Eastland Disaster animation of ship rolling into the Chicago River

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024

Комментарии • 133

  • @markmotter7060
    @markmotter7060 3 года назад +83

    I find it so ironic that with all the ships plying the waters of the great lakes the worst disaster happened AT THE DOCK

    • @Jonascord
      @Jonascord 3 года назад +9

      This happened on the Chicago River, upstream from the Lake, in only 20 feet of water. The Lake was 1/4 mile away.

    • @unconventionalideas5683
      @unconventionalideas5683 Год назад +3

      @@JonascordShe was going to the Great Lakes and would have steamed through there anyway.

    • @szennyvizcsatorna2483
      @szennyvizcsatorna2483 Год назад

      At least, is give some advantages into.
      The salvage is be easier.
      The rescue is more smooth(er rather than an open-water event).
      And... The true question, why the hell a mass of stupids moved in a ship into where it already listed to?
      Why?

    • @sillyman2013
      @sillyman2013 6 месяцев назад

      @@szennyvizcsatorna2483Apparently the passengers, going onboard for a Western Electric company picnic, a day dedicated to fun in the sun saw it as a carnival ride. They went ‘ooh’ as it lists and ‘ahh’ as it adjusts, although a few passengers were suspicious. Things went bad when the ship listed to a 45 degree angle, as a refrigerator slid and crushed two people.

    • @JaneXemylixa
      @JaneXemylixa 4 месяца назад

      Aviation has the same story to tell. So many ways to screw up with massive loss of life, and the most devastating case happens in a foggy airport with one of the two planes barely airborne.

  • @Fromard
    @Fromard 3 года назад +187

    It's aggravating when post like this are made with no explanation of the event. So here it is.
    "The Eastland was experiencing periodic problems with her stability while loading and unloading cargo and passengers, and nearly capsized on 17 July 1904, after leaving South Haven with approximately 3,000 passengers.[4][6] Subsequently, her capacity was lowered to 2,800 passengers, cabins were removed, lifeboats added and the hull repaired. Then, on 5 August 1906, another incident of listing occurred which resulted in the filing of complaints against the Chicago-South Haven Line which had purchased the ship earlier that year."
    "On the morning of 24 July, passengers began boarding Eastland on the south bank of the Chicago River between Clark and LaSalle Streets about 6:30 am, and by 7:10 am, the ship had reached her capacity of 2,572 passengers. The ship was packed, with many passengers standing on the open upper decks, and began to list slightly to the port side (away from the wharf). The crew attempted to stabilize the ship by admitting water into her ballast tanks, but to little avail. Sometime during the next 15 minutes, a number of passengers rushed to the port side, and at 7:28 am, Eastland lurched sharply to port, and then rolled completely onto her port side, coming to rest on the river bottom, which was only 20 feet (6.1 m) below the surface; barely half the vessel was submerged."

  • @ix-Xafra
    @ix-Xafra 3 года назад +17

    I was performing as a solo guitar vocalist on a river cruise boat in Tewkesbury UK and when folk started dancing the vessel rocked so bad my speakers were almost tipping over and I asked the skipper who was over my left shoulder 'Can this thing handle this?'
    To which the skipper replied ' it's alright, I'm steering into it'...

  • @vladbleoanca9201
    @vladbleoanca9201 3 года назад +15

    We had a similar situation on a container ship while loading wrongly weighed containers on top (they were supposed to be empty but we're not). This caused the metacentric height to go to shit and the ship listed heavily and suddenly to starboard and rested on the pier. I was in the engine room with the second engineer doing some maintenance...i think it took us all about 15 seconds to get to safety on the pier...we were absolutely shredding out personal records on running up catwalks and vertical ladders...10/10 would never want to experience that again

  • @plmn93
    @plmn93 3 года назад +12

    I'm not sure why this showed up on my recommendeds, but I'm glad it did. Growing up in the Midwest and with over 800 dead I'm not sure how I never heard of this.

    • @windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823
      @windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823 2 года назад +1

      It was blocked at the time in Chicago. Newsreel.

