A Big thanks to Vajiram and Ravi for your great initiave,as aspirant from rural area i didn't get news pappers daily and soft material reading very difficult for me, your multidimensional coverage of daily news really helps me lot for crucial undertanding of each and every topic....
Important for Mains 2024:- Question:- Has the Governor been acting more of an 'agent of centre' rather than being the 'constitutional head of the state'? Analysis in the light of recent controversies involving the post of Governor in India. Article- 153, which says that there shall be an office of Governor for each and every state. The Governor under article 155 is appointed by the President of India. According to article 156, the Governor shall act as per pleasure of the President. Recently, the Kerala government has filed a petition in the Supreme Court. Because in two years, 14 bills of the Kerala state kept reserve by the Governor. The Governor of Tamil Nadu also reserved the bill of the NEET examination. That sparked a rift between the states and their Governors. THE GOVERNOR IS ACTING AS A CENTRE'S PUPPET:- (1) affiliation based appointment by ignoring conventions (the President is not consulting the C.M of respective state). (2) Lack of neutrality because there is no security of tenure and because of the fear and fervor of removal, they will always be acting as a puppet of the centre. (3) misuse of discretionary power. (a) to decide that which party has got the majority in the case of lack of clarity. (b) when the Governor reserves the bill, there is no definite timeline given by the constitution. (c) no time limit for withholding the assent. (4) article 356 and 365 can be used as discretion. REFORM NEEDED:- (1) having a due process in their appointment and removal process. (a) Sarkaria Commission (1988) recommended that the appointment of Governor should be done by the president only after the recommendation from the C.M of the state. (b) in the case of Venkatachaliah Commission (2002) said that there should be a committee whose recommendation should be taken by the president in order to appoint any Governor. This committee should comprise of the P.M, Home Minister, Lok sabha speaker, C.M of the state. (2) there should be a due process of removal. (a) Punchhi Commission said that the phrase the "pleasure of President" is problematic and we need to delete it. (b) Punchhi Commission also said that the Governor should be removed only by a resolution of the state legislature. (c) Another committee recommended that there should be atleast five years of tenure fixed for the Governor. (3) there should be a Fair Floor Test in order to declare who is holding the majority. This was recommended by the SC in the S.R. Bommai case (1994). (4) Power under article 356 should be subjected to Judicial review. (5)there should be a constitutional morality check. If not the Judicial review. This is said by the SC inbthe NCT of Delhi v. UoI case. Must give your valuable suggestions...
When someone is already opening a shop for trading with the public, how disclosing name threaten Right to Privacy? While Trading, Knowing Name of the other Party should be coming under Right to Information. For a transaction to be legally valid, the parties should be well-informed about the other party. By this argument provided by activists, all Autowalas and Cab Drivers should not publish their name, which the Supreme Court had once directed for public and women safety!
A Big thanks to Vajiram and Ravi for your great initiave,as aspirant from rural area i didn't get news pappers daily and soft material reading very difficult for me, your multidimensional coverage of daily news really helps me lot for crucial undertanding of each and every topic....
Thanks to the mam and to Vajiram and Ravi.
Awesome the Hindu newspaper analysis by Richa Mam...
Thanks for giving the valuable information🙏👌👌
Thank you very much madam🥰
Thank u so much mam..
.stay blessed....
Appreciable content
Very well explained
30:22 oncologist
32:23 CAR-T cell therapy
48:01 a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2
50:49 A
51:04 D?
51:21 C
51:36 C
51:54 B
thank you ma'am
1-b, 2-d,3-d ,4 -c ,5-b
Thanks
Oncologists treat the. Cancer patients.eg. onco surgeon, onco. Physician etc.
Important for Mains 2024:-
Question:- Has the Governor been acting more of an 'agent of centre' rather than being the 'constitutional head of the state'? Analysis in the light of recent controversies involving the post of Governor in India.
Article- 153, which says that there shall be an office of Governor for each and every state. The Governor under article 155 is appointed by the President of India.
According to article 156, the Governor shall act as per pleasure of the President. Recently, the Kerala government has filed a petition in the Supreme Court. Because in two years, 14 bills of the Kerala state kept reserve by the Governor. The Governor of Tamil Nadu also reserved the bill of the NEET examination. That sparked a rift between the states and their Governors.
THE GOVERNOR IS ACTING AS A CENTRE'S PUPPET:-
(1) affiliation based appointment by ignoring conventions (the President is not consulting the C.M of respective state).
(2) Lack of neutrality because there is no security of tenure and because of the fear and fervor of removal, they will always be acting as a puppet of the centre.
(3) misuse of discretionary power.
(a) to decide that which party has got the majority in the case of lack of clarity.
(b) when the Governor reserves the bill, there is no definite timeline given by the constitution.
(c) no time limit for withholding the assent.
(4) article 356 and 365 can be used as discretion.
REFORM NEEDED:-
(1) having a due process in their appointment and removal process.
(a) Sarkaria Commission (1988) recommended that the appointment of Governor should be done by the president only after the recommendation from the C.M of the state.
(b) in the case of Venkatachaliah Commission (2002) said that there should be a committee whose recommendation should be taken by the president in order to appoint any Governor. This committee should comprise of the P.M, Home Minister, Lok sabha speaker, C.M of the state.
(2) there should be a due process of removal.
(a) Punchhi Commission said that the phrase the "pleasure of President" is problematic and we need to delete it.
(b) Punchhi Commission also said that the Governor should be removed only by a resolution of the state legislature.
(c) Another committee recommended that there should be atleast five years of tenure fixed for the Governor.
(3) there should be a Fair Floor Test in order to declare who is holding the majority. This was recommended by the SC in the S.R. Bommai case (1994).
(4) Power under article 356 should be subjected to Judicial review.
(5)there should be a constitutional morality check. If not the Judicial review. This is said by the SC inbthe NCT of Delhi v. UoI case.
Must give your valuable suggestions...
Jai Hind Mam
sir please upload ASAP WAITING SIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
1.only two
2?
3D
4c
5b
Hello sir
1-b
2-a
3-c
4-c
5-b
❤❤❤
1 b
2 c
3c
4 c
5 b
Oncologist - Cancer specialist doctor
Onchologist
oncologist, CAR-T
Oncologist: person who treats cancer
oncologist
Ans
1- B
2- A
3- C
4- C
5-B
1.B
2.B
3.A
4.C
5.B
Oncologist...
Oncologist
When someone is already opening a shop for trading with the public, how disclosing name threaten Right to Privacy? While Trading, Knowing Name of the other Party should be coming under Right to Information. For a transaction to be legally valid, the parties should be well-informed about the other party.
By this argument provided by activists, all Autowalas and Cab Drivers should not publish their name, which the Supreme Court had once directed for public and women safety!
Oncologist
Oncologist