Eat The Rich
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024
- It's a hard pill to swallow, that some rich people earned their wealth legitimately, and some poor people would be just as exploitative as the rich if given the chance.
-----
Join the community discord! ► / discord
Watch Us LIVE (And Click Dat Sub Button!) ► / gameboomers
GB Archive Channel ► / gameboomer
Dev Kit Channel ► / @thedevkit
SFO Backups Channel ► / channel
BitChute ► www.bitchute.c...
Rumble ► rumble.com/c/c...
Brighteon ► www.brighteon....
DailyMotion ► www.dailymotio...
Odysee ► odysee.com/@Sh...
-----
SUPPORT THE SHOW:
BTC:bc1q6udqgvfm9uaj59l24ut7f73wvsfu707kk6pn3m
SubscribeStar! ► www.subscribes...
Streamlabs! ► streamlabs.com...
Patreon! ► / shortfatotaku
Paypal! ► paypal.me/short...
Humble Bundle Affiliate Link! ► www.humblebund...
Amazon CAN Affiliate Link! ► amzn.to/322aFAa
Amazon USA Affiliate Link! ► amzn.to/30PLxgN
Amazon CAN Wishlist! ► www.amazon.ca/...
Amazon USA Wishlist! ► www.amazon.com...
-----
SFO-CIAL MEDIA! HYUK HYUK
DA TWEETS ► / sfosecretary
DA FACES ► / sfotaku
DA GABS ► www.gab.com/sh...
DA MINDS ► www.minds.com/...
DA PARLERS ► parler.com/pro...
DA STEAMS ► steamcommunity....
-----
Credits:
Thumbnail ► ShortFatOtaku
Background ► / cryomancerlex
Music ► Godot - The Fragrance of Darkness; That is Coffee (Jazz Cover)
Eat The Rich
#EatTheRich #Bernie2020 #Vaush
You and Mah Dry Bread uploaded minutes apart from each other.
This is a Canadian conspiracy I tell ya
HAHAHAH OOPS
@@ShortFatOtaku We must be in cahoots!
@@MahDryBread watching you both reply at nearly the same time isnt helping with the cahoots optics .... XD
@nymersic he didnt skip nintendo
@@MahDryBread RUclips turned the bell off for your channel, so I didn't even know you uploaded lol.
Nothing says proletariat like 260 dollar boots.
The Drego “everybody who has more than me should be forced to give it to people who have less than me!.....but please don’t take my MacBook.”
Its only $260 because they use cheap labour "somewhere in a developing country".
I have an identical pair and I paid like $80.
But then again, I live in a country where shoemaking and leatherwork are very popular crafts and the goth scene is very popular.
@@LichCrypt
To the restless poor of the world $80 for boots is an "Eat the Rich" situation.
@Maui Caui theyre very nice. Not surprised by the cost either
Dear Socialists, if you want a company owned by the workers, start a company owned by the workers. There are lots of people who think like you at your college. Work together with them, pool your resources and start a worker owned company. Capitalism allows you to do that, so use its own weapons against it.
If you want the state to turn all companies worker owned, then it is not owned by the workers; It is owned by the state which lends it out to workers.
Don't be silly, socialists don't know how to start companies, because they don't understand basic economics, they refuse to read Thomas Sowell on purpose....
They don't wanna work tho.
You can be a socialist in a capitalist society, it doesn't work the other way
"They do not want to own your fortune, they want you to lose it; they do not want to succeed, they want you to fail; they do not want to live, they want you to die." -Ayn Rand
Ayn Rand is the top AnCap Waifu: *Change my Mind*
@@lead8214 no.
She isn't even Ancap ffs she is ok with copyright laws which were created by Government to restrict free market of ideas
@@danielsurvivor1372 Ayn Rand never claimed to be ancap. She believed that there was a purpose for government... to enforce laws and contracts. She had no problem with copyright law because she believed that people had a right of ownership, and that included intellectual labor.
There's nothing wrong with copyright laws. If you write a song, if you write a novel, why shouldn't you own it? A "free market of ideas" means it is a MARKET. And a market requires laws against theft.
@Harald Blåtand So, in other words, you've never actually read her. Because that's flat-out untrue.
Ayn Rand: (objectivism intensifies)
It's all "Eat the rich" until they become rich and then they eat the poor while wanting to eat the even richer.
Simply looking at most of them (and the fact that they live in one of the wealthiest regions on earth), I'd say a lot of them were born rich.