    • @childofapollo2031
      @childofapollo2031 2 года назад

      No news stations covered it. In the eyes of the news people back then, the people on that boat weren’t important and besides all the media was covering world war 1

    • @astelli6181
      @astelli6181 Год назад

      A lot of shit happened at that time. 2 months earlier the lusitania was sunk by a U boat w 1200 lost

  • @firenze5555
    @firenze5555 4 года назад +47

    Thank you for posting this. I had a great aunt that was on that dock that terrible day.

  • @vulcanfeline
    @vulcanfeline 10 месяцев назад

    got here from Caitlin Doughty's video. if you're from the EDHS, you may remember her as she interviewed some of your members.
    according to her video, the ballast was only partially filled and i can easily imagine that ballast slopping back and forth as the ship started to list
    shame that so many don't even know this happened but i won't forget thanks to Caitlin

  • @ShakespeareCafe
    @ShakespeareCafe 3 года назад +34

    They pumped out the ballast water to make it easier to load passengers from the wharf, but the ship had also been retrofitted with heavy concrete that paved over the deck, adding to its top-heavy stature.

  • @cunard61
    @cunard61 3 года назад +17

    She was always a top heavy vessel, just looking at pictures of the Eastland, you can see that her beam was way to narrow for a ship of her length and height.

  • @zachhartwig
    @zachhartwig 4 года назад +51

    My great aunt was on this ship, she sadly passed away

    • @the4tierbridge
      @the4tierbridge 3 года назад +3

      @RMS Empress Seahawkic Empress Of Minnesota clearly, she died in the disaster.

    • @Ricklet0ons
      @Ricklet0ons 2 года назад +2

      I know a ship that still exists that has almost the same interior as this one if you ever want to experience what your aunt experienced

    • @Goat_Lord
      @Goat_Lord 2 года назад

      Proof? Everybody says this on shipwreck videos.

    • @zachhartwig
      @zachhartwig 2 года назад +1

      @@Goat_Lord her name was Josephine Markowski, you can look it up on a list of people who passed away from this accident

    • @Goat_Lord
      @Goat_Lord 2 года назад

      @@zachhartwig I found her, thanks. I'm sorry for your loss.

  • @greenbeacon394
    @greenbeacon394 3 года назад +2

    If I’m not mistaken the ship was salvaged And used for a number of years afterwards

  • @ariesaguila4959
    @ariesaguila4959 3 года назад +1

    This sums up everything. That ship is designed to roll. Wtf it happened in a small and smooth wave?!

  • @LongJumpingSurprise
    @LongJumpingSurprise Месяц назад

    Interesting that she was raised, repaired and returned to service as a gunboat then as a training ship for the US navy and was scrapped in 1946 more than 30 years after the disaster. FDR even sailed on her during the war

  • @LTBudd
    @LTBudd 4 года назад +47

    A poorly designed ship built for speed. Even before she went into service, she underwent the removal of a deck and a recommendation that she always sail with a filled ballast because she was so unstable. She was considered unsafe without any ballast and less safe partially filled. Even though she had been listing, they continued to load passengers and attempted to set sail. Almost 900 people, including twenty-two whole families, died making it the worst maritime disaster in Great Lakes history. Many were crushed between the ship and the riverbed. Others drowned, trapped below deck.

    • @Youngstown529
      @Youngstown529 3 года назад +3

      As our President said, "It is, what it is."

    • @ericshaw6458
      @ericshaw6458 3 года назад +5

      She was always considered a "tender" ship. The cement they poured on her top decks didn't help matters much.

    • @ethanpoole3443
      @ethanpoole3443 3 года назад +1

      What year did this disaster happen? I don’t recall hearing of this incident but then I have spent most of my life in the Southeastern U.S. (FL & SC) well away from the Great Lakes and only the first portion of my childhood in the vicinity (NY & OH) of the Great Lakes.

    • @ricardojuricic9027
      @ricardojuricic9027 3 года назад +1

      @@ericshaw6458 cement on the higher planks helped allot to unstabilize her; plus the lifeboats that were added after Titanic.

