Don't panic guys. Talked to many people who have cleared prelims even earlier. They are scoring in the range of 80/90. V few people scoring high. So my prediction is cut off going to be surprisingly low around 80-85 for general ( 77/78 obc, 72-74 EWS) so start your mains preparation right away. Don't wait till the results.
Ma'am! With all due respect i want to differ on some points- 1)they asked the constituion status of country not the preamble's status 2)how we can say that on 26th January 1950 india was neither secular nor socialist, when we had article 25, 26(secular) and 39(b)(c)(socialist) 3) even we dont have federalism word in our preamble still we are federal in natire as per schedule 7 and rajya sabha itself 4) if its only about words then word secular is used in artcle 25 5)a constitution, which has made by dr ambedkar in light of pandit nehru, was neither secular nor socialist. How this can be possible
Dear Maa'm Though you are a renowned teacher but please consider my opinion. In the question of retured judge, constitution article 128 provide that CJI can " request" the retired person to sit and act as a judge. But upsc question said that CJI can "called back" the retired judge. I think both are different things. Request need consent but called back means an order and no consent is necessary there. If you are right; a person who remember every word of constitututiin may be cheated and a novice student will be true. Kindly consider and think for this.
Right to property is a constitutional right not a legal right ,UPSC has asked such questions before and they do differentiate between 'legal' & " constitutional"
In constitutional status of state wala question ma'am is relying on status of preamble on 26th january, 1950. which was not the question. It asks constitutional status and supreme court in Delhi Transport Corporation v DTC mazdoor Congress has clearly mentioned that "42nd amendment only made Something explicit which was already embedded in Indian constitution" and then they have discussed the next clause of preamble.
Day before preliems, I watched the only headline of the news in kannada, they say aryan will be in judicial custody for some days and he will be in tihar jail, so i eliminated police station option.
In federal character ... option B might be talking about rajya Sabha...union legislature (ls +rs) has elected representatives from constitute units i.e states
InsightsOnIndia has selected B only. But, even the British Parliament has MPs from it's constituent elements like Scotland. But Britain is not federal. So, B sounds right but, B is wrong.
With reference to Indian judiciary, consider the following statements : 1. Any retired judge of the Supreme Court of India can be called back to sit and act as a Supreme Court judge by the Chief Justice of India with prior permission of the President of India. A High Court in India has the power to review its own judgement as the Supreme Court does. 2. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Its answer is B (2 only) and Madom said both (Read M.Laxikant 6th edition page no. 26.4)
I got confused about the "constitutional status" question because the constitutional was secular from the very first day, it was only explicitly mentioned as so in the 42nd amendment act...
Anwer will be definitely “D” because he Supreme Court of India in the 1994 case S. R. Bommai v. Union of India established the fact that India was secular since the formation of the republic. Also article 38 has characters of Socialism ab initio.
Hello shubhra mam, please give a look on my argument regarding the question related to liberty question..... Why it can't be a COMMITTED JUDICIARY to protect the liberty.... Afterall there is no mention of to whom judiciary is committed to .... We all know, judiciary is the Guardian of the Constitution.... So, it can be a judiciary committed to uphold Constitution..... It is upon judiciary to define basic features of the Constitution.... Like separation of power itself... If judiciary is not committed to uphold the Constitution, then the principle of separation of power will itself be at the mercy of legislature..... Kindly tell us, what this committed judiciary mean.... Committed to whom?????? 🙏🙏
Mam does preamble represents constitutional status? On 26th Jan 1950 is it like that if secular and socialist words are not mentioned in the Preamble, does it mean that socialist and secular is missing from our constitution?
