At the 15:20 mark, when white takes the corner, the 2nd white player (#4) is clearly not playing the ball and just obstructing (or impeding as the law states) the opposing player from making a play on the ball, even throwing his shoulder at the maroon player as he comes out. He does it again on the 2nd and 3rd corner. But because it involves contact the 1st time (#4 White clearly putting himself in the path of the maroon player) it should be a DFK for maroon. Admittedly, it's easy to see white move into maroons path from the video angle, maybe not so much from where the referee was standing.
If the question of a penalty is at 11:00, it looks like a foul by red. However, just going by what the referee does, the referee changes his mind and thinks the ball has been played by red and no foul. What SHOULD happen next is a drop ball to the keeper because the referee "accidentally" stopped the game while the ball was still in play. Since the ball was in the penalty area, it gets dropped to the keeper, regardless of who was in possession.
@@grumpyref- it should have been called a pk as that was a wreck less challenge that hit the player before the ball, but the ball was traveling out of bounds as the whistle was being blown. It would have been insanely harsh and unfair to not award at least a corner for white.
@CaptainDawg02 I agree that the original call was correct. BUT, if the ball is still in play, and you blow your whistle... you can't make up a restart. This is a PK or dropped ball. What if everyone had stopped playing and the ball rolled into into the net?? Would you award a goal then?
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
At the 15:20 mark, when white takes the corner, the 2nd white player (#4) is clearly not playing the ball and just obstructing (or impeding as the law states) the opposing player from making a play on the ball, even throwing his shoulder at the maroon player as he comes out. He does it again on the 2nd and 3rd corner. But because it involves contact the 1st time (#4 White clearly putting himself in the path of the maroon player) it should be a DFK for maroon. Admittedly, it's easy to see white move into maroons path from the video angle, maybe not so much from where the referee was standing.
How was that a pen for the red team but not for white😭
If the question of a penalty is at 11:00, it looks like a foul by red.
However, just going by what the referee does, the referee changes his mind and thinks the ball has been played by red and no foul. What SHOULD happen next is a drop ball to the keeper because the referee "accidentally" stopped the game while the ball was still in play. Since the ball was in the penalty area, it gets dropped to the keeper, regardless of who was in possession.
I think what they did was award a corner kick to white since if it wasn’t considered a foul it was out by red.
@CaptainDawg02 That is the restart the referee called in the end. However, as stated above, a corner is incorrect.
@@grumpyref- it should have been called a pk as that was a wreck less challenge that hit the player before the ball, but the ball was traveling out of bounds as the whistle was being blown. It would have been insanely harsh and unfair to not award at least a corner for white.
@CaptainDawg02 I agree that the original call was correct.
BUT, if the ball is still in play, and you blow your whistle... you can't make up a restart. This is a PK or dropped ball.
What if everyone had stopped playing and the ball rolled into into the net?? Would you award a goal then?
Good contested game, but red had no goals from the run of play. Hard to complain when your offense can’t do anything outside PKs and set pieces.
Ese arbitraje merece la horca por dios