I just took delivery on a 2016 AWD, Advanced Package, Graphite Luster metallic RDX. Great SUV for a great price...$41,900. Traded in my 2010 AWD Crosstour with Navi which is being discontinued. The RDX handles better with the same interior passenger room which was my main concern. Some lesser rear storage space and I do miss the rear compartment storage bin in the Crosstour. However, I was ready to move up and the Acura by far with especially the AcuraWatch features is a steal compared to Audi, Lexus, Cadillac, Lincoln and BMW. Don't waist your money, the minute differences don't warrant the extra cash. I'm retired and this is the perfect car for road trips for my wife and I.
Alex you are the master reviewer. Knowledgeable, unhurried and exhaustive, with helpful in passing comparisons with other models, and stressing key points like comfort, seats, cabin noires , etc. You sound trustworthy! People should listen to you!
Great review, Alex. I bought a 2016 RDX during COVID, in part thanks to this review and looking back on it for a couple of years now I thought I’d revisit the review and see what I thought. Your review is spot on, and is the best I’ve seen on the subject. Driving the RDX is pleasant on a daily basis, and taking it on the road is comfortable. I appreciate the generally excellent visibility and generally well designed amenities. It’s quiet, though not as quiet as some other vehicles I’ve been in, but not distractingly or annoyingly noisy. My biggest complaint about the vehicle is the occasional noncompliance of touchscreen and audio inputs. Sometimes it’s perfect, sometimes it’s a struggle when paired to an outside source. I’ve got the Tech Package and it’s supposed to have the greatest in stereos, but it’s really pretty middling. You have to work extensively in a submenu to try to tailor the sound to your liking as midrange is weak. It should have a better sound system. The stereo is actually inferior to the one that came in my 1999 Honda Accord LX when I bought it new (outstanding car!) I’m just not that enthused with the touchscreen lag times and heads-down time they require. Having said all that, I’ve had zero issues with my RDX (other than the audio and touchscreen stuff described above) and it’s been a great purchase that I have never regretted. Thanks again for the great review!
Another big difference for me is the '16 now has rear vents which wasn't on previous models. This was a deal breaker for me a couple years ago....gotta think about kids in the back!
Had a 2008 rdx and a 2016 now , I can tell you the 2008 has way more power off the line. FYI it also was extremely reliable, traded it in with 130k miles
Excellent Alex...I agree that Acura should have kept the SHAWD at least an option. I am looking to purchase my first crossover in a few years and this is looking like it will be on my short list. BMWs and Audis usually drive and handle better. However, the high maintenance and repair costs are enough to keep those off my list.
Your reviews are the best on the web. I find that in the BMW X3, or Lexus NX200, or RX350, Audi Q5 reviews you don't mention the RDX. I am really looking for a comparison of X3, and RDX.
Thanks for the detailed review, Alex! Your reviews are the most informative for me and I've been referring people to them when I hear that they're buying a vehicle. I have a 2014 Base AWD RDX and I'd have to say that it's been quite affordable for to maintain the vehicle. Oil change is every 8-9 months at $75, insurance is approx. $60/mo., I've only had rear differential fluid done apart from the oil change (tot. $155 + oil change), and it can be serviced by my local Honda dealer (Acura service dept. is in Reno, NV). I can tell when the vibration canceling system comes on and I have to say that it's also not intrusive. And yes, biggest bang for the buck for me as this vehicle is more comfortable and quieter than the Subaru Forester XT that I was looking at as well. Luxury purists will, of course, pooh-pooh on its interior and styling, but IMO, if you supposedly have that much cash on you then why the heck are you even looking at sub-$50k vehicles if you want that much luxury?
+Drummond Fengdahl Feedback on a 2014 RDX AWD Base - Transmission slippage occurred at approx. 34,000 miles (Jan. 2016). I had to bring it in to the local Acura dealership twice: 1st time, transmission flush to see if issue will be addressed (it did not); 2nd time was a 2-day diagnostic that resulted (on the last test-drive of all things) with the transmission being replaced. Thank gosh for long warranties on Acuras or I'd've been eating it all. The dealership also warranty-replace the rear shocks due to the thumping noise whenever you hit a depression in the road (e.g., manhole covers). The transmission replacement is a re-manufactured unit, so it's not new. The car certainly drives smoothly now, but I wonder how long that'll last. I'll wait to see what happens up till the 60,000 warranty. If problem recurs before then, I'll get it repaired through warranty and trade it in. Quite disappointing in a "premium vehicle" that is never driven hard and regularly serviced. For those of you who may experience the transmission slippage, document the incidences as much as you can (date, time, weather condition, noises, driving-feel, etc.) as much as you can, and you may want to report it to Acura Corp ASAP just for records. Also, if you experience that thumping noise from the rear shocks (I kind of tuned it out), take it in before the 48,000-mile warranty expires as that may be a warranty replacement. After the repair, the RDX is even more pleasant to drive, though I'm still leery of the transmission.
+Drummond Fengdahl Definitely appreciate the follow up report! Watching these RUclips videos on new vehicles is great, but I'm always left wondering how the integrity of the vehicle will hold up several thousand miles down the road...
I think within a couple of years, the RDX will be redesigned with a new 2.0 Liter Turbo engine, but with direct-injection, lighter SH-AWD, start-stop system, and either 8-speed dual-clutch or 9-speed automatic transmission. The current RDX does start to feel dated over time, despite the refresh.
@@RomaneMaticaliseGordonThe six speed is bulletproof. Go luck up the issues with these new transmissions. They know people will fall for anything if its fed in a pretty package.
I love that you have the segments smaller and less intrusive than they were before but I'd love if you could change the color of the words or the background when you perhaps are fast forwarding to get to a certain part. Now I see your videos on an iPad so you may have it on a computer but I think it would be a good idea. Love your reviews.
