It Comes at Night - The Dangers of Misleading Marketing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- FACEBOOK: / chrisstuckmann
TWITTER: / chris_stuckmann
OFFICIAL SITE: www.chrisstuckm...
Chris Stuckmann
P.O. Box 1028
Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223
Chris Stuckmann discusses It Comes at Night, and how the marketing campaign may be the cause of its lukewarm reaction from general audiences. 
Развлечения
Chris: "don't watch the trailers"
*proceeds to show us the trailer*
I think I watched the trailer fifteen times during the course of this video.
When he said "don't watch the trailers" I wanted to watch the trailer.
he said it was a spoiler review
Oh don't get me wrong I'm not at all mad or concerned that he showed us clips from the trailers I just thought it was funny how he said "don't watch the trailers" and then proceeded to play them. No offence to Chris either. Just making a harmless joke
Understandable have a good day
So what I'm gathering here is that psychological thrillers are mismarketed as monster flicks.
People went to see the Babadook to watch a film about a sinister villain from a kid's book coming to life, and instead got a metaphor for a widow's grief.
People went to see the Witch to see a witch kill a pilgrim family in the woods, but in the end, it was a film about a religious family tearing itself apart due to religious paranoia.
The question is, how do you sell a film like the Babadook without misleading the audience, while also not spoiling the twist?
Samuel Cannon The Witch did have a witch killing a family in the forest. A baby is murdered in the first 15 minutes. Unless you mean people wanted to see more of the witch... I'm tired.
07foxmulder the OP meant that the witch wasn't the focus of the movie, rather the catalyst to illustrate the themes of paranoia the OP posted
I would argue that The Witch was about the devil luring a young, impressionable woman to his side by showing her the insanity and extreme piousness of her family and how it ruined her life.
+Samuel Cannon If you have to trick the majority of people to watch your movie, then they're probably not the type of people who would enjoy it anyway. Think about what most people want in a horror movie. I'm guessing an interesting story confuses them, and all they want is cheap jump scares.
could you please stop insulting audiences and repeating the same comment on every thread.
Here is my therory I think Travis was infected this entire time, hear me out, he cant sleep at night very well and he has fever dreams, Travis mentioned that his grandpa ''BUD'' was unable to sleep too and would sleepwalk during the last week of his life and often forget where he was or what he was doing,. When Paul ask if Andrew sleepwalks both his mother and father deny it offensively Strongly suggesting that sleepingwalking is a symptom of the sickness that and Andrew also mentioned he cannot renmber what happened, MEMORY loss is also a symptom. Travis infected Andew how did Travis got infected? Stanley, Stanley was his grandfather's dog and continued sleeping on his bed most likely got infected that way and infected Travis. The dog probally had fever dreams as well and got paranoid and THATS why it run into the woods, Some of Travis fever dreams are NOT fever dreams they are in fact scenes of what really happened, Travis opened the red door as it was established that Andew was far to small to unlock it anyway, Travis had contact with the dying Stanley and then went back into the house and most likely forgot about it. (the sickness probally works as a parasite, that can mess with its host brain in order to make more people sick) in the end who opened the red door wasnt't important anymore because all of them were infected and the sickness just worked slower or faster at some people. What ''comes '' at night? pure and simple the Symptoms of the infection: Fever Dreams, Memory Loss and Sleep walking
Agreed. Only thing I'd add is that that I think the son was the one that ripped the dog up during one of his sleepwalking bouts.
fucking spot on
I've just watched the film and agree with this theory. Certainly answers most of the questions.
It cant´be a coincidence, that my therorie is exactly the same as yours. I saw the movie yesterday and understood it exactly the same way as you did. So for me, our theorie must be what really happened in the movie. (We´re not the only ones who saw that in the movie btw.)
U are absolutely wrong. It takes a day to notice symptoms and if Travis or Stanley were infected, they would all be sick or they would all be dead. Travis had nightmares because of him seeing his grandpa's death. Stanley was sick because of the lake water. He probably drank some out of the forest. Andrew opened the door and got sick because this all happened in one day and Andrew was just getting symptoms. Andrew got Travis sick and Andrew got will Kim and Paul sick because they were all in the same room. Sarah got sick because of paul
So... are you telling me... IT DOESN'T COME AT NIGHT?
Dormammu it actually comes to bargain
Dormammu it comes to bargain
omg yes
IantheGamer hahahaha nice one
Dormammu pls
Chris:"I suggest you watch this movie"
me:"oh yay"
Chris:"but I suggest you dont watch the trailers"
me:"uhhhhhhhhhhh..."
*attempting to erase memory*
ayeee jungkook and taehyung
I guess he's saying the trailers are too misleading to appreciate the movie when the movie won't deliver what you've come to expect.
One of the many reasons I don't watch trailers anymore until after I've seen the movie.
He also said this was a spoiler review if you had any intention of seeing it why would you watch this?
I read this comment at the exact moment he said these lines and felt exactly as you wrote here. haha
*Future chris time traveling would be useful right now*
I was genuinely pissed off by the marketing. I loved the movie, but I feel like I would've enjoyed it more if I hadn't been expecting something completely different.
To rely on a trailer is dumb. Trailers are to sell a movie. It did its job. To put all your expectations on a trailer again...dumb.
4021971 lol
I went in with no expectations & without watching the trailer or noticing any marketing. I just went for the film due to it's reputation & still felt much like how Chris did. It was pleasing & disappointing in ways, but still a great experience. It was thought-provoking, well acted, nicely directed & shot. It left me craving more. I feel it could have been a greater film...
4021971 You can sell a movie without being actively misleading.
@Dorian Parker Trailers are used to get you into the theaters. If people went to see it the trailer did its job. Movie reviews are used to show a plot or story, not trailers. Movie studios get people into the theaters. They aren't there to tell you anything as to what the movie is truly about or how you will like it.
You know when Chris has that music in the background shit's getting real.
Anish What's the name of the music tho??
Yeah hell!
Liam James Gacom comes home
Miguel Copaja Arca I searched, can't find it. is it on RUclips?
@@user-jf2cb6xj3t Toonami Broken Promise
I grew up with the Dangers of Misleading Marketing.
My father worked for Ubisoft.
I loved it when watch dogs looked like the best thing on the planet but then when it came out it looked like it was an N64 game
You mean ppopisoft.
1 like = 1 prayer
Lord nerd 12 it was a fun game. the story was great. second had better gameplay, but the story was bland. Ubisoft makes good games you fucking hipsters
But they downgrade nearly every one of them.
For me, this movie was a masterclass example of “the fear you create yourself is scarier than reality”. This movie encapsulates the feeling of “the monster under the bed” or the feeling of being jolted awake. Did I really hear that noise in the dark? What if something is watching me while I sleep, but when I open my eyes it’s no longer there?
For me, this is terrifying, because I often lay awake thinking these types of thoughts, and sometimes have trouble going to sleep because of how much my mind “creates” for me.
At its core, “it comes at night” is nothing more than a family slowly going crazy because of the monsters they create in their head, and I can understand the metaphorical context of the title for the reason stated above - the real monsters come at night, when we are laying in our beds just listening and peering into the dark corners of our rooms - creating things that never really existed.
I saw this film with four other people, and I was the only one that loved it, but i do understand why most didn’t care for it.
