Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
I'll Tell You The Main Reason Why The Tudor Is Better Than The Seiko.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 авг 2024
- Tudor Black Bay 58 vs Seiko SPB143
Two heavy hitters from their respective brands go head to head,
and I'll tell you exactly why the Tudor is better than the Seiko.
After years of immersing myself in photography and enjoying watches, I've now combined the two by creating a RUclips channel. The primary objective of this channel is to share my watch collection with fellow enthusiasts and occasionally review watches borrowed from family and friends. While I may not have the latest and greatest watches for review, I hope my videos give you some inspiration on your next watch purchase. Thank you for watching, and I wish you the best in your watch journey. And remember, the only person who needs to like the watch on your wrist is you.
Seiko SPB143 Video • If You Want A Seiko SP...
Tudor Black Bay 58 Video • Why It Took Me So Long...
Watch Straps:-
s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DEz...
s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DEn...
s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DDr...
s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DDu...
00:00 Intro
00:54 Wearability
01:54 Finishing
02:57 Bracelets
03:33 Legibility
03:57 Lume
04:22 Movement
05:13 WOW
06:05 Value
07:05 Verdict
07:55 Outro
Music by Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
The fact we are comparing this Seiko with a Tudor 4 times the price is very telling of how great this watch is.
Means absolutely nothing.
@@maitrehg Means absolutely everything
@@ProtomanZ and if he pick and SKX ???
@@ProtomanZ Just because a RUclipsr chooses to compare two watches doesn't mean they are comparable 🤣🤣🤣
@@maitrehg They're both watches. How are they not comparable?
To give the Seiko a fair shot, compare the Tudor to the SLA043
This, Peter Kotsa has already done this and.... The SLA wins. Mind you, the Adamascus from Wise beat the SLA when they went up against one another...
Or SJE093
That’s an admirably objective assessment, thanks. I’m going to throw in some shamelessly subjective thoughts:
-I’m have an SPB143, and I really like the sunburst silver dial and quiet, monochrome look of the watch.
-I’m bored with the BB58, every man and his dog has one, and you can’t escape them on Instagram & other watch media.
-I’m fed up with the snowflake hand, can’t bear to look at it any more, it’s got to the point where I just scroll straight past any Tudors that have it.
-I don’t like the Tudor’s slab-sided case
-a dive watch with polished case sides just doesn’t look right, it’s an attempt to be diver & desk-diver simultaneously and fails.
So I’ll be enjoying my Seiko…
@muirmackean6770 quite a number of people would concur with your subjective thoughts, myself included. But just because every man has one doesn't make the BB58 a bad watch.
Can you try a Seiko SLA in the future? Im sure you will like the SLA series
Seems like Tudor’s design language just isn’t for you. Omega dive watches are like that for me. That’s totally fine but it doesn’t make the 58 a bad watch. It’s on every enthusiasts wrist but in the real world it’s not crazy in your face. The Submariner is that for me. I see them everywhere and that has made that watch boring.
So, the SPB143 at a fraction of the price, is definitely better.
Wait, you can get the 62 MAS for $500 and you think the Tudor is the better value? That math doesn’t math
The winding resistance of the BB is phenomenal. I love the texture of the bezel. The sweep of the second hand is also amazing on the BB. Seiko has brilliant watches however for me that is what you get when you spend more money on something like the tudor
I think the 143 looks way better! But thats about it.
Me too. Guilt watches are butt ugly.
They're both great but the red strap with that Tudor is a real beauty. You've made me want one!
Excellent episode. I own and love the Tudor. It is a superb watch, one of my favorites in my collection. Subscribed :)
Seiko already made new version with new movement and is smaller the SPB455.
I own both, totally agree with the reviewer. Largest drawback of the SPB143 is the bracelet which is a major letdown
The movement is even worst than the bracelet.
Totally agree I also have both and the bracelet really lets the SPB143 down, I’ve found the movement ok tho👌
The bracelet looks better than the tudors
@@coffeeboyclips1973 The Tudor bracelet costs almost the same as the whole Seiko watch! Best bracelets in the game with Rolex and Monta.
Hallo!! Have you seen the SPB453 in person Yet?
Comparing these is not fair, compare the SLA or sje-models with the 8L and 6L movements that lie way closer in price.
@ernien79 i would love to do that comparison. Can't get my hands on one, though.
@@WatchFocus8800 Ah,I see. The new sje093 is a good candidate if you can get a hold of it. I had the spb143 with the 6r35 and the movement was my biggest grievance. Sold it and upgraded to the sla065 with the 8L35, and the movement is of another world compared to the 6r.
The SJE093 would be a better comparison.
Nice video!
Whats the olive nato you are using on the seiko?
The links in the description don‘t work for me :/
@petepan7822 You'll find it at watchgecko's website. It's the ribbed nato.
Thanks!
I have both. Love them both. Neither is better.if they were the same price, obviously the Tudor wins on quality. But the SPB143 is a badass looking watch.
