Don't listen to the guy that complained about your pronunciation. What a weird and unwarranted complaint anyway. You're doing fine! As far as the Seamaster goes they are fantastic watches for sure but visually they just have never done it for me. Looking forward to see what they come up with next though. Great content!
I appreciate you saying that. If anything I could understand someone saying I’m being dramatic cause the sea master new and old are all awesome watches. I do like the colors they are going with. I’ve never been into mesh bracelets or nato’s but that’s more of a me problem lol.
Agreed. This was a good, short video with an interesting and different look. Far too many watch videos are long for the sake of length, or seem to be anyway.
I am very pleased with my 2018 Omega Seamaster Chronometer. I especially love the ceramic bezel. I find the aluminum bezel on the newer version to be rather disappointing.
3 red flags (1 red flag is enough for "no go") : size of HEV, skeleton hands, and any 007 or fake military markings. I have a set of 4 "SMP"s, all of them sword hand divers - 2254 + 2255 in steel, 2231 + 2232 in titanium and those 4 look fabulous especially as a set, far better than any SMP that came after that. They are my beach, sea or poolwatches, all bought preowned for 2K each.
Great content. it’s pretty obvious they are going to phase out . I have my 2001 mid-size and I feel the same about it as Prince William does , I always use that as the benchmark and think if it’s good enough for him it’s definitely good enough for me 😂 These design changes are very small, what they really smack of is an attempt to address dwindling sales across swatch.
Nope. Don't agree with you at all. Far too negative. You do realize this design is probably the most recognized Omega in their line up since the Speedmaster. It's become iconic for the epitome of a luxury diver. Far more aesthetically beautiful than the counterpart from Rolex, the Submariner. There is no waning to the demand and popularity of the Seamaster 300M Professional. Omega hit the nail on the head back in the 90s with this design. They tried once to update it and took it to the wrong direction. And wisely returned with detailed updates to raise the luxury status. They were broadening the tool watch variety of this design by the first NTTD variant. It showed that people do want a no date, non-decorative dial, return to lighter and more comfortable tool diver. I really like the NTTD and have one with a variety of bracelets, NATO and two-piece straps. It simply works, and has a different vibe to the standard issue 300M Pro. Expanding the offerings in this no-date version is smart. Charging a higher price, not so justifiable though, Omega. The new Bronze-Gold model will cost more due to the gold. An actual bronze model would have been more affordable and added cache. The all-metal bezel version is great, but the dial style missed the mark. Omega should have used a variant of the Summer Blue. They should have offered a no helium escape valve version too. Or replaced it with a spring-loaded escape valve at the 9 o'clock position. And Omega should have tried to make this model thinner, if possible with their movement. But that's just my opinions. The move was a strategic one. And the difference between Rolex's no date Submariner and the Omega Seamasters, is that you can actually walk into a dealer and buy one!
@ don’t be so narrow minded. If u make public content (good content by the way) u should be mature enough to accept (honest/constructive) feedback. What u then do with it is up to u of course. I posted with no bad intentions and telling from his mature reaction on it (with which he won me over btw), he took it the right way. Critique isn’t always an affront
Don't listen to the guy that complained about your pronunciation. What a weird and unwarranted complaint anyway. You're doing fine! As far as the Seamaster goes they are fantastic watches for sure but visually they just have never done it for me. Looking forward to see what they come up with next though. Great content!
I appreciate you saying that. If anything I could understand someone saying I’m being dramatic cause the sea master new and old are all awesome watches. I do like the colors they are going with. I’ve never been into mesh bracelets or nato’s but that’s more of a me problem lol.
Agreed. This was a good, short video with an interesting and different look. Far too many watch videos are long for the sake of length, or seem to be anyway.
Outstanding video.I have to go with the MAMACOO, especially with that green dial as my favorite
MAMACOO has set a new standard for replica watches. Their craftsmanship is impeccable. Its hard to tell the difference from the originals
My favorite watch channel without a doubt.I’m happy to spend my money on MAMACOO watches. I’ve never been let down by their products
I am very pleased with my 2018 Omega Seamaster Chronometer. I especially love the ceramic bezel. I find the aluminum bezel on the newer version to be rather disappointing.
MAMACOO watches are great and affordable！
Finally a no-date no gimmick no silly Bond reference actually for purpose Seamaster that looks equal to a Rolex. A solid back would be nice?
3 red flags (1 red flag is enough for "no go") : size of HEV, skeleton hands, and any 007 or fake military markings. I have a set of 4 "SMP"s, all of them sword hand divers - 2254 + 2255 in steel, 2231 + 2232 in titanium and those 4 look fabulous especially as a set, far better than any SMP that came after that. They are my beach, sea or poolwatches, all bought preowned for 2K each.
Cool points, cheers from England
Great content. it’s pretty obvious they are going to phase out . I have my 2001 mid-size and I feel the same about it as Prince William does , I always use that as the benchmark and think if it’s good enough for him it’s definitely good enough for me 😂 These design changes are very small, what they really smack of is an attempt to address dwindling sales across swatch.
Nope. Don't agree with you at all. Far too negative. You do realize this design is probably the most recognized Omega in their line up since the Speedmaster. It's become iconic for the epitome of a luxury diver. Far more aesthetically beautiful than the counterpart from Rolex, the Submariner. There is no waning to the demand and popularity of the Seamaster 300M Professional. Omega hit the nail on the head back in the 90s with this design. They tried once to update it and took it to the wrong direction. And wisely returned with detailed updates to raise the luxury status. They were broadening the tool watch variety of this design by the first NTTD variant. It showed that people do want a no date, non-decorative dial, return to lighter and more comfortable tool diver. I really like the NTTD and have one with a variety of bracelets, NATO and two-piece straps. It simply works, and has a different vibe to the standard issue 300M Pro. Expanding the offerings in this no-date version is smart. Charging a higher price, not so justifiable though, Omega. The new Bronze-Gold model will cost more due to the gold. An actual bronze model would have been more affordable and added cache. The all-metal bezel version is great, but the dial style missed the mark. Omega should have used a variant of the Summer Blue. They should have offered a no helium escape valve version too. Or replaced it with a spring-loaded escape valve at the 9 o'clock position. And Omega should have tried to make this model thinner, if possible with their movement. But that's just my opinions. The move was a strategic one. And the difference between Rolex's no date Submariner and the Omega Seamasters, is that you can actually walk into a dealer and buy one!
Jesus, what a psychotically long response...lol.
Man what‘s up with this weird pronunciation. Would be a lot more convenient to follow if you just talked normally
Content wise -> very good video. Totally agree
You make a good point. I appreciate the feedback. My cadence and pronunciation etc is something I’m working on.
@@theONEwatches713 wow, what a mature response! I’m impressed 👍👍👍
He's doing fine. Make your own content and/or simply don't watch his channel.
@ don’t be so narrow minded. If u make public content (good content by the way) u should be mature enough to accept (honest/constructive) feedback. What u then do with it is up to u of course. I posted with no bad intentions and telling from his mature reaction on it (with which he won me over btw), he took it the right way. Critique isn’t always an affront