Nothing scary actually happens in this film; it’s all in their minds - every single thing. That to me is something I do to myself all the time at night, and I think seeing such an abstract idea play out in a film is deeply disturbing to me, because I do it too.
I'd much rather a movie create a tense haunting atmosphere than have a monster chase the main characters around for the whole movie.
well said. but i think that the virus was real. and if you think about it, Paul was right to not let will and his family in his house. he should have gone with that decision which would have been eventually better for will and his family.
@@sumedhcinephileaudiophile335 I’m still torn. I have since rewatched it, and I still think it’s JUST ambiguous enough to not know for certain that the virus is real, but that’s what makes this particular film so interesting to me.
@@drawmelikeafrenchgirl the scene where they kill the hunters, also when will is getting interrogated by Paul, etc tells us that the virus is real. Atleast to me I'm pretty convinced. However, it could be that even when there is a virus the director could be referring to Paranoia or fear which "comes at night".
@@sumedhcinephileaudiophile335 When we consider what we actually “know” about what’s taking place, all we really have to work with are the character’s very narrow perspectives in a very tight setting, which doesn’t reveal much about reality versus interpretation.
So it ultimately boils down to how much you trust that what the characters are saying is “real” is actually real.
I lean more on “shared paranoia” versus anything tangible that we can latch onto.
This is my first time commenting on your channel - big fan though! My husband and I went to see this yesterday (Sunday) and then immediately came to your channel to see if you'd reviewed it, and you hadn't yet so we sat and thought about what the movie meant... here is what we came to.
We think what "comes" at night is Travis's dreams/nightmares/sleepwalking. Near the end, Paul (Joel Edgerton) says something along the lines of, "You haven't yet seen what desperate people can do." I think this could have been a play on words... Paul thinks Will is going to do something out of desperation, when in the end Paul was the most desperate to save his family. Because of Paul's desperation, he could not allow himself to trust Will and his family, even though (in my perspective) they were completely trustworthy. Paul was looking for every excuse to not trust him, so when Will had the slip-up of the brother/brother-in-law comment, it sealed the deal for Paul, and now he was extra leery about Will's family. Will seemed to be the most honest person in the group (for example: when he agreed to every single thing that Paul asked him to do when they first run into each other, and at the end when he and the wife have the guns out, he is the one that says they should both lower the gun and he is the only one that really does-ish). Back to Travis for a second... it seemed that sometimes his dreams would have some foreshadowing (I only saw the movie once and didn't really have this thought until the end so I could be wrong), but like... he dreamed of Kim and then he saw her right after he woke up, etc. I think, he went out into the woods (like he did in his dream) and saw his dog injured and dragged his dog back into the house (it looked like, when they found the dog that there were streak marks of blood of him being dragged). In his sleep walking state, he went back to bed, woke up, saw Andrew asleep in another room (still not sure why the boy was in another room), and ushered him back to bed. Then there was the group meeting and everyone decides to split up for a day. I think Will's family assumes that Travis was the one who opened the door (not Andrew, like Travis's family thinks) and is likely sick so they want to escape asap (which is exactly what they say at the door when Paul knocks - because, they're honest people). Paul panics and assumes the worst and then... the killing happens. I think Paul is the "monster" (by killing Will's family) out of desperation to protect his family. In the end, everyone dies. And they would have all died anyway because Travis (or maybe Andrew) opened the door and then infected them all. Anyway... Not sure this is making sense, or that this will even get read. It's definitely a film worth discussing so this seemed like the best place to share my thoughts. My husband and I really liked the film for making us think so hard. Am glad to see that you did end up reviewing this. As I watched your review, I thought, 'Of course he'd review it! He loves horror films!' Thanks! :)
Your comment is a month old already & not sure if you remember it all but was there any hints of Travis being a sleepwalker? I liked your explanation but unsure only about the sleepwalking part...
@Barun Mishra Hmmmm... I can't remember now, but that's a good question! I think that the only thing that eluded to it was the nightmares he continued to have. I'll have to watch it again and pay closer attention next time. :)
barun and katekagood, i know this is now a month from that month haha, but ive just seen it for the 3rd time now after giving it a rest. and there are hints throughout the 3rd and final act of the movie that Travis sleepwalks. First as Kate already mentioned, it seems to be a popular theory that it was not a dream when showing Travis outside at night and dragging the dog back inside due to fact 1: the dog was clearly dragged inside by someone / something. fact 2: the door was opened from the INSIDE. fact 3 there is no possible way Andrew was the sleep walker due to his lack of height and strength needed for opening all the locks and getting the keys from the father, and the strength to drag the dog so far back inside. it is also hinted that Travis was the sick sleepwalker as if you may remember, not ONCE did they show Andrew during the final act. the director purposely hide the child from the viewers because Andrew WAS NOT SICK. and Kate's theory is correct by the fact that wills family just wanted to leave because they knew it was Travis who was sick and not Andrew but Paul already had doubts of their family and was very protective of his. thus killing will and his family. i was surprised by the ending for sure. i had also fallen for the marketing so i expected a completely different movie but none the less after thinking about it after the movie it was actually a really good movie. just not what i had expected is all :)
+Dr. Emmett Brown YES! I love your recap. I still have only watched it once but am definitely going to watch it a second time now that someone else agrees with this theory.
Thank you :D feel free to comment here again after you've watched it again, id love to get more views on the film from like minded viewers haha. and hey just wanted to say i just watched a couple of videos out of interest, and i must say im not usually into the life update / vlogging style videos normally but your videos have a real home video vibe to them :) great videos!
"It comes at night"
The nightmares.
Wow what a good title... not
I thought this movie was well-made, especially the cinematography and the acting, but too depressing to be enjoyable or entertaining. It falls into the "more to be admired than loved" category for me.
That said, I love A24's horror movies in general and I'm glad that people are still willing to make risky movies like this.
Well told, but not a compelling tale. Just left me feeling empty.
And once the dog disappeared, I had a feeling of dread like when Neegan was introduced on The Walking Dead. Never could feel entertained by either, after those moments.
@@texasbeast239 Exactly. I actually kinda regretted watching it, which is rare for me, because it was SO bleak and pessimistic that it left me feeling numb and just... bleugh.
Difference of opinion, but I actually think the depressing feel was starkly realistic. Sometimes in life, there is no happy end. You just sit with the events and think about them, without ever getting answers. I really liked how depressing it was because I feel like in a world like the one this movie took place in, there wouldn’t be many answers or explanations when shit just goes south.
Agreed. Too many people nowadays want safe and the usual horror movie. So happy A24 is producing movies like these that break the mold.
This movie sucked
This movie is preparing to make a sandwich and right before you take the first bite you drop the whole plate.
Kris Best damn metaphor I've seen so far.
If you're about to take a bite, shouldn't the sandwich be in your hand when the plate falls?
Kris ???
From Kanye Twitter ??
Yoo bro it's Jared🇯🇲
Well I guess you never heard of the 5 second rule. I'm picking that goddamn sandwich right off the floor and eat that sonuvabitch a little fall never hurt nobody
Not me but the director dropped it#
I went into the theater without paying much attention to the trailer and I left the theater loving the movie. The movie isn't about a "physical" monster or threat like the marketing team lead us to believe, but about the fear and paranoia of survivors in a post-apocalyptic era. The beauty isn't really about the plot but all the details that were portrayed. The dialogue and reactions seems perfectly genuine for the characters, of course the intruder would lie to a man with a gun to his head because he is afraid, of course a father would berate his son over a dog because he is worried, of course a family would defend themselves as guests because they are petrified. The only thing that comes at night is the constant reminder of the soul crushing anguish that these characters are facing and no amount of doubled door rooms, boarded up windows, seclusion, provisions, and firearms can really protect them from that.
