Euro NCAP Crash & Safety Tests of Mercedes-Benz A Class - 2018 - Best in Class - Small Family Car
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- More information on our Best in Class awards www.euroncap.c... or www.euroncap.c...
Euro NCAP performs a series of crash tests on each model tested:
- a frontal impact test, the car impacts a rigid barrier
- an offset frontal impact test, 40% of the width of the car is striking a deformable barrier
- a pole test, the tested car is propelled sideways into a rigid pole
- a side impact test, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door
A series of pedestrian tests are conducted with different impactors, adult and child head form, lower and upper leg form and whiplash tests are performed on a sled.
Active safety is tested based on the car’s equipment: autonomous emergency braking systems (car to car, with a pedestrian and a cyclist target), lane support and speed assist technologies and seatbelt reminders.
All details on the Euro NCAP Website: www.euroncap.c...
![Active Emergency Stop Assist in Mercedes-Benz A Class real-life test :: [1001cars]](/img/1.gif)
2:19 the fact that it instantly released the brakes as the obstacle passed the lane is outstanding. Prevents collisions of follow on cars.
That may have been the driver.
Yeah i agree
That dummy must learns how to drive, they always hitting something
rajaobelina fitahiry I get it lol
@@forcedhaircut Same.
😂
he buys diffrent cars and luxuries and sports and still hits the same wall. money doesn't buy driving skills
A Smashing joke... 👍
Danke für die lauten Szenen zwischendurch 👌🏽🤦🏽♂️
Just bought one of these. Seems like the perfect first car. Been great for me so far. So many safety features.
7homas 0wen what was insurance like
@@hollygould855 1.5million a month. Pretty cheap
George002000™ happy days
@@hollygould855 I've got the 2018 A-Class had it as my first car cost me £2500 with a black box for my first year.
@@George002000 whats a black box?
Only in Mercedes I can accept to play the role of the dummies with no fears or worries!
Well in GTA VCS I could drive at over 200 kmh and my car doesn't deform, those days...
Vcs is taking place in 2172 where cars are immortal and safe for driver
Jaiden Zhou don’t you mean 200mph
Excellent AEB
....the best or nothing. ..
In this case nothing
@@PiotrNie well it is their cheapest car, same can be said for BMW and Audi's cheapest cars
@@PiotrNie in this case, it's just the safest car in its class...
@@petrolane77 Volvo V40 it is way better
@@davidcarvalho8067 sorry no volvo here ruclips.net/video/t0Y0EixmzYo/видео.html
Upload your video with
*_60FPS_*
PLEASE FOR RUclips SLOW motion
Very safe car good job Mercedes
Kevin Charmillot German cars are always safe and good.
已卄尺已几川丹几几 yeah absolutely
A MasterClass, isn't it ?
Nice car😍
What is happening to the glas roof if you crash like this?
Where is that scary background song?
@Ander Jr 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
It's in my pocket u want...
very nice pp
on youcar reuploads
I would hate to crash a perfect Mercedes.
тишина, тишина, тишина
БАААХ!!!!!
Разрыв сердца можно получить
What are they doing with wrecked cars afterwards? Scrapyard? Or maybe sell the remaining parts
Ramurel Pastrama give it back to Mercedes
Probably crush or destroy them
In the Mercedes showroom for sale
cut and shut
EuroNCAP continues ignoring the front small overlap test... Shame
Good car 👍 🍻
Yes, it's a well built car, and many other cars are the same these days
But lets be logical here, 50 km/h and 60 km/h is so slow for a street/real situations
It's almost the double whn it comes to the ability of the roads and cars of these days.
I mean, most of the cars today are able to reach 100 km/h (62 MPH) and its a very easy thing to do (normal thing)
So wouldn't be more realistic to raise the speed of the crash tests to 100 km/h at least
Even though you can do more with ease
It's because drivers brake before the impact. So they slow down from 100 to 60 because they've that noticed something went wrong and then the impact occurs.
@@Repa24
Well, you got a point there, but it will be interesting to see how the cars these days will perform in that situation, doesn't?!
i think they do it because most crashes happen in around that speeds. and propably because the car will perform at 100 the same than it did on 50. if it performs poorly already on 50 you dont have to test it with 100 and the other way around too
There is no way you survive a head on collision with 100 km/h with any car
Most crashes happen in cities, don't they? I sure hope people don't drive 100 km/h around town where you live.
very good !
I just tested the lateral crash in real life and I cant tell it works
1:11 !!!
Where is the small overlap test ???
Door opened during side test. Not a good thing
@Iris in an event of a collision, the should remain shut and only opens when the vehicle is in static condition.
@Iris 13 y/o much?
