What’s The Best Bible Translation?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- 📚 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀
🤝 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗗 (𝗧𝗔𝗫-𝗗𝗘𝗗𝗨𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗕𝗟𝗘) 🤝
● Website: crossexamined....
● PayPal: bit.ly/Support...
👥 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗠𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗔 👥
● Facebook: / crossexamined.org
● Twitter: / frank_turek
● Instagram: / drfrankturek
● Pinterest: pin.it/JF9h0nA
🗄️ 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗖𝗘𝗦 🗄️
● Website: crossexamined.org
● Store: impactapologet...
● Online Courses: www.onlinechri...
🎙️ 𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗣𝗢𝗗𝗖𝗔𝗦𝗧 🎙️
● iTunes: bit.ly/CrossExa...
● Google Play: cutt.ly/0E2eua9
● Spotify: bit.ly/CrossExa...
● Stitcher: bit.ly/CE_Podca...
#Apologetics #Jesus #Christianity #Theology #Doctrine #Bible #QuestionsAboutFaith #Answers #Skeptics #ChristianityIsTrue #True #CrossExamined #FrankTurek
I use the ESV. But I am learning Greek so hopefully one day I won’t need a translation lol
lol😂
Confess - Greek Word ( Homologeō ) meaning " Same Word " Romans 10:9-10
Spending Time with - Greek Word ( Diatribo ) meaning " to Rub into thouroughly " John 3:22 - The genius of Jesus' strategy of making disciples! Where we derive our modern day word diatribe!
Make disciples of all nations- Greek phrase ( Matheteusate ta ethne ) meaning " Multiply Into all ethnicities " or" Multiply and fill the earth " Matthew 28:18-20 Matheteusate is where we derive our modern day word ( mathematics)
Just a few words that bring much more meaning to the modern translation!
A great resource available to all: " Precious Gems " a 365 word •A•Day Greek word study from scripture truth! Also the Discovery Bible - Full Greek / Aramaic / Hebrew word definitions with grammar prompts for each language as well!
I really like the the ESV myself. 👍
I'm not King James Version only but I prefer it.
AMEN ✝️
Good for you, fetus.
KJV fan also brother, but I like different translations also. God bless.
KJV is OK and will always have a place in my heart, but the Nasb and Esv are much better when it comes to accuracy.
When you realize both polish and hungarian a bit older! 😁😂
I mean english have a lot of things what changed in this 500 years… of course they must to make a new translation because if you really read the king james version you will get very hard time to undersgand even the common phrases!
I use the KJV, but I use other versions to compare if I am not quite understanding the verse.
I use a variety of versions, but now I am trying to read French Bibles, it has really made me stop and think about what was trying to be conveyed. I have a soft spot for the KJV.
Good idea. Amplified is great too.
I use all versions, even NWT to find and understand more easy but trusting KJV 1611 most.
It is difficult for me becorse I am not English. We don't have a Bible you can trust in Swedish.
I am reading the King James Bible which I find it very good . I read & meditate more than 50 years now. I was born again from an Idol worshipping Hindu family. It is so very sweet to me . I also share God's Word in local Churches . I am from Tamil Nadu , India.
It depends on what you mean by best.
The NASB is the most accurate English word for word translation of the Bible.
The ESV is much more readable but sacrifices word for word accuracy to better translate the meaning of whole sentences.
The KJV has its historical importance and Old English style which some Chrstians enjoy even if it has flaws.
The NASB reminds me of the Greek professor who tells the student "OK, you've gotten it out of Greek; now, get it into English," which is the ESV, although I kinda lean NKJV, as I have a longer history with it.
The Amplified version is best imo. It explains the text. For example: if the Bible said " vanilla ice cream" the Amplified would say "ice cream a frozen dessert made from ice, sugar, cream, or milk and vanilla." It explains the text...
No when it comes to the scriptures pick the older versions and ask Holy spirit for understanding it.
@MRakshay-fb2mu
I understand, but too many more manuscripts have been found in the Last few hundreds years.
With respect brother (or sister), but it does much worse than that- it adds to the text and tries to interprets it. That is not a translation, and is essentially adding to God's Word
JESUS CHRIST IS KING OF KINGS AMEN 🙏💪
And Lord of Lords Glory hallelujah...
