Correction! I've uploaded the images to Google Drive because Flickr can't handle the largest tiffs. drive.google.com/drive/folders/1usPzfa7-2S7K5nZcwldJB1EexbNvgEwO?usp=sharing
Great video! The article that states the 1560 max optical DPI does seam to imply that these results were obtained when scanning at around 3000DPI which is probably why you were able to see a difference between 2400 and 3000. Videos from other photographers have said that for the best results when scanning with the v600 and editing afterwards it is best to scan at 3000 then modify the file to reduce the DPI to 1500 (keep physical dimensions but change resolution) and then start the editing of the image. This way all the additional pixels created by the scanner don't affect the editing.
Great video! I've always wondered which settings to use. I see few people talking about this. In the end, I ended up scanning at 800dpi to avoid struggling with the file size. But great comparison, congratulations on the test you conducted!
Nice video. I was wondering what's your favorite camera to shoot instant film nowadays? I was thinking to get a LomoGraflok but the mint rf/sf 70 looks interesting though expensive.
Thanks! The 4x5 with FP-100C is the cheap answer but I do enjoy the SF70. I'd much prefer an SLR, like an SX70, because parallax is annoying. I don't own a properly wide lens for 4x5 to make the best use of the LomoGraflok; I'd want a 75 or wider to get some nice wide scenes.
![Scanning & Instagramming Polaroids [Instant Lounge]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/v4o24tsrTwg/mqdefault.jpg)
Correction! I've uploaded the images to Google Drive because Flickr can't handle the largest tiffs.
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1usPzfa7-2S7K5nZcwldJB1EexbNvgEwO?usp=sharing
Great video! The article that states the 1560 max optical DPI does seam to imply that these results were obtained when scanning at around 3000DPI which is probably why you were able to see a difference between 2400 and 3000. Videos from other photographers have said that for the best results when scanning with the v600 and editing afterwards it is best to scan at 3000 then modify the file to reduce the DPI to 1500 (keep physical dimensions but change resolution) and then start the editing of the image. This way all the additional pixels created by the scanner don't affect the editing.
Great video! I've always wondered which settings to use. I see few people talking about this. In the end, I ended up scanning at 800dpi to avoid struggling with the file size. But great comparison, congratulations on the test you conducted!
Just downloaded some of the sample files to see resolution - man its off the charts - you could easily print these to 12x16 with no loss
Legit, there's plenty of information in there for a sane and reasonable print.
I don't even own a instant camera but here I am watching this video eheh, good job!
Good work and nice video !!
Can U still get new Fuji FP100c45? I have a Polaroid 545 back.
I’m interested in the Lomograflok Instax wilde back kit. How do u like it?
Nope! It was discontinued quite a while ago. The LonoGraflok is nice, I just wish I had a wider lens to make better use of it.
You can still get it easily enough if you are in Japan - otherwise you have to import it and possibly pay tax/duties
Nice video. I was wondering what's your favorite camera to shoot instant film nowadays? I was thinking to get a LomoGraflok but the mint rf/sf 70 looks interesting though expensive.
Thanks! The 4x5 with FP-100C is the cheap answer but I do enjoy the SF70. I'd much prefer an SLR, like an SX70, because parallax is annoying. I don't own a properly wide lens for 4x5 to make the best use of the LomoGraflok; I'd want a 75 or wider to get some nice wide scenes.
I usually scan at 1200 DPI and save as TIFF format. Then I edit and export as JPG.