Godut Everest these test guys knows better than you that’s why they gove this car with super high mark . there’s nothing wrong with door . wear your dumb seat belt and you’ll stay on your seat
@@Nabilllllll but they aren't partial, the ford mustang got a very bad rating and it has a far better structure than this. While the iihs and the statistics signal that opening doors are a risk. Also iihs is managed by insurance companies, so they know more what they are talking about plus they are stricter
that's why you need wear seatbelts
1:05 yes pose for me hunny yes a little to the left
During side crash test door opened. It’s a bad thing
May I ask you why this is a bad thing? wouldn't it be a good thing, so you can easily exit the vehicle, or get rescued?
Stewart Tod sure. It may case that the driver would fell out of the car and when other damages occurred after the first something may protrude to the cabin and cause injuries.
Ford Explorer from 90s had similar problems but only with front crashes and due to that it had lowered score.
Kacper B it didn't open. I was bent.
Daniel Fl. They did. Take a closer look.
That's why you wear a seat belt, even in front crash test if you don't wear a seat belt you will be thrown out of the car from windshield, so impact on anyside doesn't matter if you don't wear seat belts, so the side impact and door open is not a problem it's actually a good thing so it's easy to come out after crash than the door getting jammed in crash.
No laser welded roof and hood only single latch!
Impressive!
Please do crash test for motorcycle..
Did these really need to have a full compliment with the washer fluid too? It did look pretty cool though
1:51 why did the bonnet open?
It's a safety feature for pedestrians to cushion the impact.
ActiveBonnet is the name of the feature. It has tubes in front bumper filled with some fluid. When you hit something fluid is not compressable so it raises the pressure in the sensor.
This is use to prevent backbone breakage when hitting pedestrians and has proven to be really usefull
The only con is the amount of pain thats required to get the front bumper back properly after removal in order to prevent Active Bonnet Control Inoperative message.
To reset the bonet after the activation just open it and press on relese tabs on the internal side of the bonnet latches.
Quite a good feature
やっぱメルセデスってすごいな
Me: Watches whole video
Also me: *What kind of cruelty is this*
The bad stuff I like these cars I want one
wow~very good👍👍👍
Door opened!?!?!?🙊
i will buy it
They use the same car in the AEB tests before they crash it into the barrier.
1997 ford transit vs 2019 ford transit crash test please
Mi aspettavo di meglio da un auto così
I drive a a class. The lane assist is breaking to aggressive it scares the hell out of me. The aeb is also very sensitive.I had once a situation of rolling out my car easy....there was a car about 100mtr in front of me turning left in to a parking...the aeb thinks i was not on board anymore and brakes full!! It makes you very agile all the time during driving now.
You can lower the sensitivity of the lane assist in preferences...
@@nachoci6876 ok, thanks for the info 👍👍
I think this was improved after the software update because at the beginning I thought I could have a heart attack and now it is OK
супер система
Do these safety systems come standart in all A class versions?
Thank you!
Rui Silva most of Them, Check the konfiguration
Yes
Yes: 7 airbags, emergency braking + pedestrian detection, attention assist, speed sign recognition and lane keeping is standard on all models.
As an option: Adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring, full traffic sign recognition, level 2 semi-autonomous driving, rear sidebags.
Almost every Luxury brand gets a 5star rating....
What is the liquid spilling out of the front during the crash?
Water for windshield
Vorsprung durch Technik
At front offset test also side airbags deployed, but with full frontal test only front airbags, what is logic?
That is because the offset crash involved sideways motion. That puts the driver's head at risk of injury from hard contacts such as the door pillar. In a full-width crash, the movement is forward then backward. Having airbags deploy unnecessarily could contribute to an injury, and they are not really needed in a full-width crash. As I mentioned earlier, the side airbags help mitigate injuries when the vehicle begins to slide sideways.
There are loads of armchair engineers commenting on the left bloody door. Yes it opened slightly but that's acceptable. I think NCAP understands road safety better than you.
Left front door opened to crash test bad result for customer
0:56 where does the star on steering wheel logo go? Its from hard plastic..
stay on stering wheel
Why is A class better than w213 E class?
Wow the windshield not a scratch
what is that thing that broke? it splashed a fair amount of water.
Ronald Cortez washer fluid
No difference other compact hatchbacks..side pole test doesnt look so good.
How were you expecting the Benz to respond to the tests? That the ride will come out without a scratch ?