The omission of SH-AWD on the RDX is odd, given Acura's entire lineup all possess SH-AWD as an option. However that doesn't seem to bother buyers as the RDX is one of the best sellers.
Alex, once again, a simply spot-on review. I had the chance to drive a '15 MDX in a Cadillac ride-drive event a year ago, and agree the SH-AWD makes a difference when the road gets a bit curvy; not so much under more routine situations. As you indicated in the response to another post, in foul weather either it's conventional AWD or SH-AWD will behave relatively similarly, I suspect. While I realize the RDX is about one size smaller than the Nissan Murano or the new Ford Edge, I'd bet it will be crossed shopped with the Platinum / Titanium models of both. Other than the difference in cargo capacity with those two, how would you rate the performance, ride, interior space, and fuel mileage against them? The four of us who participated together in the Cadillac event -- the MDX, RX350, & SRX -- felt the MDX was miscast in the comparison (too large) and that the RDX would have been a better choice. Coincidentally, all 4 of us agreed the MDX was by far the better vehicle of the three.
Alex, it would nice to include a rating on the audio performance of the vehicles you review. One thing to note about the RDX is the terrible mid range sound performance of its ELS sound system, I own the vehicle and the stereo is very disappointing considering ELS is marketed as something great (which it is not).
Current Acura owner so considering the RDX...Have driven and really love the way the 2016 Infiniti QX50 drives, and has such a beautiful interior. Have you ever reviewed that vehicle?
+Veyronp87 Typical of Honda/Acura : They do everything better than everyone else and nothing spectacular. This is exactly the opposite of BMW which does 3 things spectaculr but fails everywhere else.
We just picked up a 2017, and it really came down between the v6 and the 2.0t. That turbo just didn’t do it for us. Sucks that it didn’t come in SH-AWD, because Acura’s SH-AWD is the shit!
Thanks for your detailed U Tube description of the improved 2016 Acura RDX!!! Both the Acura MDX & RDX are great vehicles! Suggestion, could you put the MDX on your SUV Size Chart - comparing it's size to the other SUV's? Thanks! * I'm undecided weather to purchase a Certified 2016 Acura RDX Tech or a Certified 2014 MDX Tech? The price difference is close? I I prefer the improvements on the 2016 RDX over the 2014 RDX; however, the price difference is $4000 - $5000 more! Thanks! 06.05.17
I won't be surprised if the section of the tailgate from the chrome strip down, is a plastic cover. I'm pretty sure the entire tailgate is sheet metal but with plastic covering the lower half. That way, if there's a minor rear impact, you just replace the rear bumper cover and the plastic garnish on the tailgate.
Hi Alex thanks for all your videos, you are my 1st go to channel followed by Cnet on cars. I would like you to talk and compare more of the new technology options. I.e. adaptive cruise control and lane keep assist to name two. Both in their convenience and especially in their safety. I am shopping for a midsize or compact SUV for my elderly parents, (RDX, XC60, Lexus NX) and what I really want for them is safety and autonomous driving features are important because I feel it helps us all drive safer and they also bundle up the newest crash mitigation features together. (Volvo XC90 will come out with some rear end collision mitigation) BUT, no one is really comparing these features. Please start and if you have any suggestions in this segment, please respond to this comment. Thanks again.
Alex nice job. So RDX AWD vs QX50 AWD for the Northeast? Im not into the Volvo prices! Honda 3.5 vs Infiniti 3.7? That's my question. Also how do the Infiniti AWD, RDX AWD, & SH-AWD rank?
Alex on Autos Thanks for the awesome review as always. I am seriously considering to buy the RDX. 1. Any thoughts on the premium ELS sound system. Also are you considering to add sound system as part of your review in the future ? 2. On your other reviews about the newer Acura Models ( i think the TLX), you had mentioned that Acura has improved the cabin noise levels when compared to older models. Has the 2016 RDX improved the cabin noise level over previous generation? And how bad is it when compared to the NX ? Thanks
The ELS is a decent sound system, it's on par with the midgrade systems you find in the Germans. Personally I don't find the modern Acura models to be loud at all, the 2015 RDX was quieter than the first generation model and 2016 has refined it a hair more. I think that the NX 200t is quite similar.
I have been looking for a easy to drive, practical and fuel efficient economy car. The best fit I can think of is a mid-size hybird/diesel wagon. A wagon is lower and lighter than a crossover/suv making it easy to drive and efficient. A hybird/diesel system is a plus for the mileage. However, on the market, the only car that can fit into this formula seems to be vw golf wagon. However, I'm not quite sure about the reliability of vw and that wagon is a little bit too small for me. A subaru outback or honda crosstour or venza would be ideal size and shape. However subaru does not have a hybird system, the 2015 outback seems to have reliability issues(4 of my friends who bought the outback is suffering), and 2.5L engine seems to be to week for the heavy body. Honda Crosstour seems to be falling out of favor, not sure if there will be any in the future. The venza have a mpg as poor as larger crossover. Alex, can you give some advice? and perhaps any option in future cars?(I'm not in a hurry to buy it now or this year)
Xuan Yu You might want to specify where it is that you're driving (terrain, altitude, etc.), length of the drive, and the seasons present in your area. The 2014 RDX AWD is practical for me living in No. NV. With moderate driving speed, I can easily achieve the top mpg and even exceed it if I drive like my mother (approx. 29-30 mpg at 55-60 mph). Ownership costs seem to be low as well, with $60/mo. for insurance, oil changes at every 8-9 months at $75 (at a local Honda dealership), and I've only had the rear-diff. fluid change that cost about $70. I had a Subaru Outback that consumed too much oil and started to have trouble at 84K miles, and its mpg's were disappointing. And as long as you're not a luxury purist and willing to drive a premium-brand vehicle, the RDX seems like a good choice. I enjoy driving it, esp. for long distances.
