I´ve been a professional musician for decades, and although many are quite intimidated with this tech, having real world music skills will make an enormous difference from the average user. AI is like having a team of expert assistants.
Love this comment. In the right hands ai will be just another tool for creating music. I honestly think it will make some people pick up instruments like garage band did. Thanks for the great comment and for watching.
Stuff like this makes me more excited to play physical instruments. Imagine a decade from now being able to rip a guitar solo over any of this AI generated stuff in real time. People will think you're a wizard.
That's exactly the point. The more human, the more valuable will be. It's like classic painting, more and more expensive versus any digital crap from this era. Like this crap music that sounds "cool" for this guy.
Only people uneducated in AI could think that. As a matter of fact, most people will doubt authenticity and integrity of any musician coming up with new songs.
Nailed. Craftmanship will always be more recognized than automation, even if the final product is less sophisticated. Because (thanks to) anthropomorphism. I can see entertainment marketing plans in the future following the same valuation patterns as in the food or clothing industry, promoting how it was "finely crafted by local people" etc
@@ChrisUnlocksAI Young people are not picking up instruments. I give guitar lessons and had up to 7 students every week 15 years ago. I have only one today coming infrequently. They have no incentive and are prone to giving up qickly. This will only accelerate this trend.
A lot of people who make thei bread and butter and built their life around music, creation, production, art, and so forth are in denial about what AI is about to do and will not be able to adapt and change and shift with this emerging paradigm.
Well, I’m glad I’m 70 years old and have lived through some of the best decades of real music. I think without human intervention in a song, or a story or a piece of art it is dead and lifeless. But in the future you won’t know it - maybe that’s okay? I don’t know. And I spent the last 40 years before retiring in IT having watched the progression of AI furtively. Now I’m not so sure. “I’m sorry Dave I can’t do that." Bonus points for the film reference! Just kidding!
Hey, I really appreciate where you are coming from. I am a little more hopeful (perhaps a bit naive) with Ai, in my thoughts artist, and musicians will use it as a tool such as a camera or a midi control. I think it will take human involvement to make it good or great. Also 2001 A Space Odyssey is a classic! Thanks for the great comment and for watching.
@@ChrisUnlocksAI Thank you for your reply and of course yes it was 2001 that I saw in 1968 and many times since … Yes AI could be a very useful tool - I have lots of synthesisers and midi generators, sequencers - I don’t think you are naive it’s simply we are now facing a new thing that we will find out more about over the next few years. I’ve created a couple of bits of J S Bach that sound pretty good, from the software. Really great channel as well.
I think it's great, opens up a lot of inspiration. We've all experienced at least 20 years of decline in mainstream music, it's dulled our senses, made people miserable perhaps. With these new A. I tools I can see people wanting to get more involved in music creation and for existing artists to break the mould and do something interesting or outside their normal safe space.
From the first moment live symphony performers induced spine-tingling sensations which almost made me pass out from sheer delight, I have been addicted to music. AI-generated music doesn’t excite me at all, and I’m damn sure not going to spend money for any of it, much less waste precious time listening to it.
That's very fair. Nothing will ever replace live music. There is some free options, Suno and Udio, I hope that you can at least have some fun with Ai. Thanks for watching
Can you upload a wav file to reference instead of humming? I'd like to upload some of my old guitar demo ideas from years ago that never got fully produced or 🎉 recorded.
I can't help but wonder if the big studios with nearly unlimited resources had this tech a few years ago before everyone else. If you listen to today's mainstream music, it feels and sounds like it's been heavily computer generated. Now that the cat is out of the bag and affordable to everyone, the studios have to reimagine their biz strategy.
yes 100% they been had this tech since the early 2008 or 2009 but they kept it hidden from the public until now. they have way more advanced ai then what they gave us the public. the version the record labels have is way more advanced so far advanced then what we have now its incredible
Read up on the AI subject and history, and don't simplifiy the reasoning to "this tech" like it's something someone just invented. We had computers for long time and it affected our culture. The power of computer resources and recent breakthroughs have made this AI possible, but we still don't know how to use it properly or where it going to go in future.
