The Constitutional Sheriffs movement subverts democracy
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024
- The Constitutional Sheriffs movement relies on a belief that county sheriffs have the power - and the duty - to make their own determinations about which laws to enforce and how to enforce them. It's not just enforcing laws and following the constitution - it also involves resisting laws, nullifying and refusing to enforce laws that a sheriff has deemed somehow unconstitutional. Whether used to oppose mask mandates or gun restrictions, voting laws or immigration policy, the so-called “constitutional sheriff” movement is an overt abuse of power. There is no constitutional basis to back up their theory of sheriff supremacy, first of all. But it’s also a sign of something bigger. It’s a twisted interpretation of the constitution in order to assume power and subvert the systems of our democracy.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: on.msnbc.com/Su...
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/...
ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/...
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: on.msnbc.com/Re...
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersRUclips
Find MSNBC on Facebook: on.msnbc.com/Li...
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: on.msnbc.com/Fo...
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: on.msnbc.com/In...
#Velshi #Guns #Immigration
This is the institutional version of the Sovereign Citizens movement.
Sovereign citizens are illegals.
Exactly what I was thinking. "Sovereign Citizens" with a badge.
My thought exactly.
Good point. I didn't even think of that.
It’s not they make you swear to uphold the constitution and that says right to arms so the state law is null
If Gerrymandering was outlawed, then the TRUE majority would represent the people, and such heavy-handed ideas like this would not exist.
Out law gerrymandering, lobbying, and make a simple stright tax, no loopholes. This would allow for the dowsizing the IRS.
@@estherlast6578 nah let the irs eat the rich
@@stewblare2190 Unfortunately the IRS typically targets the poor and not the rich, but with those kind of legal changes maybe would eat the rich.
@@mirojone helluva thought dude
@@stewblare2190 They don't do that tho. They have literally never eaten the rich. The only consume normies like your parents.
Everything they personally don't like is unconstitutional.
Yep. That's exactly WHY Sheriffs are meant to *enforce the law* and not meant to *INTERPRET THE US CONSTITUTION!!!*
And backed up by the 2nd amendment… So cool 💪🏾🇺🇸
Oh, yeah, all these people that say: so cool! Cosplayers in their tactical gear that want to play dress up! 🤣
Republicans: we lose elections by the millions, people don’t vote for us.
MAGAs: don’t worry, we only need 500 sheriffs to hold America hostage
Isn't it funny how these self-proclaimed constitutional scholars must have missed the day in constitutional law 101 where they talked about how it's the courts who decide if a law is constitutional or not. Last I heard Sheriff's are not part of the judicial branch
Being this kind of sheriff sounds like a sociopath's wet dream.
I'm watching from rural Alaska. We don't have counties or Sheriffs here.
We have very few laws and very little law enforcement.
My community has four officers. If one started "Power Tripping" they would be removed before it ever became news.
psychopath, not sociopath. he former is the one that does not care about empathy, and uses people and conditions as best they can. They are also the planners...Sociopaths are much more the "losers" of life that commit crime, but can feel guilt...just cannot stop themselves. The abused becoming the abusers for example.They tend to be loners and cannot hold jobs, etc. The psychopaths are the "winners", by that meaning the hold jobs, fool people, and often high achievers. They know how they have to act, but it is just that an act...So they would be the ones to USE the sheriff, not the guy that the sheriff thinks is an eccentric bum.
Splitting hairs. They are all malignant narcissistic bullies.
Wanting to protect or Constitutional rights makes him a "sociopath"? You sure about that?
@@darnelljackson2160 They aren't protecting anyone's rights. You don't want a Sheriff who think's he supersedes all levels of government within the boundaries of his county. Because, just like in Arpio's case, that means he doesn't have to consider YOU to have any rights. A Sheriff who considers himself above all laws puts you 100% at the mercy of the King Sheriff of whichever county you reside in. That's insanity.
How much NRA money did all those Sheriffs take as political contributions? There's where their loyalty connects. They were bought so hard and deep, they are now protectors of those gun dealers. Count that cash.
And The Democrats are Bought And Paid For by The Anti-Gun Lobby. How many $$$ in contributions do the Democrats take from them?
Count the Biden cash from China, Russia, and the Ukraine! Biggest cover-up ever! FJB!
I hate too break this to you, but its not loyalty to the NRA...It is from Rural America and they love their weapons. I live in rural Illinois, and have one of those sheriffs that refused to obey the law ( they hate Pritzker around here), but that refusal had nothing to do with the NRA, Rather it had to do with refusing Liberals. pure and simple anti-american rhetoric the right have thrown around so long it has taken root in their ignorant brains.
not nearly as much as the unions gave the Democrats before the Democrats gave those same unions exclusive contracts and loans
@@DaleHartley State officials need not enforce federal laws that the state has determined to be unconstitutional; nor may Congress mandate that states enact specific laws.
Kinda duplicitous these "oath keeper" sheriffs bother with taking an oath when sworn in. If they're willing to subvert federal or state law because they simply maintain an ideological differing opinion, then we're really in some kinda hurt as a nation.