Xuan Yu Your question is kind of confusing for me. First, an economy car is one like the Corolla, not a CUV or wagon. If you're not dealing with snow, I'd say go with a mid-size family sedan such as the Camry, Accord, Fusion or Sonata. The Accord and Camry get great fuel economy and they're quite comfortable.
WuWei, it wasn't a question. I was just making a suggestion to Xuan since was asking for feedback from Alex. And I was just sharing my experience with the car (Acura) is all.
Excellent review, as always - thank you, Alex! In regard to your notes on SH-AWD, I'm curious about what you think about a potential of an SH-AWD-equipped lower-trim configurations of MDX to play a role as a replacement for an AWD-equipped RDX (exterior size-wise and price-wise they are not that different, considering additional features, of course) - is it worth it?. Also, what is you opinion on Acura's AWD vs SH-AWD from the bad weather and/or harsh climate perspectives - is there a significant benefit from SH-AWD, when comparing with AWD (as well as from AWD vs. FWD)?
Alex on Autos Thanks. Do you mean there is a small benefit for both comparison cases (SH-AWD vs. AWD and AWD vs. FWD) or only the first one? Also, what about my first question?
Aleksandr Blekh I think I misunderstood the question the first time around. In terms of capability and feel SH-AWD is superior to AWD and AWD is superior to FWD. The difference between SH-AWD and AWD in terms of bad weather handling is there but it's not huge. The difference in capability between the AWD system on the RDX and the FWD RDX is much larger and the AWD version is much more capable than the FWD version.
On maintenance costs....keep in mind that Volvo, BMW, and others may have free maintence for 3-5 years that you'll pay for with the Acura. It's after the warranty that the Acura will start saving you money. But many buyers won't keep it that long.
I can't believe Acura now requires you to put premium gas in the RDX because they added SIX horsepower and ONE foot pound of torque for the 2016 model. The '13-15 only "recommended" the use of premium gas. Especially considering the Lexus RX, this cars main rival, doesn't recommend it at all, they just let you feed it regular gas as if it were a Camry.
thecarelectronicguy Did I miss when it said it was required? At the dealership I was still told it was only recommended. This is in Canada if that makes a diff...
I am trying to decide weather to get a CPO Rdx with 17k miles 2016 model for 26k, or CPO RX 350 with 33k miles 2016 model for 31k. I am leaving in a few hours to go figure it out. Both are nice vehicles. I dont know why this guy compares rx to rdx. RdX is in competition with NX, and RX with MDX.
hellos mes Very true, I'm sure it was a mistake Alex did not intentionally make. His reviews are quite detailed and sometimes information might get scattered around.
oh yes I subscribed to his videos because they are of excellent quality. His videos are unparalleled in terms of technical information, breadth and comparisons with a personal touch. I hope a correction can be issued.
+czgoldsmiths If it were my money, I'd go for the base model RDX. The higher trims don't offer too many outstanding features, so I'd just save that money and spend it somewhere else.
+Paul Connolly Tried it... didn't like it! I went with the RDX. The rear of the Q% is too shallow for me to lay down my full suspension 29er MTB. i fit just fine in the RDX. That was a deal breaker for me. Also, you get more rear seat room in the RDX. It's better for 5 adults.
Shin Ken It doesn't really have that much do with the car brand, more so the drive train and engine power. I assume your Accord was the V6 and the amount of power the engine produced overwhelmed the front wheels. RWD don't have torque steer while AWD vehicles have minimal to none torque steer. Hope that explains something about torque steer.
WuWei Xu I never accuse any brand for having torque steer. I only brought it up because Alex mentioned torque steer in this review. Also, it's completely unfounded to assume that I don't know the cause of torque steer.
Alex, any reliable intel on the 2018 RDX? Based on your reviews and a test drive, we are about ready to pull the trigger on a '17, but I'm hearing of a near total redesign for '18. Anything to it?
Hi Alex You rated the range rover with 69 dB at 50 mph a very quiet ride A+ while for the Acura RDX you rated the noise a B+ with 70 dB and said there are quieter competitors. Is 1dB difference so important? Can you please clarify?
Sorry, but Marc's answer is slightly misleading. 70 dB will not sound 10 x's louder. Human hearing is only able to discern changes in volumes in 3 dB increments, so no one riding in a vehicle could tell that 70 dB is any louder than 69 dB, they would be perceived as exactly the same volume to anything but a scientific instrument.
+HW2800 They don't. They're at a bit of an angle so when you load long items they don't lay completly flat. There's a gap about 3/4 of the way up on an item which would be full length
+Christian Lanctot Thanks for the reply! Acura should of spent a couple more dollars to get it flat! Major obstacle for now in buying a new RDX along with no SH-AWD. No happy to continue looking!
Hi Alex. Many of your top picks do not have 4 way lumbar on driver, and don't have any lumbar adjustment on passenger seat. You acknowledge the presence/absence of this, so it clearly does make a difference. Am I right to think of it as a deal breaker though? I am searching a vehicle for once a week use, only for shopping/in city trip/long distance trip. Both driver and passenger comfort are equally important for me. And I notice Korean/Japanese vehicles often skip out on passenger lumbar entirely. As such, can these work for long distance use? Is it that, both can keep you baseline comfortable in long distance, but the more adjustable seat further adds comfort on top of baseline? Or is it that the lesser adjustable may cause aches after couple of hours? Specifically for RDX, can this be comfortable long distance tourer for 2? I do realize your seat rating often is based on context of the class of vehicle and it's competition, so I guess a 7/10 seat in luxury might be better than 8/10 of affordable. As such, assessing the long distance seat comfort (which is an absolute qualitative yes/no measure) of a vehicle is difficult for me to predict when I don't notice it in your review. Please advice. PS Big fan, watching your content regularly, highly regard your opinion!
