Eulerian Integral of the First Kind - Deriving the BETA FUNCTION! [ The non-trigonometric Version ]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
  • Help me create more free content! =)
    / mathable
    Merch :v - teespring.com/...
    www.amazon.com...
    shop.spreadshi...
    Gamma: • DERIVING THE GAMMA FUN...
    Trig Version: • The Beta Function: Der...
    Brutal Integral: • Calculating one BRUTAL...
    Today my grills and bois, we are going to DERIVE the so-called Beta function or Beta integral! Our basis for the whole process is the integral represenattion for the gamma function. We are going to multiply two of them together and solve an intruiging double integral! After that we arrive at the Symmetric relationship, that Gamma[x+y]Beta[x,y]=Gamma[x]Gamma[y]. Enjoy! =)
    2nd Channel: / @rockhardwooddaddy
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Wanna send me some stuff? lel:
    Postfach 60 06 03
    14406 Potsdam
    Brandenburg
    Germany
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    My Website: www.papaflammy...
    Flammy's subreddit: / flammybois
    Twitter: / flammablemaths
    Facebook: / flammablemaths
    Got some time to spare? Make sure to add captions to my videos! =) www.youtube.com...
    Want to know more about me? Watch my QnA! =D • Question and Answer Ti...

Комментарии • 107

  • @TopCuber
    @TopCuber 5 лет назад +61

    > if you have one apple then you only have one apple

  • @2neutrino
    @2neutrino 5 лет назад +40

    nice Australian meme at the beginning

    • @xD-jm2ie
      @xD-jm2ie 5 лет назад

      Nothing out of the ordinary to me, what are you on about?

    • @nanigopalsaha2408
      @nanigopalsaha2408 4 года назад

      This made me laugh more than the meme

  • @hehebwoai3056
    @hehebwoai3056 5 лет назад +37

    Could you do a series where you derive/discuss every oiler thing in maths

    • @lilyyy411
      @lilyyy411 5 лет назад +19

      oily macaroni

    • @silentinferno2382
      @silentinferno2382 5 лет назад +2

      @@PapaFlammy69 all for itt!!

    • @pythagorasaurusrex9853
      @pythagorasaurusrex9853 5 лет назад +3

      This would be one hell of a loooooooong video. Or you can do it in 10 seasons, each with 30 shows lasting ca. 3 hours each :)

  • @EpicHero-qe7zd
    @EpicHero-qe7zd 5 лет назад +3

    "Just Fubini that shit !" - Papa Flamie, 2019

  • @reinerwilhelms-tricarico344
    @reinerwilhelms-tricarico344 5 лет назад +4

    Very well explained. I’ve been always a bit nervous handling double integrals like this - so easy to completely screw up.
    Next you might want to talk about the Dirichlet probability density. There is a generalisation of the Beta function.

  • @subhrajitroy1477
    @subhrajitroy1477 5 лет назад +26

    hey papa, i broke my neck trying to read the meme :'(

    • @subhrajitroy1477
      @subhrajitroy1477 5 лет назад +3

      JUST GOT ADDICTED TO YOUR VIDEOS....TODAY I SPENT 4 STRAIGHT HRS ON RUclips, WATCHING YOU

    • @spacejunk2186
      @spacejunk2186 5 лет назад +3

      >laughs in australia

    • @subhrajitroy1477
      @subhrajitroy1477 5 лет назад +1

      @@spacejunk2186 :)

  • @owenl3929
    @owenl3929 5 лет назад

    I haven’t watched this until now since I’ve had so much work but I’ve been looking forward to this!!!! Thank you for one of only a few videos on this function on RUclips

  • @cbbuntz
    @cbbuntz 2 года назад +1

    The beta function is fascinating and really useful for taking a shortcut in otherwise very complicated expressions.
    One cool thing is if you fill a matrix with the results of the reciprocal beta function (with some (1/2+cos(n+k)/2) terms and dive the first column by 2), and then take the inverse of that matrix, you get the chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. Chebyshev polynomials are orthogonal relative to a weight of (1-x^2)^(-1/2), but orthogonal with no weight when applied to cosines (because the cosine transform is already orthogonal).
    Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind are jacobi polynomials with a = -1/2, b = -1/2. This is starting to remind me of the beta function....
    With some slight tweaks, you can derive the other Jacobi polynomials (It's a little complicated to fit all the math into a youtube comment), but it works out that Legendre polynomials (orthogonal with no weight, so a = 0, b = 0) when applied to cosines are orthogonal realive to a weight of sin(x)^1.
    The pattern continues for the rest of the Jacobi polynomials. Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind (jacobi polynomial for a=1/2, b=1/2) are orthogonal to (1-x^2)^(!/2), but applied to cosines, they are orthogonal relative to sin(x)^2.
    So if a jacobi polynomial is orthogonal relative to a weight of (1-x^2)^a (simplifying to set a=b), when applied to cosines, it's orthogonal relative to a weight of sin(x)^(1+2*a), which is directly reflected in the relationship that polynomials have in the beta function.
    It ends up popping up in Bernstein polynomials too, which is obvious considering they're basically the type of function the beta function integrates, stuff in the form of (1-x)^n*x^(v-n). The beta function for polynomials in that form just ends up being binomial coefficients (n; v), (the actual coefficients are different, but it's equivalent due to symmetry). Each polynomial is normalized so that each member of a set of polynomials contained in v to all integrate to the same value. The sum of this same set of polynomials is just 1, and these properties makes them a "partition of unity"

