The STANDARD MODEL: A Theory of (almost) EVERYTHING Explained

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @informaldeviant7751
    @informaldeviant7751 3 года назад +20

    So eloquently explained, yet I still have no understanding of this. Which is why I love the universe. Absolutely beautiful! 🤘🏼

  • @samsonau8205
    @samsonau8205 6 месяцев назад +2

    I will never have the math skills to understand this, but these visualizations help me ground all the ideas involved and try to pick out errors/misunderstandings/misinformation when I listen to other videos or discussions. My strength is bio and chem, with a smattering of physics at the university level. Today, add on logic/programming. What I do is listen for consistencies between different video or scientific presenters and hope they don't overstate things by highlighting the limits and identifying where we really are in research. Avrin Ash does a pretty good job of that in a fairly serious tone. I do enjoy NDT as well, but some of the humorous stuff detracts from me trying to dive deeper as he aims more at Joe-public rather than the enthusiasts or experts in other non-physics fields.

  • @Grandunifiedcelery
    @Grandunifiedcelery 3 года назад +204

    The Standard Model Lagrangian (4-line version) is explained perfectly! Thank you so much!

    • @Grandunifiedcelery
      @Grandunifiedcelery 3 года назад +21

      I saved this video on my playlist.

    • @atharvmm9805
      @atharvmm9805 3 года назад +5

      @@Grandunifiedcelery me too !!

    • @route61jen
      @route61jen 3 года назад +4

      @@atharvmm9805 me too💗

    • @Grandunifiedcelery
      @Grandunifiedcelery 3 года назад +8

      @@atharvmm9805 I made a similar video, but it's not as good as the one he made💖

    • @fakhruddinnalawala5451
      @fakhruddinnalawala5451 3 года назад +2

      Can someone explain how does light interfere with itself/other light, if photons don't interact with other photons?

  • @parasdahia8343
    @parasdahia8343 3 года назад +75

    I don't understand much in this, but still listening him interestingly.

    • @2V1ggo
      @2V1ggo 3 года назад +4

      I understand it and I’m only 12 years old

    • @jakublizon6375
      @jakublizon6375 3 года назад +1

      You will. It just takes time, and an insatiable curiosity of how reality works.

    • @deivid6774
      @deivid6774 3 года назад

      @@2V1ggo Wow!

    • @kakalibhattacherjee27
      @kakalibhattacherjee27 3 года назад +1

      @@2V1ggo It's really very easy to say you understand.The credit goes to Arvin Ash But when you really get into these equations, everything seems blank. There are many great stories and sacrifices in every single term of this equation....
      But still salute your curiosity.

    • @2V1ggo
      @2V1ggo 3 года назад

      @@kakalibhattacherjee27 yeah ik but thx

  • @anarakberov7173
    @anarakberov7173 3 года назад +19

    It's the best explanation that I have ever watched

  • @eduverse1948
    @eduverse1948 3 года назад +6

    This is called the Standard Model Equation. It explains 3 fundamental forces of the Universe, Strong Nuclear Force, Weak Nuclear Force, Electromagnetic Force, except Gravity. It describes properties like mass, charge and spin of elementary particles. Different terms in this equation represent different groups of particles. It has 5 sections. The first section describes the interactions between Gluons, the particles which hold Quarks together inside nucleons i.e protons and neutrons. Section 2 describes the interactions between W and Z bosons. Section 3 describes the interaction of particles with the Weak Force and the Higgs Field. Section 4 and 5 describe particle interactions with ghost particles. Ghost particles can make or break symmetries.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @greninjadark-cu3qt
      @greninjadark-cu3qt Год назад

      What about the phonon (quantum of lattice vibration) and plasmon (quantum of plasma oscillation). I think they are not fundamental forces and are "quasi" particles but still they are "elementary particles" cause they don't composed of smaller particles.

  • @maxsteele3686
    @maxsteele3686 3 года назад +25

    I’ve followed your channel for a couple years now. You know how they say that you don’t truly know something unless you can teach it in simple terms to a layperson? I’ve always thought you excel at that, and represent the true innovation of the internet: free access to all the information of the human race. The names of your videos, ie the topics that you teach, are always so exciting bc I know that I’ll be learning something knew about a topic I absolutely love. They’re never too simple, and they’re never too complicated.
    I won’t pretend that I can suddenly understand and solve the mathematical and physic formulas like the ones in this video, but having someone just break down and explain a formula in their elementary parts, I feel like I gain a respect for the smartest and most intelligent discoveries made by humans to explain the universe at the very large (general relativity) and the universe of the very small (quantum mechanics). I’ve actually felt so inspired by this and other amazing science RUclips channels that I am going back to college and trying to major in one of these fields.
    So thank you. I feel excited for life when I wake up everyday and embark on the journey of acquiring new knowledge. Sorry if this has sounded cheesy.

    • @catoleg
      @catoleg 3 года назад

      Such a good comment. You described exactly what I think and feel.

    • @dr.jamesolack8504
      @dr.jamesolack8504 3 года назад +1

      You explained yourself perfectly. I know how you feel.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 года назад

      What about reading a textbook on the subject. Jesus, you honestly believe YT videos will help you graduate? What a waste of entropy

    • @dr.jamesolack8504
      @dr.jamesolack8504 3 года назад +1

      @@slapmeisterrecords8226
      I graduated over 50 years ago, my friend.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 года назад

      @@dr.jamesolack8504 right fellow PhD. Why do you infer this comment was aimed at you and not the "cheesy" OT

  • @vicioustide
    @vicioustide 3 года назад +2

    Discoveries to unveil: Electron is made of the same components of a Proton, just smaller, this is why a Neutron splits into a Proton and an Electron. Also, a photon is an energized electron moving near the speed of light by means of a rotating triple layered braided wave guide with the outer layer being whichever medium the photon is traveling through. Typically it traverses through our visible universe of energy with a normal coating like outer wave layer, but this wave coating changes to a dark energy when entering a black hole (or a dark matter star's medium of space). Also, in the equations equate "Strong Nuclear Force " to a Gravity B force that resides in the proton neutron vaccinity until it is amplified as it resides on the EM spectrum, with gravity A force as the normally very weak force found every where else.