@@johnwilliamson6143 so basically you're saying sheriffs decide what is and isn't constitutional based on their "feelings". Seems pretty fascist to me.
We ARE!!!
@@El_Migz No, their "feelings" are unknown. They are just upholding the constitution.
@@only2genders02 Yeah, based on his feelings. What do you think his interpretation means? 🙄
@@only2genders02 are sheriffs required to pass the bar? most people who interpret law professionally are required to pass the bar
sounds like when sherrifs did not want to enforce emancipation proclamation that set the slaves free...
Slavery was abolished by the 13th Amendment. Doing so was not within the powers that the Constitution granted to the President. The Emancipation Proclamation was an Executive Order, a law that applied to Federal Officials ranking below the President.
@@aheroictaxidriver3180 Lincoln by executive order in 1863 only freed CONFEDERATE SLAVES. You know, the southern states.
The 13th was passed by both houses in 65. So please explain your statement "Slavery was abolished by the 13th" that was not "within the powers that the constitution granted to the president?"
Taxi, you seem smart, but you're driven by ideological falsehoods. Why you twist, are you impregnated by Fox News(?)? Get a grip, 'taxi driver.'
Some of these same sheriffs have other uniforms that look a lot like white sheets with pointy hats.
@@aheroictaxidriver3180 straw man
Setting slaves free != Abolishing slavery.
A slave could be "free" today and captured back into slavery tomorrow. Abolished slavery meant something like that couldn't happen.
@@rtjames Slavery was abolished by the 13th Amendment, not the Emancipation Proclamation. In the USA, the President doesn't have the power to make up laws by himself. He can issue orders to Federal officials, which is what the Emancipation Proclamation was.
Cowards with badges is a simple way to put it
@@InGODweTrust007 shoe must fit
Cowards? You mean heros standing up for the people and their constitutional rights.
@@goodgrief88 Wrong, buddy. They don't care about your rights. They only care about their own selves and their own power.
@@alexlifeson8946 I live in Illinois. We don't have one politician who stands up for us. Corruption runs rampant. Why is that not on the news?
@@goodgrief88 A sheriffs job is to follow federal, state, and local laws to maintain order, peace, and protection of and for ALL citizens within their jurisdiction. It does NOT mean take laws into their own hands and execute sole authority. Do you know what that means?
There is NO difference between Oath Keeper and Constitutional Sheriff-- except in Scrabble
Nah they just choose not to enforce the law just like the fbi for a certain political party.
They look like capital letters but there are no capital letters in scrabble. hehe
So which term gets the higher score? Oh never mind, they're both losers!
You are exactly right.And those that are the most vocal against them get on their radar & get harassed.
@@tr7b410 Bingo, my friend. We have to be diligent.
One of the ways that Fascists come to power is by commandeering the military and law enforcement.
And they already wear brown shirts
And commandeering words.
And another way is being elected.
"Everything I don't like is fascist". -every empty headed liberal everywhere.
Which is what the Democrats are trying to do. This is why what these sheriff's are doing is so important.
They should be fired for not doing their job.
They only way they get fired is by the voters. So clearly the voters want this.
The voters can fire them for not doing their job. Yet the voters chose them... Democracy
@@ThomasSmith-rj4zt and strangely enough none of those Sheriff's question their elections
I think a little investigation into these sheriffs is is warranted. See how much corruption we can find
*all soros DAs.
The Supreme Court and now these Constitutional Sheriff's,the result of given too much power and no oversight.
It's called checks and balances so the feds don't steam roll us.
So what has the Supreme Court or these Sheriff's done that is Illegal? Or is it just because YOU disagree with them?
@@Reaper-cm4jr Your going to have to turn off Fox news if you want to be informed.All I'll say is Clarence Thomas has been involved in nondisclosure scandals for twenty years,and it's not up to a sheriff to decide which laws to enforce,is job is to enforce all laws.
@@goodgrief88 your name betrays you.
Trust me DS - things would look VERY different in the USA if we had "too much power". VERY different indeed.
They need to be told that it is for the courts to interpret the law. It is their duty to enforce the laws. These constitutional Sheriffs seem to believe that they are police, judge and jury. Constitutionally they are bound to uphold the laws passed by the state and federal legislators. That is their job.
And not for state government to pass laws that violate the constitution
Too many cops think that they're judge, jury, and executioner these days.
@@hint0122 Your right to bear arms is not infringed by a ban on specific firearms. Nowhere does that amendment state you have the right to acquire whatever firearm you want.
@@MTStingray
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. It says right there
@@hint0122 David Dushane is right
Lawsuits that hold the Sheriffs personally responsible are needed to end this.
but you are okay when a DA lets a criminal out of jail and they go commit crime you don't think the DA is responsible funny how that works huh
America's laws are pathetically weak.
@@geeknoid All these politicians are criminals from Democrat to Republican
Yeah, and when the sheriff thinks his _beliefs_ override any judge's interpretation of the law, what exactly would be the point?
Can't litigate those who have no respect for any law but their own.
Corrupt law enforcement
No one is above the law.
