@@frnchy3 I love a regression. Get the risk off the table $110 press the inside then Regress back to base.. you can do that at any level... $10, $15 or $25 levels. Same concept.
Absolutely love regressions strategies. And while I've seen so many, i have never seen one that gets you profit with 1 hit instead of 2. But i got one that could get you out with profit after 1 hit and leave you with $66 inside. The even sweeter thing about it is that it uses less than half of what you used in this strategy.
I have an ultimate Regressor that gets you there In one hit. You go 220 inside. If it gets a hit it pays $70... At that point you could go 66 inside or 64 cross and one hit... Take a look at it. Thank you for the feedback! I would love to know what you have without also gets you there and went in.
@markthepoint I got one that uses $105 instead of $220, which is far less exposure and needs far less bank roll and can get you out with $66 inside with a $6 profit. I call it the Vino, Lol
Funny you should mention a 4-1 5 being an Easy 5. For I sometimes call the 3-2 5 the Hard 5--which is really a dominoes term, for if you start off a round with the 3-2 scoring a 5, the next player cannot score immediately (with a 4-1 5, the next player could score 10 with 1-6). Just an observation ☺
@@markthepoint I refer to that particular 9 as Studio 54--which can be referred as the Hard 9, from the standpoint that Studio 54 was hard to get in (the song "Le Freak" was inspired by one unsuccessful attempt to get into Studio 54) ☺
All 'systems', Iron Cross, Press & Collect, DoubleTap etc., seem to breakdown when a shooter is notorious for throwing 7's on the second or third roll after coming out.
It's not a terrible idea.. But I was on a cruise.. and we had about 10PSOs.. throughout the weekend... That is going to be the biggest downfall... Not getting 1 inside Hit before big Red... I Love The Idea of getting out of the hand... But it comes at a big cost when when it doesn't work out...
I love regression strategies, and this one is cool. I would make only 1 change. Math wise, we all know the 6/8 will hit more often than the 5/9, which showed up in this video. So, instead of when the 6 or 8 hitting and regressing the 6/8, regress the neighbor 5 or 9. So let's say a 6 hits, regress the 5, and next roll is a 6. Instead of only making 35, you still make 70 and regress the 9. Or you could even after 2 hits regress all the way to $88 inside (since the 5/9 would be at $20 anyways) and at that point you're at $52 profit in the rack and $88 (profit) on the table. Out of the hand and if you walked away you'd be up $140. Or out of the hand with $88 of opportunity looking right at ya on the table.
Not a bad idea.. I'm definitely not opposed to it. In a perfect world it would be nice to get all 4! Hits at the highest $50/$60 levels.. But we all know we don't live in that world!
@markthepoint absolutely. I'd love to just leave it all out and just take 4 hits and run with the 220 out there. But again. We all know how hard 2 hits is, let alone 4 hits. Either way, $220 just leaves so many options to play and I always love leaving the 6/8 out as long as I can for a system like this.
Went to the Casino in Tunica, Ms on monday and tuesday. Turned $500 into $700 in blackjack lost the $200 in craps couldn't roll for anything. So this trip I mainly played $25 double deck blackjack. Also, bought in $60 at crapless table ran it up on a hot shooter to $275. Trip went well only spent one night.
The first two hits gets you $140 ($70+&70) not $200. You still have $50 of your starting money out on the table. I prefer to get two hits before I regress down to $110 inside. Playing free with $30 profit. ...Claude
@@markthepoint OK, but after two hits, I have $30 profit in my rack and you still have $20 of yours still on the table. That regression doesn't count toward your winnings. It's merely a recouping of the starting bet, not profit. Love your videos, BTW.
Haha.. 😂 I guess you're right about the profit portion. I was trying to think about how to make the Most out of every bet.. I know I am quick to Regress.. But was thinking what if you didn't regress everything and created greater opportunity on other Bets keeping them higher... Thanks for the feedback!! I love the different ideas and interaction.... It's what makes us better!
Instead of pulling down after the first hit, if you stick around for a second hit, you can pull down to $110 inside and be $30 ahead. Yes, more at risk longer but you’re out with profit in only two hits.
