Once when Lazarus saw a man stealing a mud pot he said: " A piece of soil is stealing a piece of soil ". After Our Lord rose Lazarus from there tomb, he (lazarus) never smiled after that says a saint.
Could someone please remind me what Church document it is that gives the laity a right to have a TLM at their parish? I think it is a papal document? I dont remember. Thanks..
We have studied church history for 45 years. First and foremost from the book of acts to the last Epistles written there is NOT ONE SINGLE RECORD of anything that man spoke of Lazarus Mary Magdalene (Magdalene is Aramaic) or Mary being put on a boat and founding an order of nuns or living in caves. (This is strike one) Strike 2 is the writing of the Apostolic fathers we have about 240 years of writings. In these Not One of these claims are ever made. Much less of Peter making this Bishop and the Claimed Apostolic succession from Peter onward. Not One of these men that was constructed in this succession is named in the bible as having received Succession from Peter. The Succession of Peter was also unknown in all of the writings of the apostolic fathers (For over 240 years) (This is strike 2) Strike 3 is Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History This Book was commission by Constantine to give a history between the death of Christ all the way to Constantine. Eusebius in searching all the records of all the churches Did not find a listing of one of these early saints. Not one name. and did not find one mention of Lazarus, Mary Magdalene or Many traveling and founding anything. Nor did Eusebius find one mention of an Apostolic succession. These records running from scripture to Pentecost until Constantine Are Insurmountable. As we have three witnesses as commanded in the whole of Scripture. For out of the mouth of two and three witnesses shall every WORD (This includes teaching doctrine and revelation) be established or find their foundation. Further in the days of Constantine not one of these records existed and neither were any of these celebrated as saints. This is the reason many churches no longer teach church history as this destroys many man made doctrines and many man made traditions. As in church history beginning with the writings of the Apostolic fathers Eusebius Ecclesiastical History and the Nicene Fathers we find recorded the introduction of many of these doctrines and traditions when they were first proposed. The Most Devastating thing we learn in the Epistle of Origen to Africanus. Is that after the death of John the church elders lost almost all doctrine and teaching. He writes that the church no longer knew the scriptures of the coming of the life of the death of the resurrection of Jesus Christ as well as the second and third witnesses of all he taught and the Apostles taught. Origen writes that in reading the gospels the church fathers no longer understood many things that Christ did and taught. Origen writes that the church fathers called in rabbis to teach them these things. THIS WAS HIGH TREASON against Jesus Christ. When we read the earliest epistles of the apostolic fathers these confirm this. As the first written according to tradition by a man that sat under the Apostle John in Ephesus. This is significant as he does not quote John one single time in the Epistle. He writes of a great heresy which is not one. and he writes for the people to pray that he FIGHT WELL against the beasts. In the writings of Romans we find that during this period that these early church fathers determined that the short cut to get to heaven was Death By Roman. So they write Rome from guidance in a number of pieces of correspondence where Roman speak of Christians in outposts were showing up in droves confessing they were christians to be slain by Romans or sent to Rome to die by the beasts. There are at least three letters recording this. So in Origen we find a shocking loss of ALL TEACHING in scripture and a loss of understanding what Jesus said and did fulfilling scripture that was all lost. In Pliny we find about this mass suicide of Christian in the early 120's. We find in the Apostolic Father's writings after that period in the first decades a complete absence of scripture or Gospel and of Epistle being taught we find a commandment from no where source to meet in meetings, and a prayer to die fighting beasts well. Not for the glory of Christ or the Gospel. Further since I have a copy of the Talmud we find several doctrines and traditions of the Rabbis that are taught in the church to this day. One is that Eve had sex with the serpent. This is nowhere found in scripture. Not mentioned by Christ or the Apostles but mentioned only by the Rabbis in the Talmud which was taken from the Targums. that Jesus and Paul both cite and quote and rebuked the rabbis for a number of other teachings. All of which can be found recorded in the Talmud. So when oh when is the succession of Peter FIRST MENTIONED in a writing? And when is the first mention of these early saints recorded? It is in the Late fourth or Early fifth century that these things first appear. To give the Pope Greater Authority as coming directly from Peter this appeared when the eastern Church was fighting with Rome over the authority of certain traditions. These traditions are a rotting festering corpse. Take a look again and the writings of the earliest Apostolic Fathers as they do not list the DEATH DATE of a single apostle. Not Peter not John not James not Paul.
@@fadiabdallah8388 it depends on how you define Theophilus As a greek word meaning Lover of God to whom Luke and Acts are written for Or a Greek name which a number of souls had that name including a person recognized by the Catholic and Greek Orthodox churches as a Saint. Then not so much And as to being an Academic in this day I have been rebuked by person and preachers for knowing too much Greek too much Hebrew that i know any Latin and that i know too much church history or or or. As Bible Languages and Church History were abandoned about two generations ago as courses of study. So the younger Generation Despises any they deem educated. The world was like this in 1970 when i was in Junior High and Senior High School as anti education became big. Here 50 years later this is now firmly in Bible Believing churches that are no longer bible believing but Tradition bases as much as the other denominations they Despise. The Day of Excellence with withering away before our eyes.
St.Apollinaris 👼
Pray for us 🙏
Didn't know why Jesus chose 12, thanks for that bit of info. God bless you.
Loved learning all of this. Thank you
Thank you Father!
Thank you what a super gift... Great prayers, satchelled 😁
Praise the Lord Jesus christ!
Think God Thank Jesus
Amen
St.Apollinaris from Ravena,pray for us.Amen
Boy, does this sermon ring true in today's N.O churches. 🌹
What is n.o.
@@skojigoquist9288 the new mass or Norvous Ordo Mass.
