as an Aerocolor-defender, and like you someone who doesn't shoot 100 speed very often, it's worth noting this stuff does push very well at least up to 400 if you're doing your own development. The contrast at 400 is much closer to where you'd want it, though it still helps to boost the saturation a bit. The datasheet you were reading from has Kodak's recommended push timing for this film in C-41 chems.
Interesting colors, thanks for sharing also the unedited shots! Reminded me of Agfa RSX or some East German film (Wolfen?)… and I find you can bring out the more sensitive side of a person in your portraits 👌.
From my understanding there are a lot of lab remade films from Aerocolor or some kind of Aerocolor film, like the Santa color, and maybe the Wolfen too~
I've been shooting this stock rated at ISO 400, without push processing it, and the negatives are still plenty dense. Add to that the fact that Kamerastore tend to spool a little extra (I recently got 49 shots out of a roll), and the fact that they had a significant sale going on for this film in July (€10 inc. tax) and I think this is my favourite film to use at 400 ISO. The scans may take a little more contrast correction if you shot them in unfavourable lighting, but they're still very good.
I’ve shot 4 rolls (2 x 35 and 2 x MF) of this film and I love it. I agree that there is a lot of magenta in it which makes color correction a little difficult even using silverfast., it actual shows more magenta with less exposure than it does with more exposure. I am going to shoot some chip charts on my next roll to get a baseline. I agree that it can be pushed around a lot in camera and post, so I love its flexibility. The grain and contrast are delicious. Other companies selling this stock include Popho, Cat Labs, and Flick Film.
@@itscapturedbysam I scanned my 120 from Catlabs and it looks amazing. I'm posting my own video on it in the next couple of weeks. Put a roll through your P67 and see if you don't love it.
fun fact you can cross process this film in E6 to get really nice slides! Just a disclaimer though without filters it will kind of look like tungsten film so you might want to get some heavy warming filters
I'm glad this video showed up in my recommendations. You have a very nice presentation style, and shared a lot of information in an engaging way. This film doesn't really appeal to me based on what you shared. The Kodak Gold shots, however, were really lovely and to my taste. BTW, 妳是台灣人嗎？妳講英文的樣子很像我的一些台灣朋友們。
I think that a lot of what you are saying about the film having a vintage look with a green cast has to do with your scanner and Negative Lab Pro not knowing how to handle this film. I have been shooting the Flic film Elektra 100 of Aerocolor and I really like it. I got my film developed and scanned at Gelatin Labs and got some great results from it. It has very fine grain and shows a lot of detail and I also like the colors from it. Also the Flic Film Elektra 100 is a little cheaper than the Reflx film
There are a lot of this film out there in different re-brand for sure, and I think it’s awesome the labs keeps this film going. I’ve seen some other sample photos from this film and I think when I edit it I may unconsciously make this look “more vintage” 😅
Definitely has a look but to me I’m not that into it. I think when people use things like Kodak gold now it’s like it’s a “vintage look” because of the golden hour leaning tones, but it’s actually not really, it’s more like a stylised perfect modern version of the idea of vintage, whereas this is kind of a truer representation of that era which in reality when you look through the majority of old photos (at least excluding the very vivid slide films like Kodachrome) tended to be kind of flat and muddy looking for the most part
I haven’t shot a lot Kodak gold in 35mm, but I shot quite a lot gold in 120, to me gold 120 has a much cleaner base color, less color shifting… I think the way I scan and edit this film or any film could make the film look different from its “original color”, that’s why I prefer using easier films that fit my work flow~ (I don’t know if what I’m saying make sense 😅)
@@itscapturedbysam yes, it does make sense. In other words it’s an accurate, predictable and high quality film stock, whereas this one is… something haha
Your photos always make me emotional ! Especially 9:03
Thank you :)
Awe I love Emily! She’s a friend of mine. Her colorful style is indeed so great to show off this film. Great video and in depth dive into this film. ✨
She’s great, I enjoyed working with her!!
@@itscapturedbysam that's so awesome! love the images you captured❣
Thank you. I've always liked the way you've shared unedited images. That helps me better understand what the film really looks like.
Thank you for watching 😊
your content and review is so delightful to watch
Thank you :)
Great shots! Really interesting to hear your thoughts and process 👍
Thank you for watching :)
Nice one Sam! Thanks for sharing and going into depth into this film! Keep doing all the amazing work that your doing!
Thank you for watching :)
@@itscapturedbysam 🖤
as an Aerocolor-defender, and like you someone who doesn't shoot 100 speed very often, it's worth noting this stuff does push very well at least up to 400 if you're doing your own development. The contrast at 400 is much closer to where you'd want it, though it still helps to boost the saturation a bit. The datasheet you were reading from has Kodak's recommended push timing for this film in C-41 chems.
Very cool look of the scans. I recently tried the medium format of aerocolor in studio portrait, it turn out pretty good too.