Trust me, rich people don't taste any better than your average pleb
This.
@@peteredwards8737 No they taste Jewish
Everybody says
"Eat the Rich..."
But nobody ever asks
"HOW are the Rich..."
"We should tax the rich to pay for our programs… but also, we should get rid of them"
We all know by now that stupidity is a prolific genetic trait.
I'm going to eat this cake!
*NOM*
wait a minute where's my cake?
There's about 14m millionaires in the US and about 47m worldwide and roughly of those are 2150 billionaires. Now, I'm no Brian Williams but in the USA that's about 23 frenzied, foaming mouth, gay wonks to 1 productive, upstanding citizen. Worldwide? 166-1 They're all yours champs. Enjoy all the 70 year old white male ass jerky, for which you'll soon be fighting your fellow comrades for in the not-so-distant future streets of what was formerly San Francisco.
All the while ignoring that the top 1% of American wage earners supply 40% of income tax revenues, the top 10% supply 80%, and the bottom half pay nothing, and some in that half receive benefits. All the while ignoring that when factoring in public services, the average poor American has a higher standard of living than the global mean. These people are allergic to analysis, facts, and mathematics.
@@decwow dangerous underthinking
Mark Ruffalo: "Capitalism is terrible."
Everyone: "Then give the money back!"
Endgame was a disappointment. Did you see dark waters? Me neither.
Why don't rich socialists voluntarily do what they hope the state will force everyone to do?
Well to be fair: As long as teh system stays, Giving the money back just lowers your reach.
When Mark Ruffalo lives in a $10M Upper West Side flat, Bernie Sanders has two vacation homes, and Tom Morello has a nice secluded multi-million dollar LA home, you know they're not using their money to buy "reach". I'm not against people having nice things, but socialists who buy up lavish creature comforts are hypocrites.
@@pinklutlepig1751 Yeah. Fair point.
"Eat the rich"
Boils down to Millionaires arguing with Billionaires
I love how they hate the rich unless it's a celebrity who shares their surface level views
Vaush: I don't have wage slaves. They're part time, i don't even have to give them benefits.
I think Jordan Peterson called it. He said that socialism is driven by a very appealing idea: that everyone who has more than you got it by corrupt means and deserves to have it taken away.
So basically socialism is the politics of envy.
To be fair, that's not wrong in 99% of the cases. The video brings Pewdiepie as an example of an ethical millionaire, yet he once again made his money by exploiting a quickly growing, initially niche enterprise - making gameplay videos. While he isn't corrupt, he still didn't do a lot for his money. It was thrust upon him by fate. Ultimately in the current world that's practically the only means of achieving "greatness" without becoming corrupt. Every other person who is influential and rich is also, on some level, dirty handed. I know a few rich people, a few of them from my extended family. And they all are frankly either people who either cheated their way to wealth, or willingly exploited the system and their connections (legal cheating).
The myth of the honourable wealthy person who grinded his way to the top is indeed a myth. Not because in theory it is not possible to become successful by pure dedication, but because in practice it's so much easier to do it cheating that you only have a chance at competing if you cheat yourself. Same as with sports and PEDs. The alternative is of course luck, but not everyone gets lucky. Even Jordan Peterson would be a relatively unknown person if not for the scandal surrounding him.
The solution is of course not socialism. But anyone observing the wealth distribution in the US, or the world in general, can tell that the rich are becoming richer, and the poor are becoming poorer. And this is not because the rich are working harder than ever.
The solution is to create a just race where multinational companies don't start with an immense headstart, and small companies and individuals can flourish too.
@Stinger Grail Hm... Never knew that. That explains things. Also confirms the old truth that in order to make money, first you need money.
In Pewd's defense, he still created something that people valued. However silly or stupid that thing may be, people valued it, and he was rewarded for it. Should he only have been rewarded if he came up from a hardscrabble life?
My socialist friends in college wanted a world in which they could do and make anything they wanted and be rewarded for it, regardless of whether or not anyone valued it. Some of them came from rich backgrounds, but time has shown that their artistic drivel is just that. Artistic drivel that no one values.
Stinger Grail To me personally, it’s best to just be libertarian about it and leave people alone unless they harm others. Someone who got rich or connected by scamming and exploiting, like the Jukin Media thing or balance bracelets and snake oil salesmen, obviously harmed people. To me, it’s right to intervene in those cases. Those scammers may have put a lot of work into making their scams believable and enacting the process of taking money, but it’s still harmful.