That's Where it's hard.. Risk vs reward.. I do like keeping the other 2 Bets higher if you get 2 hits on the other..To create more opportunity and possible profit... Hoping if possible for a 3rd hit.
I haven’t played much live craps but have been studying the game and testing strategies on a simulator before heading to Vegas in June so I’m still learning. My thinking so far is to get out of the hand as soon as possible. Once the hand is paid, that is where I see the opportunity starts. From there you can go crazy with the press and create as much opportunity as possible without the risk.
Around roll 22, I now take all my place bets down to a single increment, and then begin press & collecting again. I do this because you know seven will hit at some point, so I don't want all that extra money on the table only for the casino to win it back. I did this the other night and took about $300 off the table two or three rolls before seven hit. So while everyone else had 200-400 on the table, I only had $40 or so, and the rest in my bankroll.
@@markthepoint Three nights ago I tied first place for 33 rolls, then two nights ago I rolled 38x before sevening out, but that was only good for 3rd place since apparently someone rolled 67x the next morning. Yesterday I didn't do so well, only in the teens, but a couple shooters before me, he only rolled about a 20, but he kept rolling Field bets especially, so I made a lot of the Bought 10 and the player beside me often had like $30 on the field, so we had a good time. Probably 15/20 of the rolls were in the field, including two or three 12s, and another player made em all and I had a 1-1-1. Overall fun night, but only ended up $200 ahead. I play a $5 table. $10 and up is too rich for my blood. I can gamble $200 or so a month and be okay.
Like it... I Do something similar, but I start at 440 inside..(very risky I know :) ) On your first rolls before 7 I would have been up 100 and the Second Rolls before 7 I would have been up 135 with a total of 235 profit. On the 3rd rolls before 7 I would have lost 80.
Nice! Yes this is much riskier than I am willing to play.. But each person's play is strictly dependent on Bankroll.. Each person has to learn what they can or can't do with any system... Agree?
Good system. Would have got out of those first few hands by working the come out. I mean why not, there's more chance of hitting the inside point vs the seven.
Agree there is no one perfect strategy alone. That is why I have been using DGE gambits to make over 100k a year. Using a 5k bankroll. I believe it is the most consistent style of play verses a single strategy. However, regression strategies can be good. I am also a poker player and bankroll is important to be successful. I was always told you need 200 times the big blind or on table games the min bet. This will minimize risk of ruin at the table. However, just because you have a large bankroll doesn’t mean you bet bigger. Thanks Mark for your videos.
😂 These Betting Strategies on RUclips are hilarious. Yep, give the Casinos a 6:1, or 4:1 advantage Wagering by Across ( Gravedigger ), & inside ( Shallow grave) & here’s the beautiful part….. get paid less than true odds on EVERY place bet. Isn’t that wonderful? 😝 Hmmmm let’s see… that’s a 22-32% Return of investment for a 100% investment wagering Across. Sign me up!! 🤣😝
Are you New to watching our channel? Comment New!
Are you Subscribed? Comment! Yes Sir!
New , yes sir. Just joined too. 😊
Awesome!!! Thank you for your support!! I really Appreciate it!!! 👍🏼👍🏼
@@markthepoint no worries. Learning a lot. Going on many cruises coming up. What is your favorite or your go to strategy?
@@frnchy3 I love a regression. Get the risk off the table $110 press the inside then Regress back to base.. you can do that at any level... $10, $15 or $25 levels. Same concept.
@@markthepoint thank you. Will practice it. 😊
Yes Sir.❤i love the sevens
I'm guessing you like to play the Dark side primarily?
Can anyone successfully set & control the dice? 👍or👎?
I think we can influence enough up to when it hits the back wall... But I don't think anyone can call a dice call and Roll it.
Absolutely love regressions strategies. And while I've seen so many, i have never seen one that gets you profit with 1 hit instead of 2. But i got one that could get you out with profit after 1 hit and leave you with $66 inside. The even sweeter thing about it is that it uses less than half of what you used in this strategy.
