Multiparametric MRI to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 35

  • @jellebarentsz2736
    @jellebarentsz2736  10 месяцев назад +2

    The report says the prostate is a bit bigger than usual, but the PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen) production of your prostate is normal. There's a described area that's likely a small inflammation in the prostate (subclinical prostatitis), and no serious prostate cancer is found.
    I suggest checking the PSA every year. If it's higher after one year, we should do another MRI.
    I can't really say how important these findings are because I don't know how good the MRI was and how skilled the radiologists who described it are.
    I hope this information is helpful.
    Kind regards,

    Jelle Barentsz
    Professor of Radiology
    Expert-Prostate-MRI

    • @Willsontime
      @Willsontime 4 месяца назад

      This is great. Thanks. So basically don’t really need contrast unless there’s a huger risk if cancer. A lot can be done without the contrast by looking at black/white and density.

  • @immane75
    @immane75 4 года назад +2

    I wish you can share daily cases with us . I learned prostate MRI when I was a resident in 2008 , I found it daunting because of perfusion curves and spectroscopy !!!! drop it for a while , and now I am going back to reading it , sometimes can't be sure what to do with small stuff ??? I keep on record my cases and follow the path but unfortunately we don't do image fusion !!! no sure about the results !

  • @kchopra4080able
    @kchopra4080able Год назад

    Excellent explanation Doctor Barentsz. Thank you so much for your time.

  • @marczera
    @marczera 29 дней назад

    Very nice presentation! Thank you!

  • @atilaucar5752
    @atilaucar5752 3 месяца назад

    You're explaining very precise und clear. Thank you very much.

  • @onexsculler
    @onexsculler 3 года назад +3

    An excellent presentation! Thank you very much!

  • @edinburgh1578
    @edinburgh1578 10 месяцев назад +1

    Very well explained. Thank you!

  • @THEPRINCESSAMAZING
    @THEPRINCESSAMAZING Год назад +2

    I loved this video. The explanation was beautifully written.

  • @bhumiotwani7513
    @bhumiotwani7513 2 месяца назад

    Very nice explanation 😊

  • @AQUA14130
    @AQUA14130 2 года назад +1

    Thank you sir for sharing your knowledge to us.

  • @kishorecoelho3186
    @kishorecoelho3186 Год назад

    Enjoyed your presentation. Very informative. Thanks

  • @stevedosier1829
    @stevedosier1829 2 года назад

    Best presentation yet! Thank you.

  • @olegh21
    @olegh21 Год назад +1

    Excellent video, thank you for sharing!

  • @immane75
    @immane75 4 года назад +2

    Excellent . Thank you very much .

  • @scoot77777
    @scoot77777 4 месяца назад

    Nice work ! Dr.

  • @janetw9430
    @janetw9430 10 месяцев назад

    Can you explain this to me please, our urologist never did. The 3T MRI, no contrast, was done in May. Not seen a doctor since begining of May just before this MRI. Thank-you
    Prostate gland measures 6.6, 5.5, 4.4 centimeters on CC, TR and AP dimensions respectively with
    estimated volume of 84 cc and PSA density of 0.063 ng/ml/cm3.
    9.5 mm ill-defined nodule with obscured margins are noted within posterior medial aspect of left
    peripheral zone at mid gland which show mild hypointense signal on ADC and mild hyperintense signal
    on high B value DWI sequences likely representing PI-RADS 2/3 lesion. No other peripheral zone lesion
    is noted. PSA is 4.86.

  • @duposflies2621
    @duposflies2621 Год назад +2

    I had the needle biopsy last 5th of this month but not yet got an answer. Because they saw 2 tomur in my prostate with the prostate mri and had a bone scan too because they also saw one abnomality in my bone, I am worried and asking myself did my cancer if I have already metastisized? I had only 3.8 psa and I am 62 yrs this yr.

    • @jellebarentsz2736
      @jellebarentsz2736  Год назад +1

      Sorry, to answer your question, I need to be part of your Multi Disciplinairy Team that has access to all information (e.g. imaging of your bone). As this is not the case, I unfortunately cannot help you. Instead of a bone scan, in our country the guidelines advise a PSMA PET/CT to exclude bone and Lymph Node metastases.

  • @davidwhelan4803
    @davidwhelan4803 3 года назад +1

    Excellent video, very informative.

    • @jellebarentsz2736
      @jellebarentsz2736  3 года назад

      See also:
      doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.021
      doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.024
      doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.009

  • @saqibiqbal5278
    @saqibiqbal5278 2 месяца назад

    very informative

  • @DrMusen
    @DrMusen Год назад

    Excellent video!

  • @parwezshahid50
    @parwezshahid50 4 месяца назад

    Excellent.

  • @prakashsingh-li3wy
    @prakashsingh-li3wy Год назад

    Thank you very much sir.

  • @patrykpatrzaek5641
    @patrykpatrzaek5641 5 месяцев назад

    thank you

  • @samreenlaeeque7613
    @samreenlaeeque7613 10 месяцев назад

    excellent

  • @ravipushkarna475
    @ravipushkarna475 Год назад

    Great

  • @ironsqee1609
    @ironsqee1609 Год назад

    Skill issue

  • @seveneight6535
    @seveneight6535 2 года назад

    clear concise. thank you!