yes 100% they been had this tech since the early 2008 or 2009 but they kept it hidden from the public until now. they have way more advanced ai then what they gave us the public. the version the record labels have is way more advanced so far advanced then what we have now its incredible
You're assuming a lot here. They've had the ability to convert audio to midi, and play the midi on pre-defined vst instruments. That's not a secret tech anyone has held onto, its been integrated into DAWs for a while now and only got better recently. But this tech in the video is not that and has definitely NOT been around for that long like you're describing, in secret or otherwise. Requires machine learning training methods that simply haven't been around for more than a couple years that would have been impossible previously. Records labels don't have super secret better than public models either. The financial incentives for this tech are making things publicly available for volume, or using it for intangible benefits like pulling people into your tech ecosystem. Record labels don't need premium AI models in secret, there would be no financial incentive for doing so versus using skilled musicians.
So my question is who owns the copyright>? The AI Company because you used their program? The person who types in the words to define the AI>? or the first person to take it to the copyright office.? Better read that lawyer speak that everyone just clicks agree to to be able to use the software. They may own the copyright of anything produced.
what about all the artists music that was stolen that the AI was trained on? It all seems really illegal to me. How is everything the AI creates after training on my picture not a derivative work of my picture?
Suno and now Udio allow you rights to the music. Google has yet to say. Regardless if you write lyrics or a melody and input that into sandbox it is 100% your work.
I see where you are coming from, I think the problem is what if it's taking your picture and 10,000 similar pictures and creating a picture. Is it original or does it belong to the 10,000 other artist who created something similar?
I understand why you say that. It's not really fair though. You can create powerful music with only a laptop and some imagination. I mean you can get killer guitar sounds with Native Instruments electric guitar and just your computer keyboard. Thanks for watching
ruclips.net/video/bbwmbSiNqrM/видео.htmlfeature=shared&t=55 .... that is not a 'hum' by any measure! more like scatting (as in music, not the other meaning!)
I may go manic or die before i get a song done in a reasonable amount of time bur no. Then your not even a musician. The technologies are using us then. If we give life to such things we vacate our soul and become evil A.I. (IT WANTS US)
AI sounds really bad, at least these days. But a good musician, engineer can benefit from these new tools. It never takes over music. Just like synths didn’t kill pianists, nor samplers made drummers homeless. Not too mention that it doesn’t impact 99% of world’s population. The biggest problem is responsibilitiy of big distributors… they shall not allow subpar quality music reach listeners. They shall be moral gatekeepers, so that masses won’t listen to and be used to garbage. Like these demo songs… far away from any quality produced by real human beings with many working hours.
@@cesar4729 Really? So they created a pianist, you think. Indeed? It’s so far away from artificial intelligency as Earth from the next solar system. All musicians and all good engineers in this industry will still have their job. BUT… were any of you so naive, that the “let’s pay all creatives who want to jump into the Corporate business even if it’s against UMG profit” is a feasible way? These guys had no supertech before supercomputers’ evolution, but they have had the money shortpaying all “stars” compared to what they harvested from listeners. All they are doing now (these HUMANs) is that taking back the lost steering wheel) and will use this tool (please do not say AI) to generate so much noise beyond the currently uploaded 100000 song per day, that nobody will have mood to create mediocre “songs” again. Mariah Carey won’t use this tool, and will have live seasion musicians if hubby wants to put out a new album for profit. The guys who are giving their faces on this new tool are doing it for money too. They are already rich, what can they lose? Spotify audiobook scandal… hard not to imagine how they want to keep big percentage of the royalty fees by uploading machine voiced audiobooks on their own or via subsidiaries, and paying less to self-made artists. These are the problems, and this is human problem, greediness, and likely 1st world, as music business was always so shady.
@@LipazMusic Who are "any of you"? I have been a musician for 20 years and a sound engineer. Funnier, I owned 250 instruments to date. Except that I also study Machine Learning and know how to differentiate a "tool" from a learning technology, which saves me the shame of commenting about AI out of pure ignorant spite.
Hmmm... By crap do you mean the most popular mobile operating system on the planet taking 70% of the worlds market share? Or crap like the most popular search engine in the world that has 83% of the world's market share? Or maybe crap like RUclips, the most popular video sharing application in the world? Or maybe it's their advertising platform, which is the most used advertising platform on the internet and having 76% of the world's market share? I think maybe you are misguided in your beliefs about Google services. They are immensely popular and made over $300 billion in revenue last year. That's 50% more than Microsoft. and less than 50% less than Apple.