+Ness Rosenbrad The MDX is a three row crossover that is considerably larger than the RX, the RX and RDX however are two row crossovers and that that far apart in size. The upcoming Lexus three row crossover will directly compete with the MDX.
Reginald K.Son You're going to be left with the mainstream entries from Ford, Nissan, Honda, Kia, etc. I'd suggest something like the new 2016 Sorento as an alternative to teh RDX that is as premium feeling in high end trims but doesn't need premium gas.
I really wish this generation and the third generation had reclining rear seats. The size of the 2nd and 3rd generation seem like they could’ve easily had added reclining rear seats in the second row. Even the 1st gen Lexus NX has manual or power reclining rear seats, & the NX is smaller than this generation or the 3rd generation RDX
I would buy something from this category if they would tow. The Cherokee is the only one I know of that would tow my boat (3500l lbs.) but I am looking for the Japanese quality.
disappointing to hear 70 decibel rating. that's noisy.. isn't 68 and lower what luxury cars should have ? Especially if talking on bluetooth, of which I do for business and don't need road noise .. which my 2011 santa fe has lots of.. any idea what the decibel rating on my 2011 fe is, for comparison ?
The overlay buttons are distracting, especially when you're behind them. They are more annoyance than help. An inch is only a lot of headroom if you drive on perfect roads, don't wear a hat, and are bald
Martin Espinoza Alex words are: "Very generous amount of headroom". Also, one inch headroom left is on the middle seat on the second row, with Alex being taller than 6' and not bald as you say. If you are a pro basketball player, than it can be an issue.
Why do you keep comparing this vehicle to a Lexus RX? The RX is in a bigger class, also $15,000 more for the same options. You would need to compare this vehicle to a NX200T
I just took delivery on a 2016 AWD, Advanced Package, Graphite Luster metallic RDX. Great SUV for a great price...$41,900. Traded in my 2010 AWD Crosstour with Navi which is being discontinued. The RDX handles better with the same interior passenger room which was my main concern. Some lesser rear storage space and I do miss the rear compartment storage bin in the Crosstour. However, I was ready to move up and the Acura by far with especially the AcuraWatch features is a steal compared to Audi, Lexus, Cadillac, Lincoln and BMW. Don't waist your money, the minute differences don't warrant the extra cash. I'm retired and this is the perfect car for road trips for my wife and I.
I’ve got a 2017 RDX. It’s virtually the same car with advanced safety features. It’s amazing! I love it.
Yours are the best auto review on RUclips, bar none. Liked and subbed. Thank you for your great work.
Alex you are the master reviewer. Knowledgeable, unhurried and exhaustive, with helpful in passing comparisons with other models, and stressing key points like comfort, seats, cabin noires , etc. You sound trustworthy! People should listen to you!
Great review, Alex.
I bought a 2016 RDX during COVID, in part thanks to this review and looking back on it for a couple of years now I thought I’d revisit the review and see what I thought.
Your review is spot on, and is the best I’ve seen on the subject. Driving the RDX is pleasant on a daily basis, and taking it on the road is comfortable. I appreciate the generally excellent visibility and generally well designed amenities. It’s quiet, though not as quiet as some other vehicles I’ve been in, but not distractingly or annoyingly noisy.
My biggest complaint about the vehicle is the occasional noncompliance of touchscreen and audio inputs. Sometimes it’s perfect, sometimes it’s a struggle when paired to an outside source. I’ve got the Tech Package and it’s supposed to have the greatest in stereos, but it’s really pretty middling. You have to work extensively in a submenu to try to tailor the sound to your liking as midrange is weak. It should have a better sound system. The stereo is actually inferior to the one that came in my 1999 Honda Accord LX when I bought it new (outstanding car!) I’m just not that enthused with the touchscreen lag times and heads-down time they require.
Having said all that, I’ve had zero issues with my RDX (other than the audio and touchscreen stuff described above) and it’s been a great purchase that I have never regretted.
Thanks again for the great review!
Thanks for circling back and sharing your thoughts! -Travis
Another big difference for me is the '16 now has rear vents which wasn't on previous models. This was a deal breaker for me a couple years ago....gotta think about kids in the back!
WOW!!! THE BEST AUTO REVIEW I HAVE SEEN/HEARD.
I'M PLEASED TO KNOW I MADE THE RIGHT CHOICE IN CHOOSING ACURA TO DRIVE.
I have to say, I always get all the information I actually care to hear in the order I need to hear it from Alex on Autos. Bravo!
Very glad to know Acura bucked the current trend of using highly stressed turbo fours but instead the RDX has a quiet, smooth V6 instead.
itsmegp46 some people can make turbo engines. Honda is not one of them. Said as an on and off Honda guy for years.
Had a 2008 rdx and a 2016 now
, I can tell you the 2008 has way more power off the line. FYI it also was extremely reliable, traded it in with 130k miles
I come from the future. They're turbo K20s now.
Finally, a good actual review!!
Excellent & thorough review. The SH-AWD would be nice. But, we were convinced it was still the best for us. We got it a couple days ago.
how was the experience owning this SUV? i just got a 2017 with 11K miles
@@Morjesta Our RDX has almost 65k now. We have kept up with recommended service and have had no problems. You should do as well with yours. Congrats!
Excellent Alex...I agree that Acura should have kept the SHAWD at least an option.
I am looking to purchase my first crossover in a few years and this is looking like it will be on my short list. BMWs and Audis usually drive and handle better. However, the high maintenance and repair costs are enough to keep those off my list.
I agree with you on the SH-AWD. I would pay extra for it too. We have a first gen RDX and the SH-AWD really works well.