  • @Arcane-Magician
    @Arcane-Magician 3 года назад +42

    There are only 3 professions that use imaginary numbers: mathematicians, quantum physicists and..... accountants ;)

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" -- Einstein.
      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @alphalunamare
      @alphalunamare 3 года назад +2

      @@hyperduality2838 Why do you assume that they are Dual? Doesn't Dualism imply that calculations based upon the one system imply and reflect calculations in the other? It is implicit that the dual systems are equivalent and are mere different representations of the same. So you are stating that Fermions and Bosons are just different views of the same underlying 'thing'. I am not sure that that is reasonable. Noether's theorem shows a correspondence between various Conservation Laws and Symmetry but this is patently not Dualism. You could say that Lebesgue Integration is the Dual of Measure Theory and be correct whilst being totally wrong if you were to suggest the same for Riemannian Integration. Simply put: Dualism is not duplicitous.

    • @alphalunamare
      @alphalunamare 3 года назад

      maybe I meant ubiquitous?

    • @NatCo-Supremacist
      @NatCo-Supremacist 3 года назад

      @@hyperduality2838 duality is a stupid philosophical concept that wastes intellectual energy.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      @@alphalunamare Symmetry leads to conservation, they are the same thing or equivalent or dual.
      Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
      Integration is dual to differentiation.
      Union is dual to intersection.
      Homology is dual to co-homology.
      Positive is dual to negative.
      Points are dual to lines -- the principle of duality in geometry.
      The time domain is dual to the frequency domain -- Fourier analysis.
      Bosons & Fermions are made out of energy and energy = duality!
      The ancient teachings = philosophy.
      God (thesis) is dual to the Christ Consciousness (anti-thesis) synthesizes the holy/spirit or the mind/soul.
      Christianity is actually based upon duality and not triality or trinity.
      The council of Nicaea in 325 AD was set up to answer the question, is the Christ consciousness the same substance as God or a different substance?
      Same is dual to different, homo is dual to hetero.
      Is it coincidence that the number 666 is also expressed in the standard model of physics? Was this just a lucky guess? Is this evidence of Alien contact or guidance thousands of years ago?
      Questions are dual to answers.
      Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato.
      Syntropy (prediction, projection) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      The intellectual mind/soul (concepts) is dual to the sensory mind/soul (percepts) -- the mind duality of Thomas Aquinas.
      Duality creates reality.

  • @mayankbhaisora2699
    @mayankbhaisora2699 3 года назад +57

    You explain everything very well but I still couldn’t understand it 😂

    • @stfu_trash95
      @stfu_trash95 3 года назад +11

      Same.. I watched 10 minutes and 39 seconds only to realize how stupid I am

    • @mayankbhaisora2699
      @mayankbhaisora2699 3 года назад +5

      @@stfu_trash95 yeah bro... same feelings... 🤯overwhelmed

    • @valentinmalinov8424
      @valentinmalinov8424 3 года назад +5

      This is because there is a separate explanation for each phenomenon, but all these explanations are not compatible. There is a new book, which is ticking all the boxes of the requirements for the needed Theory - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

    • @stfu_trash95
      @stfu_trash95 3 года назад +1

      @@valentinmalinov8424 good to know I'll definitely give this book a go!!!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад +2

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @leon_noel1687
    @leon_noel1687 3 года назад +32

    Thank you, I´m just learning General Relativity, so some of the notation was familiar to me. This gave me such a high motivation to accelerate my learning!!!

    • @bastadtroll8922
      @bastadtroll8922 3 года назад +2

      you can learn gr in like a few days. I mean i lgot the bulk of it in a few hours from youtube videos. What blows my mind is the schrodinger equation.

    • @mmmmukiltraining8894
      @mmmmukiltraining8894 2 года назад +4

      @@bastadtroll8922 gr in a few days ? Better be joking

    • @humeanrgmnt7367
      @humeanrgmnt7367 2 года назад

      @@bastadtroll8922 Is it possible Einstein made an error, and science/math just hasn't caught it yet?

    • @proteg30
      @proteg30 Год назад +2

      @@bastadtroll8922 Bro think he understands GR from YT vids LMAOOOOOOO

    • @bastadtroll8922
      @bastadtroll8922 Год назад +2

      ​@@proteg30 listen thats not even the crazy part. I did it with my eyes half open whilst nodding off to sleep. I dont want to blow my own trumpet but i reclkon if i went to uni and studied this i would have invented the time machine by now

  • @LukePluto
    @LukePluto 3 года назад +19

    this was really well done and was at the perfect level of depth for me, thank you!

  • @petergebbie2853
    @petergebbie2853 3 года назад +11

    Arvin, Just as your series title suggests, you have an amazing ability to take the most complex ideas and break them down into understandable bite-size pieces! Well done and keep up your terrific work!

  • @manuelmartinez-gq4ij
    @manuelmartinez-gq4ij 3 года назад +29

    Great work, though I feel a bit overwhelmed by the math I usually watch these videos at least twice to try and get the general understanding. I’m generally an intuitive life form and can get lost in thought over what we have learned but really love expanding the mind over what we don’t. Thank you for your work it’s really appreciated!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад +2

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @slimshady6597
      @slimshady6597 3 года назад +1

      @@hyperduality2838 Religious nutjob. What has Yoda to do with the bs you're preaching here??