Let me pose a hypothetical to you":
during the early 1800s (before the passing of the 13th Amendment) there were local sheriffs that would refuse to prosecute runaway slaves even though it was state law.
Would you consider them also corrupt?
@@ryant2568 Is there a difference between breaking the law for a good reason, and breaking the law for a bad reason?
@@mile_high_topher Not at all, that is my point.
If you have an issue with the actions of this sheriff but believe the actions of sheriffs that chose not to prosecute escaped slaves were justified then it's not really the individual you have the issue with but rather the laws you feel are just and vise-versa.
@@ryant2568 Maybe you don't understand what corruption means? Who would like to imply cops letting runaway slaves free were corrupt?
It's not the job of the Sheriff to deem something constitutional or unconstitutional, that is the job of the courts. They need to realize they are just the grunt's, and they need to uphold the laws. Not pick and chose which ones to enforce. And if they don't, they will find out just how powerful the FBI and Marshals are.
I hope so! But in the meantime, what are citizens to do in their states when wronged by such sheriffs?
people loved the guy.
Kinda like the sanctuary cities?
On a municipal level yes it is their job. lol
@@hint0122 no, clarence darrow, not like sanctuary cities, because scotus ruled on that, unlike these rogue sheriffs-- so far, but their court date is coming.
I would not call them "Constitutional Sheriffs". Using the framing and language of the fascists only helps them spread their lawlessness. Call them seditious Sheriffs, or lawless sheriffs, or extremist sheriffs, or illegals. Use your own phrasing not that of the perpetrator.
Anticonstitutional sheriffs
Good point.
These sheriffs are a far cry from anything constitutional.
Remember Sherrif Arpaio? His investigative team proved that the Obama birth certificate, presented to the American people as a genuine document, was a computer-generated forgery. It proved that Obama was a liar and that he might not even be eligible to be President. The Obama gang went after Arpaio with a vengeance, tried to put him in jail, to shut him up. The fake news people towed the party line and trashed Arpaio relentlessly. When Trump took over the WH, he immediately pardoned Arpaio to put a stop to the abuse.
They are constitutionalists the same way that the confederacy and civil war was a constitutionally prescribed remedy for a disagreement over "state's rights" and it is the same toxic ideology that perpetuates both corrosive concepts.
These people are sick.
Upholding the Constitution makes them Constitutional.
So well written and well spoken I can't think of a thing to add. Except, THANK YOU MSNBC for your hard work and dedication in defense of our constitution and democracy.
I’m a liberal gun owner. It amazes me how tone def MSNBC types can be when It comes to topics like this. We’re all for sanctuary cities, and jurisdictions that refuse to enforce bad immigration laws, but get upset when people who disagree on other topics use the same strategies. Only then does it become a crisis that threatens our very democracy. If the people who elected these sheriffs wanted the laws enforced, they’d elect someone who would enforce them. If the federal, or state government want these laws enforced, then they should use federal/state agencies to enforce them.
MSNBC is complicit in undermining our rights. Not upholding them.
This is absolutely disgusting. They don't get to decide what laws to enforce or not to enforce. This is scary and way out of control. These idiots need to be taken out immediately. Just because they don't like something they won't enforce it.
The people we put in government are supposed to enforce the laws the federal government are not enforcing the law,
However states have rights and power in the Constitution to deal with situations that the federal government will not deal with,
Investigate prosecute convict and jail Seditious Sheriff that engage in this manner
So you want cops to blindly enforce any directive they're told to enforce? So if Trump is re-elected and he decides to round up the queers and illegals - you'll support the cops?
So if slavery was voted on and reinstated the sheriff should enforce that law?
Actually , they do.
That's one of the scariest ideas I've ever heard. I've met some Law Enforcement personnel who acted like they were gods... maybe this is where they got that feeling from. Thank you Ali, for as always, telling it like it is.
Lololol!
What do u have to say about “sanctuary cities” that refuse to enforce immigration laws?
-Yea watched Trump speech the day
Trump has turned so many Democratic to vote for him
What do you think about liberal states. That don't carry out federal marijuana laws? You are digging a hole you won't like.
Any sheriff that thwarts laws passed by our duly elected representatives should be put in prison. That includes immigration laws.
Law enforcement needs a complete overhaul
You got that straight. In a big way.
So does the border.
And unless you work in law enforcement, it's even worse than you think.
Agree!
@@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND , I know. My husband was LEO. He told me this would happen while he was still alive. Back in the early 90s it was the very beginning of this. PDs across the country were changing, PDs were hiring people unworthy of the job, and they were getting military equipment that they never had. He was very upset that cops weren't being vetted properly and he had to constantly correct them. When PDs began offering early retirement, he took it. He said he wanted NO part of that anymore. He was a Sarge, and he LOVED his job because he loved people and was good with them. He was great PR for the Dept too. I knew it was SERIOUS when he said he was going to leave the job that he loved. And I've been telling people this for at least a decade plus. This has become so SO bad. AND I can recall when sheriffs were not allowed to show their political affiliations. As soon as I saw them openly getting behind politicians, I knew that this was exactly why he left and how bad this was going to get. He must be rolling in his grave over this crap.