How much revenue did Leonardo Da Vinci generate? What was Mozart's stock price? I don't want Google and a small cluster of multi-billionaires controlling all aspects of my life. Why do you? Money? You in the club Mr. Blues in Seattle?@@BluesInSeattle
Exactly. Google design things as if we are software engineers. Clunky, ugly, end result is lacklustre, then they trash it. Even the name: Music AI Sandbox is unimaginative and dull.
I´ve been a professional musician for decades, and although many are quite intimidated with this tech, having real world music skills will make an enormous difference from the average user. AI is like having a team of expert assistants.
Love this comment. In the right hands ai will be just another tool for creating music. I honestly think it will make some people pick up instruments like garage band did.
Thanks for the great comment and for watching.
Stuff like this makes me more excited to play physical instruments. Imagine a decade from now being able to rip a guitar solo over any of this AI generated stuff in real time. People will think you're a wizard.
That's exactly the point. The more human, the more valuable will be. It's like classic painting, more and more expensive versus any digital crap from this era. Like this crap music that sounds "cool" for this guy.
Only people uneducated in AI could think that.
As a matter of fact, most people will doubt authenticity and integrity of any musician coming up with new songs.
Nailed. Craftmanship will always be more recognized than automation, even if the final product is less sophisticated. Because (thanks to) anthropomorphism. I can see entertainment marketing plans in the future following the same valuation patterns as in the food or clothing industry, promoting how it was "finely crafted by local people" etc
I truly hope this will inspire more musicians not make less. If people put down instruments it will be a terrible day.
@@ChrisUnlocksAI
Young people are not picking up instruments.
I give guitar lessons and had up to 7 students every week 15 years ago.
I have only one today coming infrequently.
They have no incentive and are prone to giving up qickly.
This will only accelerate this trend.
Can't wait to start messing around and uploading songs!
Me too, I'm pretty excited to see the possibilities.
Thanks for watching.
A lot of people who make thei bread and butter and built their life around music, creation, production, art, and so forth are in denial about what AI is about to do and will not be able to adapt and change and shift with this emerging paradigm.
I agree, adapt or get left behind once they realize it's just a tool it will help.
Thanks for the great comment and watching.
My new favorite RUclipsr. Great bro! Keep it up! You have my support.
Thanks so much. And thanks for watching
Well, I’m glad I’m 70 years old and have lived through some of the best decades of real music. I think without human intervention in a song, or a story or a piece of art it is dead and lifeless. But in the future you won’t know it - maybe that’s okay? I don’t know. And I spent the last 40 years before retiring in IT having watched the progression of AI furtively. Now I’m not so sure. “I’m sorry Dave I can’t do that." Bonus points for the film reference! Just kidding!
Hey, I really appreciate where you are coming from. I am a little more hopeful (perhaps a bit naive) with Ai, in my thoughts artist, and musicians will use it as a tool such as a camera or a midi control. I think it will take human involvement to make it good or great.
Also 2001 A Space Odyssey is a classic!
Thanks for the great comment and for watching.
@@ChrisUnlocksAI Thank you for your reply and of course yes it was 2001 that I saw in 1968 and many times since … Yes AI could be a very useful tool - I have lots of synthesisers and midi generators, sequencers - I don’t think you are naive it’s simply we are now facing a new thing that we will find out more about over the next few years. I’ve created a couple of bits of J S Bach that sound pretty good, from the software. Really great channel as well.
Stunning
It looks like it's going to be an awesome tool.
Thanks for watching
I don't know what to think any more
Dive in, have fun, use it as another tool to create.
Thanks for watching.
I think it's great, opens up a lot of inspiration. We've all experienced at least 20 years of decline in mainstream music, it's dulled our senses, made people miserable perhaps. With these new A. I tools I can see people wanting to get more involved in music creation and for existing artists to break the mould and do something interesting or outside their normal safe space.
That is amazing!
I agree, thanks for watching.
From the first moment live symphony performers induced spine-tingling sensations which almost made me pass out from sheer delight, I have been addicted to music. AI-generated music doesn’t excite me at all, and I’m damn sure not going to spend money for any of it, much less waste precious time listening to it.