On the other side of that, if someone does little work and gets lucky without harming someone, I don’t see what would be gained from going after them. If they fit perfectly into an audience of people that liked gameplay. PewDiePie’s audience chose to watch him and buy his merchandise or sponsored products.
It’s like the saying, “work smarter, not harder.” I don’t care how difficult or easy it was to obtain power, just as long as no one is harmed or exploited along the way.
Stinger Grail Not 100% PURE libertarian lol. Nothing humans have come up with is 100% perfect in application. Obviously there is a need for restriction and control to prevent people from being absolute animals.
My brother attends a VERY expensive liberal college, and I’ve spent a lot of time around his friends. I find it interesting that most of the people there spout socialist ideals yet have never worked a day in there life. But the people I’ve met who don’t go to such a prestigious college, and pay for there education, or who are older and are simply working class never spout these ideals. They have a better understanding of how the world works because they are forced to be in it, not held above it looking down on everyone else.
hell, even Karl Marx came from wealthy parents haha
_"...never worked a day in there life..."_
Argument *destroyed.*
THIS!!!
I have never done a hards day work in ny life (im not proud of this) had a very privilege upbringing, and even i dont go spewing that bullshit
The "champagne socialist" as they are called. It's easy to think your plans would work when you're not affected by them, and this extends to many situations. Have you ever worked at a company where some HQ suit from an office overseas thinks they know how to run your workplace better than people actually working there? It's an identical situation; the sheltered college liberals living off of mommy and daddy's money in a cushy apartment, without an honest day's work under their belt, think they know how to improve the situation for everyone else actually "in the trenches". They're the "rich" they so viperously claim to despise, when in reality they *hate* blue-collar workers.
Socialists: I'm still hungry... It's time to *eat the middle class*
This was an extremely thoughtful video. We have a society that has abandoned the idea of individual responsibility.
Speak for yourself, bud.
I take responsibility for my own actions
@@TheSkyGuy77 You are not the society my man
@@TheSkyGuy77 mr society speaking fax
I know right
No, not really, but telling people to take personal responsibility for system issues that keep them permanently in poverty doesn’t work.
Cenk: Unions need to be forced down the throats of entrepreneurs and business owners!!!
Workers: so you believe in unions ?
Cenk: OFCOURSE!!!!!
Workers: then we are going to unionize.
Cenk: *surprised buffalo face*
Surprised buffalo face?
@@AngryAlfonse it would be surprised pikachu face, but hes a big, kinda bovine guy...
"Eat the rich till I get rich!"
Gets rich.
"How dare you ask for my money that I made fair and square!"
Sure, until hedge funds get involved.
Are you quoting Tom Morello?
Except the part where they get rich.
You just don't get rich.
Tho many Republicans believe they will, so they refuse to tax the rich
mommy And Daddy are rich.
How often does that happen though?
I definitely agree that rich people can be evil, it's just important to remember that people aren't evil just because they're rich.
I would also add that just because people are poor doesn't mean that they are virtues.
@@borni8925 That is also true. Poor people lack the resources to play out their evil.
@@darkmojojojo honestly I hadn't expected a answer for my comment.
I would disagree to a degree to that statement, they might lack the resources for big scale evil but if you want to do evil stuff you will always find a way. And if people are to weak to torment people they will turn to animals. In my opinion that is more evil than a CEO who exploits people for profit and just doesn't care because they make evil by their own hands. But this is just my opinion
@@borni8925 I mean my comment isn't true in every case. You can for example be a serial killer even if you're poor. My point is that people can be evil despite their reconomic status. Poor people can just as much oppress other people but they generally lack the power to do so.
@@darkmojojojo I get your point, if you are wealthy you have it easy oppress people. But as you also sayed beeing evil is not only oppression, but other things too.
But honestly I think we don't really desagree and it was nice for your answer. Thank you, Greatings from Germany
"A pack of ramen is what? 50 cents?"
No, 33. At MOST. If you can't even afford 20 cents worth of ramen (the lowest I've seen it at) then you have a serious spending problem.
They're about 60-70 including tax for me. Still really cheap. I can buy a fortune's worth of ramen with my sad wallet. I just prefer eating something I will get nutrition out of.
Well, you see she had $200 boots on.