Using the law, to abuse the law because they are the law.
This is how the 1984 masterpiece "Tank" starring James Garner started!
Ooh laawd…
You mean like liberal states do with marijuana or sanctuary cities that don't carry out immigration law? You are digging a hole of which. You won't like the outcome. Liberals are so clueless. Talking heads don't have the answers.
Sounds like the FBI
Thank you for bringing this to our attention Velshi, the whole time I was wondering which party do they vote with, this group of sheriffs is just an extension of the confederacy, we have to call it what it is and treat it as such!
The Confederacy was made up of Democrats who sought to keep a sub group of Americans from exercising their Constitutional rights. The Union was Republicans who fought to ensure all Americans had rights. You have your story twisted sweetie.
The Confederacy was democrats . These are Republicans. You know, the anti slavery party.
Thanks so much for this brilliant segment, Ali! As a Brit who loves America, I know that the Constitution of The United States (1787) was written well over 230 years ago - at a time when normalcy, rationality - and even some measure of 'trust' - existed! Very sadly, it was never intended for America in the 21st century! In many ways, some 'Amendments' to the Constitution of The United States (1787) are, so sadly , causing more "harm" than "good" today in 2023!
Thank you for your intelligent words. Our constitution was written when the word "honor" meant something. Republicans have shredded the word and shredded our constitution.
@@silencedogood7297 Democrats stage regular attacks on the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 10th, 14th, and 27th amendments, not including the Constitution itself...
@@silencedogood7297 Thank you for your reply, my friend. Regardless of 'traditional' political affiliations American's may have, I pray that they vote 'Democrat' (up and down the balllot) in 2024 to 'literally' "save your great country"!
Do you always watch American propaganda like MSNBC over there?
@@silencedogood7297 you sound angry. Is that normal for pregnant men …?
Fire them for being treasonous and not following the law. They cannot pick and choose which laws they want to follow.
Haha, that's funny. How many cities are sanctuary cities?
Like sanctuary cities that don't enforce immigration law? Or marijuana states. Not following federal law?
Actually, I think they can. You have literally already proven this for things you support. Get a brain. This isn't ending democracy or even damaging it a little.
@@franklin9400 great point , every state is doing it . That's why " states rights " is bad for the " United " states
@@paulpaul9226 if all the power goes federal, then we just end up with a dictatorship.
Absolute insanity. America is going to start losing more and more tourists. It isn’t safe there for so many reasons.
Yes, you're right, and that's why I'm glad I've become an EU citizen. I can't take this insane country anymore, but I know of other Americans who have left or are in the process of leaving, too. When your country starts scaring you and people are walking in broad daylight with guns, no sensible, decent person would still want to live there, right?
Speaking as a Canadian the USA is off my list as a place to go for a vacation. I feel safer in Mexico.
North Korea has nice real estate I hear ….
@@jimeagle5509 No doubt you would feel very comfortable there. I wish you great success in your new country.
@@zigzag1a good luck in mexico. Let your next of kin know before leaving
Any sheriff who doesn't do what their boss (the governor) says, should be fired, just like in any other job.
They don't report to the governor.
Even in the wild west, they had to leave their guns with the sheriff before they entered the town.
This ain’t the Wild West tho
That was only in the movies, and even then rarely happened. Sit down.
That's corrupted law enforcement accepting NRA money !
@@SignoftheMagi Wyatt Earp would've said otherwise.
Sit down and shut up.
That's the movie's. But I don't doubt NY sheriff's always did that.
Would conservatives enjoy if constitutional sheriffs were this adamant about upholding free speech about expression of gender identity, books, and allowing professors the freedom to teach their own curriculums in colleges?
no, they would simply let the citizens vote in a Sheriff that represents that communities values
@@richardc9634 A rational response. Thank you.
@@richardc9634 only during an election year. Obviously the question posed conservatives failed to vote in their candidate.
Subverts the Rule of Law, I might add.
*upholding the Constitution.
Sounds like something democrats would endorse.
Now you know why the rest of the world doesn't vote for law enforcement officers. We can all simply and easily fire them.
Not simply or easily. Citizens United/Dark money in politics has seen to that.
Exactly. Thank you, Supreme Court 🙄
The point is you don't and that's why law enforcement is out of control.
Except the easiest way to have tyrannical policing is through state appointed officers. In the US, if one is abusing the people, they may choose to remove him for someone better.
Republicans: we lose elections by the millions, people don’t vote for us.
MAGAs: don’t worry, we only need 500 sheriffs to hold America hostage
These petty tyrants should be locked up. Just imagine how many constitutional violations are in their jails?
More counties should establish a county Police Dept and relegate Sheriffs departments to court security, serving summonses, and operating the county jail.
Nah
looks like not only law makers, but also law implementation seems to be . . . ignorant of the law?
No - they understand the 2nd Amendment is inalienable. It's the Democrats who don't seem to understand this.
Somebody's been watchin' too much Walker Texas Ranger.
Just ask Sheriff Buford T. Justice from Smokey and the Bandit.