  • @jarogniewborkowski5284
    @jarogniewborkowski5284 4 года назад +1

    Did You already made video about Jacobians and how it can be used in integrals like in this movie You have used?

  • @tretolien1195
    @tretolien1195 5 лет назад +5

    Ohhh Flammy diden't you know you could just have used the advanced level 'Horseshoe mathematics' method and have gotten 100% in less than a minute

  • @frozenmoon998
    @frozenmoon998 5 лет назад +1

    There is a movie called Close Encounters of the Third Kind, but this is better! It is called Eulerian Integral of the First Kind :)

  • @emperorpingusmathchannel5365
    @emperorpingusmathchannel5365 5 лет назад +8

    Damn that meme in the beginning. I don't speak Australian!

  • @jacoboribilik3253
    @jacoboribilik3253 3 года назад

    Nice definition of the Beta function. It is used in Bayesian statistics very often too.

  • @MathematicsOptimization
    @MathematicsOptimization 5 лет назад +1

    omg pops now that u mentioned it pls do some multivitamin calc like div, grad, curl, jacobi, stokes theorem and shit!!!

  • @antronixful
    @antronixful 5 лет назад

    thank you papa... my girlfriend asked me for help with a programming task, which consisted in finding the zeros of a function of her choice, using numerical analysis ... you had to use 6 different methods, but the function was the important thing (hehehe), so I came immediately to the papa's channel looking for the sickest function... also put some mini-game in the in the script for the waiting time (i.e. for the memes) xd

  • @thecustomer2804
    @thecustomer2804 5 лет назад +5

    *Papa Flammy makes new video*
    Me: oooooo *clicks*

  • @owenl3929
    @owenl3929 5 лет назад

    HERE is what I was looking for Papa Flammy

  • @miro.s
    @miro.s 2 года назад

    Awesome! I've got relaxed during your video.

  • @MrCigarro50
    @MrCigarro50 4 года назад +1

    Great video. Thank you.

  • @arbitrarilyclose
    @arbitrarilyclose 5 лет назад

    Papa seems so happy at the start of the videos :)

  • @leafbaguette
    @leafbaguette 5 лет назад +1

    I know you math bois don't like this but the physics notation of putting the d(dummy variable) right next to the integral sign makes it easier to not lose track of bounds

  • @wiloux
    @wiloux 5 лет назад

    that 3:13 integareale pronunciation is gold

  • @pacman7328
    @pacman7328 5 лет назад +1

    If there's a beta function then where is the Alpha function?

  • @fanyfan7466
    @fanyfan7466 5 лет назад +1

    Finally! I love the Beta function

  • @srinivasadireddi
    @srinivasadireddi 3 года назад +1

    at 12:41, why do we need to multiply it with the det of jacobian matrix?

  • @mathhack8647
    @mathhack8647 2 года назад

    Exellent. Now I understand Beta Function. and I can solve. integral. of ln(cos(x)). in another way .
    Thanks

  • @hassan010012
    @hassan010012 4 года назад

    Awesome!

  • @uva1312
    @uva1312 5 лет назад +1

    Papa, I think it would be really cool if you put out a video on the incomplete definition of the gamma function. No pressure haha, just a suggestion for the future.
    Keep up the amazing videos.

  • @svenweiland3322
    @svenweiland3322 5 лет назад

    Oh no RUclips recommended fresh toad walker's new video with
    "Zuschauer von Flammable Maths schauen sich diesen Kanal an"

    • @svenweiland3322
      @svenweiland3322 5 лет назад

      @@PapaFlammy69 hopefully just to troll him or at least get mad at him internally.

  • @silentinferno2382
    @silentinferno2382 5 лет назад

    Trig version? Coming soon?
    I haven't forgotten about the shirt.