@@TrelliessRose hey hey now, it could go as low as $120. Lol
When you have an appartment wich in city is at leadt 700, that you need to pay electricity, fuel, gaz, heat, transport, your monthly phone subscirption and you earn like 15$ and hour, 40 hour a week or more and you pay all this by yourself...i prefer to be sure that my job won't fire me because i decided to get rid of my phone subscirption for a 45$, every work ask that type of thing, you don't have one say goodbye to it
@@sotch2271 Weird, my job doesn't require a phone and I haven't owned one in years. Stop working for retards.
A tenured university professor makes five to six figures, protection from being fired, insurance and benefits, plus state pensions. As well as post-grads on subsistance pay at best and underpaid post-docs and adjuncts who are often treated as seasonal labor. All in a structure reminiscent of the guild system.
This would all be fine but man are profesors stuck-up leftits 90% of the time. No idea why educated people always fall for socialism all the time.
@@dannyphan9456 It's probably because of what SFO said, they are told that they should be rich just for being educated, and when they don't instantly become wealthy they become resentful and turn to socialism because it's easier to blame the world for your shortcomings than coming to terms with them.
@@dannyphan9456 Being educated is not necessarily a sign that you are intelligent, wise or life-worthy.
Making it to being a professor means that you managed to stick with something and did an okay job. That's about it.
@Stinger Grail
Lmao. Funniest metoo joke I've read in a while.
@Stinger Grail That only works if the teacher is male.
here's a hint "no one is earning a billionaire paycheck" no one became a millionaire working for others
it's more accurate to say, you get rich not working for a boss but working for customers
@Stinger Grail ok so a man who operates a Diesel engine repair shop is EXPLOITING his customers? Free to play video games? Really? You use THAT as an example of exploitation?
@Stinger Grail I noticed. But according to far leftists, EVERYTHING is explotation. Do businesses have questionable policies and practices? Oh yes. But the average person doesn't really care as long as they get the product or service they are paying for.
@Stinger Grail its spelled 'consumer'. Also, you have no idea what goes on in other people's minds. It's possible most people dont care. But why is it that immediately go to anti-social behavior to fix problems? That's what petty third-world dictators resorts to (and the big ones like Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Mao). Personally, I'd take a greedy corporation over a zealot.
@@MWH12085 As an aside to describe a point from earlier, I would definitely classify today's working free-to-play video game model as exploitative, particularly in the audience the model seeks to appeal to. Free-to-play mobile games, browser games, gachas, and other online games with intrusive cash shops and advertisements are heavily supported by children and people with less sense than money, who are taken in by some aspect of these games and spend like crazy for very little tangible benefit. Apparently, .pngs of anime girls have enormous power, it's why you see the mobile games market constantly pulling larger and larger numbers on quarterly revenue reports and analyses. Whale fishing is real, and it's why I never play any mobile games anymore, not like I used to.
The right doesn't say "There's no problem with the uber-rich", it's "Being uber-rich isn't inherently evil".
@Matthew Ivy
We've just gotta keep opposing these strongholds until every lofty idea that exalts itself against the knowledge of God in SFO's mind is destroyed.
When you freeze at 2:11ish and read everything, to then have sfo read himself when I start it back up..
//curb your enthusiasm playing in my head
I did the same thing.
Consume
The
Money
Chalice
Lol yanderedev reference
Delete this comment or else if
else if
else if
else if
Semen Goblet*
"In the U.S.S.R. work is a duty and a matter of honour for every able-bodied citizen, in accordance with the principle: 'He who does not work, neither shall he eat.'"
-Article 12 of the constitution of the U.S.S.R.
Can we impose that when the west goes full socialist?
Let's check out how many workers died from starvation in the USSR.
Man, those numbers don't look good.
Social parasitism laws were a thing in the U.S.S.R. . Don't wanna work? Then you are forced to work somewhere.
"He who does not work, neither shall he eat. And if he does work, well, he won't eat either.
Unless he's Stalin. Stalin always eats."
Interesting that even the U.S.S.R. is not as far to the left as Ocasio-Cortez when she said the government ought to provide resources to "people unwilling to work".
Jokes on you, her dad bought those boots, down with the patriarchy
I was under the impression the patriarchy would prefer her in the kitchen, illiterate, bare foot and pregnant.
Not shod in expensive alt- fashionware and educated.
Time for another dose of coolaid. :P
5:50
Whenever someone say that "All employment is inherently exploitative because the worker has no choice."
I reply with: "All taxes is inherently exploitative because the worker has no choice."
Except if you don't want to work for apple you can set up your own shop, live in the woods, or join the damned Amish.