We are a Constitutional Republic
... The only people who call our government a democracy are demoncrats
The 2nd Amended gives the state the power to regulate the militia. The governor/the state legislature make/execute the state law, not the sheriff. It's the duty of law officers to follow/enforce the law, not to decide what is law.
Untrue. "I Vass chust followink zee orderss" is not an excuse. The military has exemptions for refusing to follow an unlawful order. If a Law is unconstitutional, it is, on its face, unenforceable.
There is one major problem in doing either of these:
_You BETTER be able to back it up, IN COURT!_
👍🤘🖖
@@TimeSurfer206 right. However, *SCOTUS interprets the US Constitution, not sheriff's*
@@brandirose3874 Which, at this point in time, causes me far more concern than ever before in my life.
No it doesn't. The government doesn't need to give isn't a right to regulate a military force. The entire bill of rights is preventing government force, whether in expression, justice, military stationing, etc. To pretend like there is just one that gives government more power is actually a sign of a low IQ.
The constitution gives powers to 2 Governments STATE and FEDERAL. The states delegate their powers to county and local governments. Which means the State can revoke those powers of law enforcement from sheriff Agencies.
We had one of those in Mason county Washington. His name was Casey Salisbury and after background checks for guns was voted in as law, he stated that he would not enforce the law because he didn’t believe in it. Yes, the voters that pay his salary had a sheriff that refused to enforce the law. He is now gone (thank God). There’s a new sheriff named Ryan Spurling. Going to check to see if he’s one of these right wing cowboys. Sure hope not. If you can’t do the job you were elected to do, you need to GO.
A sheriff's authority is limited to his jurisdiction, but can decide whether or not to enforce state or federal law. This is an important part of the system of checks and balances that helped make this country so resistant to central power for so long.
Sheriff may feel the laws are unconstitutional, but they don't make law. The FBI should investigate them. Lock them up.
Lock them up for upholding the oath they swore to defend our Constitutional rights? Are you sure about that?
@@darnelljackson2160 You don't get to pick and choose what rights someone does or doesn't have
@darnelljackson2160 they are law enforcement, not constitutional enforcers. If law enforcement don't enforce the law, are they not useful.
This is exactly why we need top to bottom reformation in all each and every law enforcement agency in this country period
Constitutional Sheriff = Redneck Warlord.
But they're voted in by the people. Are you against democracy?
I want sheriffs to uphold the Constitution. They’re right to do so. An oath means something.
Bob Marley wrote a song about The Sherriff ..a hit for Eric Clapton.
I think shooting a sheriff or a deputy in Jamaica is different than here.
NWA wrote a fine, uplifting song about law enforcement in 1988.
@@stoopidpursun8140 FTP
but I did not shoot the deputy
Bob would know, these sheriffs are CORRUPT.
These sheriffs are lawbreakers, why are they not in jail?
I'm still looking but as of today I still haven't found where in the constitution it says we have a right to own AR-15 style firearms. There are those that say in the time of our founders freedom of the press involved ink and paper and our rights should be adaptive to new technology. Maybe that's true. But there is big difference between spreading as much information as you can as quickly as possible and spreading as many bullets as you can as quickly as possible.
5,000,000 illegal immigrants have invaded our country since Joe took over. Montana has a population of 1,104,000. It's not about the importance of obeying the law. It's about avoiding news photos of too many illegal aliens crossing the border, which would bring bad publicity to Joe and his policies. What a message to send to illegal border-crossers. Thousands upon thousands of illegal aliens are crossing the border right now. This is how the democrats plan to destroy the USA, this is no accident, this was planned by evil people.
From Border Patrol source just now: “The problem with scabies is that is is highly contagious and the illegal aliens are getting in busses and commercial aircraft to travel around the country. The next person that sits in that seat now has scabies!” It is true that illegals are somehow getting onto commercial aircraft -- two days ago, I took a flight from the border city of San Diego to Denver, and was astonished to see the last seats filled in by a line of single weathered young men speaking Spanish and carrying raggedy backpacks who very much appeared to be recent border crossers. If it's true they were illegal border crossers, then yes, it appears likely that after some rough travel, they could have had scabies and spread them to the next person who took their seats on the plane.
Illegal aliens already know that if they turn themselves in to the Border Patrol, they'll be mass-released into the country without so much as a court date for their inevitably spurious claims to asylum. Title 42 resulted in the expulsion of only 19% of them, meaning the rest had an 81% chance of getting in. Now with Title 8, the result will be the same, and if there are a lot of them coming, they will simply be released - after lots of tough vetting, they claim, another one to make migrants laugh.
If they are slightly less lucky, they will be issued a "notice to report" to the authorities, called "parole," to be done on the honor system. Most, of course, skip the honor. If they are slightly less lucky than that, they will be released on an "alternative to detention," plan, or "parole" as well, and if it gets to that, there aren't going to be any parole officers looking for them once they skip their court date two, three, or ten years from now. Most will be released without even a notice to report to ICE - the full catch and release. That's been in the news, too. The New York Post has a leaked document.