Some doubts...and my interpretaions : Committed judiciary in true sense should mean the judiciary is performing its duties with due diligence and honesty to uphold/safeguard the constitution and thus liberal democracy feature (implicitly) 2. Independent judiciary is needed even if a country is not federal nature so it is not unique/essential to a federal structure only. But on the other hand states representees in RS is a depiction of federal feature. Therefore more than one answer can be correct in those Qs And in that referral to Constitutional bench Q ,,besides what mam said one more point is there...CJI only (not Suprem Court)who refers the case
No man, the article clearly mentions, " save by authority of law ." For enemy properties, the act is already there. It will act as an exception in this case.
Recently Enemy property Act in news where it is mentioned property of enemy will be sold. As per this law, I think Right to property is available only for Citizens only
@26:31 Article 128 - the "NJAC" requests retired Judge of SC to sit and act as Judge of SC, with previous consent of President. No role of "Chief Justice of India" is mentioned. Hence, the given statement is incorrect.
@30:20 not quoting Montesquieu how can separation of powers be safegaurd for liberal democracy ?? There are separation of powers in many states like pakistan etc I think committed judiciary is the answer !
N gopalaswamy ayynger committee in 1950s was also formed for recommending on role of secretaries and ministers.....to look into admin reforms....and dopt was in 1970 was placed under cabinet secretariat which is under pm charge....it should be both correct......
Ma'am why do we need to interpret "committed judiciary" as being favourable to government, as the context was not india. Judiciary can even be committed to constitutional values, plz Help.
Also, isn’t the fundamental rights the best safeguard of liberty? Aren’t FRs pointless without a committed judiciary and hence article 32 becomes the heart and soul of the constitution?
20. My opinion. What is liberal democracy? Seperation of powers is (already) an inherent feature of a liberal democracy. It is something already there. If there were no seperation of powers, the state can't be called a liberal democracy. It's not wanting. So, the right choice should be A (committed judiciary- committed to constitution and rule of law). Right choice could have been D, if liberal democracy was not specifically mentioned.
I have a doubt- In case of Retired judge, the constitution explicitly mentions the term “Request” that is, only if retired judge is willing to sit. So how can we use the term “Called”, shouldn’t it be requested? I ticked (2 only) based on this logic^
Maam but the question asks what is the exact constitutional status of india at 26 th jan 1950, and HON SC has time and again mentioned that even though 42 nd CAA added these words secular and socialist the principles were already a part of constitution and were implicitly mentioned what 42 nd CAA did was only mentioned it explicitly.
It's not "legal" but " constitutional" right. UPSC has asked such questions in past & one can deduce that they differentiate between 'legal' and "constitutional" right. They added the 'any person' part to eliminate any subjectivity , hence the argument posed by Shubhra Ranjan or any other faculty stands invalid. Right answer would be option D. I'm surprised how every institute & academy is stating B as correct answer
Constitutional right r of two type first is statutory right and second is legal right.... So basically legal right is subset of constitutional right. Than answer is it's legal right.
26:10 Ma'am should not the prior consent of the retired Judge be taken too??? As the statement says "Any" retired judge ...But I think only those retired Judges who give their prior consent.
A legal right can be amended by ordinary legislative process ie simple majority of parliament but a constitutional right such as 300A requires constitutional amendment. If 300A can't be taken away by an ordinary legislation then how can it be called as simple legal right?
Sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic, republic. Every feature were indirectly mentioned in our republic Day Constitution. Socialist- DPSP, Secular- FR etc. we have added socialist secular through amendment in our preamble. 🤔 ➡Edited
mam but in CJI appt. to retired judges with prior recommendation of president. there is also provision that they need approval of retired judge also. so statement 1 may be wrong
About the arc question B may be correct, coz it was created under cabinet secretariat but it was asked under prime minister , and cabinet secretariat is under pm..correct me if I am wrong
I think question 20s answer will be c.just take recent afganistan example.there is a separation of power but not elected government.then afganistan is a most liberal.
In question No. 3 the Anwer will be definitely “D” because he Supreme Court of India in the 1994 case S. R. Bommai v. Union of India established the fact that India was secular since the formation of the Republic. Also article 38 has characters of Socialism ab initio.