    • @vibaj16
      @vibaj16 3 года назад

      SlimShady Yoda doesn’t exist. That’s the connection

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      @@slimshady6597 Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      The conservation of duality (energy) will be known as the 5th law of thermodynamics!
      Energy is duality, duality is energy -- generalized duality.
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy or light (pure energy) is dual.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual.
      All energy is inherently dual.
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Duality creates reality!
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      "The Force" = duality, the Jedi worship duality!
      Fear is dual to anger, anger is dual to hate, hate is dual to suffering -- the Yoda dualities.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      @@vibaj16 You should listen to Yoda!
      Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      The conservation of duality (energy) will be known as the 5th law of thermodynamics!
      Energy is duality, duality is energy -- generalized duality.
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy or light (pure energy) is dual.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual.
      All energy is inherently dual.
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Duality creates reality!
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      "The Force" = duality, the Jedi worship duality!
      Fear is dual to anger, anger is dual to hate, hate is dual to suffering -- the Yoda dualities.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      You're mind/brain is creating dualities according to the metaphysic of Immanuel Kant et al.

  • @zeropain9319
    @zeropain9319 3 года назад +33

    Too complicated for me but good reference to come back to later as my understanding grows.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад +3

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад +1

      @Krishikesh Wagh Orthodox is dual to heterodox.
      The soul is dual to the non-soul.
      Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic.
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
      Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
      Syntropy (prediction, projection) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!

    • @EKDupre
      @EKDupre 3 года назад +1

      That's the spirit!

  • @pyne1976
    @pyne1976 3 года назад +24

    A good follow up video would be a visual guide to the standard model, possibly animating how the fermions and bosons interact/ decay. Great video as always Arvin.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад +5

      Good idea. Thanks!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @steriledial
      @steriledial 3 года назад

      @Hyperduality
      When you say, “The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast !“
      My understanding of the biblical number of 6 is that it represented heavenly imperfection. The number 7 signifying heavenly perfection, and 3 signifying earthly completion. The 3 six’s illustrated an earthly reach towards (a mythological) heavenly perfection, and falling short of it. Simply symbolic.
      Can I ask, do you honestly think that there was a hidden deeper scientific knowledge in a book, full of scientific inaccuracies and contradictions, that we should pay attention to? Just a civil and curious enquiry, nothing antagonist meant I might add. It’s intriguing to understand thought processes.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      @@steriledial The ancient teachings = philosophy.
      The bible is a small part of ancient history passed down to us.
      God (thesis) is dual to the Christ Consciousness (anti-thesis) synthesizes the holy/spirit or the mind/soul.
      Christianity is actually based upon duality and not triality or trinity.
      The council of Nicaea in 325 AD was set up to answer the question, is the Christ consciousness the same substance as God or a different substance?
      Same is dual to different, homo is dual to hetero.
      Is it coincidence that the number 666 is also expressed in the standard model of physics? Was this just a lucky guess? Is this evidence of Alien contact or guidance thousands of years ago?
      Questions are dual to answers.
      Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato.
      Syntropy (prediction, projection) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      The intellectual mind/soul (concepts) is dual to the sensory mind/soul (percepts) -- the mind duality of Thomas Aquinas.
      Duality creates reality.

  • @rmehta54
    @rmehta54 3 года назад +34

    Wow! You explained it so beautifully. I wish I had a teacher like you before I decided to drop physics. And now I wish there are more teachers like you so others can advance our knowledge. Thanks much Arvin.

  • @vedantsridhar8378
    @vedantsridhar8378 3 года назад +8

    Am I the only one who thought Arvin Ash was going to introduce Magellan Tv at 1:59 when he said "Before we get into the math........". Great video Arvin Ash, this fantastic idea of a theory of everything is one of the reasons why I want to become a physicist in the future.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад +6

      haha...I thought that's what some people might think. I only realized it after I cut the video. I bet you're not the only one.

    • @Bobbias
      @Bobbias 3 года назад +1

      @@ArvinAsh I didn't even think about it, but as soon as I saw the comment I realized a lot of people probably would lol

  • @avnishhhhh
    @avnishhhhh 3 года назад +15

    just the explanation I needed. Explained beautifully

  • @ratbuddy4642
    @ratbuddy4642 3 года назад +11

    Thanks for these awesome shows. I am glad someone takes the time to explain stuff without making it seem like its a gentleman's only club. I mean that can go both ways. Ignorance can be on both sides of knowledge and no knowledge. On a side thought, we all do our best to describe the universe both myth, science fiction or hard empirical science. But, in the end its the one that has the best results that stands closer to truth. Everything has its merits myth and science fiction as well. I think with out a dynamic dose of both we are truly lost.

  • @kostuek
    @kostuek 2 года назад +3

    Well, we figured out quite a lot, although mostly in a pure descriptive way. If you go ahead and ask those equations: "Why has the mass of an electron this exact very value?" there will be no answer. In fact, you need to take this value from an experiment and insert it in your calculations, or the whole thing will fall apart. So there is still quite a lot to learn, which is nice.

  • @vishekh
    @vishekh 3 года назад +24

    The best 16 minutes of my day.

  • @danielackles4265
    @danielackles4265 2 года назад +5

    My gratitude for your content is of great magnitude, and increases every time I see another video. Thank you so much!

  • @issamelias1747
    @issamelias1747 3 года назад +1

    Lovely & interesting, but incomprehensible for me, since I‘m a medical Dr. with a major in Philosophy. This shows me how complicated the world of existence is, with each human being having a part in deciphering the wonder of existence, & by finally carrying all parts of science together to make a coherent whole - & unified, & by saying all, I really mean all. - quantum physics, cosmology, mathematics , geometry ( Eucledian & non), chemistry, medicine, biology, philosophy, ....... & all other sciences in existence. But would us make more happy, would that knowledge bring us to other spheres or heights, & if so, what then. Still thank you for that clip which shows me my own ignorance, or as a philosopher once said „ I know that I do not know „ Thank you. ❤️

  • @jacksondick2317
    @jacksondick2317 3 года назад +9

    I am interested and shocked, as a college student, I think I have to understang these equations one day.

  • @m.alisiddiqui5802
    @m.alisiddiqui5802 2 года назад +1

    real hard work is done in explaining most difficult topic in simplified form

  • @msislam6751
    @msislam6751 3 года назад +5

    Thanks for explaining intuitively so well.This will make the basic❤️.

