This man is a smart critical thinker, wise, and well reasoned. I get the sense that he's a good man. To not use effective treatments is wrong, or to have it as an option. To admit a lack of understanding is not weakness.
Rest in peace, Charles. May God (whom you would possibly interrogate with a question: are you real?) be friendly to you. No theories needed there. Just be.
6:34 "defence mechanism" (Freud) - intellectuals are usually neurotics, but he is right in his impulse that psychotherapy in any form (drive theory Freudianism, other forms of psychoanalysis such as self psychology, object relations theory and I-psychology, or newer streams such as systemic analysis, behavioural therapy, etc.) is all about attachment and a priest could do the same job better - perhaps even better than a friend. I am not yet sure about this point yet. 3:55-4:38 nuff said
This video shows how Krauthammer's use of the scientific method in psychiatry was applied to political philosophy and the conclusions he has drawn in the area of governance. Just a thought - I wish he would've explored how Einstein's Theory of Relativity has been misapplied in the popular culture, to moral issues.
I tend to enjoy his views but his citing the DSM-5 as the pinnacle of present psychological understanding is a joke. Psychiatry is filled with fraud as well, as is the medicalization of psychological problems and treatment. The depth theorists contributed a great deal more than he acknowledges here.
As Dr. Daniel Amen pointed out, psychiatry is the one medical field where treatment occurs without the benefit of looking at the actual source of the problem, namely the brain. He has been criticized by many in his field for, as a matter of course, scanning the brain which has frequently revealed the cause of many mentally ill patients. ruclips.net/video/FTtKpBGjxd8/видео.html
General of your mom Maybe his/her point is that your comment contributes nothing to any potential discussion over whether or not Mr Krauthammer is "cool".
well yes and no, he meant all those talk therapies are more or less the same, they work not because of their content but despite, its all just about talking time with the patient. it does not work on deeply sick catatonic schizophrenics, thats where only pills and electric shocks help
While my study of Freud has been quite shallow compared with my study of The Theory Of Evolution, my general understanding is that the vast majority of Freud's theories are seen by current mental health professionals, philosopher types as either necessary stepping stones to better theories or were basically pop culture fads that have been out right disproven. The same genuine scientific rigor (as opposed to ideological confirmation bias) that led to Freud's theories being assigned to a footnote in history has been quietly examining The Theory's Of Evolution for several decades and has been discovering "The Theory" has basically zero factual support and that creates more problems, questions than it answers. When one removes speculation and assumption from The Theory, one is left with a pile of fossilized bones and an aspiring academic (and a 150 year trail of acolytes) who wanted a vehicle with which to push back against Victorian mores by chopping at the root of religion. (This is NOT what science is about) Do what I did: remove assumptive words and sentences from anything you read about evolution. You won't be left with much. Then look, usually in the first paragraph, for a declarative statement either saying something to the effect of " because evolution is true..." or just outright bashing God or Christianity. (never any of the other world religions that have equally fantastic theories about origins) Evolution is the only "scientific" literature that does this. Most other scientific literature I've read states "this is what we found out, this is how we found it out, here's the support for what we found out and here's the reasons, pro and con about what we're asserting to be true. I've been studying The Theory Of Evolution hard for over 30 years now and assumed at least a few of the fundamental, basic questions about the theory would have been addressed by now, given all the academic effort and resources that have been expended and the great, sometime unbelievable, leaps forward almost every other field of science has made in the same period. Instead of these questions being answered and the "holes" in the theory being filled in with provable facts, scientists from these other advancing fields (particularly the biological, engineering and informational fields) keep making discoveries that enlarge, not close these "holes" which those still faithful to the theory then attempt to address with more speculation. Hind sight of these past 30 years of study shows this to be an unbroken pattern. Because of this, I've had to admit that evolution is not a viable theory and, while it still has a dedicated core of academic faithful, it's dead on it's feet, it just hasn't fallen over yet. I don't know if I'll live long enough to see "The Theory" fall into as much disfavor as Freud's theories but, based on the growing disconnect between proven science and "The Theory" I know I'll see it get part way there.
Putting 30 thousand Volts to both sides of a persons head so that you need to put a bar of wood in the person's mouth so that he does not break is teeth is the most barbaric idea imaginable. I wonder if Krauthammer would like to have the electrodes attached to his head to get the benefit of this procedure he thinks is so workable.
you are an idiot. he explained that they are given drugs to prevent the seizure, its painless, the effects only happen in the braincells. look up electroconvulsive therapy. it works and has helped thousands of people who were completely lacking life at all just barely hanging on to a deeply catatonic schizophrenic state, and no medications and nothing helped but electro shock therapy.
With all due respect t He was the o the memory of Charles Krauthammer; you take away Churchill and there would have been 'no' world wars! He was the wheel that turned the animosity which brought 'world war one'. The Kaiser 'never' wanted a war with the UK or France! Read Pat Buchanan's book, "Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War"!
Oh please! Pat Buchanan! If the Kaiser didn't want UK to enter the war he knew very well he could have avoided it by not invading Belgium whose neutrality the Brits were prepared to go to war over. Actually he did apparently at the last minute consider changing the German war plan but in typically German fashion the General Staff insisted on following The Plan.