+Ken Ku Agreed! I would've prefered the Sh-awd as an extra option. FWD or SH-AWD. And I would've paid extra for the SH-AWD no problem!
Yes I love my SH-AWD in my RDX, simply amazing ❤️
Wow Alex you are an amazing vehicle reviewer!!! I was interested in this vehicle but no SH AWD is a deal breaker.
Your reviews are the best on the web. I find that in the BMW X3, or Lexus NX200, or RX350, Audi Q5 reviews you don't mention the RDX. I am really looking for a comparison of X3, and RDX.
I'd like to hear more about things like steering feel, body lean, and high speed stability on these crossover reviews, but nice job.
Very informative, as usual.
A fabulous review. I like this format (with jump to different sections of the video). Thank you.
I have this car for almost a year. Great car I love it
Thanks for the detailed review, Alex! Your reviews are the most informative for me and I've been referring people to them when I hear that they're buying a vehicle.
I have a 2014 Base AWD RDX and I'd have to say that it's been quite affordable for to maintain the vehicle. Oil change is every 8-9 months at $75, insurance is approx. $60/mo., I've only had rear differential fluid done apart from the oil change (tot. $155 + oil change), and it can be serviced by my local Honda dealer (Acura service dept. is in Reno, NV). I can tell when the vibration canceling system comes on and I have to say that it's also not intrusive. And yes, biggest bang for the buck for me as this vehicle is more comfortable and quieter than the Subaru Forester XT that I was looking at as well. Luxury purists will, of course, pooh-pooh on its interior and styling, but IMO, if you supposedly have that much cash on you then why the heck are you even looking at sub-$50k vehicles if you want that much luxury?
+Drummond Fengdahl Feedback on a 2014 RDX AWD Base - Transmission slippage occurred at approx. 34,000 miles (Jan. 2016). I had to bring it in to the local Acura dealership twice: 1st time, transmission flush to see if issue will be addressed (it did not); 2nd time was a 2-day diagnostic that resulted (on the last test-drive of all things) with the transmission being replaced. Thank gosh for long warranties on Acuras or I'd've been eating it all. The dealership also warranty-replace the rear shocks due to the thumping noise whenever you hit a depression in the road (e.g., manhole covers). The transmission replacement is a re-manufactured unit, so it's not new. The car certainly drives smoothly now, but I wonder how long that'll last. I'll wait to see what happens up till the 60,000 warranty. If problem recurs before then, I'll get it repaired through warranty and trade it in. Quite disappointing in a "premium vehicle" that is never driven hard and regularly serviced.
For those of you who may experience the transmission slippage, document the incidences as much as you can (date, time, weather condition, noises, driving-feel, etc.) as much as you can, and you may want to report it to Acura Corp ASAP just for records. Also, if you experience that thumping noise from the rear shocks (I kind of tuned it out), take it in before the 48,000-mile warranty expires as that may be a warranty replacement. After the repair, the RDX is even more pleasant to drive, though I'm still leery of the transmission.
+Drummond Fengdahl Definitely appreciate the follow up report! Watching these RUclips videos on new vehicles is great, but I'm always left wondering how the integrity of the vehicle will hold up several thousand miles down the road...
Excellent review!!
I think within a couple of years, the RDX will be redesigned with a new 2.0 Liter Turbo engine, but with direct-injection, lighter SH-AWD, start-stop system, and either 8-speed dual-clutch or 9-speed automatic transmission. The current RDX does start to feel dated over time, despite the refresh.
Damn you called it, only difference is the 10-speed transmission being used in the new RDX, but you pretty much predicted it 5 years ago
But All turbo with direct injection accumulate carbon in the engine no good unless driving mostly highway
@@RomaneMaticaliseGordonThe six speed is bulletproof. Go luck up the issues with these new transmissions. They know people will fall for anything if its fed in a pretty package.
*Good
Best review on yotube, very infromative, well organized. Thanks!
I love that you have the segments smaller and less intrusive than they were before but I'd love if you could change the color of the words or the background when you perhaps are fast forwarding to get to a certain part. Now I see your videos on an iPad so you may have it on a computer but I think it would be a good idea.
Love your reviews.
Great review, very detailed and informative.
I like Acura. its luxury without being pretentious
but i wanna be pretentious
The omission of SH-AWD on the RDX is odd, given Acura's entire lineup all possess SH-AWD as an option. However that doesn't seem to bother buyers as the RDX is one of the best sellers.
Thank You Alex so much u helped me know the flaws and the perfections
Alex, once again, a simply spot-on review. I had the chance to drive a '15 MDX in a Cadillac ride-drive event a year ago, and agree the SH-AWD makes a difference when the road gets a bit curvy; not so much under more routine situations. As you indicated in the response to another post, in foul weather either it's conventional AWD or SH-AWD will behave relatively similarly, I suspect.
While I realize the RDX is about one size smaller than the Nissan Murano or the new Ford Edge, I'd bet it will be crossed shopped with the Platinum / Titanium models of both. Other than the difference in cargo capacity with those two, how would you rate the performance, ride, interior space, and fuel mileage against them? The four of us who participated together in the Cadillac event -- the MDX, RX350, & SRX -- felt the MDX was miscast in the comparison (too large) and that the RDX would have been a better choice. Coincidentally, all 4 of us agreed the MDX was by far the better vehicle of the three.
Alex, it would nice to include a rating on the audio performance of the vehicles you review. One thing to note about the RDX is the terrible mid range sound performance of its ELS sound system, I own the vehicle and the stereo is very disappointing considering ELS is marketed as something great (which it is not).
Current Acura owner so considering the RDX...Have driven and really love the way the 2016 Infiniti QX50 drives, and has such a beautiful interior. Have you ever reviewed that vehicle?
