Astronomy - Ch. 28: The Milky Way (12 of 27) The Halo

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • Visit ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
    To donate:
    www.ilectureonl...
    www.patreon.co...
    We will try to figure out what makes up the halo of our Milky Way Galaxy: black holes, neutron stars, dark nebulae, brown dwarfs, white dwarfs, neutrinos, or...?
    Next video in this series can be seen at:
    • Astronomy - Ch. 28: Th...

Комментарии • 13

  • @ameerunbegum7525
    @ameerunbegum7525 4 года назад +1

    Hi sir, Omar present...

  • @charlesbrightman4237
    @charlesbrightman4237 4 года назад

    Consider the following, what I believe to be a more realistic probability:
    a. The net effect of solar winds, matter and energy pushing outward from galaxies (even modern science claims that 'em' has momentum), continuously, over a prolonged period of time, and other galaxies doing the same, with nothing to stop them from doing so, would tend to push galaxies away from each other.
    b. Galaxies farthest from ours, with other galaxies in between, the net effect of all those galactic energy interactions would have galaxies furthest from ours moving away faster the further they were from us, not because space itself were expanding.
    c. This galactic net effect interaction system would also allow the cosmic web to potentially form between galaxies.
    d. Many scientists are possibly looking for something way out there beyond the visible universe that does not actually exist. Job security and continued funding in an economically driven world. Sign me up. Getting paid to look for something that does not actually exist. What a gig.

  • @carlbrunner5559
    @carlbrunner5559 3 года назад +1

    Hi, Isn't the assumption of the analysis that the stars are in a steady orbit. If the velocity measured is too high then perhaps the stars orbit is increasing and the galaxy is expanding. If the sun is 4.5Billion years old and it takes 250 million years to orbit the galaxy then it has only gone around 18 times. Why couldn't the orbit be increasing over time until the orbit eventually stabilises.

  • @mobyhunr
    @mobyhunr 3 года назад

    Ether field

  • @bbartt80
    @bbartt80 4 года назад +1

    I think sqrt(GM/r) isn't true... why there is so easy believe a mysterious mass is there but not that we're simply wrong when it come to equations? Einstein has shown we were wrong when it comes to Newton's equations - maybe we're wrong when large distances come to the play...

    • @_timelike
      @_timelike 4 года назад +1

      check out MOND its basically your idea. It is not doing quite well explaining other phenomena in the cosmic microwave background, colliding clusters etx

  • @rogerscottcathey
    @rogerscottcathey 4 года назад +1

    Misinterpretation of redshift comes to mind . .

  • @charlesbrightman4237
    @charlesbrightman4237 4 года назад +1

    Dark Matter: Consider the following copy and paste from my files:
    "IF" true, and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time concerning the following, possibly chemical element #119 (8s1) could be 'dark matter' as energy enters into the atom via the opening in the outer shell and then most of the energy gets trapped under the outer shell area.
    (Copy and paste from my files):
    I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
    Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
    #119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
    Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
    #120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
    When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
    In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
    If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.

  • @quannga99
    @quannga99 2 года назад +1

    I’ll ask my mom.

  • @ClarityOpaque
    @ClarityOpaque 4 года назад +1

    Haha first!

  • @jaydeister9305
    @jaydeister9305 8 месяцев назад +1

    God breaks His own laws, in order to keep the universe from collapsing in on itself(usually a black hole, singularity, etc.).
    Second law of thermodynamics
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 месяцев назад +1

      Not sure why you think that the universe will collapse in on itself