@@mikegalvin9801 You do not understand the sibling rivalry of royal cousins! It's been an ongoing soap opera since the Battle of Hastings! Don't just come to conclusions based on some college term spent on British history or from Hollywood driven Netflix series! There is 1000 years of back-stabbing, and revenge minded people who know what motivates kings, queens, emperors, and popes to go to war. Among them there will always be those who will never allow the monarchy to 'go quietly into that good night'.
some men should just go away.. Charles was just another talking head with no talents.. Yes, Einstein was a Genius and built many things that advanced mankind. politics is for fools
I always thought Krauthammer was a mean-looking cuss but he had a beautiful mind and a heart of gold. RIP Krauthammer!
You will always be missed and admired, Charles. God rest your soul.
A treasure of wisdom, RIP
R.I.P. Charles , you are sorely missed.
This man was simply amazing. RIP Charles.
I never realized how brillant this man was. What a great mind he was rest in peace brother now you can argue with Freud in heaven.
Is Freud in Heaven? Lol, just a joke, not trolling
Love you and miss you Dr Krauthammer . Rest In Peace
I LOVE CHARLES !! "What is Freudianism?: "It's a FRAUD". Did you HEAR that, everybody? FINALLY, An actual THINKING MAN!
I miss Charles. I so want to know what he thinks of what is going on today. RIP Charles.
Same in 2023.
@@barb7014 yes. very much so.
I came across your name wrt Mr. Obama's comment about India.
World needs people like you. RIP Mr. Krauthammer ❤
This man is a smart critical thinker, wise, and well reasoned. I get the sense that he's a good man. To not use effective treatments is wrong, or to have it as an option. To admit a lack of understanding is not weakness.
God bless Dr. Charles Krauthammer, a true gentlemen and conservative.
Rest in peace, Charles. May God (whom you would possibly interrogate with a question: are you real?) be friendly to you. No theories needed there. Just be.
only fools believe in god
only God believes in fools.
Can you please explain? Pseudo-wise sounding comment....
Rest In Peace. Dr. Krauthammer. You were truly an American treasure. You will be greatly missed.
6:34
"defence mechanism" (Freud) - intellectuals are usually neurotics, but he is right in his impulse that psychotherapy in any form (drive theory Freudianism, other forms of psychoanalysis such as self psychology, object relations theory and I-psychology, or newer streams such as systemic analysis, behavioural therapy, etc.) is all about attachment and a priest could do the same job better - perhaps even better than a friend. I am not yet sure about this point yet.
3:55-4:38 nuff said
What a marvelous human being. I wish he was still around
If we're talking about The American Mind why didn't he mention Bernays?
I miss Charles Krauthammer. RIP
i loved this humble giant
This video shows how Krauthammer's use of the scientific method in psychiatry was applied to political philosophy and the conclusions he has drawn in the area of governance. Just a thought - I wish he would've explored how Einstein's Theory of Relativity has been misapplied in the popular culture, to moral issues.
This man has BIG brains.
Krauthammer's wisdom is in short supply. He is missed.
Is he saying use hypnotism in place of pain pills?
yes
We will miss you, probably our whole lives. Dr. Krauthamer.R.I.P.
I tend to enjoy his views but his citing the DSM-5 as the pinnacle of present psychological understanding is a joke. Psychiatry is filled with fraud as well, as is the medicalization of psychological problems and treatment. The depth theorists contributed a great deal more than he acknowledges here.
As Dr. Daniel Amen pointed out, psychiatry is the one medical field where treatment occurs without the benefit of looking at the actual source of the problem, namely the brain. He has been criticized by many in his field for, as a matter of course, scanning the brain which has frequently revealed the cause of many mentally ill patients. ruclips.net/video/FTtKpBGjxd8/видео.html
Loved that guy, he will be missed, especially in these times.
A good man.
My God! What a blessing it would have been for the world if he had died!
How cool is this guy?!
HerzWatIThink not cool at all... typical yankee trying to look smart
General of your mom who? Krauthammer? He graduated from Harvard Medical after being paralyzed in a diving accident. What are your credentials?
oversoul I am figuring out how his diving accident is relevant??? Are you stupid, sir?
General of your mom Maybe his/her point is that your comment contributes nothing to any potential discussion over whether or not Mr Krauthammer is "cool".
General of your mom, Trying?? Lol.
Wow, that guy is interesting.
God bless you Dr. Charles Krauthammer.
Still so sad for a great loss! RIP my friend!
shock therapy is like a reset button, of course it's working
Perhaps HRC should have bare wired her reset button for Putin BEFORE he had a chance to interfere in her plans. DeZZZZZZZZZZZZZZIP!
i'm sure it coudn't never work on Trump. ;)
Did you try turning it off and on again?
What a great mind and, from all I have heard, kind person.
his heart was bigger than his mind
once again the captions, thanx 2 utoob, r nonsense
Very Cool guy.
It is easier to teach a hungry person to fish.
The loss of a great mind and human being...
