making up for steph curry getting entirely exposed and engulfed by Michael Jordan 😹☠️☠️☠️🏀🙀
You’re showing your old age Lionel.
I would say that too my grandma and come to realize that it was wisdom
@@user-gi7ec6ss7t and yet you have nothing but emotions. Just like most dudes raised today like females.
@@malnorfleet4925 I’m much older than you think. You wouldn’t know it though. I’m not living in the past.
@@malnorfleet4925 so no I wasn’t raised today like females. What the hell you talking about? Saying anything.
The 4th option on the team is talking the most smack. 😂
May not even be the 4th 🤣
@@2Faded247 Shaun Livingston used to get more plays ran for him than Draymond lmfaoo
@@princealirogers exactly bro! 🤣🤣
@@charlesislaw nah
4th option is getting his statue. Keep crying
How about your 73 win team vs the 72 win Bulls Draymond 😂. I wonder why he don’t talk about that team much 🤔
Facts
Maybe because he said the 2017 team was better genius 😅
@@michaelharris1254 That 17' team is irrelevant though. Draymond should be comparing the team that broke the Bulls's record
@@michaelharris1254 He never gonna talk about the best regular season winning team ever because they choked in the finals 😂. That would probably be the team he would be more proud to brag about if they won even if the 2017 was more talented because it woulda been without having to add a top 3 player in the league while having a historic achievement with it. Now that team is held as one of the biggest chokers in the history of sports.
96 bulls couldn't even shoot 3s with the short line
I don't think the Warriors would match up well with the Bulls if this game is played under traditional defensive rules from the past. I think the Warriors would find out real fast that the Bulls will not let this be a glorified shooting practice like most NBA games are today. The Bulls are just too athletic and versatile defenders on the wings that would disrupt Golden State. Also, the Bulls would just score on will on Golden State. I think a hypothetical seven game series the Bulls take this 4-1 or 4-2 at worst. Golden State is dominant in this era because of rule changes that favor offenses It is no different than in football where rules changes have started to favor offenses in that sport also. I would go even further and say that there are many teams in the 1980s and 1990s that were better than the Warriors if traditional defensive rules are allowed.
I agree 100%
So what would happen if the bulls team had to play the Warriors going by today's rules?
@@eugenecaldwell9619 Warriors would win by 20
@@eugenecaldwell9619 the bulls would still win. 3 1st team all defensive players. MJ would get 45ppg. The Bulls so call small line up would match up well with the Warriors. Harper, MJ, Pip, Step and Rodman. No blowouts, but Draymond and however else starts for them are almost self check players. Put Kukoc on Iggy or Draymond, Zaza etc. Rodman on the other simple.
Lol naaa Warriors would kill them
These guys would have no issue with MJ saying the Bulls would beat the 1965 celtics by 20 pts.
Facts
Jordan fan boys
😂 100%😊
A 73-9 team that got so scared of a team they had down 3-1 they had to add Kd shouldn't be respected at all in nba history, so it's irrelevant if they would beat the Bulls or not. Compare the 16' warriors to the bulls and then stick your chest out draymond
Yeah Kd warriors and warriors are two different teams. Kd warriors top 5 team in modern basketball history
Showtime lakers
Bird Celtics
UnstoppaBulls
Kobe Shaq lakers
Kd Warriors.
What about the bulls who lost to shaq and ran and denis rodman to save them from shaq.
@@kevben706 The fact that you even tried to compare that scenario lets me know how much a clown you are. Mj was in the midst of a comeback where he only played 17 regular season games and wasn't in basketball shape. They then traded will purdue for rodman after horace grant left for rebounding purposes. Rodman is nowhere near the player kd is, he's not better than the bulls best player, and he was traded there and didn't sign in free agency. Again, you're a clown
@@hueyfreeman5509 I don't care they still lost and ran to beg rodman to save them they don't win anymore without rodman.
Just like the bulls shouldn't be respected for getting Rodman after calling him a thug when he played with Detroit
I'm a huge fan of the Warriors, recent past (with Durant) and present, but my money would be on the Bulls. To my knowledge the Warriors have
never faced a defense with the talent and prowess of Jordan, Pippin, and Rodman. Also, consider what the Bulls were able to accomplish inside,
with their 2 or 3 interchangeable big men who gave them plenty of points and rebounds, with the luxury of 18 accumulated fouls, if necessary.
I'm sorry but Steph, KD and Klay is way too much offense to handle for that Bulls team. The Pacers in 97-98 gave the Bulls all they could handle and that Pacers team was not even close to as talented as the 2017 Warriors.
@@Hopper830 & the Bulls aren’t enough for the Warriors? Who’s guarding Jordan & the bigs insides? Draymond & anybody else getting worked ☠️
@@marcbenitez5493 What bigs inside? Luc Longley and Bill Wennington weren't offensive threats like that.
