Acts

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
  • A theological inquiry as well as an example of, hopefully, consistent application of exegetical rules and norms.
    All Dividing Line Highlights' video productions and credit belong to Alpha and Omega Ministries®. If this video interested you, please visit aomin.org/ or www.sermonaudio...

Комментарии • 7

  • @promisejourney6326
    @promisejourney6326 Год назад +1

    Love this verse explanation 👏🏽👏🏽

  • @justinlundmark7879
    @justinlundmark7879 3 года назад

    It's kinda hard to imagine Peter having that much insight about the Gentiles being ingrafted in before Acts 10, but the promise is definitely limited to the repentant.

  • @robertnieten7259
    @robertnieten7259 2 месяца назад

    The fatal mistake if protestantism is to make there be one plan of salvation for the jews ( Acts 2:38) and another one ( Romans ch 10) for the gentiles. If that were the case then there would still be two seperate plans today.
    Paul said," There are neither jews nor gentles,bond nor free, male nor female, because we are all one in Christ Jesus"(Gal.3:28).

  • @PreachermanPiper
    @PreachermanPiper 4 года назад

    I’m surprised that your adamant on including baptism in receiving Jesus Christ.

    • @foxsdream
      @foxsdream 4 года назад +2

      About reading what the Bible says and talking about what the Bible says?

    • @Vae07
      @Vae07 4 года назад +2

      If Jesus said to be baptised in his name...who are you to question HIM
      Not that Doctor White said anything about baptism being necessary for salvation

    • @optik88
      @optik88 3 года назад

      I dont think that is what he said at all.