The fact that the democrats are more concerned about television pictures of crowded detention facilities than they are about securing the border tells illegal aliens all they need to know about what their odds are if they cross illegally in huge numbers. Already there are 60,000 migrants massed at the border, and another 150,000 on the way. The more who cross, the fewer who get detained and expelled, owing to the Biden's real priority: the fear of those news pictures.
Illegal aliens aren't stupid and can read between the lines of messages. If Joe's priority is avoiding those overcrowded news pictures, then for them, the more who cross, the better. The democrats are truly sick people who hate the USA ! FJB !@!@!
Apparently you haven't read the Second Amendment.
In none of those cases can the limits be arbitrary. And in all of those cases the limits are subject to a high level of scrutiny by the Courts.
It's a simple matter to amend the Constitution, Oliver Wendell Holmes.
Pres Johnson demonstrated how to handle non-law degree holding sherriffs with the national guard in the South. Embrace that spirit again.
Big ego .. big fall.
Big guns, big bang…
I find this incredibly unsurprising
They take an oath to defend the CONSTITUTION
You can’t control people tho
They also take an oath to defend and uphold all laws city, county, state and federal, when did law enforcement start having the right to pick what laws they will enforce ? Our tax dollars pays them a salary to do their job and if they cannot do they're job they need to be dismissed ? We live in a democracy of voting to govern ourselves for the people and by the people, Its not the other way around.
Yet they openly defy it.
The fbi has been doing it since Obama.
@@WeylandLabs their*
Only in America!
THESE SELF RIGHTEOUS SHERIFF'S should be REMOVED FROM POWER! FOR ABUSE OF POWER AND DERELICTION OF DUTY!
And how will that happen?
They are elected by their community.
5,000,000 illegal immigrants have invaded our country since Joe took over. Montana has a population of 1,104,000. It's not about the importance of obeying the law. It's about avoiding news photos of too many illegal aliens crossing the border, which would bring bad publicity to Joe and his policies. What a message to send to illegal border-crossers. Thousands upon thousands of illegal aliens are crossing the border right now. This is how the democrats plan to destroy the USA, this is no accident, this was planned by evil people.
From Border Patrol source just now: “The problem with scabies is that is is highly contagious and the illegal aliens are getting in busses and commercial aircraft to travel around the country. The next person that sits in that seat now has scabies!” It is true that illegals are somehow getting onto commercial aircraft -- two days ago, I took a flight from the border city of San Diego to Denver, and was astonished to see the last seats filled in by a line of single weathered young men speaking Spanish and carrying raggedy backpacks who very much appeared to be recent border crossers. If it's true they were illegal border crossers, then yes, it appears likely that after some rough travel, they could have had scabies and spread them to the next person who took their seats on the plane.
Illegal aliens already know that if they turn themselves in to the Border Patrol, they'll be mass-released into the country without so much as a court date for their inevitably spurious claims to asylum. Title 42 resulted in the expulsion of only 19% of them, meaning the rest had an 81% chance of getting in. Now with Title 8, the result will be the same, and if there are a lot of them coming, they will simply be released - after lots of tough vetting, they claim, another one to make migrants laugh.
If they are slightly less lucky, they will be issued a "notice to report" to the authorities, called "parole," to be done on the honor system. Most, of course, skip the honor. If they are slightly less lucky than that, they will be released on an "alternative to detention," plan, or "parole" as well, and if it gets to that, there aren't going to be any parole officers looking for them once they skip their court date two, three, or ten years from now. Most will be released without even a notice to report to ICE - the full catch and release. That's been in the news, too. The New York Post has a leaked document.
The fact that the democrats are more concerned about television pictures of crowded detention facilities than they are about securing the border tells illegal aliens all they need to know about what their odds are if they cross illegally in huge numbers. Already there are 60,000 migrants massed at the border, and another 150,000 on the way. The more who cross, the fewer who get detained and expelled, owing to the Biden's real priority: the fear of those news pictures.
Illegal aliens aren't stupid and can read between the lines of messages. If Joe's priority is avoiding those overcrowded news pictures, then for them, the more who cross, the better. The democrats are truly sick people who hate the USA ! FJB !@!@!
They want to be politicians but want the authority of a sherrif. They're a bunch of political activists really. Partisans.
@@francismarion6400 Politicians decide the laws and sherrifs enforce them. It looks like you want the sherrif to do both.
I would trust my local sheriff more that the president to uphold the constitution
My biggest issues with these sherrifs is the same officers that say they won't enforce this are the same ones that don't want people recording them which is is first ammendment right. They love to pick and choose which rules to follow and uphold.
Politicians being hypocritical liars? No way
Sounds like democrats. Good to see Republicans fighting fire with fire.
Simple fix here. Declare them domestic enemies of the US and deal with them accordingly.
The world is better off without folks like Jordan Neely.
Truth hurts.
Thanks
~Jim Eagle
Awe, you came up and visited the RUclips comment gutter from whatever even lower plane of existence you call home.
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Any county sherrifs department that refuse to enforce state passed laws should lose all state funding until they do follow the law.