MJ was going to get his regardless. But he and Pip are not outgunning Klay, Steph and KD.
@@Hopper830 Here's my thing. In 2017, the only serious competition the Warriors had was Spurs and their best player got injured in G1 when the Spurs were up by a lot. Every other team in the West had injuries. Does that mean the Spurs would've won? I don't know, but reason people talk about '17 as being a goat team is because they only lost 1 game (same as '01 Lakers). If the series even goes 6, no one is saying that's the best team of all time.
In 2018, that same GS team BARELY beat the Rockets. They also lost multiple games in earlier rounds to teams who were far inferior on paper. Then, of course, they beat the brakes off Cavs (their easiest series imo). You're telling me, that a team that never (and I mean NEVER) lost a series with homecourt, had an 8 year stretch of going 24-1 in playoff series, never lost a series when it was favored, and by that time had either 3, 4, or 5 rings is going to be worse than the Rockets? In '98, everyone had a great chance to knock off the Bulls cause drama and injuries, and STILL couldn't do it. Every other dynasty team in history has been knocked off for some reason or another, but the one team that didn't is going to be worse than the Rockets?
Make it make sense besides you like the names on paper. Cause names on paper said 2016 or 2011 shouldn't have been close. Names on paper says Lakers should've made the playoffs last year. Names on paper says Brooklyn shouldn't have been swept last year. Names on paper said Mavs should've lost to the Suns. Cases of "names on paper" happen so often every year, it seems like it's a dumb way to judge. Difference with Bulls is there was NEVER a time when their "names on paper" disappointed. Only other team in NBA history that might have that same thing is Russell's Celtics.
A lesser version of the Warrriors literally just a beat a bettter defense than the bulls. 3 of greatest shooters ever, 2 of the greatest scorers ever. One of the best Defenders ever. Another elite defender in Iggy. Y’all need to stop with this Jordan idolatry
Draymond Green literally contradicted himself by comparing eras. 🤦♂️
Draymond would be crying and would be out of the game in the first quarter.
It's funny how he told durant they didn't need him but now he's using the 2017 warriors to compare to the Bulls. If KD wasn't needed why not compare the 2015 warriors to bulls? Bc he knows without KD they'd be destroyed.
They didnt need him to win a championship because they are that great. But to add kd on that team? Is a cheat code. Thats easy to understand. And the 2017 gsw is already in the conversation for the greatest team of all time. Of course he will use that team.
Clearly they didn’t need him. Y’all are weird
@@realspitter2727 "Clearly"
Drop the 2017 Warriors into the way-back time machine and have them play in the NBA Finals against the 83' 76ers, 84' Celtics, the 85' Lakers, the 89' Pistons, any 90's Bulls championship teams, and the early 2000 Lakers playing by the rules of that time period, and the Warriors don't win $hit!!! They would get beat up and bullied right off the court crying to mom and pop...those guys are mean, they hit me!
Facts! Hell... As great as Steph is, all you have to do in TODAY'S game is rough him up a little bit and he's out 😂
Truth...though I'd substitute the '86 Celtics with the healthy Bill Walton they had. That team could make it a half court game with the Warriors and the front court for the Celtics would probably be shooting about 70%...they would be picked apart without mercy.
@@KClouisville Absolutely! The 2017 Warriors don't stand a chance against Larry Legend and Co. in 86'. It would be like taking candy from a baby.
Say you don’t know basketball without saying you don’t know basketball.
@@artmeddaugh6669 so mj doing all that in this era ts both ways you clearly don’t know basketball
Draymond talks a lot and will talk his way into greatness.
He's not the best defender of his era and not even top 5 in that category
definitely top 5
This role player clown will make the HOF to. Definition of a Coat tailing player
Cap
96 or 93 bulls and the 17 warriors are the two greatest teams imo. That would be such a fun game and a clash of styles.
I think it would just depend on what rules they’re playing by
92 Bulls were vicious too
92 bulls were much better than 93.
96 bulls can't shoot
Jordan clamping steph hell even Kyrie did in 2016 Rodman clamping Durant and pippen clamping klay they would win just off of defense
The problem with that argument is Steph knows Jordan would clamp him, so he would never play iso. He would give the ball up to Draymond and start running around. You think Jordan or Pippen are going to be chasing him and Klay around for 10-15 seconds every possession fighting over screens?
The Golden State offence forces an opposing defences to have near perfect communication to make sure they don't blow coverages or miss rotations. Teams of the previous generations haven't seen anything like it.
if you think jordan guarding steph i'm sorry you don't know ball
@@amrithbharadwaj4945 yea they would unless they switch everything then what Cavs didn’t switch anything and had no where near the defenders MJs bulls have
@@kalix975 fr you don’t know ball
@@lebronsthebest6 The teams in 90s didn't switch either. So if the Bulls can magically learn how to play that level of off ball defence, then I guess Steph and KD could also magically put on some extra muscle without going to the gym and play better defence and deal with the physicality
Warriors are not the Warriors with hand checking and that style of defense the Bulls played. This is beyond comical.