  • @bigbigblast
    @bigbigblast 2 года назад +1

    Whenever Arvin says "Right now," and he points his finger I can't help but smile too.
    Then I feel like I'm fastening this invisible seat belt 'coz we're goin' places, baby.

  • @labhsinghsaini3352
    @labhsinghsaini3352 3 года назад +3

    Beautiful explanation of beautiful equation.

  • @FunkyLoiso
    @FunkyLoiso 3 года назад +2

    I'm interested in how physicists "feel" about standard model. For me it seems overly complicated, it's hard to believe, that this is the simplest description of reality. Lots of different particles, that do and do not interact with each other, some of which have antiparticles, the interactions depend on whether the particle spins to the right of to the left.. Just rules on rules on rules, like we are describing natural language and not basic reality, that spontaneously exists.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад

      Most physicists will tell you that it is the best and most accurate model of the universe we have ever hand.

  • @shayangfkk7948
    @shayangfkk7948 3 года назад +28

    Nice , you wrote the gamma matrices and used the slash notation in the fermion dynamic term .

    • @TheOnlineBlackboard
      @TheOnlineBlackboard 3 года назад +3

      You paid very good attention, yes that indeed is a typo :-) the universe would however be much easier mathematically with this typo ;)

    • @nemethdaniel6384
      @nemethdaniel6384 3 года назад

      @@TheOnlineBlackboard would it? A random index sticking out would rather complicate it. This "syntacs error" would give an index to the Lagrangian. :D

    • @TheOnlineBlackboard
      @TheOnlineBlackboard 3 года назад

      @@nemethdaniel6384 Ahhh yeah. So in terms of indexes it would be fatal. But I was more thinking of the fact that you would just have two gamma matrices, and they would contract to one thus giving you a scalar interaction :) Thus, in this way it's simpler.
      You guys are so smart, do you also have a degree in physics? :D

    • @nemethdaniel6384
      @nemethdaniel6384 3 года назад

      @@TheOnlineBlackboard I'm doing my PhD, my topic is Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT) quantum gravity! :)

    • @TheOnlineBlackboard
      @TheOnlineBlackboard 3 года назад

      @@nemethdaniel6384 Cool :-) I'm working on DM via the Higgs sector, and in particular on models which would fix the hierarchy problem and issues with the EWPT such that we get the right conditions for baryonic asymmetry :)

  • @anthonyzavala7173
    @anthonyzavala7173 2 года назад +2

    If I knew more about the actual terms then I believe I would have definitely understood this due to how good the explanation was.

  • @SirChocula
    @SirChocula 3 года назад +5

    Like PBS-Spacetime, I come to this channel every now and then to humble myself in how little I actually know :)

    • @darrenmarney8577
      @darrenmarney8577 3 года назад

      Potentially Sir 😃 Your comment is the same path that i followed 🤣 Educational interaction opportunities of understanding & more questions 🤔

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 года назад

      Why do you feel you have to write this in the comments then. Just shut up and go back into your hole. What a waste of entropy

  • @Kiki-qh7xk
    @Kiki-qh7xk 2 года назад +1

    The best online class I found in youtube about the matter. Thank you.

  • @thomasposivy8003
    @thomasposivy8003 3 года назад +9

    Liked it, explained the math really well 🙂

  • @frede1905
    @frede1905 3 года назад +2

    Absolutely fantastic video. I have never seen a video before going into depth on the standard model Lagrangian. This must get to my list of equations I wish to more fully understand some time in my life!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @Sean-ll5cm
    @Sean-ll5cm 3 года назад +50

    It's like I understood, but understood nothing... What a weird and beautiful universe

    • @yaomaji762
      @yaomaji762 3 года назад +2

      ...shiva?...

    • @SkibroDuck
      @SkibroDuck 3 года назад +4

      I understand what you said. Weird

    • @TuAFFalcon
      @TuAFFalcon 3 года назад +1

      My father believes there is God and angles once you go above 'plane height'. So don't hurt yourself too much.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @TuAFFalcon
      @TuAFFalcon 3 года назад

      ​@rptrm82People who believe in a form of God also believe in winged angels. That is the same in Christianity and Islam. You underestimate the drug called religion. They are a special flower with special powers and have a God who's got their back. It all comes down to feelings and what makes them feel good. If the guy shouting for a ban on Muhammed pictures was born in say Austria (he was born into a Christian family) he would be shouting for something else. People are dumb as a bag of rocks. Religion has no purpose in this day and age. Maybe a type 4 civilization is out there controlling us but certainly no 1 being that gives kids cancer for the lulz.

  • @wernerviehhauser94
    @wernerviehhauser94 3 года назад +2

    I have the SM equation on a coffee cup, alongside Schrödingers and GR. Concentrated physics around dissolved caffein :-)

    • @steriledial
      @steriledial 3 года назад +2

      It’s contents being crucial first thing to understand your cup 😊
      I have a cat on my cup.
      Oddly enough, when I turn it around, there is no cat

    • @gravitonthongs1363
      @gravitonthongs1363 3 года назад +2

      Random fluctuations keep sending my coffee to strange locations around the office.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 года назад

      Lol, muahahahaha, rofl, hihihihi

  • @sticksimulated
    @sticksimulated 3 года назад +5

    this is next level

  • @TonyFDiego
    @TonyFDiego 3 года назад +2

    Simply an awesome explanation of our current understanding of the universe and in such a way that non-physicists and physicists alike can recognize and appreciate.

    • @adisuyash
      @adisuyash 3 года назад

      Definitely not non-physicist 💀

  • @Rationalific
    @Rationalific 3 года назад +3

    This is an amazing video! You really laid it all out there in the best way possible. Of course, I don't understand it and the equation still seems like an alien language to me, but I've been able to understand in a general sense some of the things that it describes. Mainstream TV thinks people don't want to knw about these types of things, so they never have shows about it, or if they do, they dumb it down to the point where it's just more unsatisfying entertainment than true education. That's why people are turning away. I hope your channel, others like it, and those you promote like Magellan TV and The Great Courses Plus thrive. If they do, it will show that many people actually care about learning instead of mindless "reality" shows and other garbage.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад

      I totally get what you are saying!