Great review, as always
+usman mustafa I like Alex's review. My wife says: "Does he ever come up for air?" HAHAHA
Acura's cars can be a bit better, but they're SUV's are spot on. great value and tech
+Veyronp87 Typical of Honda/Acura : They do everything better than everyone else and nothing spectacular. This is exactly the opposite of BMW which does 3 things spectaculr but fails everywhere else.
excellent , thorough review.
would expect nothing less. Good job!
Great video Alex, although, I would prefer you make your rating badges on the top of the screen while your test driving a little smaller. : )
Great review
Thank so much Alex!!! I just got mine yesterday !! =)
+Jimmy Yang Liang Picking up my slate silver tech model tomorrow.
well broken down review, Alex. You got a new subscriber.
the 3.5L V6 under the hood is very attractive for this segment...
Larry Koomson sim
Hi Alex, I would say both RDX & MKC are the best vfm.
always enjoy watching your reviews, any chance you'll be reviewing the 2016 Honda Pilot soon?
This is the perfect vehicle for my parents.
We just picked up a 2017, and it really came down between the v6 and the 2.0t. That turbo just didn’t do it for us. Sucks that it didn’t come in SH-AWD, because Acura’s SH-AWD is the shit!
Thanks for your detailed U Tube description of the improved 2016 Acura RDX!!! Both the Acura MDX & RDX are great vehicles! Suggestion, could you put the MDX on your SUV Size Chart - comparing it's size to the other SUV's? Thanks! * I'm undecided weather to purchase a Certified 2016 Acura RDX Tech or a Certified 2014 MDX Tech? The price difference is close? I I prefer the improvements on the 2016 RDX over the 2014 RDX; however, the price difference is $4000 - $5000 more! Thanks! 06.05.17
I won't be surprised if the section of the tailgate from the chrome strip down, is a plastic cover. I'm pretty sure the entire tailgate is sheet metal but with plastic covering the lower half. That way, if there's a minor rear impact, you just replace the rear bumper cover and the plastic garnish on the tailgate.
Hi Alex thanks for all your videos, you are my 1st go to channel followed by Cnet on cars. I would like you to talk and compare more of the new technology options. I.e. adaptive cruise control and lane keep assist to name two. Both in their convenience and especially in their safety. I am shopping for a midsize or compact SUV for my elderly parents, (RDX, XC60, Lexus NX) and what I really want for them is safety and autonomous driving features are important because I feel it helps us all drive safer and they also bundle up the newest crash mitigation features together. (Volvo XC90 will come out with some rear end collision mitigation) BUT, no one is really comparing these features. Please start and if you have any suggestions in this segment, please respond to this comment. Thanks again.
The design is not impressive at all but everything else is great as for most Honda cars. They really need to hire new designers.
Yeah, Pikachu and Charmander need to go ASAP...
Alex nice job.
So RDX AWD vs QX50 AWD
for the Northeast? Im not into the Volvo prices!
Honda 3.5 vs Infiniti 3.7? That's my question.
Also how do the
Infiniti AWD,
RDX AWD, &
SH-AWD rank?
Michael C. Rdx
Alex on Autos Thanks for the awesome review as always. I am seriously considering to buy the RDX.
1. Any thoughts on the premium ELS sound system. Also are you considering to add sound system as part of your review in the future ?
2. On your other reviews about the newer Acura Models ( i think the TLX), you had mentioned that Acura has improved the cabin noise levels when compared to older models. Has the 2016 RDX improved the cabin noise level over previous generation? And how bad is it when compared to the NX ?
Thanks
The ELS is a decent sound system, it's on par with the midgrade systems you find in the Germans. Personally I don't find the modern Acura models to be loud at all, the 2015 RDX was quieter than the first generation model and 2016 has refined it a hair more. I think that the NX 200t is quite similar.
I have been looking for a easy to drive, practical and fuel efficient economy car. The best fit I can think of is a mid-size hybird/diesel wagon. A wagon is lower and lighter than a crossover/suv making it easy to drive and efficient. A hybird/diesel system is a plus for the mileage. However, on the market, the only car that can fit into this formula seems to be vw golf wagon. However, I'm not quite sure about the reliability of vw and that wagon is a little bit too small for me. A subaru outback or honda crosstour or venza would be ideal size and shape. However subaru does not have a hybird system, the 2015 outback seems to have reliability issues(4 of my friends who bought the outback is suffering), and 2.5L engine seems to be to week for the heavy body. Honda Crosstour seems to be falling out of favor, not sure if there will be any in the future. The venza have a mpg as poor as larger crossover.
Alex, can you give some advice? and perhaps any option in future cars?(I'm not in a hurry to buy it now or this year)
Xuan Yu You might want to specify where it is that you're driving (terrain, altitude, etc.), length of the drive, and the seasons present in your area.
The 2014 RDX AWD is practical for me living in No. NV. With moderate driving speed, I can easily achieve the top mpg and even exceed it if I drive like my mother (approx. 29-30 mpg at 55-60 mph). Ownership costs seem to be low as well, with $60/mo. for insurance, oil changes at every 8-9 months at $75 (at a local Honda dealership), and I've only had the rear-diff. fluid change that cost about $70. I had a Subaru Outback that consumed too much oil and started to have trouble at 84K miles, and its mpg's were disappointing. And as long as you're not a luxury purist and willing to drive a premium-brand vehicle, the RDX seems like a good choice. I enjoy driving it, esp. for long distances.
Xuan Yu Your question is kind of confusing for me. First, an economy car is one like the Corolla, not a CUV or wagon. If you're not dealing with snow, I'd say go with a mid-size family sedan such as the Camry, Accord, Fusion or Sonata. The Accord and Camry get great fuel economy and they're quite comfortable.
WuWei, it wasn't a question. I was just making a suggestion to Xuan since was asking for feedback from Alex. And I was just sharing my experience with the car (Acura) is all.