The bulls are not the bulls in this era they can’t shoot the 3 teams would be up by 10 in 3 mins on them
Also in the 90s there was no hand checking
I rly don’t understand how people can go back and watch the games back then and say they think those guys can beat the best teams of today especially the 2017 Warriors. The game is always evolving and getting better but older people love there era and will never accept that guys today are sooo much more talented and skilled then guys before.
Another young dummy...
@@nickbutler7550 is it not true are guys not more talented nowadays then 30 years ago. This goes for any sports Football, Baseball, hockey, soccer even track guys are running much faster now then they were before it’s called evolution so yes if u pluck a team from 30 years ago and put them against a team now then they would lose. If u give them time to evolve in this era then maybe it would be different but then the whole Bulls team would have to change cause there not gonna have some of the guys on there team because it wouldn’t fit this era. This argument is dumb in general but overall a team back then wouldn’t be able to beat a team now because guys are more talented now.
@@marcusyosif1041 different doesn't equal better. The ony difference is that there are more three-pointers taken. Don't get caught up in the moment. The Bulls would bully them. This new Era is soft and fragile. Draymond himself would get worked by Rodman. Nice try though youngster. Good day to you.
@@nickbutler7550 your era is over 😂
@@brodiethebuilder8496 your era never began. You're the Era of gay team hoping narcissist.
The Utah jazz starting backcourt averaged 20 points a game combined and took the bulls 6. I promise you steph and klay won't averaged 20 points combined. Warriors beating the bulls man. Sorry
I didnt know GS has the equivalent of Malone to go with that lol
@@vitezjura nope but they do have kevin durant who averaged way more points in the finals that Malone did. Sorry but the warriors have way better players than the jaz did who took them 6
@@jermainelaw1077 Is that how we do it? The tempo and scores were slower in those 90ties finals compared to how GS and Cavaliers played to someone avereging more doesn't tell the whole story. Malone was also MVP player averaging 30 while being a lot more physically intimidating and dirty than Durant. They also had stockton who was their main offensive setup guy and one of the best playmakers and for shooting they had Hornacek. Now didnt the rockets with CP3 and Harden take this GS 7 games? So I guess they are better than 90 Bulls too by your logic. Or maybe, all Bulls have to do is put harper and Kerr on Curry to harass him whole game like they did vs Stockton, let Rodman or Pippen handle Durant and Jordan Klay and see what happens to their offense.
@@vitezjura the tempo of the game was different, but that didn't make Stockton and jeff h average 10 a game. Granted they were older, but were much easier for the bulls to defend. The rockets did take the 2018 warriors to seven, but like I've said on so many occasions the rockets style of play was the only way to beat the warriors. Jack up a bunch of 3's and hope they fall. Think about it, they missed 27 str8 against the warriors but never switched up they're style of play. The lived and died with d'antoni's system. No one else had the talent to beat them but only one team played like the rockets and it almost worked. The 2017 warriors were on another planet, and way more talented than tha jazz team. I get that jordan is the goat and a mythical creature but thinking they could have stopped that 2017 warriors is crazy. They would have triple teamed mj(no illegal defense in today's game) and forced the rest to beat them. They would have played a box and 1 or triangle and 2 like the raptors did against curry once when durant was out and klay in game 3 and 6.
@@jermainelaw1077 Well lets look at it this way: rebounding - advantage Bulls, post game - advantage Bulls, defense - advantage Bulls, 3 point shooting - advantage GS Warriors. Attacking the basket and driving - advantage Bulls, dunking over people - advantage Bulls, playmaking - advantage Bulls. Are you serious? You think having better 3 point shooters is enough for GS to win? You want me to continue? Physicality - advantage Bulls, playing through contact - advantage Bulls, coaching - advantage Bulls, the bench - advantage Bulls. Being more clutch - advantage Bulls, taking it personal - advantage Bulls, mental fortitude - advantage Bulls. Dominating the decade - advantage Bulls.
It's amazing that the real star on the Warriors doesn't run his mouth, but the weakest link runs his big mouth. At this point Draymond is desperately seeking recognition.
How is he the weakest link?
@@jayplunks When Curry and Klay were injured last season (not the immediate past season) Draymond failed miserably. On the other hand, when Draymond was injured, Curry singlehandedly carried the team. Put a really great defender, facilitator and someone who scores at least 10 points per game and the Warriors will walk over teams. Take Draymond to any other team and his career would have been a joke.
@@harryale 2020 Green was playing with Rookies and Wiggin. 2yrs laters those same rookies and Wiggin won the chip in under 7games arch series.