    • @ukaszwalczak1154
      @ukaszwalczak1154 2 года назад +1

      @@ethanpoole3443 1915.

  • @RonGyver1337
    @RonGyver1337 5 лет назад +17

    The buffet was on the Port side ...

  • @matthewmann8969
    @matthewmann8969 6 лет назад +69

    Being on that one side of the ship must have been so frantic and horrifying

    • @eriksimca9409
      @eriksimca9409 3 года назад +3

      well it doesnt matter which side anyone was on, they all fell to one side and drowned... thats why over 800 people died, everyone fell on each other and got pinned/crushed and couldnt get out

    • @Mr.RandomContent
      @Mr.RandomContent Год назад

      @@eriksimca9409that’s so cap when the ship rolled over people stepped on to the starboard side

  • @kevincarlson4562
    @kevincarlson4562 3 года назад +3

    That must have been even worse than the Andrea Doria nearly capsizing.At least the Italian ship rolled over more slowly.

  • @ElectrologyNow
    @ElectrologyNow 3 года назад +1

    Some explanation would have been helpful.

  • @Quint1836
    @Quint1836 3 года назад

    300th subscriber!

  • @anditacs9563
    @anditacs9563 4 года назад +19

    That was really stressful to watch because you never knew when it would actually flip

  • @vicmclaglen1631
    @vicmclaglen1631 3 года назад +3

    2,572 people on a 2K ton ship that was built for speed over the kind of stability required to support those numbers. Should have been constructed more like a ferry, or at least had the capacity reduced by half.

    • @windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823
      @windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823 2 года назад

      Not sure the capacity was anywhere like this previously. I believe they were close to insolvency when this happened and there were two other incidents.

  • @kevinhoffman6592
    @kevinhoffman6592 6 лет назад +8

    to make it to port n capsized in 1915. great lake storms took many lives but this was lack of ballast n she took over 800 souls . should have add narrative .

  • @timwatson3879
    @timwatson3879 3 года назад

    This is not considered "real time", is it? How long would this have taken in real time?

  • @SteRDLK
    @SteRDLK 3 года назад +2

    How did they do this, they didn't even have computers back then

  • @ukaszwalczak1154
    @ukaszwalczak1154 2 года назад

    How did the funnels not fall OFF??

  • @dimasgirl2749
    @dimasgirl2749 5 лет назад +7

    Like an egg in the water

  • @ChefKevinRiese
    @ChefKevinRiese 3 года назад +2

    "Come starboard Hooper"!

  • @IrishTechnicalThinker
    @IrishTechnicalThinker 3 года назад +1

    So haunting and eerie.

  • @ottomatic3123
    @ottomatic3123 4 года назад +5

    Watch out for that piano!

  • @525Lines
    @525Lines 9 лет назад +23

    Eastland Disaster Historical Society. Must be a fun newsletter.

    • @lauriemolnar1488
      @lauriemolnar1488 6 лет назад

      @

    • @sekainiheiwa3650
      @sekainiheiwa3650 5 лет назад

      Sheeple "celebrating" Titanic as well. Sick society

    • @blu_e1910
      @blu_e1910 3 года назад +3

      @@sekainiheiwa3650 no we’re just fascinated by it.

    • @Nebulasecura
      @Nebulasecura 3 года назад +7

      @@sekainiheiwa3650 what’s wrong with studying it? You make me sick, with how you selfishly and arrogantly put your own view above others with that statement

    • @sekainiheiwa3650
      @sekainiheiwa3650 3 года назад +1

      @@Nebulasecura piss off dumby down sheep

  • @lemon5155
    @lemon5155 3 года назад +5

    Eastland capsized due to the overloading stff

  • @aleatheawyman4291
    @aleatheawyman4291 8 лет назад +10

    What program did you use to make this?

  • @noelkoppel943
    @noelkoppel943 3 года назад

    Why that happened? Bad construction of the ship?

    • @ukaszwalczak1154
      @ukaszwalczak1154 2 года назад

      The ship at first *was* stable enough. They majorly refitted it, and it kinda just, sank, cuz heavy top-deck floor made from concrete isn't that much of a good idea.

