Question… this chef is amazing but why does it seem Vegan restaurants are always trying to create meals that are meat flavoured? I mean if you let this chef loose they could create some insanely amazing vegan creations with new flavours.
as much as I love eating meat. if somehow in this messes up world there was a sudden meat shortage, this process could help fill in the stop gap measures
I stopped eating meat when I was 11 because I didn't want to eat animals, not because it tasted bad. If people can create something that looks/tastes/feels like meat, I love it! The good thing is that if one doesn't enjoy that, there ARE other amazing vegetarian and vegan recipes out there with no meat substitutions or flavour simulators.
I’m a vegetarian not a vegan so I eat dairy and eggs and I wouldn’t eat these faux meats and cheeses as they are not very nice. When I first became vegetarian 7 years ago I relied upon meat substitutes but you can make great vegetarian food without them if you’re creative. I even use nutritional yeast flakes instead of Parmesan cheese in pesto as it’s very cheesy tasting.
It's veggie chicken, veggie turkey etc. Named as such because it's the VEGETARIAN/VEGAN version of that taste profile. It's what it's simulating. Shouldn't be hard to figure that out. You're still able to eat the real thing. The fact that it bothers you so much is kind of ridiculous
"Meatless meat" is an oxymoron. It's not meat when it's "meatless." That's like calling something pescatarian when it has pork in it. See how dumb that sounds? The point is, don't call something meat when it isn't. Come up with another term.
Until the 15th century "meat" meant "food" in English. In Scandinavian languages, it still means "food" (e.g., with modern spelling, Swedish "mat", Danish "mad"). It was one of several English-Swedish false friends that confused me a lot, when I was taught English as a Swedish child. So with modernised spelling, but with the original meaning of the words, as in Middle English, this would be called "fleshless meat". "Meatless meat", would mean "foodless food". But if "meatless" would be understood as to have the newer meaning of "fleshless", and "meat" have the original meaning of "food". Then "meatless meat", make perfect sense, as "fleshless food". I'm not exactly sure what my point is. But with time, words change meaning and it's sometimes really confusing. And words have changed meaning *a lot* in English, and in a totally illogical manner. E.g. not that long ago: "nice" meant stupid, "magazine"meant a storehouse, "shambles" meant chairs, and "ketchup" meant fermented fish, "rare" meant stir, and that is what those words still means in a lot of languages. But as long as everybody instantly understand what someone trying to express, that is OK, even if it would be really nice if English could preserve the same meaning of words, as they meant originally, at least as long as they have preserved the same meaning in most other language, instead of making every English loan word change meaning into something completely different, within a few generations. Perhaps what I'm getting at is that the English language itself, is nothing but oxymorons. Sometimes from a historical perspective, but also sometimes within the modern use of words, e.g. you use the word "oxymoron" (literally sharp-dull), which itself is an oxymoron, or self contradiction (as I would rather call it, since it's less self contradicting).
@@randomlikingsYou seem more triggered than anyone else...since you've made the same type of reply to everyone's comments. Maybe eat a burger and calm the f'k down. ✌
Im not a vegan but it always amazes me how creative the chefs are to get to the food that they want.
I love when Guy goes to veggie/vegan places!!
You know, I was very skeptical from the outside but after seeing the process, I am 100% sold. Dude is pioneering meat-free cold cuts...
I have seen this one so many times I just love it. I would try his food 😋
Dam that's some skill with that equipment, love it!!
Just Awesome 😀🤗🤗♥️✌️🕊️oh Jesus that Vegan meal was just Mind blowing 😎🙏
ok, that vegan place is awesome. fingers crossed to find something like that here in Belgium.
Vegetarian place, not vegan.....they still use meat based products
@@lunatikexperience pretty sure the sandwich bar was vegan. What meat based products did you see?
It looks very very delicious,, aromatic spices are there.. 😋
I would go to that restaurant.
“Vegan turkey?” My grand grand grandma is shaking in her grave😬😬😬
Morgen would've loved the Hiborvous Butch6
Question… this chef is amazing but why does it seem Vegan restaurants are always trying to create meals that are meat flavoured? I mean if you let this chef loose they could create some insanely amazing vegan creations with new flavours.