So under your logic the people of that County wouldn't have to pay state taxes then
is this the governmental Tyrrany of which the 2nd ammendment speaks?
Have any of your fantasies come true ?
@@seymourbutts4654 what fantasies are you talking about?
@@clive3490 The 2A doesn't speak about tyrrany at all.
@@seymourbutts4654 So the gun nuts that insist the 2A is for "safeguarding against tyrannical governments" are the ones that get it wrong?
@@seymourbutts4654 Hamilton says this "apprehension" may be considered "a disease" after explaining that the independent nature of the state and federal governments provides the ultimate check against either becoming overly tyrannical. The 2A is thus seemingly both insufficient and unnecessary to prevent tyranny from within -- a governor calling up and arming their state militia should it ever come to that would not be impeded in any way if those words didn't exist.
And on the other end, one could argue that the 2A provides a useful tool for would-be tyrants -- much like these sheriffs want to be the final authority on what is or isn't Law, if you're making a proclamation of tyranny without democratic backing, you're no better (or possibly worse) than the supposed tyranny you seek to supplant.
Arpaio was born in my town … Embarrassing
Tell us something new. law enforcement has used its own playbook for decades. Brookside Georgia is a prime example of what happens when law enforcement goes unchecked. There needs to be an agency that oversees local law enforcement so corruption can't spread.
So long as our Sheriff's do not hold the ultimate authority in a county, then expect corruption, Rico and racketeering on every level of our society. The sheriff's ultimate constitutional duty is to protect the rights of the people in his County as well as to ensure that all elected officials are constitutionally in office in upholding their constitutional duty as well.
your average "sheriff" has a high school level education. they don't understand the law, let alone the constitution, any more than you do.
Put them in jail with the people that they put in jail and let Darwinism rule.
Fire all of these sheriffs. They are dangerous, and not following the law.
Why cant the President send in National Guard to enforce these laws when the sheriff's wont???
Ummm, ahhh, errrrr, eeeee…… states rights. POTUS can using the insurrection act. Most notable were during school integration by Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson where NG blocked entrances, etc. Lincoln used it when the southern states seceded.
isn't it time we pick a wall to stand the Oath Keepers in front of?
If these sheriff refused to enforce an abortion ban, they would be celebrating them
But we all no they wouldn’t do that.
Hey, hey....none of that logic allowed here.
“Laws they Somehow deemed unconstitutional”? - the law is either constitutional or not! How is that a threat to democracy?
Florida has passed constitutional carry. And Floridians can thank Ron DeSantis
If you see someoe carrying a rifle and wearing a tactical vest call the cops you just might have stopped the next mass shooter. Better to be safe than sorry.
I imagine street gangs are excited.
Negative gangs have always carried the only thing that's changed is we've leveled the playing field . From this point forward you're only a victim if you choose to be.
It has actually been proven that states with constitutional carry laws have lower per-capita levels of crime.
This stat makes perfect sense when you think about it, you are far less likely to commit a crime if there is a good chance the person on the other end has a loaded gun on them.
Not only carry but also concealed with no restrictionist on who can purchase Another brilliant move by Florida's communist governor
Sheriff's should come under US Marshall office? Marshalls were always over the sheriff, so let the US Marshall put the sheriff's back in to line!!!
I would like to see how this flies in Florida!
In every way I'm sure it will politicized to the fullest extent possible.
@@seymourbutts4654 "In every way" you are sure; or you think it will be politicized "In every way"...?
😉
@@TheScandoman Political bases have to be inspired coffers have to be filled ads have to be run and interviews have to take place. It's non stop they never take a break.I guess you haven't noticed .
@@seymourbutts4654 Yes, Bo-Bo! I have noticed!
Apparently, like a 6 year-old (or Trump), whenever you get new information, you assume that you are the first, and noone else has it!
I can assure you, that when YOU learn something new, you will have a tough time time finding someone else who hasn't!
@@TheScandoman If you noticed than why did you ask in the first place ?
Issue them their constitutional authentic musket.
And be done with it.
The ability tp decide whether or or a law is unconstitutional or not does not recide in law enforcement, but in the judicial branch. A sherrif could bring a case or suit before a judge to challenge a law they believe is wrong, but they have no authority to ignore it. None. Hells, the very document they claim to uphold clearly states the authority of state and federal law, and most states reserve the right to terminate a Sherrif if they refuse to do their job. The FBI also has the authority to investigate local law enforcement and remove them if necessary (happened twice in my area in the last 15 years).
So what I see here is a bit of a spine problem. If sherrifs are refusing to enforce laws, remove them immediately. I can understand disagreeing with a law, but thinking you are above it and capable of judging it on your own is NOT a power any sherrif has.
So if a sheriff refused to enforce an abortion law in Arkansas he should be removed?
The word "sheriff" doesn't even appear in the Constitution.
Isn't it similar to Democrat run sanctuary cities where to choose to ignore and not prosecute certain crimes
No.
@@tedosmond413 why not? It's a federal law to prosecute and kick out illegal immigrants who broke the federal law and infiltrated this country illegally and yet several Democrat DAs, mayors wouldn't prosecute them or let ICE do it's job.