    • @windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823
      @windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823 2 года назад

      @@ukaszwalczak1154 I think it wasn't so great to start with, as it was acting funny before lifeboats and concrete, with 2 other occasions of nearly tipping over.

    • @ukaszwalczak1154
      @ukaszwalczak1154 2 года назад

      @@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823 Yes. I know that.

  • @drejackson4882
    @drejackson4882 Год назад

    Chicago Bears owner George Halas was slated to ride that ship but never boarded it.

  • @ededmonds8792
    @ededmonds8792 3 года назад

    Or was that Starboard.

  • @Pottema
    @Pottema 3 года назад +1

    The horror the horror, is that it....wake me when you're done!

  • @cogitationescaecae1125
    @cogitationescaecae1125 3 года назад +2

    Ive never seen anything like it. It explains everything.
    can you do Titanic disaster like this please?

  • @isaacsrandomvideos667
    @isaacsrandomvideos667 3 года назад

    okay?

  • @ededmonds8792
    @ededmonds8792 3 года назад

    So,everyone ran to port.

  • @double4790
    @double4790 3 года назад +3

    Imagine if you were in the boiler room or engine room of that ship that would be horrifying

    • @VeryFamousActor
      @VeryFamousActor 2 года назад

      I would be horrified just being in a coal boiler room tbh, nevermind the potential for water to either drown you or blow you into canada.

    • @windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823
      @windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823 2 года назад +4

      The engineer actually ran back down to save the boilers from hitting the cold water and exploding. Wow.

    • @whateverlolawants
      @whateverlolawants Год назад

      @@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823 Wow! Did he live?

  • @darlenesmith5471
    @darlenesmith5471 7 лет назад +9

    capsized

  • @moparmadman1134
    @moparmadman1134 3 года назад

    I think that's called a loll in ship stability terminology!

  • @damienzanic2918
    @damienzanic2918 6 лет назад +5

    I don’t know how it capsized 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

    • @kimberlyortiz2635
      @kimberlyortiz2635 5 лет назад +1

      Overloaded

    • @jamesfracasse8178
      @jamesfracasse8178 5 лет назад +1

      I thought it was too many life boats

    • @sekainiheiwa3650
      @sekainiheiwa3650 4 года назад

      Me too and what about mooring lines I didnt find anywhere that she already started voyage

    • @kellatry
      @kellatry 4 года назад +3

      After the sinking of the Titanic three years earlier, a new federal act was signed regarding lifeboat requirements. Lifeboats were added onto the Eastland, and this made her top heavy. Or shall I say, more top heavy. There had been incidents of the vessel listing dangerously in the decade before the tragedy. On this day, the ship was packed with passengers and at some point it began to lean away from the dock. The crew tried to add ballast to right it, but that only helped so much. There may have been a sudden shift in weight due to the movement of passengers that caused the momentum and weight needed to capsize it onto the port side.

    • @crisacosta5882
      @crisacosta5882 3 года назад

      Strong winds, maybe?

  • @nancysalazar8850
    @nancysalazar8850 10 месяцев назад

    😢

  • @kartboarder22g17
    @kartboarder22g17 3 года назад

    Wow doesn't look well designed

  • @rowo86
    @rowo86 3 года назад

    Нихрена не понятно но очень интересно

  • @amanitetue-mouche3229
    @amanitetue-mouche3229 5 лет назад +1

    why youtube ? why do you feel that watching this is beneficial for me ?

    • @cursedcat-3700
      @cursedcat-3700 4 года назад +6

      It's not beneficial for you. It's just showing what happened that terrible day.

    • @metalEric69
      @metalEric69 3 года назад +3

      Don’t watch it if you’re not interested. It’s history

  • @Slash1066
    @Slash1066 3 года назад

    This was more deadly than the Titanic sinking apparently

  • @cranklabexplosion-labcentr8245
    @cranklabexplosion-labcentr8245 4 года назад

    Rich people watching this: ah yes. *chuckles* so many citizens perished.