    • @Rationalific
      @Rationalific 3 года назад

      @@ArvinAsh 👍

    • @SpotterVideo
      @SpotterVideo 2 года назад

      @@ArvinAsh Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
      Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity.

  • @vivekpatel3752
    @vivekpatel3752 10 месяцев назад +1

    I m an experimental physicist and will submi my thesis soon. We will have a theoretical physicist who is famous for asking to explain the SML .. thank you very much for this. It reduces all the effort I need to make to learn this

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  10 месяцев назад +1

      Best of luck!

  • @theklaus7436
    @theklaus7436 3 года назад +8

    Frankly the math is beyond me- but I think I learn how to picture some of it in my mind. And this is due to all these science channels. But this so interesting and a true gift especially for the young people! And the impact can’t be overstated! 😊🎸

  • @user-kw1kc2bc9c
    @user-kw1kc2bc9c 3 года назад +2

    Hello) I have a question.
    According to the material presented, we are always talking about the sum of the components, which is logical, since everything is still reduced to entropy. Entropy is interpreted as a measure of the probability of a system being in a given state. So the more disorder, the more entropy should be. Any system gradually moves to its more probable state. Disorder in it increases, chaos grows, and therefore entropy increases.
    My main question is, does the dark matter and energy follow the same principle? Does the amount of dark matter and dark energy increase in proportion to the increase in ordinary matter in case of increased entropy?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад +1

      Good question. Dark energy does not appear to be influenced by amount of regular matter. Dark matter, although it is typically found in close proximity to regular matter, we don't know what it is or what link it has to regular matter, so hard to say.

    • @user-kw1kc2bc9c
      @user-kw1kc2bc9c 3 года назад

      @@ArvinAsh Thank you for the quick answer!
      It is more clear with dark energy now, as it is not interacting with the matter, we simply can not take it into account.
      My point is, if we can measure the amount of dark matter in the standard model, why we can not measure the deviation of its amount in increasing entropy. It seems that it all goes to the possibility of observation of such deviation.

  • @Jdelli0916
    @Jdelli0916 3 года назад +16

    I am so glad this channel randomly popped up. Sometimes that algorithm works out.

  • @LynxBlackWind
    @LynxBlackWind 3 года назад +1

    Hey, regarding handedness - does that mean that moving particle can have spin only parallel to motion vector? I.e. If moving along with X axis to the right, it can only have spin left or right but on u or down or between? Or if it has some measured spin in Y direction while moving with X,how do we tell if it's left or right handed?

  • @Name-js5uq
    @Name-js5uq 3 года назад +23

    Thank you for all that hard work

  • @cosmicinfinity8628
    @cosmicinfinity8628 3 года назад +1

    One doubt Arvin. How these electrons or other particle move continuosly. From Where they got the energy. Is that a PMM. Why the energy behind the movement of electron and other particles not depleted??

  • @aryanbotre4949
    @aryanbotre4949 3 года назад +10

    The speciality of his videos is that they answer a huge question simply and leave you with ten new questions!

  • @frenzyneutrino1766
    @frenzyneutrino1766 9 месяцев назад

    A wonderful and beautifully explained video and I would like to point out that the term which gives coupling of force particles with matter particle @5:10 over there it should be just D instead of D dagger .

  • @Sigmaairav
    @Sigmaairav 3 года назад +5

    what if the fabric of spacetime is a quantum field like the higgs, in which all gravitational effects could be explained? What if gravity wasn't actually a force so much as it was the effect of spacetime curving in the presence of mass?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад +2

      It probably is the latter, but the quantum theory behind it is missing.

    • @ozzymandius666
      @ozzymandius666 3 года назад

      Things like photons and gluons, which do not couple to the Higgs field, also have gravity.

    • @humeanrgmnt7367
      @humeanrgmnt7367 2 года назад

      @@ozzymandius666 What's gravity, and can you demonstrate your certainty?

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 3 года назад

    Excellent explanation of Physics without Gravity, metastable proportioning probability resonancs. If sufficient density-intensity of orbital-orbits form relative Timing-spacing Condensate, this is observable by resonance through the Singularity Apature Trigonometric positioning holographic phenomenon, and resolves according to tuned focus.., receeding in macro-micro perspective exclusion to the Singularity positioning vanishing point-zero-infinity i-reflection containment. Ie if the Universe appears in this projection-drawing exploded view, Gravity is "unbonding" via chaotic, and therefore not measurable, "Quantum Uncertainty" darkness, the same as emptiness of Space-time.
    So this is the "what" physical manifestation is composed of/in sensory realisation. Quantum-fields are left incomprehensible by exclusion of Time duration timing.
    Which is "How" it is composed by time-timing projection-drawing holographic embedding, ..of What you think you see.., QM-TIME wave-particle Modulation Mechanism Singularity positioning Mathematics, in formations such as the properties of Fluxions suggested by Newton in his purified maths, CalculusCamera Obscura Optics demonstrations. Newtonian Gravity is left unexplored, but the process of chemistry in later years demonstrated bonding-antibonding resonance that is quite sufficient in Completeness.
    And "Why" is the Infinity/Eternity here-now-forever Superspin self-defining Modulation positioning, e-Pi-i function cause-effect of Quantum Logic.
    Which implies Everything Theory is Temporal Logarithmic Superspin Condensates in/of Quantum-fields.
    A Math-Physics practitioner with 10k hrs experienced Intuition might link Fluxions and Higgs Bosons in a Glossary of Terms..
    Amateurs are, with respect, unqualified to Comment beyond Feynman type guessing. Time is Time, e-Pi-i sync-duration connectivity etc.., Everything. To suggest leaving out this Principle is ineffective.

  • @yasir4511
    @yasir4511 3 года назад +7

    You brilliantly sum up in a short video. Remarkable also it boosted my interest to know more! Thanks

    •  3 года назад +1

      I can recommend Sean Carrolls playlist "The Biggest Ideas in the Universe": ruclips.net/p/PLrxfgDEc2NxZJcWcrxH3jyjUUrJlnoyzX

  • @kaulickmitra6898
    @kaulickmitra6898 Год назад +1

    Amazingly explained with such simplicity.