Mam please make a video that why these questions were asked meaning wrt current affairs or something else. And also how to develop such clarity while doing self study, and what source to follow? Thank you
Aryan Khan’s drug case helped me to solve the question on Judicial Custody correctly.
Starkids are atleast of some use..
😂😂😂😂
@@infinitegaming1296 🤣
😂💯
😁😁😁
Q1. 4:09
Q2. 6:11
Q3. 12:11
Q4. 13:03
Q5. 14:25
Q6. 16:33
Q7. 18:52
Q8. 21:29
Q9. 22:16
Q10. 23:26
Q11. 25:09
Q12. 26:08
Q13. 27:49
Q14. 29:03
Q15. 30:25
Q16. 33:57
Q17. 35:00
Q18. 35:31
Q19.
@34:52 Cabinet Secretariat is directly under the charge of Prime Minister of India. The second statement is correct.
I remember , all topics she discussed here is from her class.. Trust me. She is best for Polity.
AND THE LEGEND CONTINUES!!!!! CANT BELIEVE ITS BEEN 10 YEARS SINCE I BECAME HER STUDENT!!!
Subhra ranjan mam is a gem of polity ❤
Don't panic guys. Talked to many people who have cleared prelims even earlier. They are scoring in the range of 80/90. V few people scoring high. So my prediction is cut off going to be surprisingly low around 80-85 for general ( 77/78 obc, 72-74 EWS) so start your mains preparation right away. Don't wait till the results.
Tq madam
80% of my questions were done right
Congratulations Brother. All the best.
Ma'am! With all due respect i want to differ on some points-
1)they asked the constituion status of country not the preamble's status
2)how we can say that on 26th January 1950 india was neither secular nor socialist, when we had article 25, 26(secular) and 39(b)(c)(socialist)
3) even we dont have federalism word in our preamble still we are federal in natire as per schedule 7 and rajya sabha itself
4) if its only about words then word secular is used in artcle 25
5)a constitution, which has made by dr ambedkar in light of pandit nehru, was neither secular nor socialist. How this can be possible
Dear Maa'm
Though you are a renowned teacher but please consider my opinion.
In the question of retured judge, constitution article 128 provide that CJI can " request" the retired person to sit and act as a judge.
But upsc question said that CJI can "called back" the retired judge.
I think both are different things.
Request need consent but called back means an order and no consent is necessary there.
If you are right; a person who remember every word of constitututiin may be cheated and a novice student will be true.
Kindly consider and think for this.
Right to property is a constitutional right not a legal right ,UPSC has asked such questions before and they do differentiate between 'legal' & " constitutional"
Right to Property is both Constitutional as well as Legal right.
Play video with 1.5x speed... It helps... Thank you shubhra ma'am for your analysis....
Thank you so much Ma'am for your valuable analysis of UPSC CSE 2021(Preliminary) Question Paper.
In constitutional status of state wala question ma'am is relying on status of preamble on 26th january, 1950. which was not the question. It asks constitutional status and supreme court in Delhi Transport Corporation v DTC mazdoor Congress has clearly mentioned that "42nd amendment only made Something explicit which was already embedded in Indian constitution" and then they have discussed the next clause of preamble.
Day before preliems, I watched the only headline of the news in kannada, they say aryan will be in judicial custody for some days and he will be in tihar jail, so i eliminated police station option.
Most precious words from the ma,am 🌹
I found She is one of the best teacher while I search 2021 polity explanation
In federal character ... option B might be talking about rajya Sabha...union legislature (ls +rs) has elected representatives from constitute units i.e states
I got the same doubt !!
I thought the same
InsightsOnIndia has selected B only. But, even the British Parliament has MPs from it's constituent elements like Scotland. But Britain is not federal. So, B sounds right but, B is wrong.
Even unitary governments have independent judiciary. It’s B for sure. Hope someone sends representation.