Travis Rhodes love your picture
Travis Rhodes we all already know, smart guy
Travis Rhodes did you have a series of head-trauma accidents as a child?
This movie was the polar opposite of a psychological thriller. I love psychological thrillers. This film was an aimless array of shit with a shit plot and shit acting, and shit editing.
j3m1f8 your just a troll if your going to blatantly say that about this great film
j3m1f8 shit arguments
I genuinely loved this movie. And not in a pretentious "you just have to think about it way." I'm 100% fine with not knowing anything, because the characters in the film didn't know anything.
There's an excellent sense of dread and paranoia built throughout the entire film, and it was fantastic. Was he lying about the brother? Who hurt the dog? You don't know because our main characters have no idea, and I think it really creates the great finale and resolution we're left with. So while I get wanting everything or most things tied up neatly at the end, I feel like this movie jumped into the middle of people's lives during a tragedy, made you feel for and understand them, and then left you wondering about how everything went or could have gone -- just like the main characters.
It's a tragic and gut-wrenching drama, more so than a horror movie, but I thought it was nevertheless gripping and visceral. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It felt a bit long to me personally because of how much I was dreading what was going to happen next, and I thought that was good. The film itself was like 90 minutes so not really on the long side, I think. I'm glad somebody at least agrees :')
He wasn't lying about the brother. However, he did have a "oh shit, now he thinks I'm lying moment." That probably made Will not trust Paul anymore.
Damn those last 20 min were violent as f***k
I didnt like it that much but beautiful description
Shanna Banana then what movies do u like? they're not pretentious, theyre made for art and emotional reasons.
Chris, my man, review Mullholland Drive.
Water Hazard that'd be amazing
i wish he did, it's my favourite movie of all time
Water Hazard It's so good! one of my favorite movies. I wanted him to do a review of Twin Peaks to.
Although, I feel he wouldn't like Mulholland Dr. He complained about unresolved plot points in this video and Mulholland Dr has those to.
Mullholland Drive is a pretentious bullshit of a movie.
zhaquiri you misspelled masterpiece hombre
"It Comes At Night" is a metaphor for dreams. Obvious.
Not to mention that it is heavily implied that Travis sleepwalks.
I figured it was a metaphor for fear of the unknown
Travis was inexperienced with certain things (like women) and his uncertainty was emphasized every night, where the camera focused on him mostly
Who opened the door was unknown, the intentions of the other family was unkown, the intention of the MAIN family was unknown, who was infected was unknown
That's what I took away from it, VERY interesting movie indeed.
Although my comment doesn't really make up for the "travis sleepwalks" implication
Perhaps the unknown of "who opened the door" and having it be Travis was a reference, or a callback to "Who was infected?" once again...Travis.
Chris is too dense to understand basic metaphors lol
yeah the fever dreams which are a symptom of the desease
Jeff Spencer Wet Dream
My boyfriend and I stumbled over this film by accident and watched it, without any anticipation, and we both really enjoyed it.
To me, this was clearly a character-driven film, more than it was a plot-driven one. We focus on cause and reaction, as well as the elements of isolation, and why the family would set up all those rules. We discussed if it was the right thing to board up like that in an epidemic like this, or if they could have done something else, and came to the conclusion we understood why they boarded up, even if we didn't necessarily agree with the idea, as they made themselves captives in the house.
One thing we caught onto, as we discussed it in the end, is that Travis' nightmares actually hint at him being a sleepwalker. The door happened to be open after he had a dream where he went through that door. It made no sense for Travis' family to think it was the little boy who opened the door, since he couldn't reach. None of the adults remembered opening it, neither did Travis, but watching his dreams, and where he ends up, and how something seems to happen in those areas a few times, we came to the conclusion that Travis walks in his sleep. We didn't know how long he'd done it, but I for one thought it was triggered by the grandfather's death where we see these PTSD-like nightmares for the first time. Because the nightmares do serve a purpose in some way. Maybe not to the plot, but to the character Travis. It’s a way of showing how his mind copes with this whole ordeal, and probably also to hint that he walks in his sleep, and he was the one who opened the door.
We didn't reach an agreement on how Travis got ill, though. We first talked about the little boy. But there was no actual hard proof that the small boy was ill. He cried in the parents’ bedroom, and they hid his face when Travis’ dad came with a shotgun. My boyfriend thought that was suspicious, how they tried to keep Travis’ dad out, and how they hid the little boy’s face, but I for one understoond it. The other couple clearly understood Travis’ parents were paranoid, got scared about their little boy, and decided they should move on. The little boy COULD be crying out of fear, and hiding his face reinforces that idea, as seeing Travis’ dad wield a gun at them would have made him panic even more. So the little boy COULD have been ill, sure, or he could have just been scared.
Since we agreed Travis walked in his sleep, we talked about whether or not he found the dog during the night, since he dreamt about it before it was found. And if he did find it and take it home in his sleep, he could have gotten ill from that.
And the last possibility, is that he was ill all along, since he shared a bedroom with his grandfather, but it took its time really getting to him, since he’s 17 and looks relatively heathy.
I think this will go down in history as a movie with polarising initial reviews, but will be regarded as a classic in the future. Like the remake of The Thing or Stanley Kubrick's adaptation of The Shining.
It's already getting good reviews, so I don't think that theory holds much water.
Diego Perez The John Carpenter one. The prequel wasn't well received by anyone, now was it?
Joelrat John Carpenter's classic The Thing is a remake of A Thing From Another World made in 1951.
John Carpenters i assume but you should watch Good Bad Flicks exploring the things. He goes over how the 2011 remake got screwed over by the suits.
dawson kiser Yeah i've seen that video. It's a shame, that movie could have actually been good.
CHRIS COMES AT NIGHT
UnbelievabIeMontages No, CHRIS COMES AT CHILDHOOD
Ralph Regis XD XD
Ralph Regis hahahahahahaahahaaaa
BLAH BLAH LAND* SHAMIEN HACKZELLE*
those hate were from multiple times i constantly made racist comments and a lot of the casual trolling things such as memes. nice try though kek. chazelle did remake two of Jacques Demy's films without permission at first hand, but Demy's family saw it and approved it afterwards so it's all fine now.
I just finished it here's my interpretation , Travis was sick from the beginning and most likely Paul and his wife too. The dog was sick,there was nothing in the woods he was hallucinating, that's why he bit Paul. Paul is now infected from the bite if he wasn't already .Will signed his and his families death sentence by agreeing to stay with Paul and his family,But will is not innocent he tried to set up Paul ,the men who attacked them when they were driving were his buddies .any of Paul's family may have opened the door and let the dog in while hallucinating because they and will's kid were all infected at this point but the kid couldn't reach the lock.
I kinda felt the same way: Travis was having fever dreams the entire movie
I've come to expect that a smart, yet quiet and ambivalent horror film will not satisfy mainstream audiences. I hope that this doesn't deter filmmakers and studios (especially A24) from making bold choices with their projects. I feel we are entering a new golden era of horror films and I'd hate to see it derailed because we have to cater to the masses.