Lebron took HOF talent to the 12th seed but because he can score. But dump on Green tho
“Attack” Michael Jordan… Rob shut the hell up😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
free nba community from the shackles of debating if the 2017 Warriors would beat Jordan’s Bulls or the 2000s Lakers every few weeks 🙏 amen
I'll take the Bulls but none of these arguments prove anything.
Yes MJ never lost in the finals but neither did the Warriors with KD (healthy).
And saying that today's teams were baffled by the Golden State offence but that the Bulls were used to it is just false. Nobody ever extended the defence like Steph. The geometry of the court in a half court set itself has changed. You didn't have to guard shooters at 35-40 feet. Very few teams played at this pace, very few teams had such a pick and roll heavy offence and rarely did any team play five out or had such off ball movement.
That the Bulls had three of the best defenders in their position is the only good argument that was made.
It all comes down to which rules they will be allowed to play. The NBA changed the rules so that you could play tougher defense in the playoffs and we see what happens to KD Kyrie Irving and James Harden when other teams are allowed to play some defense they all look mediocre in this year's playoffs. The same thing will happen to Steph and clay if you allowed to play tough defense against them.
@@gerominomohican1565 And on the flip side, the lack of physicality and lesser contact has allowed more freedom of movement and the game is faster and the athletes are conditioned for that. So, if KD and Steph wouldn't be able to contend the physicality that previously existed, then I could also argue that nobody from the 90s would be able to keep up with Steph and Klay's movement and stop them raining down 3's
I like your last sentence. Their defense is soo overlooked. And more importantly, what's most overlooked? Coaching. Phil would have killed Kerr. Wait.. damn...Kerr was on the team then 😂
@@amrithbharadwaj4945 True the game was much slower pace back then. The players would have gotten much leaner to be more athletic in todays game. Todays game is very simple, if you make more 3s you win the majority of the time. Those bigger players like pippen, barkley, malone, mourning shaq etc. would have man handled alot of these skinny wig players. The guards of that era were tough asf as well.
@@gerominomohican1565 it really doesn't come down to that in this case. Of course there would have to be adjustments either way but I dont care what rules you use that Warriors team ain't running the bulls of the court or the jazz.
Draymond is 100% right. Today’s 3 point oriented ball would blow any old era team off the floor with 3’s, it wouldn’t even be close.
"No way! No how!"
They could beat them by 20 one night and lose by 20 the next. That is the nature of the game.
Jordan played teams with 1 star and the rest of the team was made of guys who couldn't make a squad today.....dubs by 30
Draymond cant even score 20 how does he say the warriors will beat the Bulls by 20
He got a few teammates who can, yeah? Bulls had one guy who could consistently get his own shot.
@@DaggerMan11 and those Warriors had 2. I still think the Bulls would find a way to win.
@@dpistons149 How? They took 12 3s per game in 98. How could they possibly beat the Warriors taking 12 3s? Stay at home on Kerr, don't guard Rodman, don't guard Harper, don't guard Longley outside of 15 feet, send doubles at Jordan in the post. 2017 Warriors aren't losing to swing-swing to Toni Kukoc.
@@DaggerMan11 With defense. Pippen on KD. 6 ft 6 Harper on Klay. Jordan on Curry. Rodman on Draymond. Rodman could double of Draymond. They were the greatest defensive team of all time or at least one of them. Keep it close and let Jordan win it at the end.
@@dpistons149 But defense is a team game, not about individual matchups. How will the Bulls defend PnR when one or more of Kerr, Kukoc, Longley, or Wennington is involved? Will they trap? How will they guard the short roll? In the 90s teams didn't have to cover 400+ square feet of territory on 4 on 3s. If Rodman doubles off Draymond, how will Chicago defend DHOs on the perimeter? Again, that's not something they had to do. And if Jordan has to chase Steph around for 40 minutes, that's going to take a toll on his offense. He never had to defend a player like Steph.
We saw Jordan lose the first round
Put draymond on any other team and we’ll forget about him
The Bulls did not play 5 man basketball. It was Jordan, Pippen and the rest were basically non existent offensively. Look at the numbers
You just described the overrated Warriors
@@jooson2826 Tf are you talking about? At least 3 players averaged 20 on the 2017 Warriors. The 2022 Warriors are more similar to the Bulls than the 2017 team.
Kukoc was the sixth man of the year
I’m 44 and I have been watching basketball since 1985 (Sixers Fan) and the best team I’ve ever saw is the 2017 Golden State Warriors.
This isn’t recency bias it’s truly how I feel. I’m not sure who would win. Oh yeah Mr. Triple Single Draymond needs to be quiet. I’m tired of him.
Best team I've seen is The Dream Team
@@jasonjanisewski78 Well yeah I agree with that.
I have been watching basketball as long as you have and I can honestly say that I have seen multiple teams from the 1980s and 1990s and the Lakers from the early 2000s that were better than the Warriors especially when traditional defense was allowed. Golden State is clearly the best team under the modern rules but if they had to play under the old rules I can see them struggling against multiple talented teams from years gone by.