But if you don't pay taxes you are thrown in jail.
The classic "rules for thee but not for me"
Nintendo...the PR fallout will be glorious.
Reggie would defeat them all with only 1% of his power.
Can't wait for that tidbit being in joshscorcher's Top 10 Nintendo's fails whether as an entry or as a dishonorable/iffy mentions
This isn't a new list though, people don't care once they get their stuff working and cheap.
Console wars became the Chinese working camp plastic wars
MK ULTRA It’s a shame all they have is Bowser now.
It's funny that my peers say "eat the rich", despite going to a school that's exorbitantly expensive. The irony in that just makes me laugh.
I love you for reading out that whole list around the 3 minute mark. I was going to read over it, but it's much more intense when you hear someone list them off.
They are not jealous. They are envious.
Jealousy is the fear that someone will take away what you believe is yours.
Envy is the hatred of the fact that someone else has something that you don't.
Most of those “Eat the Rich” types are just lousy budgeters. I barely spend anything, ration my funds, and sit on my wealth (aside from investments).
Hidden Desire Most Americans including myself are very bad at budgeting. We’re really a consumerist society not a capitalist one at this point
@@allsmilesguy Okay, people keep using that word, consumerism, but fail to ever actually explain what it is, either on it's own terms or even in comparison to capitalism.
@@brandonbrown6922 Consumerism is an aspect of a free market imo.
@@xxGamerX-cc2ho It certainly is, the problem is when there is a massive surge of people who just take it for granted that the government (or their upper class parents) will just pay for everything and don't care about budgeting, then when they get older and all of a sudden start running out of money a bit they freak out and screech that they are entitled to a bailout
Stinger Grail Yep, exactly
"eat the rich" says the college sophomore whose parents pay their $1250 rent
1250 rent. Fucking where bro. Certainly not where I am. It starts at like 1500 in a nicer slum
This comment was from 3 years ago…..
I think after you read that list out, the real question should be; which companies are NOT doing this.
It might be a shorter list.
There are more than 166 companies
Let's remember what "eat the rich" got the French people. Yeah, they overthrew the king who absolutely should not have been in charge, but they also replaced it with a police state that beheaded people for simply saying the wrong things. In the end, a powerful individual took over the "democracy" and installed himself as dictator.
robespierre u talking about?
@@theALTF4 the police state was robespierre, while napoleon eventually took power afterwords.
Who was then killed by his own invention the gulitunr
Emperor king pm president a Council of people all are dictatorship regardless
The king wasn’t even that bad. I mean he wasn’t great but mostly the conditions that led to civil unrest weren’t under his control for the most part, and he did a lot to hear the people out and reform and democratize the government.
That goth chick you posted the picture of? She;s a friend of a friend of mine. She got doxxed and dragged for looking too wealthy by the local antifa.
HAHAH, LINK?
@@ShortFatOtaku Not the sort of thing I keep links of on hand for, sorry. It all takes on a different tenor when its someone you know and they have to move off campus to protect themselves.
On the plus side, it did make many, many things much easier to talk about between myself and most everyone connected to the debacle.
@@deesevrin8570 Protect themselves? Was she getting legitimate threats or just a lot of people shitting on her on the internet?
Dee Sevrin she called for her own massacre so forgive my lack of tears
@@ShortFatOtakuI'm gonna have to double check on the details but from what I remember there was some written threats threats left at her dorm on top of a lot of online harassment which bubbled over into her social life. Nothing too horrifically serious but enough to make her feel unsafe and not just in the lefty sense of the word.
Vaush has the verbose style and cadence I’ve come to associate with elbow-patchy social studies types that bury arguments in semantics.
Say as little in the most words possible
The chairman of socialist party was one of the richest man in my country (in 90s), also he owned the largest real estate development and construction company.
You're Georgian, right?
And now you deal with open border companies.
Almost every communist baddie on the planet owned one of the most expensive Mercedes of the day. Mao had 7 Grossers, Castro had 3, the Kims had 8, Gaddafi had 2, and Saddam had one. Being a communist pays very well up at the top.
@@lolbuster01 Gaddafi was a communist? Saddam?
Weird how he used petro dollars and based his economy on oil. And how does Iraq and Libya look now, after democracy and freedom?
@Stinger Grail If that was really socialism, why the focus on the petro dollar?
Plus, why is it that socialist countries that always seem to fail must have regime changes implemented by Western nations?
@Stinger Grail I guess it's safe to say that under democracy, they aren't better off, are they?