Drummond Fengdahl Not replying to you...
***** Elaborate.
Excellent review, as always - thank you, Alex! In regard to your notes on SH-AWD, I'm curious about what you think about a potential of an SH-AWD-equipped lower-trim configurations of MDX to play a role as a replacement for an AWD-equipped RDX (exterior size-wise and price-wise they are not that different, considering additional features, of course) - is it worth it?. Also, what is you opinion on Acura's AWD vs SH-AWD from the bad weather and/or harsh climate perspectives - is there a significant benefit from SH-AWD, when comparing with AWD (as well as from AWD vs. FWD)?
Aleksandr Blekh There is a benefit, but its not huge.
Alex on Autos Thanks. Do you mean there is a small benefit for both comparison cases (SH-AWD vs. AWD and AWD vs. FWD) or only the first one? Also, what about my first question?
Aleksandr Blekh I think I misunderstood the question the first time around. In terms of capability and feel SH-AWD is superior to AWD and AWD is superior to FWD. The difference between SH-AWD and AWD in terms of bad weather handling is there but it's not huge. The difference in capability between the AWD system on the RDX and the FWD RDX is much larger and the AWD version is much more capable than the FWD version.
Alex on Autos Now I better understand the differences. Thanks, again.
How big is the mercedes GLC 2016 vs the Acura RDX 2016?
9:45 why would you want to put a gallon of milk in the storage cubby? 😂
I love this vehicle but I feel that the SH-AWD should have been included.
Hi Alex,
is the 6 speed transmission same as that's in the new Pilot?
Rear seats don't move back and forth or recline? Wonder why they didn't add that in this car. They really need to update their gauge cluster.
Are you going to do a review of the 2016 Honda Pilot Touring Elite?
GBraidi78 I hope so
On maintenance costs....keep in mind that Volvo, BMW, and others may have free maintence for 3-5 years that you'll pay for with the Acura. It's after the warranty that the Acura will start saving you money. But many buyers won't keep it that long.
can you please make a 2015 Honda Pilot video alex
I can't believe Acura now requires you to put premium gas in the RDX because they added SIX horsepower and ONE foot pound of torque for the 2016 model. The '13-15 only "recommended" the use of premium gas. Especially considering the Lexus RX, this cars main rival, doesn't recommend it at all, they just let you feed it regular gas as if it were a Camry.
thecarelectronicguy Did I miss when it said it was required? At the dealership I was still told it was only recommended. This is in Canada if that makes a diff...
Jennifrag It is recommended, not required!
please do a review for the new Honda Pilot. Thank you.
Hey Alex, I keep waiting for your review of the 2015/16 Edge Sport, are you going to have one soon?
Charles Pellicci It looks like I will in mid July.
Alex on Autos
Great, I will look forward to it. I always enjoy your reviews the best so I was waiting for you.
I am trying to decide weather to get a CPO Rdx with 17k miles 2016 model for 26k, or CPO RX 350 with 33k miles 2016 model for 31k. I am leaving in a few hours to go figure it out. Both are nice vehicles. I dont know why this guy compares rx to rdx. RdX is in competition with NX, and RX with MDX.
That’s how good the RDX is. Almost as big as the RX for a lower price tag and a way better driving experience.
I believe the rdx is longer than the x3, if I'm not mistaken. This is after checking both acura and bmw website.
hellos mes Yup, you're right. The X3 is 183.1 in while the RDX 184.4 in. It's not a huge difference though.
sure it's not big, but it's good for those who are shopping around to be aware of that. If you're trying to fit it in your garage, every inch counts.
hellos mes Very true, I'm sure it was a mistake Alex did not intentionally make. His reviews are quite detailed and sometimes information might get scattered around.
oh yes I subscribed to his videos because they are of excellent quality. His videos are unparalleled in terms of technical information, breadth and comparisons with a personal touch. I hope a correction can be issued.
hellos mes It seems that Acura's media website had a typo. I've asked for clarification because one document says 183.5 and one says 184.4.
How tall are you for reference?
I am going to get the RDX, which model and option do you recommend?
+czgoldsmiths If it were my money, I'd go for the base model RDX. The higher trims don't offer too many outstanding features, so I'd just save that money and spend it somewhere else.
3.0 TDI Q5 the best choice in this segment? I'm dying to drive that!
+Paul Connolly Tried it... didn't like it! I went with the RDX. The rear of the Q% is too shallow for me to lay down my full suspension 29er MTB. i fit just fine in the RDX. That was a deal breaker for me. Also, you get more rear seat room in the RDX. It's better for 5 adults.
As a previous Honda Accord owner, I'd never buy another car with torque steer...
Thank you for letting me know.
Shin Ken It doesn't really have that much do with the car brand, more so the drive train and engine power. I assume your Accord was the V6 and the amount of power the engine produced overwhelmed the front wheels. RWD don't have torque steer while AWD vehicles have minimal to none torque steer. Hope that explains something about torque steer.
WuWei Xu I never accuse any brand for having torque steer. I only brought it up because Alex mentioned torque steer in this review. Also, it's completely unfounded to assume that I don't know the cause of torque steer.
Tan Shin triggered cause you didn’t know haha
The best sellers in this class are the RDX, followed by the Lexus NX and Audi Q5
Please do a review on Car Play and Android Auto.
Yes, I too had a question about CarPlay on this new infotainment system. Any chance it could retroactively added?
Hoobitron Acura has said they do not expect that to be the case.
Alex on Autos I wasn't saying in Acura, but in general.
Alex on Autos But Acura said they will incorporate Android Auto...
RDX or XC60?
Alex, any reliable intel on the 2018 RDX? Based on your reviews and a test drive, we are about ready to pull the trigger on a '17, but I'm hearing of a near total redesign for '18. Anything to it?