❤️
Once when Lazarus saw a man stealing a mud pot he said: " A piece of soil is stealing a piece of soil ". After Our Lord rose Lazarus from there tomb, he (lazarus) never smiled after that says a saint.
Could someone please remind me what Church document it is that gives the laity a right to have a TLM at their parish?
I think it is a papal document?
I dont remember. Thanks..
MOTU PROPRIO SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM
Does anyone know what priest is talking?
I don’t, but this link was in the notes for the video- maybe he’s from this church? www.olmcfssp.org/index.php/olmc
Why do they know the day but not the year?
Jesus should take much better care of his preachers than He did Apollinaris.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollinaris
lol!!! I’m sure St Apollinaris is well taken care of ;)
We have studied church history for 45 years.
First and foremost from the book of acts to the last Epistles written there is NOT ONE SINGLE RECORD of anything that man spoke of Lazarus Mary Magdalene (Magdalene is Aramaic) or Mary being put on a boat and founding an order of nuns or living in caves.
(This is strike one)
Strike 2 is the writing of the Apostolic fathers we have about 240 years of writings. In these Not One of these claims are ever made. Much less of Peter making this Bishop and the Claimed Apostolic succession from Peter onward. Not One of these men that was constructed in this succession is named in the bible as having received Succession from Peter. The Succession of Peter was also unknown in all of the writings of the apostolic fathers (For over 240 years) (This is strike 2)
Strike 3 is Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History This Book was commission by Constantine
to give a history between the death of Christ all the way to Constantine. Eusebius in searching all the records of all the churches Did not find a listing of one of these early saints. Not one name. and did not find one mention of Lazarus, Mary Magdalene or Many traveling and founding anything. Nor did Eusebius find one mention of an Apostolic succession. These records running from scripture to Pentecost until Constantine Are Insurmountable.
As we have three witnesses as commanded in the whole of Scripture. For out of the mouth of two and three witnesses shall every WORD (This includes teaching doctrine and revelation) be established or find their foundation.
Further in the days of Constantine not one of these records existed and neither were any of these celebrated as saints. This is the reason many churches no longer teach church history as this destroys many man made doctrines and many man made traditions.
As in church history beginning with the writings of the Apostolic fathers Eusebius Ecclesiastical History and the Nicene Fathers we find recorded the introduction of many of these doctrines and traditions when they were first proposed.
The Most Devastating thing we learn in the Epistle of Origen to Africanus. Is that after the death of John the church elders lost almost all doctrine and teaching. He writes that the church no longer knew the scriptures of the coming of the life of the death of the resurrection of Jesus Christ as well as the second and third witnesses of all he taught and the Apostles taught. Origen writes that in reading the gospels the church fathers no longer understood many things that Christ did and taught.
Origen writes that the church fathers called in rabbis to teach them these things. THIS WAS HIGH TREASON against Jesus Christ.
When we read the earliest epistles of the apostolic fathers these confirm this. As the first written according to tradition by a man that sat under the Apostle John in Ephesus. This is significant as he does not quote John one single time in the Epistle. He writes of a great heresy which is not one. and he writes for the people to pray that he FIGHT WELL against the beasts.
In the writings of Romans we find that during this period that these early church fathers determined that the short cut to get to heaven was Death By Roman. So they write Rome from guidance in a number of pieces of correspondence where Roman speak of Christians in outposts were showing up in droves confessing they were christians to be slain by Romans or sent to Rome to die by the beasts. There are at least three letters recording this.
So in Origen we find a shocking loss of ALL TEACHING in scripture and a loss of understanding what Jesus said and did fulfilling scripture that was all lost.
In Pliny we find about this mass suicide of Christian in the early 120's.
We find in the Apostolic Father's writings after that period in the first decades a complete absence of scripture or Gospel and of Epistle being taught we find a commandment from no where source to meet in meetings, and a prayer to die fighting beasts well. Not for the glory of Christ or the Gospel.
Further since I have a copy of the Talmud we find several doctrines and traditions of the Rabbis that are taught in the church to this day. One is that Eve had sex with the serpent. This is nowhere found in scripture. Not mentioned by Christ or the Apostles but mentioned only by the Rabbis in the Talmud which was taken from the Targums. that Jesus and Paul both cite and quote and rebuked the rabbis for a number of other teachings. All of which can be found recorded in the Talmud.
So when oh when is the succession of Peter FIRST MENTIONED in a writing? And when is the first mention of these early saints recorded? It is in the Late fourth or Early fifth century that these things first appear. To give the Pope Greater Authority as coming directly from Peter this appeared when the eastern Church was fighting with Rome over the authority of certain traditions.
These traditions are a rotting festering corpse. Take a look again and the writings of the earliest Apostolic Fathers as they do not list the DEATH DATE of a single apostle. Not Peter not John not James not Paul.
Are you a theophilus academic?
@@fadiabdallah8388 it depends on how you define Theophilus
As a greek word meaning Lover of God to whom Luke and Acts are written for
Or a Greek name which a number of souls had that name including a person recognized by the Catholic and Greek Orthodox churches as a Saint.
Then not so much
And as to being an Academic in this day I have been rebuked by person and preachers for knowing too much Greek too much Hebrew that i know any Latin and that i know too much church history or or or.
As Bible Languages and Church History were abandoned about two generations ago as courses of study.
So the younger Generation Despises any they deem educated.
The world was like this in 1970 when i was in Junior High and Senior High School as anti education became big.
Here 50 years later this is now firmly in Bible Believing churches that are no longer bible believing but Tradition bases as much as the other denominations they Despise.
The Day of Excellence with withering away before our eyes.