Forgot ferdinand, but good vid, the jgpanzer e100 was never complete, it chasis existed, but never completed,its supposed to be e100/jgpanzer it either of those
@@Ryzenger I would actually stay back mounted is for one reason they changed the engine layout and then they built a structure over it similar to the Ferdinand but the issue with that is the weight would be to far back and it would lack good gun depression and it would be easy to hit the reason front mounted is more realistic than rear is because it would lower the profile and yes it would put more weight forward but would make the tank better dude too the angles and slopes.
Forgot ferdinand, but good vid, the jgpanzer e100 was never complete, it chasis existed, but never completed,its supposed to be e100/jgpanzer it either of those
He didn't forget it, he showed a different version of the line.
A better and more fitting name would be sturmgeschütz auf e100 fahrgestell, or "assault gun on e100 chassis"
Chassis for it never existed either, the E100 chassis existed, not the Jg
. Pz. E100 chassis
@emilrasmussen33 bruh
And nashorn too
Te quedó muy bien hermoso
Por favor el del 60 TP
Jagdpanzer E100 is a frictional tank the tank that existed was only E100 which never got in production only its prototype chassis existed
But the 170 mm gun planned to be in e100 its real tho
blue prints of jgpz e100 exists
@@seaman69. No blueprints exist, only the gun mount for a 15cm gun
@@hjug12542not the 17cm gun, the 15cm gun and only blueprints of the gun mount exist
Tank you
I see what you did there
@@Blurr1d0. huh
@@FIRECATWASXD funny pun
Nice
We don't actually know what the jpz e100 would have actually looked like because the blueprints are lost, we just guessed.
More realistically it would look more similar to the jadgpanther as to make it harder to hit and more armored
@@Old_user123 more like a jagdtiger tbh
@@Ryzenger yeah I reckon it would be like a jadgtiger but mixed with jadgpanther
@@Old_user123 centre mounted design is most realistic the front mounted is least realist one
@@Ryzenger I would actually stay back mounted is for one reason they changed the engine layout and then they built a structure over it similar to the Ferdinand but the issue with that is the weight would be to far back and it would lack good gun depression and it would be easy to hit the reason front mounted is more realistic than rear is because it would lower the profile and yes it would put more weight forward but would make the tank better dude too the angles and slopes.
jpanther ii was invented by WG
Ferdinant : am i a joke to you?
He didn't forget it, he showed a different version of the line.
Yes
I can't imagime it if this tank are built and smashed every defend on WW II 😁
But it will be slow
If it even got there without
Breaking down
Getting flanked
Getting bombed
Being abandoned
All of the above
Jagdpanzer E-100 it's just fantasy tank, the original one is E-100 & it's never finished.
There were blueprints for a 15cm gun mount but that's all there was
it in the game not real life
т34 братья