Non-Euclidean Geometry [Topics in the History of Mathematics]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 авг 2013
  • Another Open University oldie. This one's a bit more hxc (and considerably older - the 1970s public were apparently considered far smarter than we are today!), but it's mostly easy enough to grasp if you put your mind to it.
    Non-Euclidean Geometry is relevant for the Riemann curvature of space-time in General Relativity and all that. It's also interesting to watch logic (or a bearded professor) decimate what was once considered to be a fundamental truth of mathematics and reality, if you're into that sort of thing. (maybe that's a bit over-dramatic).

Комментарии • 56

  • @mikefuller6959
    @mikefuller6959 8 лет назад +68

    I used to creep down stairs in the early hours of the morning in the 1980's to watch Open University. Happy days!

    • @mikefuller6959
      @mikefuller6959 8 лет назад +9

      +Mike Fuller I never understood a word of it! I just liked it and admired how clever the lecturers were! I wished to be as clever!

    • @vengerer
      @vengerer 8 лет назад +1

      +Mike Fuller how cute :)

    • @buckpartington7161
      @buckpartington7161 8 лет назад

      what with cock in hand

    • @mikefuller6959
      @mikefuller6959 8 лет назад +1

      +Vladi Nekoloff (vengerer)
      Thank You, Vladi!
      It is nice to come across a nice person!

    • @theaviary1
      @theaviary1 8 лет назад +2

      +Mike Fuller Me too I used to watch it as a child - goodness knows I couldn't understand it

  • @reddevil9554
    @reddevil9554 8 лет назад +13

    I used to watch them every weekend as a kid, because I got up early and there was no kid's TV on until later back then. If you wanted to watch TV early, only this was ever on lol.

  • @NorthEastTrailRunner
    @NorthEastTrailRunner 9 лет назад +189

    We need more intellectually stimulating television programmes like this, and less X Factor.

    • @PatGleeson123
      @PatGleeson123 9 лет назад +19

      Absolutely - TV has gone downhill since those days - chasing the lowest common denominator - sad really ...

    • @AvNotasian
      @AvNotasian 9 лет назад +13

      Can't be done.
      The initial audience would require skills for every new TV show the likelihood that the whole audience can watch and comprehend is very low.
      Someone needs to collate all stimulating programs into a youtube guide.

  • @maurpine
    @maurpine 6 лет назад +7

    this is fantastic! i love this timeless instructional programs

  • @billyh88uk
    @billyh88uk 8 лет назад +11

    I actually remember watching this - it would have been one of its last TV showings in the mid 2000s (maybe this showing?) when I was a sleep-deprived teenager. Didn't quite get all of it but interesting to watch!

    • @MarsHareMarshAir
      @MarsHareMarshAir 8 лет назад

      i think i must've taped this slightly earlier than that - I remember watching it with my housemates 2000/2001/2002?
      Pretty impressive that these old shows had such longevity anyway

  • @hanniffydinn6019
    @hanniffydinn6019 6 лет назад +9

    I miss open university programs on tv on in the early morning

  • @EdiDrums
    @EdiDrums 6 лет назад +5

    21:31 Oh, Jeremy!

  • @parkerd2154
    @parkerd2154 7 лет назад +13

    mind blown at 12:21

  • @net51cc
    @net51cc 7 лет назад +3

    Beautifully told. Thus just triggers my curiosity.

  • @arj123sub
    @arj123sub 5 лет назад

    Fantastic video. Helped me get the basics

  • @Robert-qs4th
    @Robert-qs4th 10 лет назад +17

    Anyone else procrastinating math homework to watch this?

  • @donaldklopper
    @donaldklopper 6 лет назад +4

    Brilliant videography! The shirt that changed.. The camera dollies and the 3D models. Wow.

  • @emadal-shirbeeny4696
    @emadal-shirbeeny4696 6 лет назад

    How I can get the script of this lecture or video?

  • @ronin6158
    @ronin6158 6 лет назад +2

    i love when he's making a particularly noteworthy point and his voice cracks.

  • @chopped4skin620
    @chopped4skin620 9 лет назад +3

    Thanks for uploading ... Do you have anymore videos in the series?