  • @Earwaxfire909
    @Earwaxfire909 3 года назад +5

    Beautifully inspiring and depressing. Great work!

  • @thingsiplay
    @thingsiplay 3 года назад +2

    Almost "theory of everything" is like saying "almost the location of a point in space, we just miss the third dimension". Its hard to argue "almost", if an important factor as such the gravity is missing from the equation.

    • @NortheastGamer
      @NortheastGamer 3 года назад

      It's easy to make that argument using your example: A postal address is a two dimensional value (doesn't take height into account) and is usually good enough to direct a traveler to the majority of places on Earth.

    • @thingsiplay
      @thingsiplay 3 года назад

      @@NortheastGamer But I was talking about a point in a room in 3D. Coordinates on the surface of the earth are 2D. You can't have the position of the earth in space by just giving a two dimensional coordinates.
      And the example shouldn't be taken too seriously, as I just wanted to illustrate the principle of missing important information itself. Missing gravity from the equation is a big deal.

  • @tericklePlayer
    @tericklePlayer 3 года назад +8

    Almost is the most accurate words in the title. We knows very well that the theory of everything is strongly contested

    • @moddquad8362
      @moddquad8362 3 года назад

      I contest the word 'almost' as 85% of the universe is dark matter/energy. It's hard to claim a theory of everything when it only explains 15% of the universe.

  • @jworldwide904
    @jworldwide904 3 года назад +2

    Excellent presentation! Thank you!

  • @MrElvis1971
    @MrElvis1971 3 года назад +5

    I struggle with the concept of renormalisation. Would like a video on it.

    • @tiny_toilet
      @tiny_toilet 3 года назад

      I struggle with pre-renormalization, everything that comes before renormalization. Oh, also post-renormalization. And post-modernism, too. Know what? Better to just go ahead and cover it all, please.

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 3 года назад

      @@tiny_toilet you forgot pre-mature

    • @Bobbias
      @Bobbias 3 года назад +1

      Yes, I'd love a good explanation of renormalization.

    • @NatCo-Supremacist
      @NatCo-Supremacist 3 года назад

      I find it funny whenever people who "love science" never apply such theories on people where they accurately explain populace phenomena .

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 3 года назад

      @@NatCo-Supremacist It is a lot easier to attack and criticise than to explain. It's a lot easier to call someone stupid than to educate them. It is just human nature and an efficient use of our internal resources. It is nothing special or unique and often we as humans gamify it and turn it into bullying.

  • @jesseaustin2438
    @jesseaustin2438 3 года назад +1

    Pic at 11 minutes shows variant theres a present Layer within spaceTime, and either its present flat and some things are moving forward in time faster, unlike the pic, or its like the pic and theres a present that has things farther in time,, OR theres a 3rd option even that there is NO present and all time exists as one and a present you see or experience has objects that are at diferent points in space which wudnt break functionality of a present that must always be present w other space in that present, but a present that has flat at same time doesnt have warped spacetime cause for gravity, but a warped or curved present that causes gravity isnt a preset, it wud have stuff in future and stuff in past, but that later situation has an ability to semi exist as a present that isnt the previous 3rd option of all time existig at once, if existence is a time that is a constant present w things just traveling through time at different rates that are older or farther in time change but in one present. Basically this is a proof that a warped spacetime isnt existant, thusly showing gravity isnt caused by the curvature of space in time, but is a product of time change effecting space causing it to propel stuff thru space w a force, and my theory is just that space is caused by the different fields tht make up everything, and even if they are one simplified field, space, they are seen and are logically viewable or dually are seperate fields at the same time just like my theory that gravity is the time of time and time is the Calculus integral of space and space is the sum of the different fields, and each field wud have its own time, in my theory, and the times wud have one time, and that time and it as multiple times have a time like thing, which cud be thought of as a dimenion or just an integral of space type thing such as time,,, and the time of time is gravity. ScienceClic English has a similar theory as of August about 2020, but they say a derivative of space, but id already considered that and wanted to get it looked into along w my bigger hunch that it is integral of time, time integral of space, and space the multiple fields as one,, and i came up w my in early September 2017 but was led about after a small trip to jail where staf lied id spat on them so i was sent to a mental hospital and then on arrival they said same thing, but video evidence wud show that was incorrect and most likely a lie. ScienceClic English cud, idk, cud of been given ideas from me talking to ppl of my theory. SciCli Eng said there dimension was a temporal dimension. Please like this comment so itll be seen.

  • @Gaurav-um4oh
    @Gaurav-um4oh 3 года назад +10

    Although i didn't get a single point i watched this video till the end and i felt like i was watching this sitting inside a warp drive travelling in another world of higher dimension at a speed faster than the light . Oh god

  • @jeancorriveau8686
    @jeancorriveau8686 3 года назад +1

    Good explanation of the imaginary number 'i'. Indeed, that number must not end up in the final physical result. Comes to mind Minkowski 4-space equation usually expressed as ds2 = (icdt)2 + dx2 + dy2 + dz2
    dx, dy and dz can't be real since there exists no absolute frame of reference. So, the number 'i' should be present. Let's do that by multiplying by -1:
    -ds2 = -(icdt)2 - dx2 - dy2 - dz2
    that is
    -ds2 = -(icdt)2 + (idx)2 + (idy)2 + (idz)2
    or
    -ds2 = (cdt)2 + (idx)2 + (idy)2 + (idz)2
    Time is now real as it must be. Time is equivalent to energy. Time goes by only with energy. The left-hand side -ds2 causes concern. It's like (ids)2. This is supposed to represent the space-time distance, an absolute value. However, the presence of 'i' means that it's not physical. So, we have time (energy) on the right side, clearly physical, but the left side is nonphysical. Minkowski's equation doesn't express reality, then. So, General relativity doesn't either. I've seen videos that claim that time causes gravitation. If by time is meant the one in Minkowski's equation, then GR has no physical reality.

