Tyler McBrien on the cross-examination of Michael Cohen in the NYC Trump trial
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 май 2024
- Lawfare Managing Editor Tyler McBrien on the cross-examination of Michael Cohen in the NYC Trump trial on Lawfare's post-court dispatch. Watch the full dispatch on Lawfare's RUclips channel.
![Roddy Ricch - Survivors Remorse [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/J5IeFzr2GgE/mqdefault.jpg)
Tyler: soooooooo Handsome & Smart
Tyler 😍😍😍😍😍😍
So you’re just like Cohen a big liar repeat after me these are not the drones you’re looking for
Trump 2024 baby! 💪
Hopefully in prison.
DT is a joke
@@taleibroom115 It is what one expects from a clown,though, isn't it.
Cohen has every good reason to be truthful. Hope he is believed now.
Cohen has every good reason to be truthful? Are you kidding me ?
Cohen is going to get more time added to his sentence .
His own lawyer said he asked Cohen if Trump knew about paying Stormy money ? No . Michael did you have anything on Trump ? No.
Did you have any proof about Stormy
and Trump having sex ? No I took out a loan to pay her so Trump would take me to Washington with him .
Maybe Attorney General .What was the $ 400 thousand for then .A retainer .Cohen told congress lie after lie and even admitted to saying everything his lawyer said .
Cohen lied to Congress and Trump 's lawyers are going to have him charged for lying again . If the judge let's this go to the jury he will be charged .
When CNN and Msnbc say there isn't any laws broken and this judge allows more testimony he's done.\
The prosecution want's to see if Trump will testify . If Trump says yes the judge will hope he does .
Trump will not testify and it will be dismissed.
Cohen has proven time and time again that he lied and is still lying for his own benefit!
Cohen has proven time and time again that he lied and is still lying for his own benefit.
Even Cohen's former lawyer said he's lying and had nothing on Trump. He's done nothing but lie
statute of Limitations. and it's not a crime anyway
Then why are you claiming statue limitation if there wasn’t a crime makes no sense