That's very fair. Nothing will ever replace live music. There is some free options, Suno and Udio, I hope that you can at least have some fun with Ai. Thanks for watching
Uhhhhh... Vochlea's Dublr has been doing this for like 2 years already. 🙄
You dont know what youre talking about
I'm not sure who that is.
Thanks for watching
Yeah Ai is the best band player/ friend ever
😂 it is certainly Les difficult to work with then some of my old band mates.
Thanks for watching.
Do they take ownership/copyright over the submitted recordings that you upload there?
Great question. I don't know as they have not released any terms of service yet. I hope not.
Thanks for the great question and for watching.
Stoked to test
Me too!
Can you upload a wav file to reference instead of humming? I'd like to upload some of my old guitar demo ideas from years ago that never got fully produced or 🎉 recorded.
Oh this is a great idea I've got some of those laying around myself❤
Yes you will be able to upload a file for reference. Looking forward to seeing the possibilities.
Thanks for watching
This might be exceptional, but can't you basically do this with RipX and Melodyne?
That's fair, however this would be a lot faster. Thanks for watching.
When will it be available...any idea?
No date yet, there is not even a waitlist available. I will keep an eye out and post when a waitlist is available. Thanks for watching.
I can't help but wonder if the big studios with nearly unlimited resources had this tech a few years ago before everyone else. If you listen to today's mainstream music, it feels and sounds like it's been heavily computer generated. Now that the cat is out of the bag and affordable to everyone, the studios have to reimagine their biz strategy.
Music is about to become even more derivative and bland.
yes 100% they been had this tech since the early 2008 or 2009 but they kept it hidden from the public until now. they have way more advanced ai then what they gave us the public. the version the record labels have is way more advanced so far advanced then what we have now its incredible
Read up on the AI subject and history, and don't simplifiy the reasoning to "this tech" like it's something someone just invented. We had computers for long time and it affected our culture. The power of computer resources and recent breakthroughs have made this AI possible, but we still don't know how to use it properly or where it going to go in future.
I'm not sure, I see why you say that though. Thanks for watching
yes 100% they been had this tech since the early 2008 or 2009 but they kept it hidden from the public until now. they have way more advanced ai then what they gave us the public. the version the record labels have is way more advanced so far advanced then what we have now its incredible
You're assuming a lot here. They've had the ability to convert audio to midi, and play the midi on pre-defined vst instruments. That's not a secret tech anyone has held onto, its been integrated into DAWs for a while now and only got better recently. But this tech in the video is not that and has definitely NOT been around for that long like you're describing, in secret or otherwise. Requires machine learning training methods that simply haven't been around for more than a couple years that would have been impossible previously.
Records labels don't have super secret better than public models either. The financial incentives for this tech are making things publicly available for volume, or using it for intangible benefits like pulling people into your tech ecosystem. Record labels don't need premium AI models in secret, there would be no financial incentive for doing so versus using skilled musicians.
So is this a plugin or a website?
Great question, They haven't stated yet. I'm hoping it will be stand alone.
Thanks for watching.
@@ChrisUnlocksAI I agree. So far everything's dependent on your internet connection.
I dig it
Yeah me too. Thanks for watching.
So my question is who owns the copyright>? The AI Company because you used their program? The person who types in the words to define the AI>? or the first person to take it to the copyright office.? Better read that lawyer speak that everyone just clicks agree to to be able to use the software. They may own the copyright of anything produced.
what about all the artists music that was stolen that the AI was trained on? It all seems really illegal to me. How is everything the AI creates after training on my picture not a derivative work of my picture?
Suno and now Udio allow you rights to the music. Google has yet to say. Regardless if you write lyrics or a melody and input that into sandbox it is 100% your work.
I see where you are coming from, I think the problem is what if it's taking your picture and 10,000 similar pictures and creating a picture. Is it original or does it belong to the 10,000 other artist who created something similar?
yes, but it sound like shit
It sounds very wobly and unstable😂
That's fair. Thanks for watching.
Google is now the music overlord, obey
🤖 Yes, Overlord Google!
As a session guitarist i meet a lot of young people who call themselves musicians when all they have is a Laptop.