  • @michelkhoury1470
    @michelkhoury1470 4 года назад

    Cheers papa Laplace :p

  • @fym4x7
    @fym4x7 4 года назад

    Me: I'm gonna watch a *B*orn
    RUclips recommendation:
    Me: fuck yeah

  • @paulbucher4655
    @paulbucher4655 5 лет назад +1

    Papa❤

  • @biswadeepchatterjee6074
    @biswadeepchatterjee6074 5 лет назад

    Papa flammy can u make a video on Jacobian determinants nd matrices plzzzz for ur fellow mathematicians

  • @peterdriscoll4070
    @peterdriscoll4070 5 лет назад

    Nice!

    • @peterdriscoll4070
      @peterdriscoll4070 5 лет назад

      @@PapaFlammy69 Is beta related to the reciprocal of x+y comb x = (x+y)!/x! y!

  • @surferriness
    @surferriness 5 лет назад +1

    Halfway through the vid
    Didnt correct the t to Tau
    TRIGGERED

  • @garogarabed6196
    @garogarabed6196 4 года назад

    11:20 the same Spiel lolll

  • @JamalAhmadMalik
    @JamalAhmadMalik 5 лет назад +2

    Papa or papá?

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk 5 лет назад

      papa=adad ;) Kelly's Reflection formula.

  • @bon12121
    @bon12121 4 года назад

    NEW SUBSCRIBER!

  • @athul_c1375
    @athul_c1375 3 года назад

    papa can you name the book I can study these special functions

  • @thesattary
    @thesattary 8 месяцев назад

    why you are so good?

  • @subhrajitroy1477
    @subhrajitroy1477 5 лет назад +1

    Today PAPA became proud by receiving fan mail...for the kids who didn't know.
    BTW 9TH COMMENT PAPA!!!

  • @hacker2ish
    @hacker2ish 3 года назад

    Pls explain why gamma is continuous

  • @spacejunk2186
    @spacejunk2186 5 лет назад +10

    Lol this boi thinks the Euler integral actually exists.

  • @matron9936
    @matron9936 5 лет назад +1

    Please solve Integral(ln(x)sec(x)dx)

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 лет назад

      Matron I think this is a non-elementary integral. This is because if you use integration by parts, you eventually integrate the antiderivative of secant, and I am fairly certain that one is well-known to be non-elementary.

    • @thephysicistcuber175
      @thephysicistcuber175 5 лет назад

      Trivial with horseshoe integration bruh

  • @insert_a_good_name_here4585
    @insert_a_good_name_here4585 5 лет назад +1

    Have you read 'inside interesting integrals' by Paul Nahin?
    Just curious :)

  • @user-kw4er9un3e
    @user-kw4er9un3e 2 месяца назад +1

    the beginning of this video..... Misophonia........... 😭😭😭😭😭

  • @mahmoudkhamis409
    @mahmoudkhamis409 5 лет назад

    4:26 yes that's right but in Quantum mechanics I don't :)

  • @nicholasquiroga2861
    @nicholasquiroga2861 4 года назад

    epic, thank you

  • @adithyar4282
    @adithyar4282 3 года назад

    everyone will have one apple that is Adam apple

  • @yotty97
    @yotty97 4 года назад

    Can't you give an intuition for the beta function? Like the gamma function is the continuous analog of the factorial function....so what is the intuition behind the beta function?
    EDIT: i just found out it's related to (and in a sense derived from) the binomial function - you should really have made a mention of this. Just like defining the gamma function in terms of a continuous factorial, it's extremely useful to be given a motivation for the beta function too

  • @matheus_rml
    @matheus_rml 5 лет назад +1

    hey papa, I challenge you to solve the sum from 0 to infinity of 1/((4n+1)^2), this is actually a challenge that I recieved from my friends and I couldn’t solve

    • @matheus_rml
      @matheus_rml 5 лет назад +2

      Flammable Maths holy shit that was fast

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 лет назад

      Matheus Ramalho Once you see how to solve it, you'll be mindblown. It's not very difficult, but you do need to be quite clever.

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 лет назад +1

      Flammable Maths The question is, can you solve the alternating version of that series? Namely, 1/1^2 - 1/5^2 + 1/9^2 - 1/13^12 + •••. It's much more challenging :)

    • @etasyr
      @etasyr 5 лет назад

      One of the definitions of Catalan's Constant (which he already made a video on) is G = -⅛𝛑² + 2 * ∑ 0 to ∞ of 1/(4n+1)²
      Rearrange and ∑ 0 to ∞ of 1/(4n+1)² = ½G + ¹⁄₁₆𝛑²
      It would be nice were he to show how to get to that definition ^_^

    • @matheus_rml
      @matheus_rml 5 лет назад

      Angel Mendez-Rivera of course I can’t hahahaha

  • @huhulili9021
    @huhulili9021 5 лет назад

    Mr Daddy, is it alright if I ask a question, what's ur view in learning applied math for comp science? I'm at a cross road on whether to do a degree in CS or in applied math