It takes strong character to decide that you have enough. It's easy to be jealous of what others have.
I still can't believe there are real people out there who honestly believe that the man-bun is a viable hairstyle.
Basically they are culturally appropriating the samurai hairstyle.
Ahmenthi Mullet/ponytail bros R I S E U P
Not a man-bun.... it's a twat knot.
@@erlycuyler The Bitch Bun.
So it isn't just me who thinks man-bun looks awful on any gender?
11:45 Imagine getting owned this hard by Egg Guy.
It's legitimately humiliating
When Stefan says this isn't a gotcha thing it almost always is. And people continually fall for it anyway. I find this hilarious.
It's dishonest, but it's so obvious that I can only assume it catches people off-guard.
@@cryw1092 He basically gives them warning and so they think they won't be caught in the trap.
Meh. What's "got ya" about asking why someone does not live what they preach?
@@cheddar2648 I assume the "gotcha" bit is how he gets them to unintentionally admit it using somewhat dishonest tactics.
@@cryw1092 if they weren’t hypocrites they’d have nothing to admit to. Him being dishonest is merely his way of getting it out.
Look, anyone who's truly struggling to buy food isn't going to be spending their time protesting and crying like a child. They're to busy working trying to keep their head above water.
Being rich isn't inherently bad but it allows you to be pretty bad and many rich need to pay for their crimes
The main problem with politics is that no one seems capable of speaking about it without going to extremism.
"Eat the rich" is a clear example.
The problem is not the rich, is the distribution of wealth.
The aim shouldn't be eating the rich, but creating a system where even the poorest can live with dignity.
Rich and poor are equally good and evil and I am in disbelief by that fact than even a kid should know this.
Your comment on how, even in communism, somebody must work to provide your food and shelter, and that capitalism lets you do it for yourself, and that it's not the political system that drives human need, it's reality itself, regardless of the system, is a REALLY important point.
It's fundamentally reality that is "The Tyrant", not any system we use to cope with it.
Also, the first "enemy" of any political system is not another political system, it's humanity itself. WE eventually fuck things up, and WE have to be responsible enough to handle our political systems, cultures etc. And, too often, we aren't.
That said, different systems produce different outcomes. Communism/socialism always seems to end up terribly. It seems to encourage worse human behavior, while it proclaims it does the opposite.
This point is based upon the fact that people these days are seriously removed from "nature" and the "natural needs and requirements for survival". Before the industrial revolution, when most people lived in villages and did manual labour on farms, everyone knew "if I dont work I will starve". Ever since people moved into the cities they have lost "basic knowledge" and "basic wisdom".
Muck006 someone else gets it.
@Stinger Grail Which is exactly what people would do without laws. Remember Dev's video on healthcare and responsibilities? He assumed all humans are equally responsible.
Monty, that's all great until vulture capitalism comes in. You will have guys with massive wealth who will tank currency and buy out countries' debt to sue them for it later.
Corporations have taken the place of the American worker. You don't have good healthcare or social nets, but the illegal immigrant next to you does.
@@blacktigerpaw1 I'm failing to see how what you're complaining about necessarily follows what I posted. I think you're not even talking to me. I think you're just saying some shit.
"What you poor people are starving? Just write a book bro!"
Bernie Sanders
"You are homeless ? Just buy a house duh !"
There is a term for these type of people.
They are called Champagne Socialists
Much like how an eye for an eye leaves the world blind, those who eat the rich are on the menu because they're eating like kings
It's not just a political thing
*Eating the rich* is also a cannibal thing
Nothing says “Eat the Rich” like owning an $1100 iPhone. 🤣
I never understood the socialist/communist “employment is exploitative because you need to get employed to not starve”. Their form of employment, aka “work in the goverment owned factory or farms or meet mr bullet” is just as bad if not worse😂
The mental image of Cenk freaking out at a board meeting chucking a stack of paper hits the soul like the finest things in life
His nephew is a fn weasel also. Ducking the candyman.
When you eat the rich, you shit out the poor.
But have you read “A modest proposal”?
It offers a out-of-the-box idea that can motivate the poor and the rich! I hear AOC is a fan.
🎩
🐍 no step on SNEK! 🇺🇸🇭🇰
Really eating babies is the only logical solution for both climate change and poverty
@@nautdead3197 Nah the human veal goes to the rich. Babies are expensive, the elites had to create global charity organizations just to have a constant source of them- oh shit I forgot this was supposed to be satire.