I also have some medium format vision of this film, I’m going to try it as well~
Interesting colors, thanks for sharing also the unedited shots! Reminded me of Agfa RSX or some East German film (Wolfen?)… and I find you can bring out the more sensitive side of a person in your portraits 👌.
From my understanding there are a lot of lab remade films from Aerocolor or some kind of Aerocolor film, like the Santa color, and maybe the Wolfen too~
@@itscapturedbysam I see… not so easy to come by here in Germany 🤷♂️
I've been shooting this stock rated at ISO 400, without push processing it, and the negatives are still plenty dense. Add to that the fact that Kamerastore tend to spool a little extra (I recently got 49 shots out of a roll), and the fact that they had a significant sale going on for this film in July (€10 inc. tax) and I think this is my favourite film to use at 400 ISO.
The scans may take a little more contrast correction if you shot them in unfavourable lighting, but they're still very good.
I’ve shot 4 rolls (2 x 35 and 2 x MF) of this film and I love it. I agree that there is a lot of magenta in it which makes color correction a little difficult even using silverfast., it actual shows more magenta with less exposure than it does with more exposure. I am going to shoot some chip charts on my next roll to get a baseline. I agree that it can be pushed around a lot in camera and post, so I love its flexibility. The grain and contrast are delicious. Other companies selling this stock include Popho, Cat Labs, and Flick Film.
I haven’t try the 120 format of this film yet, looking forward to try it out~
@@itscapturedbysam I scanned my 120 from Catlabs and it looks amazing. I'm posting my own video on it in the next couple of weeks. Put a roll through your P67 and see if you don't love it.
The information in quote marks is wrong! "Color reversal" is SLIDE film. This, obviously, is a negative film. Love the comparison.. Good topic.
I wonder if this is the same stock as in SatalColor 100. It is also spooled from some Kodak aerial film.
There might be different type of Aerial film, but I think SantaColor is also some kind of Kodak Aerocolor~
fun fact you can cross process this film in E6 to get really nice slides! Just a disclaimer though without filters it will kind of look like tungsten film so you might want to get some heavy warming filters
Yeah I've seen photos thats cross processed... I don't love the look, but for science we could always try it~ lol
I'm glad this video showed up in my recommendations. You have a very nice presentation style, and shared a lot of information in an engaging way.
This film doesn't really appeal to me based on what you shared. The Kodak Gold shots, however, were really lovely and to my taste.
BTW, 妳是台灣人嗎？妳講英文的樣子很像我的一些台灣朋友們。
我也更喜欢Kodak Gold。我是中国人，做英文视频来练习口语的哈哈哈哈～
@@itscapturedbysam 妳的英文非常棒，不需要刻意練習哦！很高興我今天發現了妳的視頻，我訂閱了。
I think that a lot of what you are saying about the film having a vintage look with a green cast has to do with your scanner and Negative Lab Pro not knowing how to handle this film. I have been shooting the Flic film Elektra 100 of Aerocolor and I really like it. I got my film developed and scanned at Gelatin Labs and got some great results from it. It has very fine grain and shows a lot of detail and I also like the colors from it. Also the Flic Film Elektra 100 is a little cheaper than the Reflx film
There are a lot of this film out there in different re-brand for sure, and I think it’s awesome the labs keeps this film going. I’ve seen some other sample photos from this film and I think when I edit it I may unconsciously make this look “more vintage” 😅
whats scanner do you used? its noritsu or frontier? thank you
Epson V850
big fan
Thank you~
bastante contraste destruye todo.
Definitely has a look but to me I’m not that into it. I think when people use things like Kodak gold now it’s like it’s a “vintage look” because of the golden hour leaning tones, but it’s actually not really, it’s more like a stylised perfect modern version of the idea of vintage, whereas this is kind of a truer representation of that era which in reality when you look through the majority of old photos (at least excluding the very vivid slide films like Kodachrome) tended to be kind of flat and muddy looking for the most part
I haven’t shot a lot Kodak gold in 35mm, but I shot quite a lot gold in 120, to me gold 120 has a much cleaner base color, less color shifting… I think the way I scan and edit this film or any film could make the film look different from its “original color”, that’s why I prefer using easier films that fit my work flow~ (I don’t know if what I’m saying make sense 😅)
@@itscapturedbysam yes, it does make sense. In other words it’s an accurate, predictable and high quality film stock, whereas this one is… something haha
@@itscapturedbysam do you have an Instagram? I would like to follow it, I love the range of your work it’s really cool
They sold an ad to someone talking about a dead kid. Happy video + dead kid story = bad time
Great video, however my neighbor declined my offer.
LoL time to hack in their computer 🤓
I don’t use photoshop I prefer to send them to The Darkroom Lab to get the original results.
A lot of people don’t, color can turn out differently depending on how you scan it and how your edit it for sure.
There is no new film.
There are not much old films either.... cry.jpg
The second roll looks so good, I think I’ll still use negative lab pro 🫣 excited to give it a try though 🥳
Negative lab pro is soooo much easier!!!