  • @mrinalchoudhury2725
    @mrinalchoudhury2725 3 года назад

    Ons wakhan

  • @razmakbazai3556
    @razmakbazai3556 3 года назад

    wow

  • @vaualbus
    @vaualbus 5 лет назад

    The finalproblem is does it exixt the fourier transform of the gamma function? And if so how to calculate it :)

    • @karolakkolo123
      @karolakkolo123 5 лет назад

      To my naked eye, the answer is no. Even if there is a fourier transform of the gamma function, it is most likely not a function itself, but a distribution. And that distribution doesn't look like it would be nice to handle. Just take a look at the positive reals with Im(z)=0, and the fact that it is non-periodic-like and monotonically increasing starting with the minimum between 1 and 2

  • @Mystery_Biscuits
    @Mystery_Biscuits 5 лет назад

    Video is 17:29 on the thumbnail, woo!!!

  • @s1ng23m4n
    @s1ng23m4n 5 лет назад

    excuse me, but I still do not understand, is the beta function purely derived from the gamma function?

  • @novanecros9145
    @novanecros9145 5 лет назад

    Papa I have failed you. i factorial sent me to the reflection formula which then sent me here and then I realized I haven't studied multivariable calc so I'm not ready for the awesomeness. I'll be back in two weeks, promise. :(

  • @unknownknown347
    @unknownknown347 5 лет назад +1

    Papa you inspire me!!!

  • @kevind.shabahang
    @kevind.shabahang 3 года назад

    cool :)

  • @ducksfan1018
    @ducksfan1018 5 лет назад

    Yeah sex is cool and all but have you seen Papa Flammy destroy inteGERALS by the thousands

  • @xdtidebringer5583
    @xdtidebringer5583 5 лет назад

    Nice

  • @obaidurrehman2464
    @obaidurrehman2464 3 года назад

    Saying " cool ,cool " again and again 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @holyshit922
    @holyshit922 Год назад

    What about derivatives of Beta function fe
    Int((ln(cos(x)))^n,x=0..pi/2)
    t = -ln(cos(x))
    -t = ln(cos(x))
    exp(-t) = cos(x)
    -exp(-t)dt = -sin(x)dx
    exp(-t)dt = sin(x)dx
    exp(-t)dt = sqrt(1 - exp(-2t))dx
    dx = exp(-t)/sqrt(1 - exp(-2t))dt
    Int((-t)^nexp(-t)/sqrt(1 - exp(-2t)),t=0..infinity)
    Int((-1)^nt^nexp(-t)/sqrt(1 - exp(-2t)),t=0..infinity)
    Let f(t) = 1/sqrt(1 - exp(-2t)) and L(f(t)) = F(s)
    Our integral equals d^n/ds^n F(s) at s = 1
    Lets calculate L(1/sqrt(1 - exp(-2t)))
    Int(exp(-st)/sqrt(1-exp(-2t)),t=0..infinity)
    u = exp(-2t)
    du = -2exp(-2t)dt
    du = -2udt
    dt = -1/(2u)du
    -1/2Int(u^{s/2}/(u sqrt(1-u)),u=1..0)
    1/2Int(u^{s/2}/(u sqrt(1-u)),u=0..1)
    1/2Int(u^{s/2-1}/(sqrt(1-u)),u=0..1)
    1/2Int(u^{s/2-1}(1-u)^{1/2-1},u=0..1)
    L(1/sqrt(1 - exp(-2t))) = 1/2B(1/2,s/2)
    Int((ln(cos(x)))^n,x=0..pi/2) = d^n/ds^n (1/2B(1/2,s/2)) at s = 1
    But how can I calculate derivative of Beta function

  • @garykang3712
    @garykang3712 4 года назад

    Please don’t make a confusion with t and tau

  • @CDChester
    @CDChester 5 лет назад

    THAT GULP DOOOOE #ASMR

  • @gdsfish3214
    @gdsfish3214 5 лет назад +1

    When is the redpill alpha integral coming libtard?

  • @benjaminarias5193
    @benjaminarias5193 5 лет назад

    Gucci af you boi

  • @michelkhoury1470
    @michelkhoury1470 4 года назад

    Ummm I think I did it with the same way

  • @sofianeafra6161
    @sofianeafra6161 5 лет назад

    Hey yen say 555 in Germany 😂😂

    • @sofianeafra6161
      @sofianeafra6161 5 лет назад

      @@PapaFlammy69 oh shit ! Studying maths for pH.D is easier than pronouncing this word 😂😂

  • @kwirny
    @kwirny 5 лет назад

    Ok Papa,now i have enough from the gamma stuff :().