I never knew people but watches that fit their built and not only their wrist. Fitting the build has come up a lot. I have a Garmin that is 47mm and it fits me and build well, maybe because the lug to lug is smaller than 50mm. Comfortability is a must for me as well.
I collect vintage and modern watches. So, i love it when ask what brands my vintage watches are. I have a lot of rare or hard to find watches. But when i want flex , I wear my 1968 Breitling Cosmonaute 819 (Big Eye) 48mm or my Rolex Datejust (Blue Roman) 36mm or my 1950 Omega Constellation. Its not the size of the watch that makes for the biggest flex, its the quality or the stories behind the watch. P.s. Keep putting out good content.
Yes I agree, I don’t think the size has to be super large to flex or be noticed. History and dials can be the trigger. And thank you for the kind words, i’m trying to put the content out there. But it’s difficult to tall about new watches as I don’t have them haha. So I’m enjoying talking about shared moments on watch enthusiasts ect. I really love the people and channel. Even now, i’m not getting ready for work, imm replying 😂 Have a good day 🙌🏾
I have always liked smaller watches, which is also why I appreciate vintage models more than modern ones. Obviously I like the watch to be noticed, but only by enthusiasts who are a small percentage of people. Enthusiasts notice watches regardless of size. In fact, the less you notice it, the more curious it makes you to know what watch it is.
I love the vintage smaller ones. Especially the pre-ceramic models for the same reasons, smaller and less bold. That’s why when they released the Explorer as 36mm, modern engine with an vintage size. It was a must for me. The Explorer II suckered me from out the blue.
I buy watches for my outfits and size it according to my wrist and body frame. I’m 6’3 ft tall and have big wrists, and my flex watches are; Breitling 43mm solid rose gold Navitimer, Rolex Sea Dweller 43mm two tone and my Sky Dweller Blue.
@@timemycollection yes, on original bracelets, the Navitimer is on a leather band. The Omega 300 you had before I bought, and it’s my “nato monster” lol, I rotate between the original Bond nato and the no time to die Nato.
Under the radar for me, my everyday is a christopher ward cranwell series 1 on canvas , The Hamilton day date on bracelet is surprisingly bold but I'm broke. Unless the watch is no a bracelet you pretty much need to get over that 41mm
Seriously, I was under the radar as well but the Explorer II got me! I think smaller watchers could have a fluted bezel or something that could create the presence.
I buy watches that fit my build. 40-42 mm only. Just what makes me feel comfortable.
I never knew people but watches that fit their built and not only their wrist.
Fitting the build has come up a lot.
I have a Garmin that is 47mm and it fits me and build well, maybe because the lug to lug is smaller than 50mm.
Comfortability is a must for me as well.
I collect vintage and modern watches. So, i love it when ask what brands my vintage watches are. I have a lot of rare or hard to find watches. But when i want flex , I wear my 1968 Breitling Cosmonaute 819 (Big Eye) 48mm or my Rolex Datejust (Blue Roman) 36mm or my 1950 Omega Constellation. Its not the size of the watch that makes for the biggest flex, its the quality or the stories behind the watch.
P.s. Keep putting out good content.
Yes I agree, I don’t think the size has to be super large to flex or be noticed. History and dials can be the trigger.
And thank you for the kind words, i’m trying to put the content out there.
But it’s difficult to tall about new watches as I don’t have them haha. So I’m enjoying talking about shared moments on watch enthusiasts ect.
I really love the people and channel.
Even now, i’m not getting ready for work, imm replying 😂
Have a good day 🙌🏾
My luxury watches never get noticed but my Casio Duro and rose gold Seiko 5KX get compliments lol.
That’s the best way 🙌🏾 Seiko 5kx 😅 I love the green one A LOT
I have always liked smaller watches, which is also why I appreciate vintage models more than modern ones. Obviously I like the watch to be noticed, but only by enthusiasts who are a small percentage of people. Enthusiasts notice watches regardless of size. In fact, the less you notice it, the more curious it makes you to know what watch it is.
I love the vintage smaller ones. Especially the pre-ceramic models for the same reasons, smaller and less bold.
That’s why when they released the Explorer as 36mm, modern engine with an vintage size. It was a must for me.
The Explorer II suckered me from out the blue.
I buy watches for my outfits and size it according to my wrist and body frame. I’m 6’3 ft tall and have big wrists, and my flex watches are; Breitling 43mm solid rose gold Navitimer, Rolex Sea Dweller 43mm two tone and my Sky Dweller Blue.
All of them are heavy hitters 🙌🏾 , do you wear them on the bracelet as well? That would make them really pack a punch on the wrist.
@@timemycollection yes, on original bracelets, the Navitimer is on a leather band. The Omega 300 you had before I bought, and it’s my “nato monster” lol, I rotate between the original Bond nato and the no time to die Nato.
@@frankv7068the 300 57 is a nato monster, no doubt about it. Even yellow worked on that!
What a watch!
Under the radar for me, my everyday is a christopher ward cranwell series 1 on canvas ,
The Hamilton day date on bracelet is surprisingly bold but I'm broke.
Unless the watch is no a bracelet you pretty much need to get over that 41mm
Seriously, I was under the radar as well but the Explorer II got me!
I think smaller watchers could have a fluted bezel or something that could create the presence.
Rootbeer for me 😆
That is a blinder 👌🏾