@@vansh.vardhanjha members from Scotland represent people not constituent. India’s RS and US Senate represent constituent elements.
With reference to Indian judiciary, consider the following statements :
1. Any retired judge of the Supreme Court of India can be called back to sit and act as a Supreme Court judge by the Chief Justice of India with prior permission of the President of India. A High Court in India has the power to review its own judgement as the Supreme Court does.
2. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Its answer is B (2 only) and Madom said both (Read M.Laxikant 6th edition page no. 26.4)
Q) 4 repeated from last year's. Options just got elaborated a bit...
How many according to your analysis from the entire paper. Could you list topic-wise be it direct or indirect?
Hence proved that Laxmikant is no guarantee for polity prelims.
Shubhra mam best polity faculty for IAS
Shandaar discussion
Damdaar questions 🙏🙏
Ma'am please 🙏 PSIR OPTIONAL का हिन्दी में भी बैच लाए 🙏
I got confused about the "constitutional status" question because the constitutional was secular from the very first day, it was only explicitly mentioned as so in the 42nd amendment act...
I did the same.
Answer will be D
Anwer will be definitely “D” because he Supreme Court of India in the 1994 case S. R. Bommai v. Union of India established the fact that India was secular since the formation of the republic. Also article 38 has characters of Socialism ab initio.
Hello shubhra mam, please give a look on my argument regarding the question related to liberty question..... Why it can't be a COMMITTED JUDICIARY to protect the liberty.... Afterall there is no mention of to whom judiciary is committed to ....
We all know, judiciary is the Guardian of the Constitution.... So, it can be a judiciary committed to uphold Constitution.....
It is upon judiciary to define basic features of the Constitution.... Like separation of power itself...
If judiciary is not committed to uphold the Constitution, then the principle of separation of power will itself be at the mercy of legislature.....
Kindly tell us, what this committed judiciary mean.... Committed to whom?????? 🙏🙏
Mam does preamble represents constitutional status? On 26th Jan 1950 is it like that if secular and socialist words are not mentioned in the Preamble, does it mean that socialist and secular is missing from our constitution?
Some doubts...and my interpretaions :
Committed judiciary in true sense should mean the judiciary is performing its duties with due diligence and honesty to uphold/safeguard the constitution and thus liberal democracy feature (implicitly)
2. Independent judiciary is needed even if a country is not federal nature so it is not unique/essential to a federal structure only. But on the other hand states representees in RS is a depiction of federal feature.
Therefore more than one answer can be correct in those Qs
And in that referral to Constitutional bench Q ,,besides what mam said one more point is there...CJI only (not Suprem Court)who refers the case
If this is so..
Then all persons also includes the persons of enemy nation also..
So, does the Right to Property is available for enemy aliens also?
Smart objection tho
This would complicate issue of Kashmir as well maybe this is why questions was asked.
No man, the article clearly mentions, " save by authority of law ." For enemy properties, the act is already there. It will act as an exception in this case.
Yes enemy property comes under home ministry .. Govt auctions it🤣🤣🤣
Exactly answer is 1 only
In the judiciary questions- ans is A
HC has power but not as the sc
Thanks mam 🙏
.
12 correct 😍
4 wrong 😬
2 skipped 🤔
In case of retire judges prior recommendation of that person is too required.
Recently Enemy property Act in news where it is mentioned property of enemy will be sold. As per this law, I think Right to property is available only for Citizens only
Property of enemy wl b sold means Pakistan. Not of others
Exactly, same I thought.
I was confused between right to citizen vs right to everyone. Did Right to Citizen.
Mam,your voice is very clear.
Thanks Madam... At 25:00 wonderful explanation for Federal character of constitution...
Mam you are awesome... The way you teach is just sublime 😍❤
@26:31 Article 128 - the "NJAC" requests retired Judge of SC to sit and act as Judge of SC, with previous consent of President. No role of "Chief Justice of India" is mentioned. Hence, the given statement is incorrect.