Draynond be wildin
Draymond’s parents: draymond sounds like a dumb name, let’s name our son draymond.
Come on. It's Draymond Green. What the hell else is he going to say No? The bulls would destroy us by 20. Of course he's going to put over his team like this. This is not much to write home about. I'm honestly getting sick and tired of hearing about the bulls in about who they would beat and who they wouldn't beat.
he went out of his way to post it on Twitter...its not like someone asked him who would win.. he said it on his own
As a Bulls fan who witnessed the Bulls dominance, I'm sick of this silliness as well.
The bulls would not beat them by 20 😂 who’s scoring besides Jordan? Pippen was an average scorer at best if you watched basketball (equivalent of Kevin Love w/ Bron offensively). If the bulls were to beat warriors they would’ve had to locked em up w/ physical defense (which is almost impossible because of spacing Warriors allowed). I agree w/ Draymond on this case.
@@irishmaniac8922 I know and what I said is valid
@@dennisthomas2811 Yes I mean come on different times. Different eras not to mention both rosters play two completely different types of games
Bulls in 5. The 17 Warriors almost lost to James Harden 🤣
Listen MJ would avg 60 points.
Rodman avg 30 rebounds per game
Pippen avg quadruple double: 20p, 10 reb, 15 assists, 10 steals and 5 blocks
And KD announces he's joining the Bulls after game 5 at the press conference
That’s not true. The 17 Warriors almost ran the table. The only playoff loss they had THAT YEAR was to the Cavs in the FINALS
Warriors VS Blazers 4-0
Warriors VS Jazz 4-0
Warriors Vs Spurs 4-0
Warriors VS Cavs 4-1
Nktice how he didnt say the 95-96 72 win Bulls....he specifically talked about '98 Bulls...older team...still even with that..No way Bulls lose...
Because he was watching the 98 Bulls play the Jazz. Read the full tweet not what Broussard and Parker tell you
Rodman would make Draymomd cry!!!
😂😂😂
Draymond has a podcast so everything he says is to get clicks and an instant reaction. He is so overrated as a player and delusional to think he’s as good as Steph or Clay but he knows how to stir the pot.
Shooting 3s doesn't mean making 3s. Pippen is eliminating whoever he guards. Rodman and Jordan are doing the same. At the same time MJ is hanging 40+ every game. The Bulls easily win by 4 possessions.
Check my comment that's pretty much what I said lol 😂😂
So you telling me that Rodman gets put in a high pick and roll with curry curry won’t cook him mj chasing curry and klay won’t get tried cause they won’t stop moving so all the bull is just super human and have unlimited stamina no and these player is used to get double team so one all time great defender gon to just take him out the game no does make sense then we don’t even talk about the bench full of shooter on the warriors you can’t leave nobody open and it’s non stop moving they gon get tried and get smoked
@@kapxlotpj5008
You telling me that you believe Rodman would struggle in a high pick in roll is you telling me you don't know bball to the extend you think and/or never watched him defend. Rodman is one of the first to be able to legitimately guard 1-5.
@@blakhistury 1-5 in the 90s not today's players were there's movement better handles and shooting were you have to guard 5 feet beyond the 3pt line constantly.
Man these old guys be thinking thy can keep up with the warriors and these skills today smh
Jordan will shut down Curry Pippen would limit KD Ron Harper would limit Thompson Rodman will frustrate Draymond etc. Ain't no one on the warriors shutting down Mike. I get it iggy Is a good defensive guy but Jordan would have did him in. And the bulls had shooters Kerr Kukoc jud B etc. To match that. You all don't get it do you. The bulls had the best player in the Game with no Debate All Defensive player in Pippen the Best Rebounder in Rodman and all of them made the all Defensive 1st team. Kerr had the best shooting percentage.
MJ never lost in the Finals, he was smart enough to loose in the first round. I guess in your minds that is better( better to never qualify in the olympics than get silver medal)
Don't be dumb, get informed.
you miss the point when people make that statement. Its similar to a clutch gene concept....but i dont expect you to understand lol with that stupid comment.
Facts
Erase this post my dude you sound crazy
@@Northphilly-wu4oq no it’s fair. Because Lebron went to 4 more finals but gets criticized
The Jordan lovers . He can do no wrong
Draymond go sit down, or go stand up in the corner. It timeout time.💯👍👍👍
Just from a starter point of view, I’m taking Warriors players 3 to 2 in the lineup. You can’t make me believe the greatest and 2nd greatest shooter, with the supposed greatest scorer ever or best since Jordan couldn’t beat the bulls.
It all comes down to which rules they will be used if they played. The NBA changed the rules this year so that you could play tougher defense in the playoffs and we see what happens to KD Kyrie Irving and James Harden when other teams are allowed to play tough defense, they all looked mediocre in this year's playoffs. The same thing will happen to Steph and clay if you allowed to play tough defense against them.