  • @khushi3958
    @khushi3958 3 года назад +11

    Wooooowwwwww! Arvin, this is amazing, hey kudos to you and ur team, I totally am amazed, you are awesome 😍😍😍👏👏👏👏👏

  • @jareknowak8712
    @jareknowak8712 3 года назад +2

    Perfect video, as usual.
    It confirms my unprofessional belief, that the string theory is either not a solution, or there is still some long bridge that leads to it, a bridge made of many different boards.
    Thank You Arvin!

  • @penumbraman99
    @penumbraman99 3 года назад +3

    You have put out some great videos. I feel this is one of your best!

  • @CyberiusT
    @CyberiusT 3 года назад +1

    I'm so happy that was the intuitive explanation.

  • @adamraiyan
    @adamraiyan 3 года назад +13

    You don't know how much I waited for your uploads.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 года назад

      Dude no one cares! Why you waste entropy here? Just go bacl into your hole

  • @davidramsey2566
    @davidramsey2566 3 года назад

    I'm glad I found this today. "Theory of almost everything." LOL What a chuckle. But it's kind of cute. Like your puppy dog all of the sudden learning to talk and then proceeding to tell you about the fundamental nature of reality! (Still, I have to admit the dog's theory can predict where all the bones are buried in the yard. Maybe a theory of everything isn't so far away.)

  • @TuAFFalcon
    @TuAFFalcon 3 года назад +11

    Yeah, my head exploded... Thanks Arvin!

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 года назад

      How old are you? Like 5?

    • @TuAFFalcon
      @TuAFFalcon 3 года назад

      @@slapmeisterrecords8226Not understanding the theory of everything in full means you have the intelligence of a 5 year old? So that is what 99% of the worlds population?
      Instead of trolling here why don't you go get a job and maybe a life.

  • @Alex-lk7qy
    @Alex-lk7qy 3 года назад +2

    Another great informative video. Thank you

  • @unkleful
    @unkleful 3 года назад +3

    High praise to this video.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад +1

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @duhmez
    @duhmez 3 года назад +1

    I'm on ya Arvin! Correct me if I am wrong though I am no expert. You said gluons only interact with quarks, but from my studies I recall that quarks, amazingly, do interact with other gluons too. If I am wrong I'd love to know it because I recall learning ths over the years.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад

      Gluons interact with quarks and they interact with themselves. I should have made that clearer.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      Quarks are dual to gluons.
      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @aeixo2533
    @aeixo2533 3 года назад +5

    Your presentation is some of the best on youtube bro!

  • @meahoola
    @meahoola 3 года назад +1

    Thank you, ever since I first saw that equation I was waiting for THIS explanation.
    . ..and in the final presentation of the Lagrangian, the second term has both a gamma and a slash, that's too much.

  • @motif123456
    @motif123456 3 года назад +7

    What an amazing explanation of the beaity of the universe...had i had seen this in my early adulthood,I would have definitely chosen physics

  • @richardventus1875
    @richardventus1875 2 года назад +2

    Arvin - thanks, great video. Unfortunately, as you acknowledge, the standard model is a bit like describing a whole elephant when you've got a piece of its tusk: it doesn't include gravity and only accounts for 5% of the observable universe. I wonder if physicists will ever be able to create an equation which really does cover 'everything'.

  • @ayubsherif5898
    @ayubsherif5898 3 года назад +6

    The standard model Lagrangian equation is a piece of art. Great video as always

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 3 года назад

      How did you know it was a great video?

    • @danielbavisetti8731
      @danielbavisetti8731 3 года назад

      @@MrElvis1971 He has a membership.
      So he has early access to videos of this channel.

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 3 года назад

      @@danielbavisetti8731 oh

  • @Kenoask
    @Kenoask 3 года назад +1

    One of the best video of your channel. You realy simplify the topic. Thank You Sir. Great fan.

  • @maysampkh4242
    @maysampkh4242 3 года назад +3

    Fantastic job Arvin, nice videos... thanks for the great work.

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 года назад

      What are you, like 5yr old?

    • @vedantsridhar8378
      @vedantsridhar8378 3 года назад +1

      @@slapmeisterrecords8226 what did Maysam say that only a five year old would say? He or she was just giving a compliment to Arvin Ash, since this video is pretty interesting and simplified

    • @slapmeisterrecords8226
      @slapmeisterrecords8226 3 года назад

      @@vedantsridhar8378 sorry but that is a pointless waste of entropy.

    • @vedantsridhar8378
      @vedantsridhar8378 3 года назад

      @@slapmeisterrecords8226 entropy, hmmmm.

  • @jakobfredriksson2272
    @jakobfredriksson2272 3 года назад

    "[...] to show something that's quite complex" -> 1:14
    "quite" :)

  • @edgarbandoy6646
    @edgarbandoy6646 3 года назад +3

    This the real deal. Thank God and all scientists collaborated to make this possible

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 года назад

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 I respect your disrespect. Nice sarcasm btw

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 года назад

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 You don't even know me personally. But again I respect your disrespect.

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 года назад

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 even Ash this channel tackles about this subject and you just conclude without any scientific reasons. Maybe you are not for this channel. 😆

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 года назад

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 ruclips.net/video/sm0Ul-Ym8Ys/видео.html watch this smart guy

    • @edgarbandoy6646
      @edgarbandoy6646 3 года назад

      @@michaelbolchunas1271 Thanks God for your existence

  • @dadan79
    @dadan79 Год назад +1

    Thank you for doing this.

  • @marcosfreijeiro8763
    @marcosfreijeiro8763 3 года назад +3

    Excellent video and great content👍🏻

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад +1

      Glad you enjoyed it

  • @ATSF854
    @ATSF854 2 года назад +1

    Incredibly fascinating. Does the sum of all energy interactions imply something about the nature of gravity, as it doesn't seem to fit into the standard model? Hard to word my question, might have to rewatch.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  2 года назад +1

      That's an interesting observation. The equation of General relativity relates energy to the curvature of spacetime, so it can be used to relate gravity to energy, since gravity is spacetime curvature. The precise nature of why these two relate to each other is not known. So this would be a fascinating area for further research.