What do you think about the Concordant Version?
Empty claim from Peter, here....
Lol yelling bs doesn't make it real.
Get a grip!
@@MrAuskiwi101
You have issues Mikey, seek help bud.
KJV! it's a masterpiece that goes beyond simply a translation (see truth is christ)
😂😂😂😂
@@Mavors1099You will be judged by the King James Bible, at least don’t laugh at it. “Truth is Christ” has videos literally made by the Holy Spirit. God bless that channel and Brandon.
I've been using the LSB and ESV lately.
Praise Yahweh the one true God. Revealed Triune as Father, Spirit, and Jesus the Son, each member fully God of which there is only one. 3 distinct Persons coexistant, coequal, and coeternal sharing 1 Divine Essence. Jesus lives and is God, Christ, King. Repent of your sin and believe in Him and be saved to eternal life!
I do king James only.
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved
I used KJV only for for decades. It has an incomparable majesty to the text and by far the easiest to memorize. I now switch between KJV and NKJV, but favorite is KJV.
@@chloemartel9927Lol!
@@mattslater2603- Hey Matt!!! Still trolling these faith sites I see! Arguing against a being you claim does not exist, without any proof to that claim whatsoever! Delusional....yes! Borderline Insane.... quite possibly! You should have yourself checked out! Anyway....be well you and yours!
@@mattslater2603🤡
@@paulrivalto1974
You’re misrepresenting what he’s arguing.
Why?
NKJV for me with resources like Blue Letter Bible to understand certain passages. Not a fan of NIV because it brings it’s theology into the text (too interpretive and not true to the text).
As a Beginner Find a BIBLE KJV BElieving Church and Learn from the Pastor and GO to BIBLE studies and learn from other Christians and Check what they all say by what the BIBLE says cross checking with the concordance. Go to Church Go to Bible Studies
Don’t get a translation from catholic texts.
The KJV and the Luther are both translated from catholic texts.
@@harryfaber wrong
@@WWYG316 Luther translated the Vulgate into German. You don't get much more catholic than that. The KJV was based on the canon established by the catholic church.
Why not?
@@harryfaber Luther was wrong in many respects. KJV comes from the Hebrew masoretic and Aramaic and textus receptus. The popes persecuted anyone with a textus receptus and tried to destroy it.
I use the ESV primarily, but often cross reference with the NRSV, BSB, NASB, NKJV, and others. NLT and NIV are okay but they have a few notable changes that I dont find very helpful.
Thoughts on NET bible?
I would also stay away from The Message. Otherwise, start with your favorite version and use other versions for depth. Always have an good English dictionary nearby to choose the correct definition that fits the context.
Try the Holman Christian standard bible.
An excellent choice (I've taught English for nearly forty years).
Amplified
I prefer the NKJV and NASB, but when I first starting reading I had to start with the NLT.
But for those who want "kindergarten-level" English, go for the CEV.
The NASB 95 or Legacy Standard Bible is the most accurate translation. The KJV is useful for the precise but archaic pronouns in the NT.
Dumb.
The new world translation is light years ahead of most of the translations.
This guy brings up NIV, Which is absolute trash but the NWT is bad?
Absurd.
Kent Hovind and others have made great cases for the KJV
Kent hovind..... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sure. But there are also great cases for NKJV, ESV, and NASB. I would beware of anyone who preaches KJV only!
I use the NIV, and sometimes the NKJV.
King James is just too much of an old style of linguistics for my dumb brain to comprehend.😅
Study requires a word for word translation. Have on hand several translations to compare them, including a middle of the road translation. Also build a library of study helps, for example, Bible dictionary, concordance, commentaries, a book of charts, maps and timelines. Any other recommendations my brothers and sisters in Christ?
Awesome information, God bless sister...
@@gi169God bless you brother.
Thanks, remain blessed 🙏
@@ndibunwapeter9013God bless you also.
Absolutely 💯 🙌
Don't use the Mirror bible either. It's worse than the Passion translation.
Why is the New Word Translation and the Passion bad translations?
Don't read The PER-version😂😂😂
My native language is Dutch, but I prefer the NKJV. I check the KJV too when reading, but that is more out of curiosity for the language/vocabulary use. When I compare with the Dutch version, I find - oddly enough - the NKJV better. The language in the Dutch NBG doe not have the depth that the English one has.