I think the Warriors would've had an even bigger advantage with 90s rules. Obviously modern teams are much more adept at running PnR. Imagine Steph/Durant or Steph/Draymond PnR with 90s illegal defense rules in place. It would be an open shot for one of the best shooters ever literally every time. And teams didn't switch hunt in the 90s. If they wanted the ball in Jordan's hands, he'd have to deal with Iguodala all game. And Iguodala is allowed to be physical on Jordan. Good luck. Name one defender in the 90s that Jordan faced who matched Iguodala's combination of size, athleticism, physicality, motor and IQ?
@@DaggerMan11 So now igudala is an all time great defender? Lol. Yeah, ok kid.
@@SuperSonic_868 Answer my question: Name one defender in the 90s that Jordan faced who matched Iguodala's combination of size, athleticism, physicality, motor and IQ? Instead of being condescending, how about you talk basketball for a change?
@@DaggerMan11 how bout Dennis Rodman, Alvin Robertson, Rolando Blackman, Gerald Wilkins, Nick Anderson, Stacey Augmon, Eddie Jones, Ron Harper, and others. He would have no problem with Andre Iguodala. Mike would average over 40 on the Warriors.
@@bcjclj But you're just naming players. These aren't actually players who answer the question. Dennis Rodman didn't have Iguodala's lateral movement in the 90s. He was exclusively defending bigs by then. Robertson is 6'3" and peaked in the 80s. Wilkins was a poor defender; you're just naming him because he's tall. Nick Anderson was also a poor defender, had short arms and was a middling lateral mover. Stacey Augmon had nowhere near Iguodala's strength, motor, or IQ. Eddie Jones and Harper both weighed no more than 200 lbs, and Harper's lateral movement was compromised by his knee injury. Iguodala is around 225.
Thank God! The duo is back!
Give the rest of what draymond said you left out a lot lol
I hate how these guys cherry pick examples to make their case like how the Bulls swept Shaq and Penny's team; the Penny that was just in his third year. They make it seem like he was an all-time great in his prime that was swept. Or saying that Jordan's 6-0 in the Finals, so he's probably going to remain undefeated if he played in any other Finals, and the Bulls had to go through all these great teams to win it all. Please, Jordan couldn't get out of the East the first 6 years of his career (3 of which was with Pippen). I don't care if Pippen was only a 3 year starter; in this equation he was an all time great like Penny was. Only reason Jordan is undefeated is because all the teams that kept beating him in the East got old, and the great Western teams all got old too. If Worthy and Scott had been healthy during Jordan's first Finals, he may be 5-1.
To be fair Penny was on pace to becoming one of the best players of all time. Also, in MJs early years the East was stacked with some of the best teams of all time such as the Celtics. That is why context and understanding the history of what was going on at the time is paramount.
@@jasonh5547 that's my exact point. Being on pace to become something is not being something, and they are using Jordan's Bulls sweeping the Shaq and Penny led Magic as a prime example of how unstoppable the Bulls . It's an example of them using history without context to craft a narrative that's untrue. And again, they were saying how stacked the East was, but in reality, the East had gotten old, and MJ couldn't beat the great teams of the 80's, and he feasted on the good teams of the 90's.
@@Hienieken Penny was already arguably one of the best perimeter players in the league and was a superstar by then. I have always felt that if the MJ Bulls had been out of the equation and Shaq had stayed in Orlando and Penny had not had injury issues that Orlando would have been a dynasty. I will say this that the Bulls in 1996 were unstoppable. MJ as GOAT arguably had his biggest will to win drive that year.
All I’m saying is 3 is more than 2 lol and the older bulls teams would’ve had trouble for sure
Draymond talks more than he plays.
Y’all are missing his point
Depends on which era's rules. The rules of today wouldn't allow the bulls to play high defense. MJ and Scottie would foul out in the first quarter of today's league. Golden State would out shoot the Bulls hands down. On another note, if MJ had the greatest team of all time then how is He the GOAT?? That means He was supposed to go 6-0. I don't see the hype of the 6-0 argument if you have the best team.
You still can play defense, did you watch the Celtics this season? Today's rules would make Jordan go SAVAGE on those drag queens. And for your other question, Jordan had the greatest team of all time because of his presence on those teams: The presence of the best and greatest and most dominant player of all time.
So Kawhi isn’t an all time defender on par with MJ and Pippen? Y’all act like the greats wouldn’t adjust in this era
@@TheLionaaa In MJ's era you could get away with hand checking. MJ would hold the offense player in place using his off hand and swat at the ball. That wouldn't fly in today's league. Again MJ would foul out in the 1st quarter. So many steals back them would've been called foul today. This henders players today from giving their all on defense because they are trying hard to avoid a foul call.
