@@destroymennardshippers1701 My knowledge about dinos is aged, so please correct me if what I say is outdated and wrong. Isn't it believed that juvenial T-rex is Nanotyrannus lancensis which was at first clasified as different species and growing up was losing some of the teeth and feathers leaving mane?
Most images he used are from prehistoric wildlife,which is known for having outdated silhouettes and inaccurate sizes. For example,Dilophosaurus is a lot more robust than what the chart showed
"Most image he used are from prehistoric wildlife" bruh the fucking video is literally about which prehistoric anime if they were alive today from every fucking state
I know drawing on top of skeletons can be pretty inaccurate if you don't pay attention to the other facts about the animals. That could've been a huge contributor
Actually the Gastornis was a herbivorous extinct big bird,but with most thing on this list if you mess with them,they probably would destroy you. Also though Mastodons we're like elephant,they were separated from ancient elephants,also Dunkleostus was from a prehistoric group of fish similar to bony fish that why they have armor either way this was a great video,hope you have a good day.
6:56 so in incredibly simplified terms since T.rex is a coelurosaur and its distant tyrannosauroid relatives had feathers,people think it too had feathers. But since rex is far too large for feathers to actually be useful to it,it's far more likely that it was either featherless,or had an incredibly sparse coat of feathers(kinda like rhino or elephant hair)
I can't stop thinking about how fun it seems to just climb into the beak of one of these giant birds and just let it take me places. Assuming that it doesn't kill me, that'd be amazing
@@Proftrof Relicanth is based on the coelacanth and fun fact: They still around, and look like small scale versions of Dunkleostius. You can find them in the western parts of the Indian Ocean.
Was thinking of doing a stream or 2 this week not too sure got a lot of stuff i am dealing with currently but i will announce it when it is happening .
Autistic and Inbred are different af. I have autism and it has no outward differences other than fidgety motion, and even then you would not know some Autistic people on sight, and Inbred is literally very damaging to DNA, to the point of extreme physical mutation enough times down the line. Down Syndrome people would also have physical differences, but like Autism they would happen just by accident cause nature's lottery, while making an inbred child requires conscious decision and is typically not an accident. Not mad, just clarifying a bit for anyone who will listen. But yeah, an Inbred Rhino and Hippo combo is what that would look like. Pelicans and pterosaur would have been similar so yeah they would try to swallow you whole.
If you read this I'm from North Carolina the state I would have been I probably would have died if I them dinosaurs that we had over here would of still been here.
Yeah hunting mammoth is not easy, throwing spear is not going to be enough, caveman hope the spear to penetrate the mammoth's skin and kill it. By the time the spear penetrate the skin caveman probably already pass 10 if they are not careful. All the tactic caveman used are also risky
@@KietTuan-nh7rw I mean cavemen were able to hunt mammoths into extinction, if they were alive today they'd be killed the same way elephants were killed
@@xxtuberpro4093 Idk there are 2 way this can go. They either evolve and breed into a large population or they can just evolve and still in an endanger species list and not allow to kill. Cannot deny that they still can be kill by gun.
"this thing don't eat people though" neither does an elephant but it'll still fold you.
Same for hippos
7:00 You may not know it but about decade ago it was found that many dinos, including T-Rex, had feathers
That isn't really confirmed, it's believed that young Tyrannosaurs had feathers but they lost them as they matured.
@@destroymennardshippers1701 My knowledge about dinos is aged, so please correct me if what I say is outdated and wrong. Isn't it believed that juvenial T-rex is Nanotyrannus lancensis which was at first clasified as different species and growing up was losing some of the teeth and feathers leaving mane?
@@Krokmaniak I am unsure right now, but it's unlikely for adults to have feathers cuz they are just too big for the feathers to be useful.
@@destroymennardshippers1701 I would say it can be useful for intimidation or attracting partners. Like lion's mane.
@@Krokmaniak True, true.
8:53 since most animals at the beginning of life were very bug like still and many still had their shells for a long time
Honestly this list can basically summed up as Land sea or sky we're all gonna die ahahaha
Here's a fun fact about dire wolves; recent DNA-analysis has proven that the Dire Wolves were not wolves at all. They were actually giant jackals.
Most images he used are from prehistoric wildlife,which is known for having outdated silhouettes and inaccurate sizes. For example,Dilophosaurus is a lot more robust than what the chart showed
"Most image he used are from prehistoric wildlife" bruh the fucking video is literally about which prehistoric anime if they were alive today from every fucking state
I know drawing on top of skeletons can be pretty inaccurate if you don't pay attention to the other facts about the animals. That could've been a huge contributor
I love how he looks normal but on the inside he's screaming about these animals.
I’m from Louisiana, we fish for big gar as a pastime. Gar are rather interesting fish, but they don’t usually taste good.
