Method of characteristics and PDE

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 янв 2025

Комментарии • 23

  • @raultrigo
    @raultrigo 7 лет назад +3

    Thanks a lot, as engineers in the industry we forget a lot of the mathematics underlying the solution of these PDEs, and we find a lot in the industry...this is a real push for science application...thank you

  • @il2xbox
    @il2xbox 10 лет назад +3

    This video was very useful. I was having trouble with a quasilinear PDE problem in my textbook, so I watched all of your videos covering the method of characteristics and quasilinear PDEs. The amazing thing is, the problem you did in this video is EXACTLY the same equation I was having trouble with! The Cauchy data was different but the equation itself was the same. So thank you very much for this video, now I should be able to solve more problems like this. And if I have trouble with other types of problems in the future I'll definitely watch your videos on those as well.

  • @ankit87gupta123
    @ankit87gupta123 9 лет назад +3

    Thanks Chris for making my life easier. Your videos are really helpful. Really appreciate your efforts.

  • @jameyatesmauriat6116
    @jameyatesmauriat6116 2 года назад

    Simple and beautiful explanation, I wish that all the videos like this so that even if I don't know how the equations come from, then at least I can memorize some small details

  •  10 лет назад +1

    Thank for the lessons Chris! Much appreciated!!

  • @tomlynd8836
    @tomlynd8836 8 лет назад +2

    Your lectures are great but I am wondering how can I come up with factors that would simplify my problem. I mean is there a deterministic approach to this problem or I will have to go with heuristics?

  • @yunsongliu8610
    @yunsongliu8610 11 лет назад +5

    im just getting confused about why C(1) is determined by C(2)? can we use the funtion of C(2) equals to some function of C(1)?

    • @DrChrisTisdell
      @DrChrisTisdell  11 лет назад +6

      Yes, you can write it that way if you prefer.

  • @kkc60
    @kkc60 6 лет назад +1

    thank you very much, but i have one question.. shouldn't the 4th line ( when finding C1) be negative 1/u because we took it to the other side?

    • @ianwong6534
      @ianwong6534 6 лет назад

      In the previous line, the RHS needed to be multiplied by -1 to get the denominators the same in order to cancel them out, thus taking 1/u to the other side would make it positive

  • @loveislam9174
    @loveislam9174 8 лет назад

    Thank you, I pray that God gives you all the best

  • @ciudadesoscuras
    @ciudadesoscuras Год назад

    how x(dx/dt) turns into 1/2 d/dt(x^2)?

    • @DrChrisTisdell
      @DrChrisTisdell  Год назад +1

      It's the chain rule or the product rule for differentiation applied to the 1/2 d/dt(x^2). 👍

  • @DrChrisTisdell
    @DrChrisTisdell  11 лет назад

    Hi - see if you can prove the identity that I work from in the top right hand corner of the screen at 04:12. Once you have that then you'll feel more comfortable with the method that I use.

    • @jbergamp
      @jbergamp Год назад

      Id be nice if you can show how you verify that the solution is the correct one, its more challenging than solving it. Bytheway...what is suppose to be 'u' in the corfficient?thanks

  • @ayeshasirkazi7345
    @ayeshasirkazi7345 7 лет назад

    Can u give how to solve Lagrange's DE....and it's geometric interpretation....and what if denominator is zero in any of the ratio u r taking for finding the characteristics curve.....plz sir it's urgent

  • @prakharshekharparthasarthi7741
    @prakharshekharparthasarthi7741 8 лет назад

    where is recording camera placed

  • @rinchuimy1292
    @rinchuimy1292 10 лет назад

    It helps.. thank you

  • @RakeshKumar-zw2ey
    @RakeshKumar-zw2ey 7 лет назад

    Thanks sir

  • @taniapq91
    @taniapq91 10 лет назад

    thanks

  • @ankurc
    @ankurc 6 лет назад

    awesome