Rose Valley Real Estate vs Union of India | P Chidambaram vs Directorate of Enforcement | PMLA Case
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- #pmla #pmlalandmarkcases
PMLA Landmark Cases
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002
Need for combating Money-Laundering
Magnitude of Money-Laundering, its steps and various methods
The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002:
(i) Definition of ‘Money Laundering’, Ss. 3 & 2(1)(p)
(ii) Punishment for Money Laundering (Sec. 4)
(iii) Enforcement: Attachment (Sec. 5)
(iv) Survey, Search, & Seizure (Ss. 16, 17 & 18)
(v) Power to arrest (Sec. 19)
(vi) Adjudication under the Act: Adjudication by Adjudicating Authorities (Sec. 8)
(vii) Special courts (Ss. 43 to 47)
(viii) Vesting of Property in Central Government (Sec. 9)
(ix) Preventive Mechanisms under the Act: Obligation of banking companies, financial
institutions and Intermediaries (Ss. 12 & 12A)
(x) Reciprocal Arrangements with other countries (Overview of Chapter IX i.e. Ss. 55 to
61)
13. Rose Valley Real Estate v. Union of India, (2015) 2 Cal LT 617 92
14. P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement, Supreme Court
Judgment dated: 5 September, 2019
15. Amendment in the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002
brought by The Finance Act, 2019
This is so helpful mam..
This lecture was one of the best lectures I’ve ever had on PMLA taking into account my classes at faculty of law.
Glad you liked it ! Do share among your friends!
Mam Business Regulations k or topics pe bhi bna dijiye video please 🙏
Mam telecom regulatory k topic pe bhi bna dijiye or uske bsnl wale case pe bhi