Actually the Gastornis was a herbivorous extinct big bird,but with most thing on this list if you mess with them,they probably would destroy you.
Also though Mastodons we're like elephant,they were separated from ancient elephants,also Dunkleostus was from a prehistoric group of fish similar to bony fish that why they have armor either way this was a great video,hope you have a good day.
I am from Arizona lucky I got a herbivore
Same bro
Wait, you lived in Rhode Island? You're the first RUclipsr I've seen that's lived in my home state!
With his hatred of birds, I was expecting argentavis (giant eagles). But I guess they were not in states.
those were in argentina, south america, not in the us
8:50 I see... So the armor meta was a thing on that era
Dunkleosteus was a creature living in the age before the fish even evolved bones.
4:14 yea we kill those but how many people you think got clapped to kill one of them
The video isn’t about weather we can take the animal or not .. just what lived in the areas of each state at some point in history.
6:56 so in incredibly simplified terms since T.rex is a coelurosaur and its distant tyrannosauroid relatives had feathers,people think it too had feathers. But since rex is far too large for feathers to actually be useful to it,it's far more likely that it was either featherless,or had an incredibly sparse coat of feathers(kinda like rhino or elephant hair)
Also we have scale impressions for rex and some other Tyrannosaurids
I can't stop thinking about how fun it seems to just climb into the beak of one of these giant birds and just let it take me places. Assuming that it doesn't kill me, that'd be amazing
There is a Pokemon based off of Dunkleostius: relicanth.
Oh lmao it is almost the same
@@Proftrof Relicanth is based on the coelacanth and fun fact: They still around, and look like small scale versions of Dunkleostius. You can find them in the western parts of the Indian Ocean.
No its the coelicanth
When are you gonna stream again btw prof? xD Were waiting for it
Was thinking of doing a stream or 2 this week not too sure got a lot of stuff i am dealing with currently but i will announce it when it is happening .
@@Proftrof noted prof hope it happens soon
I got lucky Mastodons were herbivores
Let's hope you don't have any cripples in your family, I heard herbivores like vegetables
I am godo then
@@langdonledwig3734 just because it is a herbivore doesn't mean it wouldn't fuck you up
True but I would be safer then most states
I must be from Puerto Rico, cuz I have a titanoboa right here 🤣👌😔😭
ayyyy
F in the chat for Puerto Rico
Well, I'm live in Indonesia and I don't know any prehistoric animal that live here except pigmi elephant and giant komodo
In nature everything gives the smoke.
The duck billed dinosaurs, imagine elephants or black Buffalo but biger
Hood Nature over exaggerated A LOT in this video. And sometimes he didn't even said species of Animals, sometimes he said their families
Autistic and Inbred are different af. I have autism and it has no outward differences other than fidgety motion, and even then you would not know some Autistic people on sight, and Inbred is literally very damaging to DNA, to the point of extreme physical mutation enough times down the line. Down Syndrome people would also have physical differences, but like Autism they would happen just by accident cause nature's lottery, while making an inbred child requires conscious decision and is typically not an accident. Not mad, just clarifying a bit for anyone who will listen. But yeah, an Inbred Rhino and Hippo combo is what that would look like.
Pelicans and pterosaur would have been similar so yeah they would try to swallow you whole.
8:24 proftoftherium
I live in Michigan I don’t think I’d have to worry about the mega beaver considering everyone in my town own like seven guns and they’re herbivores
Got the stag moose and if I never went out hopefully they won’t kill me.
Woolly Mammoths didn't went extinct because of humans
I'm in London and we got the baryonyx
Hmm.
Missouri got it bad that's where I live :(
I am a Mainer!
I'm from Finland 🇫🇮
If you read this I'm from North Carolina the state I would have been I probably would have died if I them dinosaurs that we had over here would of still been here.
Me:New Zealand
Yeah hunting mammoth is not easy, throwing spear is not going to be enough, caveman hope the spear to penetrate the mammoth's skin and kill it. By the time the spear penetrate the skin caveman probably already pass 10 if they are not careful. All the tactic caveman used are also risky
Woolly mammoths are smaller and weaker than African elephants and you know what happened to those
@@xxtuberpro4093 than it explain how caveman can hunt mammoths still risky
@@KietTuan-nh7rw I mean cavemen were able to hunt mammoths into extinction, if they were alive today they'd be killed the same way elephants were killed
@@xxtuberpro4093 Idk there are 2 way this can go. They either evolve and breed into a large population or they can just evolve and still in an endanger species list and not allow to kill. Cannot deny that they still can be kill by gun.
Poachers will likely get them or trophy hunters, and a gun will be more safe and effective than a spear, one shot to the head and any animal goes down
I kinda take offense of when you said autistic rhino sense i a am autistic but I understand it’s a joke
1st, 1 minute