Nicholas Brown I don't think that's true, it's mostly false advertising that I hate, and I know the ones who make the trailers are a different group of people, but they always try to sell you a different movie, that would upset anyone. and I mean, I like movies like the fast and the furious: Tokyo drift and suicide squad, but I also liked the bathroom, so I don't know what that says.
So the confrontation between the two families did nothing for you?
Nicholas Brown thank you! We need more more audience members like yourself so that more physiological and intelligent, thought-provoking films can be produced... especially by A24... every A24 film I've ever seen has been beautifully put together and shot. This is no exception
I loves this film and I've been loving so many horror films made in recent years. I think horror is finally being given the respect it deserves, being acknowledged for its ability to explore complicated themes in a horrifying way.
This is actually one of my favorite types of horror. The kind that plants a seed of paranoia and fear of the unknown in the beginning with a great payoff. My friend and I thought it was great. Depressing but great.
This is way more interesting than any actual reviews.
I agree
I love The VVitch. It's one of my favorites of last year. I can understand the people that didn't care for it, but I really enjoyed it.
I’m sorry but it’s not the “VVitch” it’s the “witch”. Just because the trailer makes it look like 2 v’s doesn’t mean that’s what it is.
@@copyglow Lol I do it just because it looks cool. Don't ruin my fun :P
Journeyous idk but I think of heard of this a very long time like years ago but people use to write w as 2 v’s
Me too
Same
Just watched the film. it's absolutely incredible. Marketing was vastly off point, but it didn't reveal anything, which I appreciate.
Joel Edgerton seriously deserves an Oscar for this film.
Oscar for joel? Yes
But NOBODY should watch this garbage. Even people behind us were confused af
why appreciate that it didnt reveal anything?..cause that is the LIBERAL way to think about a movie?..like thats COOL and SMART and some shit cause it made you think?..movie had SO MUCH potential but it failed to deliver..get off your liberal pretending soap box sir..you didnt think it was great..youre just trying to be a liberal...grow up sir
Terrific Troll What?
Terrific Troll um what?
because i prob felt like it..dont get so emotional over it bruh
SPOILERS, PLOT POINTS EXPLAINED
Andrew was never sick. Will told him to close his eyes in case he was forced to kill Paul. Paul's family are the antagonists of the film. Travis opened the red door while sleepwalking. Will's family wants to leave because they fear Travis is sick. It is Paul's fear that turns him into a monster and ends up killing Wills family.
Ernesto Grey
I also think that Travis contracted the illness through the grandfather's dog. Although it seems like the dog was just a carrier for the illness and didn't actually show signs of being sick. Travis' nightmare about the dog being killed maybe him remembering what happened when he was sleep walking the night before. He left the house, saw the dog getting mauled and came back to the house without closing either door (this would explain how the dog was able to get into the room)
Ernesto Grey then why was he constantly crying?
Thi51Chick travis cant open the doors he needs the ONE and ONLY key to the door which his dad or mom had 24/7 how would they not wake up to him taking it from their neck, also he found the dads rifle laying on the ground OUTSIDE in that dream sequence, they keep all guns locked in the safe, why would it be already outside on the ground, also assuming travis sleepwalked im sure his parents would have fogured it out by him making noises at night and waking them up prior the 17 years hes been living, theyd take precautions to prevent him from doing dumb things while sleep walking i.e. opening the door the sleepwalking theory is a weak one
maybe paul didn't keep the key literally with him at all times but somewhere in his bedroom, and I'm not saying travis has been sleepwalking his entire life, his sleepwalking probably started when his grandpa died as it seemed he had a close relationship with him. His sleepwalking could've also started bc of his fear of the unknown, an unknown he witnessed first hand when watching his grandpa die.
Ernesto Grey but we see Paul "literally" have a necklace with the key on it when it explains it too them
I feel like a misleading trailer is a death sentence for a movie. If the trailer makes the movie look better than it is, the audience is disappointed; if the trailer makes it look worse, audiences won't see it; if the trailer makes it look like a really good movie of one genre, but in reality it's another genre, regardless of its actual quality, then audiences will be disappointed. However, the point of the trailer is to just get butts in seats, and if that means advertising psychological horror like it's a monster movie, then so be it.
I think a trailer that leads to many questions, will make audiences want answers and go see it. A good trailer doesn't spoil the film, yet tells just enough to spark interest.
Effeffia Gonalick That’s the worst for me, when a psychological thriller is marketed as a monster movie, because I’d actually much prefer to see a psychological thriller but I often won’t want to see a monster movie. So if a psychological thriller (which I actually want to see) is marketed incorrectly, I’ll often miss it because I don’t realize that’s what it was. Meanwhile said movie will get bad reviews from those expecting a monster movie, further enforcing my desire to not see it because I keep hearing what a “bad movie” it is. Only after someone I trust says, “oh actually that’s a really good psychological thriller” do I finally realize it’s right up my alley. So essentially this form of marketing completely misses advertising the movie to the people who might actually WANT to see this type of movie when they mis-market it to the masses, making them think it’s a different type of movie altogether.
Triangle (2009) suffered from it
when you get a chris stuckmann reveiw notification and stop everything to watch
I honestly loved this movie i really liked the lack of information it gives, it makes you feel like the characters do the sense of isolation and fear of the unknown its awesome like Chris said we don't need to be spoon feed information, use your imagination to fill in the blanks.
I honestly agree 100% with you
Andrew Milei thanks man
My take: They focused so heavily on Travis' dream sequences (and him as a character), that I think it's most likely he was the cause of the illness being brought in. He kept saying he wasn't sleeping well, so it's very possible he started losing track of what was real and what was a dream, so much so that he went out into the night to find his dog and brought it back home. This is when he got sick. They even said that Andrew was too short to open the door to begin with.
So, the reason Will wanted his family to leave was simply because he didn't feel safe anymore, given that Paul seemed convinced that Andrew was sick. They wanted to leave and get their share of supplies, which he knew Paul wouldn't have given them (at least as much as they'd hoped).
I'm with the critics. Yeah, I think the advertising ruined this movie with audiences. I saw the reaction of everyone and how they seemed disappointed with what they got but I was so invested with every scene, that I didn't care it was the typical horror story.
On the other hand, this movie does suffer from not telling us anything. Which I like and don't like at the same time. The questions raised really baffled me but after some thinking, I thought they fit the theme of the film perfectly. If none of the characters know what's going on, then why should we? I thought that was the genius part of the whole movie.
It's possible, that when I go back to watch this film again, I might not like it as much because I know what I'm getting and nothing will ever be solved. But for the first viewing, I thought it was an intense experience, mixed with great acting, a compelling plot, and an unique movie that will divide audiences and critics once more.
Chris Zwick completely agree with everything you said
I like movies like It Follows, The VVitch and The Babadook, so I'll check it out.
Joshua Baratheon don't do it it's sucks
Joshua Baratheon I loved the Babadook, but didn’t like this movie.
Joshua Baratheon I genuinely like all of those movies, It Follows is one of my favorites in the past few years. I did not like It Comes At Night.
gasp. all bad reviews
Joshua Baratheon save your money
Joel Edgerton has quickly become one of the best actors working today.
Review David Lynch movies
You have me wondering what he'd think of Inland Empire. That movie... well I'm not sure still and I've seen it four times for some reason.
