when i tell you i was in shock for at least ten minutes and my jaw dropped and gave out the loudest gasp. haneke really knows how and when to utilize violence.
I’m a film student. For the calm and slow-passed editing along with the quiet dialoge and diegetic sound, this scene made everyone in the lecture witness in pure shock. How all the information, steps and the unanswered question to who was sending the tapes, this took all of us by surprise. Absolutly haunting.
From what I recall they are brothers with a fractured relationship going back years, and they both seem to blame the other for the torment in their lives. The guy visiting has been recieving anonymous video footage of his family house being watched along with disturbing drawings. I believe he has turned up at his brothers to tell him to stop because he suspects it's him. The harassment continues after this scene however, so we know it wasn't him.
Close. The guy that ended himself was adopted by the other ones family. When he was 6, he told a lie that presented him as a unstable child, taking him away from a privilegied life into a orphanage. The suicide is merely the consequence of our main characters denial of this action that took place during his childhood.
@@uvl.g5611 The main character (Georges) tricked his brother (Majid) into killing a rooster by saying that his dad wanted him to do it, after Majid killed it Georges then proceeded to tell his parents that his brother was a Pynchon who killed the rooster as a threat to what he was eventually gonna do to him which then got the parents to get the authorities called and he was then put in foster care.
Una escena de lo mas inquietante y eso que tampoco es muy grafica y el plano no es la gran cosa. Pero michael haneke por como ha puesto la camara, el silencio total, el como la historia nos ha llevado para ese punto y la buena actuaccion; hicieron de esta escena algo mucho mas inquietante y shockeante a nivel emocional que la mayoria de muertes de la saga Saw o de esa cosa llamada Terrifire.
La escena despues de esta muestra al prota saliendo de una puerta (no se si del cine) con un cartel encima que pone "Deux Freres" (dos hermanos en español) , lo cual probablemente símbolice que la ultima oportunidad de reconciliarse con quien pudo ser su hermano tiempo atras.
I’m not fluent in French but I know some and at one point watched it with subtitles many years ago. The final line was basically “I wanted you to witness this”. It has to do with the context of their relationship in the film, which is a clear allegory for the relationship between France and the peoples it colonised. The film as a whole is dealing with how upper middle class French people deal with colonial guilt and deny it. This scene is presented as a part of that dialectic.
when i tell you i was in shock for at least ten minutes and my jaw dropped and gave out the loudest gasp. haneke really knows how and when to utilize violence.
I’m a film student.
For the calm and slow-passed editing along with the quiet dialoge and diegetic sound, this scene made everyone in the lecture witness in pure shock.
How all the information, steps and the unanswered question to who was sending the tapes, this took all of us by surprise.
Absolutly haunting.
considering film students are typically the most shallow interpreters of film, this makes perfect sense.
Did you watch the whole movie in class from start to finish? I envy that if you did
Genuinely one of the most shocking scenes I’ve ever seen. Stuck with me for a long time
From what I recall they are brothers with a fractured relationship going back years, and they both seem to blame the other for the torment in their lives. The guy visiting has been recieving anonymous video footage of his family house being watched along with disturbing drawings. I believe he has turned up at his brothers to tell him to stop because he suspects it's him. The harassment continues after this scene however, so we know it wasn't him.
Close. The guy that ended himself was adopted by the other ones family. When he was 6, he told a lie that presented him as a unstable child, taking him away from a privilegied life into a orphanage. The suicide is merely the consequence of our main characters denial of this action that took place during his childhood.
@Marius Fjørtoft What was the lie about? Like what was the incident from their childhood?
@@uvl.g5611 The main character (Georges) tricked his brother (Majid) into killing a rooster by saying that his dad wanted him to do it, after Majid killed it Georges then proceeded to tell his parents that his brother was a Pynchon who killed the rooster as a threat to what he was eventually gonna do to him which then got the parents to get the authorities called and he was then put in foster care.
Just commenting to say "Hey" from 2020.
Hey from 2021!
Hey from 2022 😷
Hey from 2023.
hey from 2024.
Una escena de lo mas inquietante y eso que tampoco es muy grafica y el plano no es la gran cosa. Pero michael haneke por como ha puesto la camara, el silencio total, el como la historia nos ha llevado para ese punto y la buena actuaccion; hicieron de esta escena algo mucho mas inquietante y shockeante a nivel emocional que la mayoria de muertes de la saga Saw o de esa cosa llamada Terrifire.
I saw this movie with my brother. when this scene came , we almost screamed and we were looking at the screen like WTF
GREAT MOVIE
La escena despues de esta muestra al prota saliendo de una puerta (no se si del cine) con un cartel encima que pone "Deux Freres" (dos hermanos en español) , lo cual probablemente símbolice que la ultima oportunidad de reconciliarse con quien pudo ser su hermano tiempo atras.
Perturbant !
what did he say
I’m not fluent in French but I know some and at one point watched it with subtitles many years ago. The final line was basically “I wanted you to witness this”. It has to do with the context of their relationship in the film, which is a clear allegory for the relationship between France and the peoples it colonised. The film as a whole is dealing with how upper middle class French people deal with colonial guilt and deny it. This scene is presented as a part of that dialectic.
@@simonpryor877 you’re right. I’m not French nor can I even come close to speaking outside my native tongue, but you’re right.
@@simonpryor877 as a french person I could not have put it better myself.
Excellent cinéma