Laxmikant ki book me diya hai and the statement is correct. Please see the book
Nice to understand your discussion mam..really im so appreciate
@30:20 not quoting Montesquieu how can separation of powers be safegaurd for liberal democracy ?? There are separation of powers in many states like pakistan etc I think committed judiciary is the answer !
Good..but upsc goes with philosophers
I also think same... Marked the answer with similar logic
N gopalaswamy ayynger committee in 1950s was also formed for recommending on role of secretaries and ministers.....to look into admin reforms....and dopt was in 1970 was placed under cabinet secretariat which is under pm charge....it should be both correct......
Please provide PSIR Optional class lectures on RUclips as well for students who can't afford coaching. My highly request. 🙏🙏
They won't. They would lose money if they do so!
What is known as the shield of direct democracy (a) recall (b) plebiscite (c) referendum)(d) initiative.
Please ma'am give answer with explanation
Very very usefull lecture mam
best Analysis thank u maam.👌👌
Other Channels pe Log Kuch ka kuch bta rahe h ""Google"" ke bharose hai aadhe channel 😡
Ma'am why do we need to interpret "committed judiciary" as being favourable to government, as the context was not india. Judiciary can even be committed to constitutional values, plz Help.
Exactly. 👏
And in Britain there is nothing like exact separation of power, still it uphold liberty casue of committed judiciary
Also, isn’t the fundamental rights the best safeguard of liberty? Aren’t FRs pointless without a committed judiciary and hence article 32 becomes the heart and soul of the constitution?
Commited judiciary is more logical in my opinion
20. My opinion.
What is liberal democracy?
Seperation of powers is (already) an inherent feature of a liberal democracy. It is something already there. If there were no seperation of powers, the state can't be called a liberal democracy. It's not wanting.
So, the right choice should be A (committed judiciary- committed to constitution and rule of law).
Right choice could have been D, if liberal democracy was not specifically mentioned.
I have a doubt-
In case of Retired judge, the constitution explicitly mentions the term “Request” that is, only if retired judge is willing to sit.
So how can we use the term “Called”, shouldn’t it be requested?
I ticked (2 only) based on this logic^
Yes it should be B.....retired judge consent is also required....
Aacha hu mam main aapke PSIR k notes padta hu isliye state aur liberal wale questions bana liya ❤️
3:00
Thank you mam. You are a great teacher.
Thank you so much Mam 🙏
Maam but the question asks what is the exact constitutional status of india at 26 th jan 1950, and HON SC has time and again mentioned that even though 42 nd CAA added these words secular and socialist the principles were already a part of constitution and were implicitly mentioned what 42 nd CAA did was only mentioned it explicitly.
Exactly like this federal term is not used in preamble still india is federsl in nature because we have schedule 7.
MPSC aspirants would have rocked this Polity section!!
I got the parole ans. Right just because of the movie" The Shawshank Redemption" .
How did you get that right from the movie? Is it not mentioned in our law book?
Same here..even I thought of Morgan freeman rejections in the movie.
@@doge3436 Common sense helps. Everything is not there in Laxmikant, which is considered as the Bible of UPSC. But others are wrong for Me.😢
The legend of Polity 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Regarding right to property, as it has been mentioned any person..can we say refugee have right to property?
It's not "legal" but " constitutional" right. UPSC has asked such questions in past & one can deduce that they differentiate between 'legal' and "constitutional" right. They added the 'any person' part to eliminate any subjectivity , hence the argument posed by Shubhra Ranjan or any other faculty stands invalid. Right answer would be option D. I'm surprised how every institute & academy is stating B as correct answer
Or a ENEMY ALIEN during war time
@@catdealer9932 completely agree with you. even upsc has asked it earlier . Right option is d
Ma'am my question to u : does gallantry awards also include in Balaji Raghwan case..?