Connor McCartney He should definitely consider this for the future as I've seen this being suggested more than once here. Lynch is up there as one of my top 5 favorite directors and I'd love to see Chris upload analysis videos for Lynch's most surreal and confusing namely Eraserhead, Mulholland Dr., and what you mentioned, to name a few.
Connor McCartney I was thinking about David Lynch when he was saying how the director wouldn't tell any information about what happened in his head off camera. That is a very Lynchian approach.
Connor McCartney hell yes!!
Mr. Keyser Söze You can find some pretty good explanations of Mullholland Drive and Lost Highway on RUclips. Inland Empire less so. But Lynch usually has a story arch to his films, and puts clues throughout, while leaving the viewer to find their own meaning. Except Inland Empire...every time that film starts to make any sense, bam! another absurdly strange set up and situation unfolds.
I just watched this movie and the only way I can get myself to like it is to imagine that it takes place in the same universe and location of the witch, just 400 years later
No if only one of the goats was Black Phillip. I still liked the movie though and who knows, maybe it does and maybe Black Phillip got the dog sick and opened the door
Stefon Stephens woah
I thought I was the only one who got similar vibes between the two films. As soon as it ended and I thought more, it reminded me heavily of The Witch in plot direction and cinematography. Loves them both
That would make sense, yeah. Yeah, that sounds interesting.
Tylerforeman1000 it was made from the same production
"The only thing that separates it from other films or TV shows of this sort is the execution." And that's why I love It Comes at Night.
It's like 4 am Chris what are you doing
Danyal Mohammad he came at night
Danyal Mohammad not where I am. lol
4 AM ? 10 AM here!
He's coming...at night.
Teoman Taner Sorry for the repeat comment...you beat me to it!
I was visiting a friend getting a creative writing degree at Concordia University and, on the basis that I'm a professionally published writer, I was invited to sit in on one of his classes. The professor was their writer-in-residence, a man who identified himself as a post-post-modernist, and whose best-known book had shreds of newspaper glued randomly over parts of the text to deliberately obscure it. Most of the students in the class had trouble assembling a coherent sentence, but they spent the entire class discussing whether an author who was gay was necessarily a gay author.
Films like "It Comes at Night" remind me of that class. A genuinely thought-provoking film doesn't have to scream in my ear, "I AM THOUGHT-PROVOKING! LOOK AT ME, I'M PROVOKING DEEP THOUGHTS NOW!" The Matrix, for example, isn't afraid to be fun and to give us ground-breaking action scenes even while it's making existential arguments about destiny and free will. Likewise, films like Hitchcock's Psycho, Kubrick's The Shining, and Nolan's Inception are capable of being thought-provoking without having to signal that they're doing so by turning into a pretentious pastiche of Tarkovsky. I think if you have to tell people you're being clever you're probably not as clever as you think you are.
Incredible response, and I mean that. Show, not tell, is an important rule. But showing without much connection or none at all to the subsequent scenes, even if the film is going on a state of being, like paranoia ... it can become too much, too quickly.
Well said. I wish there were more horror films in the vein of The Thing, or The Fly. Those are films that are hugely entertaining, but they also comment on the human condition without being self indulgent.
NoJusticeNoPeace I think that some directors and "clever" moviegoers mix "What the heck did I just watch?" And "That movie metaphor has me interpreting this film ten different ways" as "thought-provoking." They want to direct/watch a "complex" film, and don't care if it's confusing or nonsensical. They'll make something up to try and show the hidden meaning behind the film, or use the easy way out and refuse to comment on it. It's like trying to use twenty big words to tell a story that could've been told in ten.
That guy sounds hilarious. I want to call people post-post-modernists now.
+Marissa Perez His name is Robert Majzels if you're curious about him. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Majzels
This movie pissed me off. The trailer completely mislead me.
Steven Vega
And I can understand that.
thats how i felt.
Okay, I agree, but what if you ignored the trailer? And just watched it on it’s ons?
@@samwse7503 - i would've still been upset.
Valorince i can understand that.
I am VERY happy I never saw any trailers for the movie. It was one of my favorite movies in a while.
The Last of Us vibes make me really hopeful there will be a Last of Us movie, because this one turned out great in my opinion
Guess you got your wish in a way
I hope *THIS* is the video that finally pushes you over 1 Million Subscribers! :)
🅱️🅱️
Wow. I waited 4 years to finish this Chris Stuckmann video, because I didn’t want spoilers and finally saw the film. I loved it. The movie, not this review. I’m very surprised Stuckmann didn’t get it. I suppose that goes to show, films speak to others differently, especially the ambiguous ones. To me, it was obvious at the end that Travis was sick the entire time. And it is a horror that Paul never looked throughly within his family, rather trying to guard them from outside threats. The dark irony. And the film was beautifully shot and well acted, and the suspense was intense throughout, not only trying to figure out what the threat was, but where it could potentially be coming from. Amazing! I do agree with Chris with poor marketing. The trailers seemed to show more of Travis’ nightmares, from his sickness, for the entirety. When actually the movie is more suspenseful than a gorefest. Thankfully I went into the movie mostly blind with low expectations, and I received the best reward.
i waited 5 xD
@@bradastra6111 what are your thoughts? Worth the wait? Ha
@@mitzack well I liked the movie. The dreams I think it comes from whatever the deasease is and they are also used has foreshadowing. The camera ratio at the end is very interesting, because it causes confusion on what it's real or not, or the crash between reality and dream. Overall very well done.
@@mitzack one more thing is that I would add is that I don't agree with your take on paul. I think he new what's up with is son, but choose to ignore, to keep going and hope for the best.
Still waiting for the analysis on Neon Demon and Nocturnal Animals man.
WallyWest hes done both?
WallyWest oh wait you meant analysis not review ahah
he did neon demon, didnt he : o?
Maybe in an alternate universe, yes.
oh youre right, he hasnt lol
Chris, I think you misunderstand the film completely. The film is about the psychological effects of constant fear.
BEGIN SPOILERS: The film's protagonist is Travis. The the "It" of the title refers specifically to the nightmares and the terror of constant death. He finally succumbs to the constant fear after not only losing his grandfather but his dog, added to the sexual frustration that he was starting to feel towards Kim. He lied about going through the door as we saw in that flashback at the end, he was the one that killed everyone by going out and finding his dog. The only scene that doesn't really belong is the shootout between Paul, Will and the two men (father and son?). This is the only scene that isn't impacted by Travis and he has no role in. Even the drinking scene between Paul and Will could be part of something Travis is incorporating into his dreams as the film expertly establishes Travis does with sounds going on in reality as he sleeps, mixed in with relatively thin walls. END SPOILERS
The film isn't perfect and I am furious that A24 took what was a great psychological drama and tried to market it as a horror film and if anything shows the serious problem of Rotten Tomatoes as marketing tool. That should be the takeaway from this. If I were marketing this, I'd probably go with the way Hitchcock marketed Psycho mixed with the original Cloverfield marketing; by leaving the "it" a complete mystery and not trying to play up the monster aspect. Why are the critics raving? And DO NOT RELEASE THIS AS A SUMMER FILM!!! This could've been a sleeper surprise in February or September. But alas, they did what they did and now I can only hope it finds a second chance on streaming.
When did he go out to find his dog? In the dream sequence? And if he did, then what was the point of that scene where the father shows everyone that he Is the only one that has the key to the exit? Ugh, just thinking about the many pointless scenes this movie had makes me regret seeing it even more. Nothing they said led anywhere, and they ended with such a cliché outcome at the end. Other than the cinematography, I can't possibly understand what the critics saw in this movie that was so freaking awesome.