I have refused to read the RC Willibrord bible (Dutch) because of my ex- RC background, but maybe I should start comparing and looking for the lies in the RC one....
They all say the same bs.
Not the “nwt” or the “niv” both are not translated correctly!
To truly translate, get a Vines and a concordance.
I study many versions to compare.
I’d add the Message version as another one to avoid
Why does he say the passion is a bad translation?
All the other versions except KJV are corrupt!! You don’t take verses away from the Lords word.
KJV is corrupt too.
@@Mavors1099 yeah ok Lol
@@blizzard1646
Laugh loud, your god is a joke after all. 😁
@@Mavors1099 You know he’s real that’s why you’re mad. 🙂
@@blizzard1646
Yes, he's a real joke .. 🤣🤣🤣
KJV is the only version you should be reading…. They used a different for of Greek and Hebrew translation… other version are missing or have things taken out of them or verses reworded that give it a different meaning
It's not that the other versions take out anything, rather kjv added some stuff..
Kjv was written when a lot of manuscripts weren’t even out yet
I personally use a Bible app that allows me to toggle different versions while I'm reading for comparison - I like the NKJV, NASB, and KJV best
For me personally I read the NLT and has helped me this year understand the Old Testament more. But I feel it’s important to cross reference your version to others. Some words omitted and different understandings pulled from each.
1) NASB, 2) NKJV, 3) NIV
Any version that makes it "easier to understand" means you ain't getting the real thing, plain and simple. KJV, ESV, NASB are the only safe ones honestly. Don't even get my started on NIV
You're getting the "real thing" with any version.
@Mavors1099 oh really? You seriously think man hasn't twisted scripture to fit their own view? Read "The Message Translation", compare it to the KJV or even ESV, and tell me they have the same meaning. They don't. Not even close. Even read the NIV. Or the Passion Bible. They all skew God's true word because instead of translating it literally, they paraphrase it and in doing so change the meaning. Don't take my word for it, go look for yourself. Be very careful with that way if thinking my friend. It would be foolish to say all Bible translations are the real thing. They're not.
NLT is the best
NKJV for me
I have the brand new Thomas Nelson NKJV Study Bible, it’s fantastic.
A lot of skeptics online will quote those "paraphrase" translations in order to make it seem like the bible says something it doesn't.
I believe the best version in American English is the NASB. It is the closest to KJV without the Old English syntax and vocabulary. I suggest the NASB Ryrie Study Bible.
I like the Old English.
I would go with the ESV to answer the question but like he said to have maybe 3 different versions for study. And always a KJV.
Why always a KJV?
EHV (Evangelical Heritage Version)
Its Aramaic and not Arabic!
He said Aramaic only the subtitles said Arabic. Go back and listen to it again
@@larzman651 I know. I hope Frank`s Editor will fix his mistake.
Theres even a queen james version.....take a swing at what sin it tries to justify..
Well king James was already called queen of England... So..
I prefer the Wikipedia version.
Read whichever book of the bible you’re interested in and you find out many more things about it other than it’s content,
such as if it’s a forgery (2 Timothy) or if it was written later than it says (Daniel, Isiah) which myth it was copied from and much more.
Smh... 😂
@@robertkinsey1098
You would quadruple your understanding of it.
I implore everybody,please read the King James Version. The others are not only simplified,entire verses are taken out. This really affects doctrine believe it or not. English isn't my first language but the KJV is quite easy to follow,please get yourself a KJV and compare with NIV etc to find out all these subtle but important changes yourself. God bless.
Nothing wrong with the New KJ, or ESV, as well as some others that are available. Some people don't care for the old English phrases like Thee, thou, etc. The Holy Spirit will reach someone through God's Word and The Gospel, not only KJV
There is everything wrong when doctrine is affected. No compromising God's word.
eg:
1 John 5:7 (KJV) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
1 John 5: 7(ESV) "For there are three that testify:"
CLEARLY NOT THE SAME STATEMENT.
Even made Christ to seem to lie with their subtle changes:
John 7: 8 (ESV) : You go up to the feast. I am not going up to this feast, for my time has not yet fully come.” 9 After saying this, he remained in Galilee.