His team was overwhelming better than any team in the 90s. Pacers had 1 HOFer, Knicks had 1, The Cavs had no HOFers, The 76ers had 1 HOFer, The Suns had 1 HOFer, The raptors had no all stars. The only noteworthy oponent was the Jazz w/ 2 HOFers. Jordan had a cake walk in this 90s era. Lebron faced teams w/ at least 3-4 HOFers and every team w/ at least 2. This is why I have Lebron as my Goat.
Wtf are you talking about. MJ is the best player they weren’t the best without MJ
And yes it comes down to rules. Playing with hand check, bulls win by 20. Playing without hand check Jordan scores 70 and bulls win by 20
I'd have to disagree with these guys, simply because they are middle aged men trying to hold on to the past and keep it sacred. Those Bulls would have gotten ran out the gym. Plus that version of the Bulls were old. Michael Jordan was 35, and the 2017 Warriors were young greyhounds.
😂😂😂😂😂
🤫🤫🤫
Please don't post when you are drunk!
you're underestimating the Bulls Defense. Plus Mike was 33 in 96,not 35. Bulls win 4-2.
You say that like there weren't teams in the 90s that were putting up over 110 PPG.
1993: Highest scoring offensive team was Charles Barkley's Suns at 113.4 PPG.
2017: Highest scoring offensive team was Steph Curry's Warriors at 113.5 PPG.
'91 Nuggets were dropping 119.9 PPG
'92 Warriors throwing up 118.7 PPG
And since they were doing it with far fewer 3's, that means MORE running up and down the court.
@@johndarius18 Nobody is questioning Jordan, but his supporting cast would get clobbered. Ron Harper had bad knees and could barely jump, Dennis Rodman can't shoot, and Scottie Pippen would get killed by Kevin Durant. Durant is a matchup nightmare for any player in the history of the game. So let's not elevate these guys as the messiah on all of basketball just because you have this love affair with Jordan. Yes, Jordan would get his numbers, but the Bulls never seen offense like this before. Pippen admitted himself Durant can't be stopped. Rodman would foul out trying to stop Durant.
@@jameswarner300
Jason Tatum & the Celtics stopped Durant. In fact they accomplished this by playing a 90's style of physical defense! Surely this destroys your argument.
You are not outscoring Steph, Klay and KD......
all those bigs and star players chris is talking about were on separate teams. calling their names in bunches makes it seem more loaded than what it was. truth is a lot of em needed more help
Durant Klay and Steph will have Bulls players running thru screens all game. I think Klay and Draymond match up well with Jordan and Pippen. While KD will have to go at it with Rodman which is no east feat. But Steph Curry is in this game. Warriors just seem to much to handle. Steph and Durant are elite shot creators and off ball scorers. Klay might be the BEST off ball scorer. 39 points on like 6 dribbles or something stupid like that. Warriors were a glitch in the system
Curry and Okay getting dragged by Harper and Jordan going thru them screens
Ever heard of Reggie Miller? He played very similar and what happened?
stick to zone to force them to make outside shots rodman on offense would be a liability just play box and one on jordon Draymond and Klay can double him without worrying about rodman making shots . Jordon would be forced into facilitating to pippen lol and we know hes not a great scorer. even if Jordon has a big game, he will be tired by the 4th 98 jordon was much older you could see that in the Utah jazz series as it took everything, he had to muster up 40 points
@@mar-jax9341 there was only one Reggie on the pacers. Imagine 3 Reggie millers running around…I actually don’t want to that’s a pain to guard
Once again, Michael Jordan is so mythologized that he's become a superhero for middle aged men. And the bulls might as well be the Avengers with the way people talk about them. 2017 Warriors would absolutely beat the Bulls. Stop it.
Bro. Michael Jordan might as well be Zeus to these guys. If you never did any research and only listened to the old heads, you'd think MJ never lost a game.
Look folks , there's no damn way the 90s Lakers , Blazers , Suns , Sonics , Jazz , or Magic even compare to the 2 3 4 or 5 All Star 3 ball Sharp Shooting Superteams like the 1999 - 2017 Spurs , 2011 Mavs , 2012 - 2016 Thunder , 2004 or 2005 Pistons , 2008 - 2010 Lakers , 2008 - 2010 Celtics , 2011 - 2014 Heat , 2015 - 2019 / 2022 Warriors .
The Warriors lost to a Great team / Great Player Lebron James in the 2016 Finals folks . The 2015 - 2018 Cavs weren't the suck 92 Blazers . The 2015 - 2018 Cavs could have won 4 Straight Finals against any other team if it weren't for the Warriors being there 4 Straight Finals in those years . Let's not act like Jordan ever faced the same team with an All Time NBA GOAT candidate in the Finals 4 Straight years .
The 2016 / 73 - 9 Warriors were the Greatest Team ever to not win a Ring . Major Injuries derailed them in the Finals primarily .