The filmmaking and aspects of suspense were very impressive in this movie but as someone who picked this as a “scary horror movie” for the whole family to watch, I was so damn disappointed and honestly upset. Felt like it was leading up to something that never happened for the whole movie
I saw the trailers and knew exactly what I was getting into. It seemed like a film similar to the tone of The Witch, so I expected a dreadful tone. I think at this point the horror genre has been so cliched any movie that is labeled as such audiences will expect shit jumping at them every minute
poetryjesus pretty much yeah. for example 'it follows' got a lot of hate from general audience's because it was "boring".
poetryjesus I know! I didn't find the marketing that misleading. if anything the title is misleading.
Chris, why did you come at night? Now I have to lose more sleep to watch this video.
In my understanding of the movie, the idea is to experience everything from the characters perspectives. SPOILERS:
They all died not knowing any of the truth. There is probably something in the woods causing the infection, but the family doesnt know. Nobody knows what is happening, in the cities, etc. So, the audience will experience the fear of the unknown until the end. I found it refreshing, and i loved it.
The film is focused on paranoia and fear. The title itself alludes to that very same thing. This is more of a look into the psyche of the fear of the unknown.
TastyMTG And yet it even fails to establish that aspect properly. This movie was a piece of shit.
Dan Levitan "omg, why didn't explain it to me in a 10 minute explanation directly towards me, ugh I hate subtlety just tell me the them directly instead of conveying it through the events of the film and the imagery" oh please. If you want things monologued to you read a book.
Everyone is asking, why did Chris come at night? He won't tell us. Just like this movie.
I just recently watched It Comes at Night yesterday. No trailers coming in. Came in with a fresh mind. I loved the movie! It shows that the true horror is paranoia.
I saw this film and I thought it was great! I saw the trailers and I agree that it was very misleading but I was happy that it wasn't just another film about a monster that goes bumping the night!
but isn't a monster bumping in the night what you wanted to see in the first place.
Jude Ceant I've seen so many films that are about a monster that comes out at night and I'm kinda sick of them. I haven't seen many pathogen outbreak movies and the ones that I have seen don't even come close to this fantastic film! It was a lot scarier than I thought it was going to be and that's the main reason I went to see this film and it did scare me so I was satisfied!
Honestly...I never noticed the aspect ratio changes. I feel kind of dumb and almost want to see it again because of that. But the ending and false sense of what we all thought it was going to be was such a let down. I'm disappointed but not upset and glad I saw it.
I never mind aspect ratio changes as long as the story is enticing.
I just saw it last night and I thought it was super powerful. I was lucky that I had not seen a single trailer of it. As you refer to The Witch and Babadook; those are two films I also adored and it's nice to have you put them in that list because yes, this film belongs there. They are doing something with horror that is unique, grips you and is not all about the jump scares but the experience. The unanswered questions kept me busy for the remainder of the night. You noticing the screen dimentions shifting was something I had not noticed and I think that makes it even more powerful. Can't wait to see it again.
Suicide Squad was the definition of misleading.
Elektra It looked like shit and ended up being a bigger shit
Elektra How was it misleading? Other than making people think it would be good.
Josh Taylor the marketing campaign made the Joker seemed like he was going to be in most of the movie, but he was only in it for 10 minutes.
Josh Taylor They made it look like the Joker was going to be a main point of the film, and he was barely in the film at all.
Elektra ummm this was more misleading
It hurts my heart when people crap on a well made movie, then like a piece of garbage like transformers
Jtog I have yet to meet someone over 6 who likes Transformers and this is still a movie that deserves to be crapped on.
Jacob Staten If people didn't like it then it wouldn't make a billion dollars
Jtog it made money because of misleading advertising and critics propping it up, not by being good. This is no different than a thousand other direct to video horror movies that have all been done to death and it's hollow. It did well because people who liked good movies like Nocturnal Animals, Babadook, VVitch, It Follows, and dozens of other decent movies done on a budget thought it would be more than it was. $10 and 2 hours of everyone's life they will never get back.
Jtog you realize it's mostly teens and parents who still don't seem to realize the movies are way inappropriate for their tots that keep those movies going, right?
Jtog I just saw it today and people were shitting all over it already it pisses me off cause people now a days have the brain capacity of a squirrel and give all these slower buildup movies shit and thrillers like these don't get the praise they deserve, this movie is deffinitely not a masterpiece but it's also not a piece of shit like people in the audience said, I thought it was a good movie
When a director says they purposely leave questions unanswered, it’s because they didn’t know how to answer them.
hell yeah and in this case it was a detriment to the movie.
Brad Jones enjoyed it. That's better marketing than the trailers.
I grew up at night.
I grew up coming at night.
I was born at night but not last night
TheMovieJunkiez my gf throwing it back at night
I loved the fact that non of those questions were answered. I felt like I was there with them, experiencing what they were experiencing and just as anxious, confused, and afraid as they were. Really refreshing.
*It snaps at night - The Danger of My Neck*
Zod's Snapped Neck Lol!
Zod's Snapped Neck
not fuckin' funny
hulk fan it's fuckin funny
O man I missed that! LOL
Lmao!
This is one of the most loved and hated that I have seen in a while.
i liked it honestly
I feel like the title flew over many peoples heads as they expected the "It" to be a physical presence, rather than the vividly realistic nightmares (possibly sleepwalking) that "comes at night", portraying the first signs of the infection.
There is a line between leaving things open for interpretation and being intentionally confusing, Chris. I understand everything you're saying, but I think you're asking for too much here. Asking for a movie based on paranoia and confusion of the characters to answer every possible question defeats the purpose of the movie. The brother-in-law moment is entirely believable, I'm an only child with a stepbrother and I still normally refer to myself as an only child.
The point of a lot of parts of the movie (without spoiling anything) is that it doesn't matter who did what, who let who in, etc. because the story would still end up playing out the same way. I had the same thoughts you did when the movie ended, but I enjoyed the discussion of them and interpretations of them rather than being upset that they weren't directly answered. The entire movie had me on the edge of my seat, especially the score, because I had absolutely no idea what was going to happen. And, come on, "It Comes At Night" is clearly referring to either Travis' dreams or the general paranoia that sets in with the whole family. It's the fear of the unknown. Criticizing a movie that is entirely based on the fear of the unknown because it doesn't have clear, easy to digest answers is be self-defeating.
I'm glad you got a lot out of it to discuss, though. I agree that the trailer is nothing like the film and can ruin the film for some, but "It Comes At Night" itself is an engaging, freaky, human movie. This is "Babadook" and "The VVitch" level for me.
Dream sequences are weak. And Babadook and The VVitch were way better than this pile of crap
The only thing I didn't like about it comes at night was the aspect ratio change. It's so distracting. And like Chris said it killed the tension for me a lot of the time.
thefatman69fude how? Every time I saw the dream sequence aspect change, I thought "okay, what does this dream symbolize in the context of the movie?"
Not, "Wow now I know it's not real I guess there's nothing to gain from this". I'm not trying to be a dick, but this part of Chris' argument seems so surface level to me. It seems like he doesn't want to have to put thought into a movie that clearly deserves it - either that or he will put thought into it, but he's taking away points from the movie for having symbolism at all.