Not if it was a side crash, the door opened and that's very dangerous
Cam you male a Crash Test wir the audi a1 2019
NO sound??????
first
Wieso zieht man einem Crash Auto AMG Felgen auf? Verschwendung!
hatten vlt einen kleinen Makel wie Kratzer oder sowas. Für den Kunden nicht geeignet, für den Crashtest noch gut
The car did great cause of nicki minaj
Exemplary results.
wow
I could’ve had that merc
Door opened. It's not good by the way
A
0:51 le pare brise à meme pas pété beau gosse :)
Nice, but most of the safety features, aren't from factory. You have to pay for.
Miguel Angel you have to pay for safety. Safety should be standard really. It’s good that Honda and Toyota are including all of their main safety features as standard
All of these safety features are standard
Хау мэни доларс?
3 ляма
Volvo for life
1:41 compared to the volvo v40 test (at 2:00), the v40 was at a 90 degree angle to the crash pole and the mecedes class-A is already more on the side ruclips.net/video/PivsJODHeks/видео.html without counting on the impact of pedestrians, Mercedes has a tougher bumper, and all other tests the V40 is better.
Between these two tests, you can see that the criteria are not the same, and that some brands benefit from this.
A tragic accident in northern Belgium between a recent Porsche and a Volvo v40. The driver of the Volvo, a woman who escaped unscathed from the accident. Unfortunately the passenger of the Prosche died.
The Porsche was completely destroyed and the Volvo v40 only got the front destroyed.
Porshe: kw.knack.be/medias/5800/2969617.jpg o1.ldh.be/image/thumb/5755487035708ea2d635a8c6.jpg
Volvo: nbocdn.akamaized.net/Assets/Images_Upload/2017/06/12/13640794-4f64-11e7-ac6d-400656d623a8_original.jpg?maxheight=460&maxwidth=638 www.focus-wtv.be/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/ongevalwoumen2_0.jpg?itok=gRAG1xbn
"www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&biw=1440&bih=789&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=ntwgXIHCFs3KwQKksaj4BQ&q=accident+dirk+de+vrise&oq=accident+dirk+de+vrise&gs_l=img.3...10028.17239..17746...0.0..0.72.762.13......1....1..gws-wiz-img.......35i39j0i19j0i8i30j0i30.WEG25DuE5mQ#imgdii=MfywP4Z5pzyhhM:&imgrc=6nvafFthWUUzIM:"
Looks to be an oblique crash you showed. that type of crash is not equal for both cars because they have to manage crash energy in different ways. The Porsche there got hit almost side so almost no crumple zone was able to give protection to the passenger. In the volvo however like 75 percent of the crumple zone was engaged, providing adequate protection. Also I don't understand how brands benefit from this criteria difference.
Passo no teste
1:51
почему капот приподнялся?
потому что мамку твою увидел
@@ThinktankUA, молодец, хорошо с острил. Вижу ты очень умный и мудрый человек. Как таких, как ты Земля ещё носит?
E o 180d
The door opened during the side impact test and it is not clearly highlighted in the official results as it should be!!! ( please look on the official site at the photo post test)
euroncap.newsmarket.com/find-a-car/mercedes-benz-a-class---euro-ncap-results-2018/s/adcb3136-4089-4987-8d22-8c48f4f1a851
Big safety issue. I guess Mercedes fixed the problem and this is why the rating applies only from the cars from this VIN number: WDD1770031J054450.
Anyway: EuroNCAP surely went easy on Mercedes specifying that: "Maximum points were scored in the side barrier impact, with good
protection of all body areas". Normally the car should receive an 1 point demerit if the door opens.( and then the performance of 96% will become 93% - quite low for a brand car like Mercedes... )
In my opinion this should have been clearly highlighted so that every consumer can understand.
한국인 지나감 2021 3.27
One of the few cars who's looks are improved by a crash. Did they accidentally approve the head designer's child's drawing of an old Daewoo?
I know, the new A class and CLS look absolutely hideous, but i hear that is gonna be their new design language across models. YUCK 😖
ЯРИК ВОДІЛА
Watch me
0:50 - Moulding comes off
1:52 - Head misses bonnet
1:54 - Headlight breaks
"quality"
😨😢😢😢😢😭😭😭😭😭
Le meilleur... Sinon RIEN
Ah canım mercedesim arabayı parçalamayın lan zaten o sağlamdır 😂
101763
Modern cars turn to shit when they impact something.
vsboy 25 indeed. That's kind of the point. Older cars held up physically... Because they didn't have energy absorbing structures. Quite often, the passengers' insides turn to jelly in older cars. Modern cars have various parts that are designed to collapse in order to absorb energy. A car can be replaced. The occupants cannot. For an eye opener, take a look at the (US) IIHS 50th anniversary celebration. They took a car from 1959, the year they got started, and crashed it head on into a car from 2009. It's a real eye opener.
I don't like Audi, BMW or Mercedes-Benz, they're beautiful, but in the inside is ugly and noisy...