Love Velshi reporting!
Welcome to to America version of Germany's Geheime Staatspolizei (German: “Secret State Police”...
Nothing new, it is called discretion.
Make Abortion Great Again
Cut federal aid to those counties and police departments since they don't want to be in a democracy.
They are like sovereign citizens movement.
And what’s wrong with that? 🤷🏽♂️
"Sovereign citizens" are in our country illegally.
@@JasonDrvmz read about the movement it's insane and un-American.
Constitutional sherif is just a short hand way of saying “I’m a a traitor and my own power matters more than anything else”
Government officials that pass unconstitutional laws are traitors
Trump 2024!🇺🇸🇺🇸
So now you're for terrorism? You said you were against it...
So the sheriffs are deciding which laws to follow,. Very dangerous.
Sherrif Arpaio is a national treasure and an American hero.
Napoleon syndrome 1d iot.
He's a criminal. Fu Q
Oops. Don't move to Illinois. The list of don't move THERE, don't vacation THERE, don't attend college THERE, don't leave your home unless you have to THERE states continues to grow. America, the Angry, Fearful, and Manicured to look Beautiful on the outside.
Pushing propaganda
Recycled agrapovz are chirping 😂
Well the gov letting em do it so....
Jordan Neely recieved zero days in jail for an attempted murder of an elderly woman
…but hopefully Penny will spend more than a few in jail for killing him.
@@Icecream_ghost I will be willing to accept a guilty or not guilty verdict. You?
This should not be in the news like any other employee. He refuses to work fire him and his friends.
I've seen this movie before. It was a Clint Eastwood movie in the territory of Oklahoma. Well...we know how that has turned out...most of Oklahoma was recently given back to the First World Nations indigenous Peoples in the Oklahoma region.
first nations of earth
new and old are ju wish doctrines of flat plain laws..
It WAS? I missed that.
FINALLY some GOOD news!
@@martytrueblood5902 Sorry if I got it wrong. It was not intentional. I ask for forgiveness and a blessing.
@@TimeSurfer206 It was. But then the Feds had to stick their thumb in that pie.
@@TimeSurfer206 The US Supreme court ruled in 2020 that 1/2 of Oklahoma is Native American Land. (Basically, the far eastern and southern part of the state) The justices decided 5-4 that an eastern chunk of the state, including its second-biggest city, Tulsa, should be recognised as part of a reservation.
The ruling means some tribe members found guilty in state courts for offences committed on the land at issue can now challenge their convictions.
The notion that ONE MAN (a sheriff no less) should be the total arbitrator of what is supposedly Constitutional is the most ridiculous thing imaginable! It's nothing more than declaring "King of the County"....
When you drop out of school, do you get a free computer and get to live in your mother's celler
If you cross the border illegally you get a phone, food, and a luxury hotel stay.
Obviously so.
After all, you're here.
or become a sherrif
@@francismarion6400 You remind me of my recruiter before I joined the service.
Please send the migrants to Biden's house's Shumers house, Shiff's house Nadler's house and all of the other Dems that are allowing this border catastrope.
The Dems aren't allowing it. They finally got rid of the Republican's title 42 mess.
Yes! Lolol don't forget Nancy and Hunter 🤣😂🤣
We the people under Republican presidents forced "regime change" in central and Latin America. There were no major migrations until our country caused it. And, BTW, WE democrats did everything legal to stop you republicans from meddling in all our neighboring countries. If you need a history lesson, read about Nicaragua and Ollie North. Try learning some facts before repeating Fox nonsense. Demand that your beloved Fox prove with real, hard evidence one word
We're going to send them to your house.
You forgot to include the laptop😅
The right to bear arms does not mean you have the right to bear whatever arms you want. Your right to a firearm shall not be infringed, but there's nothing in there that says you that right to any type of firearm you want. Your rights would not be infringed even if the only thing you can get is a handgun. Enforce the laws that are passed, or step down.
REFUSING TO ENFORCE THE LAW, KINDA SOUNDS LIKE JOE BIDEN 😳 🤔
What law exactly? And no need for the all caps, Grandpa.
@@donyoung7874 The border for the past 2 1/2 years .over 4 million migrants. During this time. More than ever recorded for this time span . Which is intentional by the BIDEN administration. His rein of terror is coming to an end. Good 👍 luck.
These yahoos need to be arrested by real police officers.
There also isn’t a constitutional basis to force sheriffs to enforce all federal laws.
Law enforcement officer must take an oath to defend the Constitution. Good enough for me.
@@balrog322 Ever heard of the 10th amendment IN THE CONSTITUTION!
True. Ironic these sheriffs bother to take an oath at all.
That implies sheriffs/police may implement the law @ their discretion; laws they don't like can be ignored.
@@realitycheck5902 10th amendment
Abolish the second amendment
Please to all the people who live by the boarder, please keep safe ! Keep your doors and windows locked ,take what ever safety precautions you need to keep safe !
If you have a boarder, aren't you living by them by definition? They are renting a room in your house, after all. Maybe you should have gotten some references or known something about the person before renting a room to them.