"Of course, a child will make two meals, naturally the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish boiled and seasoned with a little pepper or salt." Sounds like a decent enough.
I'd suggest "Eating the poor" ... because there are far more of them!
The Satanists aren't even trying to hide anymore.
I'd eat them before I'd starve if I was snowed in at some resort. Considering they are mostly health nuts that eat like prey animals they'd likely taste better that us poor pizza eaters. . .
I'll take a multi-millionaire, with a side of green beans and mashed potatoes
11:25
That is the smile of a man who knows he has just systematically destroyed his opponent, simply by asking a question.
Damn cannibals
*Lists companies profiting from slave labour*
*Me* I think at this point its more prudent to list those not profiting from it
Eat the poor. There's way more of them and they're way higher in caloric content per serving.
So, if you were to hipothetically fight this exploitation with your wallet you could say goodbye to any smartphone or laptop you own.
"There's no ethical way to get rich."
-Woman shakes her booty on the internet for money-
"Now that's ethical!"
Is bootyshaking a career path or opportunity for respectful being?
Or religous person in poverty status?
Envy has become a virtue for the radical left.
"Evil will become good, and good will become evil."
I'm a recent subscriber, and I have to say, I really like your videos. Reminds me when Sargon was doing his series on cults and Why People hate Feminism. Good, concise videos that use various examples to make a solid argument. I'm watching more and more, so that's why I say this on an old video.
Nothing like revolutionaries who learned how to spell “bourgeoisie” from their iPhone autocorrect.
That's why it's "bourgie" now.
@@TrelliessRose
I’ve seen people spell it “boojee”.
@@LEO_M1 Really? I just shorten it from bourgeoisie.
Pewdiepie's a great counter-example because....exactly who did he exploit?
Revolutionaries always ultimately end up eating their own
"Eat the rich"
Wouldnt that be canabilisim?
This is hilarious. I personally know the woman in the thumbnail. She was my TA for intro to ethics at the University of Washington, and I actually got her to say that she does not think instincts are real on the basis that they are socially constructed. This was in response to a hypothetical involving a schoolteacher shielding her students from an attacker, to which I suggested that the teacher could have done so purely out of instinctual response rather than consequentialist moral calculus, Kantian imperatives, or because it was a consciously virtuous action. It was possible, therefore that one could act morally without being consciously aware of their own actions, which obviously presents some difficulties for the primary moral philosophies. Her response was so mind boggling that I still regularly think about it lmao. Like how could you actually say biological instinct is a social construct and not second guess yourself immediately after. Blows my mind.
They probably immediately forgot any course on Biology that they took after the class was over, ever since public school.
@Stinger Grail Seriously, you need to sort yourself out. Being unnecessarily edgy doesn't add anything, but you just can't help yourself.
@Stinger Grail Doesn't matter what platitudes I make, you're still edgy. Also, you can't take away what I don't have, and I am far too stubborn to beg. You couldn't have picked a more flaccid threat if you tried.
You know what, I stand corrected, you aren't edgy. You don't push the boundaries of social norms in any way that hasn't been done a millions times before a thousand times more effectively. None of it is original, nor is it particularly offensive. It's just flaccid. Ineffectual. Lame.
I remember a great Bloom County strip all the way back in the 80's that involved a lefty-type having an existential crisis at a bar because he had wrote a book supporting lefty concepts regarding taxes and the wealthy. But because of Reagan's tax policy, he found himself wealthy because of his book's success.
I mean I like my creature comforts, me actually being able to afford a house in a place I want to be, and generally not having to worry about food. That being said I do detest the megacorps trying to take control of the world.
Starving kids in Africa could have eaten that woman and her boots.
Money is just an amplifier. If you're a terrible person and poor you won't be able to spread your misery around. The more money you have, the more good and bad you can put into the world.
Bernie Sanders in 2024: "those damn trillionaires shouldn't exist, we should redistribute their wealth to me, so I can buy an entire country for my many houses."
Will he be alive at the time?
socialism is nothing more than envy for those above and contempt for those below
Those boots cost more than a month's worth of groceries, and she's calling other people rich?
Eat the Rich just means, 'Give us the money instead'
2:13 basically, that's gonna be a Yikes from me, dawg.
There's no competition against Amazon, so where else are we going to buy stuff online?
We can't play video games anymore either, especially not EARTHBOUND. And we're not allowed to make our own PCs either; most of those parts come from China too.