I have an ultimate Regressor that gets you there In one hit. You go 220 inside. If it gets a hit it pays $70... At that point you could go 66 inside or 64 cross and one hit... Take a look at it. Thank you for the feedback! I would love to know what you have without also gets you there and went in.
@markthepoint I got one that uses $105 instead of $220, which is far less exposure and needs far less bank roll and can get you out with $66 inside with a $6 profit. I call it the Vino, Lol
Funny you should mention a 4-1 5 being an Easy 5. For I sometimes call the 3-2 5 the Hard 5--which is really a dominoes term, for if you start off a round with the 3-2 scoring a 5, the next player cannot score immediately (with a 4-1 5, the next player could score 10 with 1-6). Just an observation ☺
Love it.. I've also called the 5-4 9 the Hard 9! 🤣😂
@@markthepoint I refer to that particular 9 as Studio 54--which can be referred as the Hard 9, from the standpoint that Studio 54 was hard to get in (the song "Le Freak" was inspired by one unsuccessful attempt to get into Studio 54) ☺
All 'systems', Iron Cross, Press & Collect, DoubleTap etc., seem to breakdown when a shooter is notorious for throwing 7's on the second or third roll after coming out.
Yes.. And that's usually the second I try to be aggressive and get out of the hand @220 inside for 1 hit to go $66 inside.... Then Wack!!! PSO!
330 inside regress to 25 5/9 and 30 6/8. Any thoughts? Trying it in 2 weeks
It's not a terrible idea.. But I was on a cruise.. and we had about 10PSOs.. throughout the weekend... That is going to be the biggest downfall... Not getting 1 inside Hit before big Red...
I Love The Idea of getting out of the hand... But it comes at a big cost when when it doesn't work out...
I love regression strategies, and this one is cool. I would make only 1 change. Math wise, we all know the 6/8 will hit more often than the 5/9, which showed up in this video. So, instead of when the 6 or 8 hitting and regressing the 6/8, regress the neighbor 5 or 9. So let's say a 6 hits, regress the 5, and next roll is a 6. Instead of only making 35, you still make 70 and regress the 9.
Or you could even after 2 hits regress all the way to $88 inside (since the 5/9 would be at $20 anyways) and at that point you're at $52 profit in the rack and $88 (profit) on the table. Out of the hand and if you walked away you'd be up $140. Or out of the hand with $88 of opportunity looking right at ya on the table.
Not a bad idea.. I'm definitely not opposed to it. In a perfect world it would be nice to get all 4! Hits at the highest $50/$60 levels.. But we all know we don't live in that world!
@markthepoint absolutely. I'd love to just leave it all out and just take 4 hits and run with the 220 out there. But again. We all know how hard 2 hits is, let alone 4 hits. Either way, $220 just leaves so many options to play and I always love leaving the 6/8 out as long as I can for a system like this.
Should try this on Waylon's table....he NEVER loses!!😉
Well he plays a Ladder system that requires a higher Bankroll... Usually with that ladder you can Ladder high enough to recover losses.
Went to the Casino in Tunica, Ms on monday and tuesday. Turned $500 into $700 in blackjack lost the $200 in craps couldn't roll for anything. So this trip I mainly played $25 double deck blackjack. Also, bought in $60 at crapless table ran it up on a hot shooter to $275. Trip went well only spent one night.
Very nice! Thanks for the update!!!
@@markthepoint used my $840 in free play in blackjack.
You guys always come out with different strategies. Why do you guys getting trained for the dominator?
Not Sure I totally understand.. The Dominator was a great shooter.. Dice influencer.. Not as much a strategy endorsed player...
Great video..........that big red was brutal early!!
Yes it was! Hard to recover! Thanks Todd!!! 😁
The first two hits gets you $140 ($70+&70) not $200. You still have $50 of your starting money out on the table. I prefer to get two hits before I regress down to $110 inside. Playing free with $30 profit. ...Claude
Right.. But the extra is including the regression part... Bringing back to the rack...
@@markthepoint OK, but after two hits, I have $30 profit in my rack and you still have $20 of yours still on the table. That regression doesn't count toward your winnings. It's merely a recouping of the starting bet, not profit. Love your videos, BTW.