    • @MarsHareMarshAir
      @MarsHareMarshAir 9 лет назад +1

      Afraid not, I taped over a lot of subjects after I later studied them so mostly history and nature docs left.

    • @chopped4skin620
      @chopped4skin620 9 лет назад

      Sorry to hear that. Anyway - check this out and tell me what you think ...
      ruclips.net/video/2un9rO2ZF4g/видео.html

    • @MarsHareMarshAir
      @MarsHareMarshAir 9 лет назад +1

      Chopped4Skin Sorry, just saw this it was marked as spam!

  • @frazzleface753
    @frazzleface753 5 лет назад +3

    Jeremy Gray is still at the OU :)

  • @Spix_Weltschmerz-Pucket
    @Spix_Weltschmerz-Pucket 9 лет назад +2

    Thank you for the upload! :)

  • @innertubez
    @innertubez 5 лет назад +1

    0:15 either Jethro Tull or Mick Fleetwood teaching math.

  • @gpcrawford8353
    @gpcrawford8353 7 лет назад +4

    Left school with no exams ,didn't like the style of teaching , used to watch these to see what I was missing got married and worked all hours god sent bang went watching them . Much later on I was recovering from severe ear infection and surgery read a book forget title in which it claimed that time is relative and gravity is a fictitious force. This was contrary to what I learned in school,I liked science there, got into special relativity and tried to understand general relativity still trying geometry on a sphere is the key but alas the mathematics is still beyond me. Learnt a lot about Einstein the man though .

  • @gatehanger1385
    @gatehanger1385 9 лет назад +37

    It seems that men wore non-Euclidean clothes in the 1970's....

    • @garyzod8818
      @garyzod8818 7 лет назад

      Yes Joseph I remember the 70s rather stylish.

  • @metorical
    @metorical 9 лет назад +1

    Oh man, I remember watching this when it was on! Up way too late.

  • @russellmoxham5625
    @russellmoxham5625 8 лет назад

    That gives me the fuckin' nostalgia horn

  • @wleon4068
    @wleon4068 5 лет назад +1

    Well, that was clear enough. Lolol.

  • @robertbrandywine
    @robertbrandywine 5 лет назад +3

    The 5th postulate *is* intuitively obvious.

  • @Herb.
    @Herb. 5 лет назад +1

    Ah yes, curved space. *straightens monocle*

  • @stevenrogers6983
    @stevenrogers6983 5 лет назад +1

    Creepy good..

  • @pickledegg1989
    @pickledegg1989 9 лет назад

    "The Sum of the Angles" by Concretism brought me here.

  • @Holobrine
    @Holobrine 7 лет назад +5

    That parallel postulate looks obvious to me.

  • @bobbutler606
    @bobbutler606 5 лет назад +1

    Be honest how many of us had heard of this topic before now?

  • @jamesrobinson4028
    @jamesrobinson4028 7 лет назад

    I watched this as part of my degree course!

  • @fitofight8540
    @fitofight8540 7 лет назад +1

    i think euclid refered only to a straignt line in his parallel postulate. . a line drawn on a globe is not straight so the postulate do not apply.

  • @BLUEGENE13
    @BLUEGENE13 5 лет назад

    we live in a non euclidean space

  • @wi11ydapimp
    @wi11ydapimp 8 лет назад +1

    Good old bbc

  • @yugsnave1
    @yugsnave1 10 лет назад +4

    i'm procrastinating going to bed ;)

  • @Novasky2007
    @Novasky2007 10 лет назад +12

    looks like a non eucledian beard :D

    • @raythetse
      @raythetse 10 лет назад +4

      It's actually infinitely large at the tip.

  • @apburner1
    @apburner1 5 лет назад +4

    This is dumb. Euclid's postulates are valid IN Euclidean space.
    Gee, why doesn't diesel work in a gasoline engine?

  • @david-yt4oo
    @david-yt4oo 6 лет назад

    blew my mind

  • @garyzod8818
    @garyzod8818 7 лет назад

    Geometry hmm interesting.

  • @rkent06
    @rkent06 8 лет назад +1

    This guy must have got some serious poontang