No more cars. No more phones.
So basically, just starve ourselves, go into a fetal position, and waste away? Because that seems to be the only way to NOT be complete puppy-kicking monsters.
^ Take cover. The NPCs have arrived, spraying sparks all over and emitting soyspeak
Oof
yikes
let's unpack this, sweaty
That's what happens when corporations prefer cheap labour over your own. That's why oligarchs love open borders.
@@blacktigerpaw1 Well, if there's one good thing that came out of the corona virus, it's the collective teeth kicking in gave to every single corporation who went all in on China, manufacturing or otherwise. It's things like that that make me want to believe in some form of karmic retribution, even if the process was fucked up.
@@Jenartik What he's saying is don't stop doing things you enjoy because of things outside of your control. The only thing you can do is speak out about Chinese Slave labor. It's the only way to solve this problem once and for all.
@@J-Wolf17FTW What about "voting with your wallet"? Doesn't that render the whole "outside of your control" thing moot?
Vaush unironically saying that if you’re doing gig work your contributions don’t matter.
Commie wannabe: "Eat the rich"
Commie wannabe: *Votes for Bernie*
Great observation.
actually most of the communists like to ignore the genocide in xinjiang they like to say eat the rich but not when it involves mentioning communist atrocities.
The problem with eat the rich there's always someone poorer than you.
I've noticed the trend for using the phrase super rich so they can discount themselves 😂😂😂 same as how Bernie started saying billionaires instead of millionaires as soon as he had a couple mill hidden under the bed
I’ma poorish dude , I invest in stuff when I can , didn’t go to a super fancy college and me and my gf keep a weekly budget for our house
Maybe these other young people can be smart and not get a 300K loan for their feminist dance theory degrees
God dude, I'm amazed with how these videos nail it.
Resentment. That’s what they are. Read Notes from the Underground by Dostoyevsky. Only 70 pages
I'll tell you what. I e been so poor that I've lived off of McDonalds because I could get away with two dollars a meal. I've been poor enough to dumpster dive for stuff to sell.
Now that I'm upper middle class, I hate the poor too. Some are smart and good people, but so many are assholes and opportunistic and will pull down those around them to get ahead.
Cannot be! Identity politics failing due to people not being just one thing at a time? How very shocking.
>Typed from an Iphone
Iphones are so overrated lol
Stephen Weiler that’s what a bourgeois dipshit would say. Poor people would be happy to own an IPhone 📲
@@FazeParticles lol whatever androids are better
3:03 holy fuck that's nearly every company I heard of
Do as I say, not as I do.
Damn Dev you're just cranking out videos, really enjoying it
Thank you, you have given me something to think about
"Eat the rich"
Okay kulak.
Just FYI,
The Kulaks weren't the ones saying, "eat the rich".
They were the ones murdered by those saying, "eat the rich".
@@brandowhitemusic Just FYI,
After the land owning farmers originally referred to as "kulaks" were rounded up and either murdered, sent to the gulags, or exiled the term began to be applied more broadly to those perceived as being in some way wealthier or better off than the lowest common denominator. Meaning that people who had previously used the term with gleeful zeal now found themselves being labeled with it.
On encountering the numerous people wearing an outfit that costs more than the entirety of my wardrobe, carrying various other visible examples of conspicuous consumption, and espousing the "eat the rich" ideology I think it appropriate to label them a kulak immediately rather than waiting until after they've started a purge. Perhaps also rhetorically asking them if they prefer to be fried or roasted just to further drive home the point.
Claims to to not even able to afford noodles.
*wears $300 Gucci boots*
Honestly I trust a rich person more than a poor one I mean the rich person will screw me at some point but I know it's when I'm not needed anymore the poor person will shank me for my shoes
Edit house from fallout new Vegas was both the best hero and villain of that game, yes he killed people but he helped and protected those who played by his rules
Being poor isn’t a virtue, neither is falsely declaring yourself poor.
"Every company should be collectively owned! Unionize now!
...except if I own a company, because then it's mine. It'd be bad if it unionized."
how the fuck did we raise a generation so addicted to socialism... our school system has failed
I love almost anything that makes Vaush sqiurm
I once talked with someone that argued co-ops were the best form of running a corporation. I pointed out that those corporation have a problem with the freeloader problem. He argued against it and then gave me a source. The source in its Abstract pointed out the Con of a co-op is that it suffers from the freeloader problem. I pointed this out and he outright refused to accept it.