Haha.. 😂 I guess you're right about the profit portion. I was trying to think about how to make the Most out of every bet.. I know I am quick to Regress.. But was thinking what if you didn't regress everything and created greater opportunity on other Bets keeping them higher...
Thanks for the feedback!! I love the different ideas and interaction.... It's what makes us better!
My idea is to always try and get out…no bankroll on the table as quick as possible. You always know that big red is next.
Instead of pulling down after the first hit, if you stick around for a second hit, you can pull down to $110 inside and be $30 ahead. Yes, more at risk longer but you’re out with profit in only two hits.
May go back and watch a sec on time to see how much of a difference that would have made on these rolls.
That's Where it's hard.. Risk vs reward.. I do like keeping the other 2 Bets higher if you get 2 hits on the other..To create more opportunity and possible profit... Hoping if possible for a 3rd hit.
I haven’t played much live craps but have been studying the game and testing strategies on a simulator before heading to Vegas in June so I’m still learning.
My thinking so far is to get out of the hand as soon as possible. Once the hand is paid, that is where I see the opportunity starts. From there you can go crazy with the press and create as much opportunity as possible without the risk.
Around roll 22, I now take all my place bets down to a single increment, and then begin press & collecting again. I do this because you know seven will hit at some point, so I don't want all that extra money on the table only for the casino to win it back. I did this the other night and took about $300 off the table two or three rolls before seven hit. So while everyone else had 200-400 on the table, I only had $40 or so, and the rest in my bankroll.
If you make it to Roll 22 you should absolutely be banking! Its pretty rare to hit that at most casinos
@@markthepoint Three nights ago I tied first place for 33 rolls, then two nights ago I rolled 38x before sevening out, but that was only good for 3rd place since apparently someone rolled 67x the next morning. Yesterday I didn't do so well, only in the teens, but a couple shooters before me, he only rolled about a 20, but he kept rolling Field bets especially, so I made a lot of the Bought 10 and the player beside me often had like $30 on the field, so we had a good time. Probably 15/20 of the rolls were in the field, including two or three 12s, and another player made em all and I had a 1-1-1. Overall fun night, but only ended up $200 ahead. I play a $5 table. $10 and up is too rich for my blood. I can gamble $200 or so a month and be okay.
Like it... I Do something similar, but I start at 440 inside..(very risky I know :) ) On your first rolls before 7 I would have been up 100 and the Second Rolls before 7 I would have been up 135 with a total of 235 profit. On the 3rd rolls before 7 I would have lost 80.
Nice! Yes this is much riskier than I am willing to play.. But each person's play is strictly dependent on Bankroll.. Each person has to learn what they can or can't do with any system... Agree?
@@markthepoint Agree, and of course the POS will kill any system that is not on the Darkside...
Good system. Would have got out of those first few hands by working the come out. I mean why not, there's more chance of hitting the inside point vs the seven.
Very Valid point... I debate working the come-out all the time! Hard to make the right decision... Thanks for the feedback!??
Agree there is no one perfect strategy alone. That is why I have been using DGE gambits to make over 100k a year. Using a 5k bankroll. I believe it is the most consistent style of play verses a single strategy.
However, regression strategies can be good.
I am also a poker player and bankroll is important to be successful. I was always told you need 200 times the big blind or on table games the min bet. This will minimize risk of ruin at the table. However, just because you have a large bankroll doesn’t mean you bet bigger.
Thanks Mark for your videos.
So you are primarily a poker player.. How do you judge your Bankroll knowing the Blinds go up every *** rounds? Thanks for the insight BTW! love this!
😂 These Betting Strategies on RUclips are hilarious. Yep, give the Casinos a 6:1, or 4:1 advantage Wagering by Across ( Gravedigger ), & inside ( Shallow grave) & here’s the beautiful part….. get paid less than true odds on EVERY place bet.
Isn’t that wonderful? 😝
Hmmmm let’s see… that’s a 22-32% Return of investment for a 100% investment wagering Across. Sign me up!! 🤣😝
Well I guess we all think we have the secret sauce.. Joke's on all of us I guess.. Because I'm not building a bigger house but the casinos are.... 😂🤷🏼