12/19 scored
18 hi hai polity se 03:00
Ok. Thanks
Very nicely explained 👏 tqu mam😊🙏
I beleive mam right to property is neither legal nor fundamental right it is A constitutional right.
Yes
It is Both legal and Constitutional right under Article 300A by 44 CAA. But preference me legal First
Constitutional right r of two type first is statutory right and second is legal right.... So basically legal right is subset of constitutional right. Than answer is it's legal right.
Thanks
Thanks with gratitude mam ji ❤️❤️❤️
Thanks mam
Thanks for the clarity mam
Please provide detailed analysis of other subjects also 🙏🙏
Mam Constitution of liberty is written by Friedrich hayek if I'm not wrong the book written by Montesquieu is sprit of law...
26:10
Ma'am should not the prior consent of the retired Judge be taken too???
As the statement says "Any" retired judge ...But I think only those retired Judges who give their prior consent.
That is super obvious. No one can be appointed at any post without the consent of the person.
That is intrinsic to the statement!
Just search article 128.
U will get the same statement.
Without SUBHRAMAM PSIR is incomplete🙏🙏
A legal right can be amended by ordinary legislative process ie simple majority of parliament but a constitutional right such as 300A requires constitutional amendment. If 300A can't be taken away by an ordinary legislation then how can it be called as simple legal right?
Sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic, republic.
Every feature were indirectly mentioned in our republic Day Constitution. Socialist- DPSP, Secular- FR etc.
we have added socialist secular through amendment in our preamble. 🤔
➡Edited
I had the same doubt..they say that it is indirectly included in the original constitution and these terms added in preamble
Socialist, secular n integrity were added to preamble.
I have also the same doubt
@@kumkumkumari2566ha jaldibaazi me aisa ho gya
How can state definition be community of persons?
Polity, economy and history are moderate for me but.... Other sections are out of my reach.
mam but in CJI appt. to retired judges with prior recommendation of president. there is also provision that they need approval of retired judge also. so statement 1 may be wrong
Yes, i have same thought.
Mam isn't matter referred to const. bench by CJI, that's why he is called master of roster ?
I attempted 82 question mam
Art 300A is a constitutional right. 🙄
About the arc question B may be correct, coz it was created under cabinet secretariat but it was asked under prime minister , and cabinet secretariat is under pm..correct me if I am wrong
I think question 20s answer will be c.just take recent afganistan example.there is a separation of power but not elected government.then afganistan is a most liberal.
Very nice dear 👍 मैम
Super class mam
Your ans key and explanation is best ma'am 😅
Very nice explanation 🙏🙏
In question No. 3 the Anwer will be definitely “D” because he Supreme Court of India in the 1994 case S. R. Bommai v. Union of India established the fact that India was secular since the formation of the Republic. Also article 38 has characters of Socialism ab initio.
Your are great Mam🙏🏻🙏🏻
Thank you madam 💐🙏
Very very thanks mam 🙏
What does one domicile mean.. we can as indian live any part of India..except the states required ilp
Madam,...
Devi lal contested three constituencies in same general election it is right.
But the year was 1991 or 1980?
Please confirm...
Eci pdf says 1989 me lada..
What is the position of the Right to Property in India ? Is it available to enemy citizen? because any person encompass all type of Citizen.
Please provide analysis for science and tech also mam
Thank you mam for your efforts...#FutureUPSCaspirant
All the best
Mam is the best❤️
Mam..consent of supreme court judge....must be received......
.plz..revise it 🙏
Thank you so much mam
What is the name of the technology / software that Ma'am is using? It is so cool.
Mam please make a video that why these questions were asked meaning wrt current affairs or something else. And also how to develop such clarity while doing self study, and what source to follow?
Thank you
Mam, where can we study these legal amentments made cort?
As part of current afairs?
TQ Maam 🙏
Thank you🙏
Thank You 😇😇