10 But after his brothers had gone up to the feast, then he also went up, not publicly but in private.
John 7:8-10 (KJV) Go ye up unto this feast: I go not up yet unto this feast; for my time is not yet full come.
When he had said these words unto them, he abode still in Galilee.
But when his brethren were gone up, then went he also up unto the feast, not openly, but as it were in secret.
One word "yet" but changes the whole narrative. Be vigilant my fellow brethren in Christ.
facts
Thank you CE
All Protestant Bibles are wrong, for they're not complete. The best and only version of the Bible is a Catholic Bible, such as the NABRE or Jerusalem Bible, as they are the complete 73 books.
Most have Omissions. Subtle, prayer instead of prayer and fasting.
Omissions or additions?
@dux657 Omissions. The new International version has something like 48 changes and Omissions.
@@johnpage7735
Omissions from what text?
@dux657 Do a couple of minutes of research online and then you'll have all your questions answered. Regards.
@@johnpage7735
You do the research because your are lost.
NASB, NIV, NKJV, ESV are all based on faulty manuscripts vs the 5500 manuscripts of the TR (Textus Receptus)
All manuscripts are faulty, including the textus receptus.
Neither is "The Message" good. KJV or NKJV is the way to go. Compare 1 John 5:8 across versions!!!
That's because kjv got the message wrong
@@Mavors1099 yeah and you got it right? Am I replying to God by any chance?
@@AlaricDsouza
Not a god, just someone who knows..
@@Mavors1099 so do I. You're dealing with an apologist and polemist. I hope you've done your homework to avoid being humiliated in public!
@@AlaricDsouza
So you're wise in your own eyes... Got it... 😒
And definitely don't get Trump's Bible!
Why? It is just a KJV.
@@gi169 No. It's a blasphemous book with all sorts of irrelevant additions.
@@RJ-uu9mh
How is it blasphemous? It's a KJV Bible none of the documents are or subtract from the Word of God.
@@gi169 Are you aware of the additions that are in the Bible? The Bible isn't a book just for Americans. The Bible is the book of God's word. If God had wanted the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and any other Americanized structuring of it he would have done it himself. If you can't understand the blasphemy, then you're not a very good Christian.
Deuteronomy 4:2 and 12:32.
@@RJ-uu9mh
Trump is God.
The best version would be God just appearing and talking to us.
He doesn't appear to hopeless non believers who mock Him. "A wicked and adulterous generation shall seek a sign but they AREN'T getting one aside from the sign of Jonah."
I would, if I was God. I'm not here to mock though. I would think an appearance from this God would be the greatest thing in the world.
@@mattr.1887 I already told you what Jesus said. You aren't getting a sign besides the sign of Jonah who was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights- like Jesus was in the tomb and rose. We cannot see God and live. No man can. No man for example, can stand 20 feet from the sun and live. That would be impossible. I've seen you blaspheme God in many many posts. You're only hurting yourself. If you're really serious ( and I pray you are ) you'll open your heart and mind to God and He will show you exactly what you're looking for. Humble yourself like every Christian on earth has too. Other than that, you can continue doing what you do... Blessings to you.
Agree. Say if He were born after hundreds of years of prophecy to a virgin in a specific town that's was foretold, did miracles to prove Himself and then died and rose again. Then you'd believe Him. Oh wait...
@@festushaggen2563 And that's a pearl bangle button Billy's absolutely true.
1. Consider a Bible that has ALL the 73 books.
2. Then search for a good translation
Definitely DON'T want the Catholic Bible
@@RJ-uu9mh
What bible do you want?
@@Mavors1099 Are you gonna buy me one? That's so nice of you.
@@RJ-uu9mh
Ask your mom..
So many Bibles only One Quran.
And that only one sucks.
Surah (5:68) Say to them: 'People of the Book! You have no solid ground to stand on unless you establish the Torah and the Gospel and all that had been revealed to you.
THE DIFFERENT ARABIC VERSIONS OF THE QUR'AN
By Samuel Green
Look that up. Your leaders have lied to you (although not necessarily knowingly). There's not only one Arabic version of the Qur'an, but there are many.