Aaron Kriever this movie sucks. Babadook and VVitch we're much better. The "It" that comes at night is the symptoms of the illness. The boy got it from the dog who got it from Grandma. You start with bad dreams and paranoia, sleep walking, delirium, then finally the wheezing and spots. He opened the door in a sleepless haze. It would be an ok 20 minute short film but it's nothing deep or original and nothing we haven't seen a thousand times.
Jacob Staten good point on the dog getting it from grandpa I hadn't thought of that! This movie would indeed make a good short film. However I think that it works great as a full length movie, it's not even that long. It's a slow burn. The VVitch and Babadook are better to me because of the thematic material being more strong. That being said, this movie in no way sucks. It has a target audience, it's not for everybody.
The ending of this movie is amazing. My jaw hit the floor.
I found the editing choices to be fantastic. They really added to the tension and the paranoia - I was actually wondering for a while if I was imagining that aspect ratio tinkering, until the end where it's really obvious, but oh so effective. The unanswered questions also add to the film. As for "what was the dog barking at in the woods" - it's hidden, but in ONE shot, you can see, if you know where to look, the arm of someone hiding behind a tree towards the right of the screen. Just barely moving back into cover, like someone desperately trying to avoid detection. It sent chills down my spine.
One of the best horror films of 2017.
No monsters shown, but who needs to see them when a film is this affecting.
Puts most Indie-Horror film makers to shame.
The type of film you can watch more than once.
kufujitsu Yep. It’s also my favorite horror films of 2017. My second favorite is IT. I’ve seen It Comes At Night about 3 Times. Thank god I didn’t see the misleading trailers.
And fall asleep again.
The problem with this film is it doesn't have a pay off. Yeah people have complained about the VVitch, but at least at the end of the film we have closure. I dunno, this was a very interesting film but in the end I just felt more confused and frustrated.
ashley how so? This is one is a bit more satisfying than The Witch
Yeah this movie was way better than the witch.
The payoff is that everyone is dead. Some people find pleasure out of not being spoon fed happy and predictable endings. I loved the hell out of this.
William Poole
Who said the ending had to be happy or predictable?? The issue people like myself have with this film is that it felt like pointless tension. I’m not gonna fall in line to the snobs who think I’m somehow a lowest-common-denominator horror fan, because I felt this film had a nothing ending. I love horror. I just felt as if this particular film was a pointless venture.
People are excusing this movie's lack of writing because of the atmosphere and tension it creates. Imo atmosphere and tension with no pay off is a waste of time. Great directing, poor writing.
I just watched this movie. I had not seen trailers or other reviews for it and have never heard anyone talk about it. You hit a lot of what I was feeling: a lot of questions (like the dog barking in the woods) with either no answers or unsatisfying answers.
So basically what the movie is, is the family in The Happening who boarded up their house and killed the two young boys trying to break in with a shotgun. It's from their POV perspectives, which is just 'fear from what they do not know,' therefore audience doesn't know either...they're just a bunch of confused people letting fear controlling them from stepping into the outside world. Which could be interesting, but sadly is a let down. I'm assuming 'It comes at night' is a metaphor for a 'man's fear of the unknown (darkness/night) haunting him relentlessly until he becomes mentally ill.'
"Fear from uncertainty comes at night"
Joe Cook actually that is a hundred percent correct, there is actually a doctor who episode called listen which does this much better
Couldnt agree with you more. I was crazy excited about this movie (one of my most anticipated of the year). The poster is AWESOME, the trailer is one of the best of the year, and I left liking the movie yet still very disappointed. That entire scene with the dog barking was what i wanted more of from the whole film, but in the end didn't really get any of afterward.
But there's no Hollywood monster creation that could match what your imagination conjures (maybe the original Alien or the 1982 The Thing). Think about it - is there really anything zombie or alien related that would have satisfied that need? No. The unknown is FAR more terrifying.
i hate when movies don’t answer questions they set up and act intelligent for not answering them ..it’s a super well made movie but it’s also super disappointing
Why didn't chris do a regular review as well as an analysis, I'm interested in what grade you'd give it and your opinion on the film without revealing spoilers it's frustrated me a bit
I know, right? He's supposed to avoid giving away too much and I feel like I don't need to see it after this video.
He did give his grade though, its something in the middle, with no real grade, its not a film for a grade really. And its definitely a movie we should see, imo, in order to figure out our own thoughts. I know i like this style of movie, regardless so now i am interested due to the review.
Exactly the point Chris! You should've seen the exclamations and remarks by the average movie-goer once the film ended, it was more horrific than anything that happened in the actual film.
I love this movie. Just saw it and I'm in awe of what I've seen. The message I left with is that compassion will get you killed. Boldness and mercilessness will keep you alive but will destroy you as a human being. Dark and disturbing. I loved it.
All I can say is I liked it. I liked not knowing what happened. The realist actions from the characters made me more disturbed than a creature would normally. Seeing how far a person would go for their family. How fear is actually the monster of man.
WHAT SCENE IS THAT 2:38?
THAT FIRE
André Filipe It wasn't in the movie
ezwar99 😂😂😂
André Filipe word I didnt see that in the movie.
yeah what scene is that tho? not in the movie
André Filipe it is the movie after audiences saw it
Terrifying movie. Captured the terror of what a post apocalyptic world might be like. I will not forget this one any time soon.
Chris, I think I have it "Explained." The oil painting in the movie is "The Triumph of Death" painted by Pieter Bruegel the Elder painted in 1562. It explains what "it" is that "comes in the night". The painting is a representation of death and the futility of humanity to fight back against it. Everything from dining families, to kings, or even to parents trying to protect their children from death are written all over it. The "infection" is the catalyst of death and the "thing" in the wilderness the dog barks at are all one and the same. It is death. The representation of death. Cancer, murder, starvation, you name it. The director lost his father, and was powerless to stop death, and now he has a perfect view of his own mortality, which is the fear of death. And what is the fear of death? A fear of going into the unknown. Is there an after life? Is it just an eternity of darkness that can't be experience by the dead? Which leads to the fear of regret. Did we do all we could in life before we go to face the unknown darkness of ceasing to exist? The unanswered questions left to you in the movie aren't meant to be solved. They're meant to build the walls of the ever encroaching fear of the certainty of death.
Steven Yanis damn I think you’re interpretation is the best one I’ve seen.
the most misleading marketing i remember was the trailers for the adam sandler movie that had came out where he was dying of cancer. they made it seem like it was another sandler comedy but was not even close.
Jennifer Smith funny people was a great movie, in my opinion at least
People feel differently towards things. This exact movie scared the shit out of me. I cringed in my bed that night couldn't stop thinking something unexplainable, the IT, was outside the door, roaming around in the dark dining room. I had watched many horror films, yet this one really got me on the nerve. Even watching you recap make me unsettling.
Come on, it makes the dream sequences as obvious as it possibly cann, not only with the aspect ratio change. It shows very clearly, a shot of Travis laying in bed and drifting off to sleep, and then the screen slowly fades to black. If anyone was surprised that the scenes that come after that were dream sequences, then it's their own fault for paying no attention at all.
I just watched this last night and I agree. it was very obvious to tell when it was a dream. It wasn't supposed to trick you and to be honest, it was still terrifying.
I love these breakdown vids!