He contredict himself;saying all the therapies are equal then he say that freudian therapies do not work...;)
well yes and no, he meant all those talk therapies are more or less the same, they work not because of their content but despite, its all just about talking time with the patient. it does not work on deeply sick catatonic schizophrenics, thats where only pills and electric shocks help
Rest easy Charles xxx
I strongly suspect large parts of the theory of evolution will go the way of the theories of Freud.
+Matt Obermiller That I doubt, sir. VERY doubtful.
Who cares that you suspect that? Why tell youtube what your hunches are about this, or anything?
that sort of comment is useless, unless you explain why. I would sincerely be interested.
While my study of Freud has been quite shallow compared with my study of The Theory Of Evolution, my general understanding is that the vast majority of Freud's theories are seen by current mental health professionals, philosopher types as either necessary stepping stones to better theories or were basically pop culture fads that have been out right disproven.
The same genuine scientific rigor (as opposed to ideological confirmation bias) that led to Freud's theories being assigned to a footnote in history has been quietly examining The Theory's Of Evolution for several decades and has been discovering "The Theory" has basically zero factual support and that creates more problems, questions than it answers.
When one removes speculation and assumption from The Theory, one is left with a pile of fossilized bones and an aspiring academic (and a 150 year trail of acolytes) who wanted a vehicle with which to push back against Victorian mores by chopping at the root of religion. (This is NOT what science is about)
Do what I did: remove assumptive words and sentences from anything you read about evolution. You won't be left with much. Then look, usually in the first paragraph, for a declarative statement either saying something to the effect of " because evolution is true..." or just outright bashing God or Christianity. (never any of the other world religions that have equally fantastic theories about origins) Evolution is the only "scientific" literature that does this. Most other scientific literature I've read states "this is what we found out, this is how we found it out, here's the support for what we found out and here's the reasons, pro and con about what we're asserting to be true.
I've been studying The Theory Of Evolution hard for over 30 years now and assumed at least a few of the fundamental, basic questions about the theory would have been addressed by now, given all the academic effort and resources that have been expended and the great, sometime unbelievable, leaps forward almost every other field of science has made in the same period. Instead of these questions being answered and the "holes" in the theory being filled in with provable facts, scientists from these other advancing fields (particularly the biological, engineering and informational fields) keep making discoveries that enlarge, not close these "holes" which those still faithful to the theory then attempt to address with more speculation. Hind sight of these past 30 years of study shows this to be an unbroken pattern. Because of this, I've had to admit that evolution is not a viable theory and, while it still has a dedicated core of academic faithful, it's dead on it's feet, it just hasn't fallen over yet.
I don't know if I'll live long enough to see "The Theory" fall into as much disfavor as Freud's theories but, based on the growing disconnect between proven science and "The Theory" I know I'll see it get part way there.
mieliav... you must now regret asking. Fool.
more churchill
STRETCH
Putting 30 thousand Volts to both sides of a persons head so that you need to put a bar of wood in the person's mouth so that he does not break is teeth is the most barbaric idea imaginable. I wonder if Krauthammer would like to have the electrodes attached to his head to get the benefit of this procedure he thinks is so workable.
you are an idiot. he explained that they are given drugs to prevent the seizure, its painless, the effects only happen in the braincells. look up electroconvulsive therapy. it works and has helped thousands of people who were completely lacking life at all just barely hanging on to a deeply catatonic schizophrenic state, and no medications and nothing helped but electro shock therapy.
RIP he was very lucky cz he did not see the psycho- narcissist Trump , by the way he was a good political commentator
Stop listening at Psychopharmacology....
I'm very sorry this guy died. But now he is free of his bounds.
i'm not saying krauthammer is evil, but he could be cast as satan if you were trying to save money on makeup.
LOL!
RIP.
o deere
With all due respect t He was the o the memory of Charles Krauthammer; you take away Churchill and there would have been 'no' world wars! He was the wheel that turned the animosity which brought 'world war one'. The Kaiser 'never' wanted a war with the UK or France! Read Pat Buchanan's book, "Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War"!
Oh please! Pat Buchanan! If the Kaiser didn't want UK to enter the war he knew very well he could have avoided it by not invading Belgium whose neutrality the Brits were prepared to go to war over. Actually he did apparently at the last minute consider changing the German war plan but in typically German fashion the General Staff insisted on following The Plan.
@@mikegalvin9801 You do not understand the sibling rivalry of royal cousins! It's been an ongoing soap opera since the Battle of Hastings! Don't just come to conclusions based on some college term spent on British history or from Hollywood driven Netflix series! There is 1000 years of back-stabbing, and revenge minded people who know what motivates kings, queens, emperors, and popes to go to war. Among them there will always be those who will never allow the monarchy to 'go quietly into that good night'.
This guy is another Global Elitist who believes in Might makes things right.
Richard Brice
Like Churchill?
some men should just go away.. Charles was just another talking head with no talents.. Yes, Einstein was a Genius and built many things that advanced mankind. politics is for fools
88Gibson... your nose smells like charles BUTT HOLE..He was a PATHETIC Talking HEAD.. I love my 1967 SG and 1972 Les Paul Custom..!!
thou sayest