  • @awolgeordie9926
    @awolgeordie9926 3 года назад +3

    Freaking amazing presentation. Thank you.

  • @faisalsheikh7846
    @faisalsheikh7846 2 года назад +1

    Simply phenomenal

  • @Xyphex.
    @Xyphex. 3 года назад +13

    This kinda stuff is my favourite science!

  • @stevedixon9734
    @stevedixon9734 3 года назад +2

    Well done once again

  • @HmlsDarkOps
    @HmlsDarkOps 3 года назад +15

    The fact that we have gotten this far is crazy enough.

    • @MrKydaman
      @MrKydaman 3 года назад

      I agree, but we could be barely scratching the surface.

    • @spinor
      @spinor 3 года назад

      I know, I feel people don't appreciate just how incredible it is that we've been able to figure out what we have. We've formulated extraordinarily accurate descriptions of the universe from the scale of subatomic particles to the entire universe, all just by tinkering, observing, and thinking really hard. We certainly haven't got it all figured out, and maybe most of what's out there is yet to be uncovered, but the progress we have made is truly awe-inspiring.

  • @RussellBeattie
    @RussellBeattie 3 года назад +1

    The amusing thing about these types of videos is how my brain is wide open to just about any craziness that could come up. So much so that the "L gauage" at 5:40 made me go check to see if that was a misspelling or an actual thing. (Pretty sure it's just misspelled.)

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 года назад +1

      Yep, I missed it in review. Sharp eye. Thanks.

    • @TheOnlineBlackboard
      @TheOnlineBlackboard 3 года назад

      From a technical point of view, you can define things as you want. But yes you would generally write just gauge ;-)

  • @AchwaqKhalid
    @AchwaqKhalid 3 года назад +7

    Arwin! You need a graphic animator/illustrator in your team for more visual easy to digest goodness ⚛

  • @43-manoranjan22
    @43-manoranjan22 3 года назад +1

    All the elementry particles or just a virtual particles so how the detect the particle can you explain it

  • @tonywells6990
    @tonywells6990 3 года назад +6

    Thanks, you just confirmed that I understood the lagrangian perfectly as something I cannot grasp!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      Bosons are dual to Fermions -- spin statistics theorem.
      Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
      6 quarks, 6 leptons, 6 force carriers (Higgs, photon, gluon, Z, W+, W-) -- The standard model.
      The ancient teachings state that the number 666 is the number of the beast!
      Quarks are dual to leptons, quarks are dual to gluons.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialect.
      The proton (thesis) is dual to the electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon or pure energy -- atomic duality.
      Force carriers or Bosons are by-products of conserving duality!
      Pure energy is created or synthesized from conserving duality!
      Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual.
      Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields.
      North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields.
      Energy is duality, duality is energy!
      Pure energy or photons, light are dual.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
      Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac newton.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry!
      Lagrangian equations conserve duality (energy).
      Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem.
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

    • @tonywells6990
      @tonywells6990 3 года назад

      @@hyperduality2838 I actually meant I couldn't grasp all the math.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      @@tonywells6990 The equations of motion (Lagrangian) minimize the action in quantum mechanics and maximize reality! The equations of motion are literally optimized predictions or syntropic.
      Convex (convergence, syntropy) is dual to concave (divergence, entropy).
      Homotopic equivalence = duality.
      Union is dual to intersection.
      Integration is dual to differentiation.
      Injective is dual to bijective synthesizes bi-jective or isomorphism.
      Positive is dual to negative.
      Homology is dual to co-homology.
      Y = X.
      Y is equal to X. Y is the same, similar, equivalent or dual to X. Y is dual to X.
      All mathematical equations in physics and mathematics are dualities.
      The Lagrangian is a mathematical tool which makes optimized predictions (syntropy).
      Duality creates reality!

    • @tonywells6990
      @tonywells6990 3 года назад

      @@hyperduality2838 Actually, the math all makes sense now, but thanks!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 года назад

      @@tonywells6990 Noumenal (rational, analytic) is dual to phenomenal (empirical, synthetic) -- Immanuel Kant.
      Mathematics is analytical thinking or transcendental logic (noumenal).
      Transcendental logic (concepts) is dual to transcendental aesthetic (sensory percepts) -- Immanuel Kant.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      Here is a video you can watch about non-dualism:-
      ruclips.net/video/dWLd9y1MG4c/видео.html

  • @PR-fk5yb
    @PR-fk5yb 3 года назад +2

    Thanks for the video. You forgot to mention the value of L would be 42....

  • @joegillian314
    @joegillian314 3 года назад +8

    "...psi dagger..."
    lol, you know what this sounds like, right? (this equation includes psychic powers 😂😂😂)

    • @michaelsmusic3532
      @michaelsmusic3532 3 года назад +1

      Yes, this proves ESP, time travel, ect

    • @TheoEvian
      @TheoEvian 3 года назад

      The funny thing is that if I am not mistaken that letter was "phi" :D

  • @mada_nunes
    @mada_nunes 3 года назад +1

    So beautiful! And the song gave a magical touch.

  • @googleit1370
    @googleit1370 3 года назад +14

    So basically the entire syllabus from mid to final can be crammed up in 16 minutes!

  • @mehmetali4626
    @mehmetali4626 Год назад

    i added this video my playlist. Literally So uniqu video. Perfect explained.

  • @carbon_no6
    @carbon_no6 3 года назад +5

    If I was to try and use these equations t he “L” at the beginning of the equation would not be representative of its true meaning is, but changed to “LOST” as in that’s exactly what happens when I look at those squiggles!

  • @tahirbacha431
    @tahirbacha431 3 года назад +1

    Can the spooky action of quantum teleportation be detected,like if u teleport a particle, and a detector in the other place detected the change,if this could happen than quantum teleportation is possible, u only need to detect the change