Simple coz if miss eating meat thats the substitute .
as much as I love eating meat. if somehow in this messes up world there was a sudden meat shortage, this process could help fill in the stop gap measures
I stopped eating meat when I was 11 because I didn't want to eat animals, not because it tasted bad. If people can create something that looks/tastes/feels like meat, I love it! The good thing is that if one doesn't enjoy that, there ARE other amazing vegetarian and vegan recipes out there with no meat substitutions or flavour simulators.
@@randomlikings plus u never see anyon happening meat i mean because their most similar things to us humans so if we can find substitute will be cool
Because a lot of vegans love the taste of meat!!
Awesome upload 👌👌👌👌
Fantastic !!!
One love y'all ❤
his personality is a bit outgoing for me but I can see why people enjoy watching Guy Fieri.
I’m a vegetarian not a vegan so I eat dairy and eggs and I wouldn’t eat these faux meats and cheeses as they are not very nice. When I first became vegetarian 7 years ago I relied upon meat substitutes but you can make great vegetarian food without them if you’re creative. I even use nutritional yeast flakes instead of Parmesan cheese in pesto as it’s very cheesy tasting.
Holding chopsticks like a gaijin
Can't believe what frauds call that Turkey.im a farmer and can only grow lamb on mountains .
Meatless meat sandwich 😂
imagine going vegan actually saved animal lives....
And now we know those proteins are now full of chemicals and harder to digest than actual chicken 😂😂
VEGAN GABAGOOL!
If it's plant based, why name it after meat? Trying to play a trick?
Bruh
Yea i started eating chemical fake meat for health... wut?
Looks almost as good as meat so il just eat meat
I hate vegans stop calling food after the real food name…. Chicken is chicken and turkey is turkey from a turkey
Chill. It's just a name, lol. What a silly thing to be mad about.
@R S, what would you call it?
It's veggie chicken, veggie turkey etc. Named as such because it's the VEGETARIAN/VEGAN version of that taste profile. It's what it's simulating. Shouldn't be hard to figure that out. You're still able to eat the real thing. The fact that it bothers you so much is kind of ridiculous
1st place looks amazing. 2nd place goes to a lot of effort to make things taste like things they are not. Ill just stick to meat and real cheese.
Soylent green anyone ?
Pls no
Oh, come on....mozzarella cheese????? Not vegan either.....this shop is vegetarian, not vegan
the "cheeses" are vegan substitutes
Soy sauce contains fish....this is not vegan
Pretty sure he said he added chicken stock too...
"Meatless meat" is an oxymoron. It's not meat when it's "meatless." That's like calling something pescatarian when it has pork in it. See how dumb that sounds? The point is, don't call something meat when it isn't. Come up with another term.
Until the 15th century "meat" meant "food" in English. In Scandinavian languages, it still means "food" (e.g., with modern spelling, Swedish "mat", Danish "mad"). It was one of several English-Swedish false friends that confused me a lot, when I was taught English as a Swedish child.
So with modernised spelling, but with the original meaning of the words, as in Middle English, this would be called "fleshless meat". "Meatless meat", would mean "foodless food".
But if "meatless" would be understood as to have the newer meaning of "fleshless", and "meat" have the original meaning of "food". Then "meatless meat", make perfect sense, as "fleshless food".
I'm not exactly sure what my point is. But with time, words change meaning and it's sometimes really confusing. And words have changed meaning *a lot* in English, and in a totally illogical manner. E.g. not that long ago: "nice" meant stupid, "magazine"meant a storehouse, "shambles" meant chairs, and "ketchup" meant fermented fish, "rare" meant stir, and that is what those words still means in a lot of languages. But as long as everybody instantly understand what someone trying to express, that is OK, even if it would be really nice if English could preserve the same meaning of words, as they meant originally, at least as long as they have preserved the same meaning in most other language, instead of making every English loan word change meaning into something completely different, within a few generations.
Perhaps what I'm getting at is that the English language itself, is nothing but oxymorons. Sometimes from a historical perspective, but also sometimes within the modern use of words, e.g. you use the word "oxymoron" (literally sharp-dull), which itself is an oxymoron, or self contradiction (as I would rather call it, since it's less self contradicting).
Or just get over it, maybe? Just a thought. It's just a goddamn name lol. Jesus.
@@randomlikingsYou seem more triggered than anyone else...since you've made the same type of reply to everyone's comments.
Maybe eat a burger and calm the f'k down. ✌