If you haven’t watched Shults first film “Krisha,” it is an amazing film that he made on a $30,000 budget in his house, with his aunt as the main character and the rest of his cast is his family except for Bill Wise. It’s a deep and challenging character study about family and how the past can affect a person. It’s absolutely brillaint.
Well, this makes me very glad I didn't watch the trailer before seeing the film. I liked the movie, didn't love it, but luckily had no expectations that weren't met.
great review.. the fatal flaw of the film is lack of resolution / payoff.. in the theater where I watched it, there were literally a couple "boos" at the end... there's a lot of quality work in it but it just fizzles, because of no satisfying ending...
Do we really need a "payoff" for every movie? I don't think so.. I'm tired of people trashing a film because it didn't end wrapped up with a pretty bow. There have been some amazing films that don't follow the conventional way of Hollywood filmmaking... with an obvious one being 2001 A Space Odyssey.
Jarin Nealy and the shining
655321 but the shining did have a satisfying ending, same with 2001. Yeah they had some very open ended part but for the main focus of the film the ends were satisfying.
I disagree. The payoff IS the unknown. Is there anything more terrifying, really, than knowing that a deadly plague is outside your walls, you just killed/watched killed your grandpa, a child, a husband/wife, a dog, and your own son. You are/may be infected. Heck, Carpenter's The Thing bombed at the box office and he struggled to get work but it's now considered among the best horror sci fi ever. No "payoff" at the end there - same unanswered questions as to who is infected and what happens next.
I could have been good, but that ending was pure shit
I didn’t see the trailer for this or anything, just watched it off a streaming website. Thoroughly enjoyed it, thought the somewhat lack of explanation gave it a real strangeness.
It's obvious that A24, which distributed the film, wanted to make some money off of it and decided to marketed as a horror film when they know that it really wasn't one. They know people, like myself and you Chris, will go see of horror film, whether critics praise the movie or not. That is why The Babadook got slammed by audiences because they though they were going to a creature horror film but instead, got a film about grief. That was due on how the film was marketed by the studio who release it and the same thing is happening here.
This is like a quiet place with no creatures
Just vcame out in Scotland today, had not seen any ads or trailers, my mates just said "new horror it came out today, wanna see it." Went in blind and came out loving it.
I'm fine with not having all the answers but that can go off the rails real quick and just become obtuse or make your film flat out nonsense for anyone not the director.
Still my award for the most misleading trailer still goes comfortably to DRIVE. The trailer made it look like Fast and The Furious and if you've seen the movie that is so not what that movie is.
I don't know if it has anything to do with the marketing. Critics love slow burns without much payoff and a lot of audience members hate them.
Also isn't what comes at night the airborne virus?
The second family isn't sick. They want to leave because they know Paul's family is sick. Will is probably telling them straight that he refers to his step brother as his brother since the point is Paul doesn't trust Will no matter what even though Will probably just had a slip of the tongue. The movie is intentionally ambiguous but I feel like you also didn't pay attention to a few of the answers it did actually give.
MicoDossun wait hold up.
Their little kid was sick, wasn't he? Found sleeping in other room, he was crying, getting yelled at & then shielded. What did I miss
QuitJones no no that's trying to trick you, I think. I think the movie in the end is trying to say that Will's family is trustworthy while the main family is not.
When we hear Will's family fighting and crying and saying "he's sick" we assume Andrew is sick but I believe what they're saying is Travis is sick and they need to escape. The arguing probably stressed Andrew out and he started crying.
At least that's how I interpret it
Would love to see movie thought videos like this from you Chris. Big fan since 2016(15?) Much love from El Paso, TX
7:34
Check out the tree to the immediate right side of Stanley. If you rewatch this scene in the movie, there is someone (or some thing) barely visible behind the tree. It shifts and you can clearly see its arm move from being barely visible to going behind the tree. It's at the 49:30 mark in the film. Stanley and crew end up running right past it, but it was there watching them.
Eric Smith On the first tree to the right of the dog
max brightness, 1080p, 0.25 speed. Don't see shit to the right of the dog or Stanley except for shitty video capture causing the footage to warp slightly. Good troll.
It’s true! It’s in the movie. Hard to see unless you keep rewatching that part in the movie but he’s right.
Anything you think you see is just slight distortion from the video quality/monitor you're watching it on.
Start button > Search programs & files > Calibrate display color > Next (x3) > Turn up gamma > Watch again in highest possible quality.
There's nothing there.
I don’t know. I think I still see it. 🤨 But anyway it’s not the only thing like that in the movie. Like a man sitting on a tree stump as they are driving along, for example.
I was left "meh". I think is about paranoia. The parents are overreacting and probably kill the other family just out of fear.
your tune in these filmy-educational videos is great...like in ACTION-BASED video!
"The job of the artist is always to deepen the mystery" - Francis Bacon
"The role of the artist is to ask questions not answer them." - Anton Chekhov
"Interpretation is the intellect's revenge upon art." - Susan Sontag
The thing I hate the most about modern audiences is their expectation of simple answers and their attempts to place rigid explanations/theories on every film they see. They completely ignore the film as it is and therefore miss the emotions/ideas/questions it is trying to provoke. A film is not a math equation or crossword puzzle to be solved.
On a final note I thought the film was well made and interesting, but not a masterpiece.
Dude, I agree with you 100%. Art doesn't need an explanation.
Yeah, I don't really know why people always need all the answers. Probably an overall lack of imagination as well as the clear mass state of confusion people are unaware they're suffering in. Humans aren't known for being very original or interesting though. C'est la vie.
A movie is supposed to tell a story. If your story has a bunch of gaps in it it's not a complete story.
I hate when directors do this kind of thing, but it's unfair to act like this is anything new. This could even end up as the new "Donnie Darko" in several years.
It's not as quirkly/ creative/ weird as Donnie though.
Donnie darko actually has clues to what it means though, and tbh, its not that hard to figure it out.
DeepFried Wat3rMel0n actually its the opposite for me i had no clue what was going on in donnie darko but could figure out it comes at night pretty quickly
@@codyking981 Donnie Darko needs the Director's Cut to figure it out
I did as you said. Stop the video, watched the movie and finished with the same trouble and questions.. don't know if I like it or not, the cinematography and actings are way too good but it leaves you with a sense of emptyness.
Thank you Chris for videos like this, when you take your time to reflect on other things than just the movie itself!
I HATED this movie. I'm definitely biased because I've never been a fan of the "choose your own adventure" type of story (my OCD forces me to think about it nonstop for days after and it's impossible for me to turn it off) but this takes that idea to the most ridiculous extreme. What on earth is the purpose of bringing up so many subplots just to not even address them?? People are saying that we only know what the characters know, but we don't even know that much. The characters are clearly afraid of a physical danger at night, why would that not be explained to us? Why are we left with just a metaphor? The 'it' is fear and paranoia? I'm sorry, is heightened fear and paranoia at night some original idea all of a sudden?
All this disconnect made me not care about the characters. Will's family dies at the end? Good. Will started it and they were all sick anyways. To me, this all just came across as incredibly lazy story telling. Critics are praising it for being a human story instead of a monster story, as if that's somehow unique. But as Chris said, this has been done over and over and over again. The only thing unique about it is the execution.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all about the psychological thriller (see They Look Like People for an actual good example) and I didn't even watch the trailer before watching this movie. But NOTHING new was addressed here. In fact, the story didn't even bother to address itself, so how am I, as an audience member, supposed to give a damn about it?