Shabbat Shalom, Alex!
What would you say is better? This or Lincoln MKC.
This.
Hi Alex
You rated the range rover with 69 dB at 50 mph a very quiet ride A+ while for the Acura RDX you rated the noise a B+ with 70 dB and said there are quieter competitors. Is 1dB difference so important? Can you please clarify?
dB is a logarithmic scale. so 70 is 10X as loud as 69.
Sorry, but Marc's answer is slightly misleading. 70 dB will not sound 10 x's louder. Human hearing is only able to discern changes in volumes in 3 dB increments, so no one riding in a vehicle could tell that 70 dB is any louder than 69 dB, they would be perceived as exactly the same volume to anything but a scientific instrument.
do a 2018 review
Alex - would you recommend getting a new 2016 RDX or a 2014/15 MDX if the prices were comparable?
And by that I mean the AWD version of both.
Hoobitron I don't know too much about both cars but the MDX has three rows of seats while the RDX has two. People hauler vs family hauler.
Hi Alex! I just wanted to ask if you could do an honest review on the 2015 audi Q7, we recently got one and i wanted to see what you think of it!
proboywantagh The 2015 is unlikely to happen since the new model is coming out soon, I don't think Audi has any to let me borrow.
could you review some fancy cars. Europeans autos?
Joyface D We will have the 2015 S550 and a 2016 GLA 250 soon!
You need moer money for Acura, but I like the speedometers on Acura cars - its straight and modern and its half mechanical
What are your thoughts on the 2018 rdx? Just as good in terms of reliability?
Does anybody know if the RDX'S 2 row seats can lay flat with the cargo floor?
+HW2800 They don't. They're at a bit of an angle so when you load long items they don't lay completly flat. There's a gap about 3/4 of the way up on an item which would be full length
+Christian Lanctot Thanks for the reply! Acura should of spent a couple more dollars to get it flat! Major obstacle for now in buying a new RDX along with no SH-AWD. No happy to continue looking!
Hi Alex. Many of your top picks do not have 4 way lumbar on driver, and don't have any lumbar adjustment on passenger seat. You acknowledge the presence/absence of this, so it clearly does make a difference. Am I right to think of it as a deal breaker though?
I am searching a vehicle for once a week use, only for shopping/in city trip/long distance trip. Both driver and passenger comfort are equally important for me. And I notice Korean/Japanese vehicles often skip out on passenger lumbar entirely. As such, can these work for long distance use? Is it that, both can keep you baseline comfortable in long distance, but the more adjustable seat further adds comfort on top of baseline? Or is it that the lesser adjustable may cause aches after couple of hours? Specifically for RDX, can this be comfortable long distance tourer for 2?
I do realize your seat rating often is based on context of the class of vehicle and it's competition, so I guess a 7/10 seat in luxury might be better than 8/10 of affordable. As such, assessing the long distance seat comfort (which is an absolute qualitative yes/no measure) of a vehicle is difficult for me to predict when I don't notice it in your review. Please advice.
PS Big fan, watching your content regularly, highly regard your opinion!
Why is this being compared to the RX? That isn't a fair comparison. The MDX compares with the RX not the RDX.
+Ness Rosenbrad The MDX is a three row crossover that is considerably larger than the RX, the RX and RDX however are two row crossovers and that that far apart in size. The upcoming Lexus three row crossover will directly compete with the MDX.
Does the 2015-2016 RDX have the same downshifting hesitation that plagued the 2013-2014 RDX ?
What was the exact 0-60 time?
qwt18 5 5.8, that information is always in the end credits.
After driving my RDX 2016 for 2 weeks for some reason I only get 18.1 MPG .... T_T
My 17 rdx does o to 60 in 5 sec flat
Is premium fuel required?
Reginald K.Son Premium fuel is recommended
Can you recommend a compact utility vehicle that won't require/suggest premium petrol?
Reginald K.Son You're going to be left with the mainstream entries from Ford, Nissan, Honda, Kia, etc. I'd suggest something like the new 2016 Sorento as an alternative to teh RDX that is as premium feeling in high end trims but doesn't need premium gas.
26 cu ft of trunk space is a deal breaker for me. Same sizr rav4 has 38, which is a huge difference.
I really wish this generation and the third generation had reclining rear seats. The size of the 2nd and 3rd generation seem like they could’ve easily had added reclining rear seats in the second row. Even the 1st gen Lexus NX has manual or power reclining rear seats, & the NX is smaller than this generation or the 3rd generation RDX
I wana buy this
The Forester XT has great power
22mpg combined for dropping the SHAWD is better? That sounds pretty bad..
I would buy something from this category if they would tow. The Cherokee is the only one I know of that would tow my boat (3500l lbs.) but I am looking for the Japanese quality.
disappointing to hear 70 decibel rating. that's noisy.. isn't 68 and lower what luxury cars should have ? Especially if talking on bluetooth, of which I do for business and don't need road noise .. which my 2011 santa fe has lots of.. any idea what the decibel rating on my 2011 fe is, for comparison ?
No break hold?
The overlay buttons are distracting, especially when you're behind them. They are more annoyance than help.
An inch is only a lot of headroom if you drive on perfect roads, don't wear a hat, and are bald
Martin Espinoza Alex words are: "Very generous amount of headroom". Also, one inch headroom left is on the middle seat on the second row, with Alex being taller than 6' and not bald as you say.
If you are a pro basketball player, than it can be an issue.
Why are you comparing the rdx to the rx the nx is the competitor to the rdx
Why people keep buying these over priced cheap Hondas???
Why do you keep comparing this vehicle to a Lexus RX? The RX is in a bigger class, also $15,000 more for the same options. You would need to compare this vehicle to a NX200T