The 2017 Warriors are the Greatest Superteam , ever going 16 - 1 in the Post Season . They won 65 games , they led in Offense and Defense all Season . They had the Best All Around Shooting / Defending Backcourt ever in Curry , Thompson . They had 3 of the Greatest Shooters Ever / Curry , Klay , Durant . They had a Top 6th man / 2 Way Player Andre Iguadala . They had a Top DPOY candidate from 2015 - 2017 / 2016 DPOY Winner Draymond Green . They had 3 Good all Around Centers in Green , McGee , Looney that could Score , Rebound , or Defend well . They had the Greatest Small Ball Death Lineup of All Time / Curry Klay Durant Iguadala Green . They had a loaded Bench of Good All Around Players that could have been Starters on other teams . There's nobody on the 90s Bulls that could have covered or Shot Blocked KD's Jumpers or 3 ball . The Bulls weren't good enough defensively to chase the Splash Bros or Durant around for 48 minutes . Luc Longley would be on an island in Pick N Roll switches covering Curry on 3s ? That would be an automatic bucket for Curry on 3s or to the Bucket for layups .There's no damn way Jordan or Pippen are dunking on a prime KD , Green , or McGee either as Shot Blockers in the Paint . Who on the 90s Bulls are stopping McGee or KD Lob dunks ?
Only old people think bulls beat Warriors
"The whole thing is just COCKAMAMIE " - Rob Parker🤣🤣
Charles Barkley said it's lazy Journalism comparing Era.. 😂
So why didn’t the 2017 Warriors beat the all time record of 96 bulls or the 2016 warriors 😂. What space do you have to shoot for the Warriors with Harper Jordan Pippen and Rodman locking you down
Because they didn’t care about the regular season and were coasting.
I do think they can beat them, Warriors are much much better than Utah and the bulls beat them 4-2
Draymond would be knock out by Rodman the time the national anthem was over.
I can’t stand Draymond, dude never shuts up
Jordan's Bulls? New media sounds the same as Old media
The warriors of 2017 going to loose against the spurs till Pachulia make the dirty play to leonard
Depending on what era the warriors vs bulls play in would determine which team wins, neither team wins in the opposite era
Bulls are ten times better in todays era with all it’s rules changes. Come on man.
Toni kukoc in this era, omg, he would be unstopable
I finally agree with glo stick and wallet mouth 😂😂😂
Career triple single dude talking smack against the goat. Idiocy at its finest.
How is Broussard gon brag about Jordan “dismantling” Shaq & Penny as if they didn’t beat the Bulls in the playoffs the year before?
You can't compare eras of sports.
The rules are different
The styles are different
Then theirs this thing called evolution
Draymond said its stupid to compare era based on his own statement. You guys cant come up with anything these days
The comprehension is low
I grew up watching 90s basketball, but i'm not a 90s fanboy. The reality is the difference in spacing and style of play would be huge. Anyone who says different is wishful thinking. The Bulls played in an era where 6 3s a game was considered a lot for a TEAM. There is no evidence they would be able to defend a team with 3 prolific 3 point shooters.
Like hearing the sound of his voice says the man that talks all day for a living .. Gimme a break brew
I can't believe Draymond, who is an average player at best,is even allowed to have a podcast and even taken seriously
The warriors won 2 championships and went 73-9 and got to the without Kevin Durant which was their best player. The warriors with Kevin Durant were untouchable without an injury all this bs 90s nonsense about the rules is a tired argument.
Draymond understands the assignment…give y’all content, it doesn’t matter how y’all feel about it lol
The bulls wouldn’t be able to keep up with golden state they got 3 scorers who can go for 30 every night bulls only got mj as only real scorer yeah they defense was great but the spacing and movement with 3 main guys who can shoot like that they never faced anybody as close to gs.
Plus the warriors defense wasn’t no joke either they tougher then u think & I hated golden state
Ur right.. the 98 bulls can't even get pass 90 points..the 2017 warriors score 70 points by halftime.. stop the illusion with Jordan..
I wonder if Draymond knows that the bulls center position with today's rules would be Kukoc or Rodman 😆 when they go small ball
So you saying Rodman and Kukoc would guard Curry/Durant in the switch
I don't like how they didn't read the whole Twitter post he made a bigger point at the end
I agree, wanted all to talk about the matchups though
Expected but not realistic. We all know how that series would play out.
It’s a real stretch when people say teams in the 90s had shooters. Jus look up the stats and see what there’re version of a shooter was.
To be honest what era of rules?
Why are you guys hating on draymond for doing what you guys do
THIS is why certain players shouldnt have podcasts,Draymond just likes to hear himself talk
Draymond is the gift that continues to give. Warriors wouldn't win. Bulls better defensively & would limit 3pt shooting of Steph/Klay. Draymond must believe Bulls were just about the Triangle Offense, but them was was a beast on the break! Jordan & Pippen on the wings was a nightmare for opposing teams. Draymond would be a non-factor defensively & self check on the offensive end. Bulls in 6