I understand why you say that. It's not really fair though. You can create powerful music with only a laptop and some imagination. I mean you can get killer guitar sounds with Native Instruments electric guitar and just your computer keyboard. Thanks for watching
I wasn’t hearing a lot of fidelity.
That's pretty fair. Not as good as Suno or Udio Thanks for watching.
ruclips.net/video/bbwmbSiNqrM/видео.htmlfeature=shared&t=55 .... that is not a 'hum' by any measure! more like scatting (as in music, not the other meaning!)
Ya because the other meaning it sure would sound gross, lol.
That's fair, thanks for the comment and watching.
I will let AI to think for me, why do you want us to think about it?
🤷♂️ however thanks for watching.
I may go manic or die before i get a song done in a reasonable amount of time bur no. Then your not even a musician. The technologies are using us then. If we give life to such things we vacate our soul and become evil A.I. (IT WANTS US)
You should make this a song.
Thanks for watching
will there be enough ears when the tsunami of great music hits
Maybe not. 😂 thanks for watching
LOL you got rick beato throwing ads at you too.. That guy is a joke with this AI stuff.. He such a jerk ass..
Haha, I actually like Rick Beato, I don't agree with his stance on ai.
Thanks for watching
AI sounds really bad, at least these days. But a good musician, engineer can benefit from these new tools. It never takes over music. Just like synths didn’t kill pianists, nor samplers made drummers homeless. Not too mention that it doesn’t impact 99% of world’s population.
The biggest problem is responsibilitiy of big distributors… they shall not allow subpar quality music reach listeners. They shall be moral gatekeepers, so that masses won’t listen to and be used to garbage. Like these demo songs… far away from any quality produced by real human beings with many working hours.
It's not the right analogy. It is a bit tiring at this point that the difference between creating a piano and creating a pianist is not understood.
@@cesar4729 Really? So they created a pianist, you think. Indeed? It’s so far away from artificial intelligency as Earth from the next solar system. All musicians and all good engineers in this industry will still have their job. BUT… were any of you so naive, that the “let’s pay all creatives who want to jump into the Corporate business even if it’s against UMG profit” is a feasible way? These guys had no supertech before supercomputers’ evolution, but they have had the money shortpaying all “stars” compared to what they harvested from listeners. All they are doing now (these HUMANs) is that taking back the lost steering wheel) and will use this tool (please do not say AI) to generate so much noise beyond the currently uploaded 100000 song per day, that nobody will have mood to create mediocre “songs” again. Mariah Carey won’t use this tool, and will have live seasion musicians if hubby wants to put out a new album for profit.
The guys who are giving their faces on this new tool are doing it for money too. They are already rich, what can they lose? Spotify audiobook scandal… hard not to imagine how they want to keep big percentage of the royalty fees by uploading machine voiced audiobooks on their own or via subsidiaries, and paying less to self-made artists.
These are the problems, and this is human problem, greediness, and likely 1st world, as music business was always so shady.
@@LipazMusic Who are "any of you"? I have been a musician for 20 years and a sound engineer. Funnier, I owned 250 instruments to date. Except that I also study Machine Learning and know how to differentiate a "tool" from a learning technology, which saves me the shame of commenting about AI out of pure ignorant spite.
@@cesar4729 And this comment is most likely a lie.
Thanks for watching
It'll end up being crap like most Google stuff sorry
Hmmm...
By crap do you mean the most popular mobile operating system on the planet taking 70% of the worlds market share? Or crap like the most popular search engine in the world that has 83% of the world's market share? Or maybe crap like RUclips, the most popular video sharing application in the world? Or maybe it's their advertising platform, which is the most used advertising platform on the internet and having 76% of the world's market share?
I think maybe you are misguided in your beliefs about Google services. They are immensely popular and made over $300 billion in revenue last year. That's 50% more than Microsoft. and less than 50% less than Apple.
How much revenue did Leonardo Da Vinci generate? What was Mozart's stock price? I don't want Google and a small cluster of multi-billionaires controlling all aspects of my life. Why do you? Money? You in the club Mr. Blues in Seattle?@@BluesInSeattle
You’re mistaking monopoly power with quality
@@honeymojave Very well said.
Exactly. Google design things as if we are software engineers. Clunky, ugly, end result is lacklustre, then they trash it. Even the name: Music AI Sandbox is unimaginative and dull.