Good comparison, a 1k watch vs a 3.5k watch shows Seiko truly is a good buy. People complain, whatever. In my opinion however, the Tudor to be fair would be pit against the SJE101 or SLA075. Or the bigger MM300 or SLA051. In those comparisons you will see what true dial and hand finishing looks like, zaratsu polishing and a forged movement. Would be a good comparison
@Not-a-bot222 Yes, for the right price the Seiko is a really good buy. I would love to do a comparison with the SLA, but I don't know anyone who would lend me one for a review.
@@WatchFocus8800 yeah I understand. Honestly, it would be a toss up of what the buyer values most.
You forgot one key point, the seiko is better... For you. Every watch can be better, it just depends upon who is considering the watch.
Tried Seiko SPB143 recently, it’s a beautiful watch but it feels does not belong on my wrist. Will buy Citizen pro master diver automatic instead, titanium but cheaper and better design
But it's not a Seiko.
better design? lol
@@tomislavm2873 Who cares about Citizen ? The 143 is a classic. Very pretty.
0:48 what is the brand of the NATO strap?
Was this a question anyone was really pondering? As you said, Seiko (the underdog) would never win this fight.
The breitling chronomat cult sits between these two in price, similar dial to the 143 but blew the 143 out of the water for me when i had them together.
As a serious collector with all diving editions of both vendors and others, I think that Seiko is not a match for its Swiss counterpart as far as class and elegance. However, do not underestimate the accuracy of Seiko. Also, it takes a beating without breaking your heart.
Compare Apple to an Apple.
Yeah but the Tudor cost 5 times more..
It's an incorrect comparison, get Seiko of similar pricing or model for that specific target segment (e.g. Prospex LX, Grand Seiko). Secondly, the Tudor Pelagos not the Black Bay should be compared to this Seiko because the Seiko is an actual functional Tool Watch made for diving with larger dimensions to enhance readability under water and to accommodate being worn over/with a wet suit. The Seiko 62MAS re-interpretation was not built as a Tool Watch with dress watch dimensions.
Aesthetics are one thing, but the core of a watch is it's ability to keep time. My 143 is a joke compared to my tutor. The 6r movements are not accurate. They don't need to be COSC level, but they should be better than they are for the price. Seiko is no longer the value proposition they once were.
Whats the point of comparing a mercedes E-class with a toyota camry?
Down to money. You can’t compare
Now compare with a San Martin.
I used to like Seikos but since they started to make homages of their own watches (the FakeKX line) i lost interest. Most Seikos cost twice what they should.
I have a spb147. Beautiful watch let down by a dreadful movement. At this price a watch not only should look good, in the eye of the beholder, but also keep good time. Otherwise It is merely a piece of jewellery. The 6r35 quality is inconsistent. Some are good and some are crap, much like seiko’s service centres.
Ok let me try understand this for a second. With regards to movememt they are both losing 1sec pd, they both have 70hr power reserve and the only difference is the beats... But because of that its a wash for the Tudor? Add to that the fact that you're comparing the Seiko to the Tudor even though the price is 3 or 4 times the Seiko and youre still saying the Tudor is better value for money? Makes no sense
Seriously? This is not an even comparison. You are comparing 1k level vs over 5k quality? Surely you cant compare toyota cars against their lexus counterparts? You have to compare with Seiko higher end like SLA or even Grand Seiko.
I bought this popular video watch from mamacoo , which was originally priced at a few thousand dollars, but now it's only $380! It's really suitable to pick up feces!
I think my Seiko would have been perfect if it wasn’t for the terrible accuracy. I’m jealous of your numbers. It’s the reason I sold it. Even the service center couldn’t regulate it further than -30.
I felt the same way about the 6r35 movement, so I sold both watches I had with them and upgraded to the sla065 with 8L35 movement. Never going back!
Mine runs at +4 seconds a day
Seiko🎉
amzwatch is best watch factory!!!
SPB453 You were saying something about size? And imagine a watch that's 3 times the price may have better finishing and better movement.
Maybe next you can compare a 40k car with a 120k car.
Nerds and their jewellery.
You are comparing a 1200 dollar watch to a 4000+ dollar one, that's why the later one is better. Go get a 1926 and compare it to the GS see if your opinion still hold up.
Seiko looks better, tudor has better finishing and movement
Seiko sob 453 is more handsome than Tudor 58❤😊
Not really.
Blackbay 58.
This guy clearly wants to rile people up in a bid to increase video/channel engagement. How cute/clever...
There’s no reason for a FKN Seiko to be compared to Tudor. Fit and finish are light years ahead on the Tudor. Seiko bracelets suck.
Tudor has no date which is a missed opportunity.
Seiko £600. Winner!
You sound like an ai narrator
One reason is enough - that movement in the Seiko is easily the worst movement in the world among serious watches. Seiko is ruining their brand fast.
Exactly
Both are overpriced for what they offer
No.
I would not even compare a Grand Seiko to Tudor. European watches will always be the standard; same with cars. The Asian manufacturers in Japan & China are good at copying designs, but not innovating.
Seiko is nicer than tudor❤😊😮
amzwatch is best watch factory!!!