omaygad blessing in disguise pala na pinaself study lang samin tong topic na to. nadiscover ko tuloy tong channel nyo po. Thank you so much PERFECT yung pagkaturo. reasonably certain na nagets ko sya talaga.
I think po pag ikaw yung nag file ng suit just like yung sa given example (yung pinakahuling example). Since ikaw nag seek ng damages, makakareceive ka ng asset pero dahil probable lang siya, contingent asset siya. Contigent liability naman po if ikaw yung maglalabas ng pera (pero possible outflow of resources lang). Bale sa POV nung pepper, contigent asset siya while sa POV nung Rain provision siya since probable.
ask ko lang po bat naging 1.07 yung minultiply sa illustrative #3 kung 7 % lang po yung nakaindicate na risk adjustment factor sa problem? Thank you in advance po!
that is to get the amount directly, so you can add 100% and the risk adjustment rate of 7% and multiply it rather than adding the 7%. in other words for shortcut purposes po.
omaygad blessing in disguise pala na pinaself study lang samin tong topic na to. nadiscover ko tuloy tong channel nyo po. Thank you so much PERFECT yung pagkaturo. reasonably certain na nagets ko sya talaga.
This channel is yung takbuhan ko talaga always. Thank so much, sir! ❤️
Thank you so much Sir! It was much clearer that our prof's discusion. I won't skip any ads ^^
We remain behind every time the language shifts from English. All in all it seems like a good lecture video
Thank you very much po sa maliwanag na explanations.God bless!
crystal clear explanation! thank you so much po!
I love how the characters on the examples are from how to get away with murder :)
Thank you very much for the detailed discussion. God Bless
Thank you sir!!! More powersss
more video lectures to come po
Thank you so much sir! God bless you!💛
Thank you sir. God bless po. 🥰
Thank you
Thanks po Sir Rain, 😀
thankkk youu po. great help po
THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR, GOD BLESS!
how will you know if it is contingent liability or contingent asset in a problem?
I think po pag ikaw yung nag file ng suit just like yung sa given example (yung pinakahuling example). Since ikaw nag seek ng damages, makakareceive ka ng asset pero dahil probable lang siya, contingent asset siya. Contigent liability naman po if ikaw yung maglalabas ng pera (pero possible outflow of resources lang). Bale sa POV nung pepper, contigent asset siya while sa POV nung Rain provision siya since probable.
Shocks the how to get away with murder names
Thank you sir!
thank you for this po!
thank you sir, Godbless po
Thank you!!
thankyou so much po sirrrr!
God bless sir
Thank you po!!!
Thank youu po!!!!
I will not be surprised if the names for the next lessons will be the characters from "suits" HAHAHHA
ask ko lang po bat naging 1.07 yung minultiply sa illustrative #3 kung 7 % lang po yung nakaindicate na risk adjustment factor sa problem? Thank you in advance po!
that is to get the amount directly, so you can add 100% and the risk adjustment rate of 7% and multiply it rather than adding the 7%. in other words for shortcut purposes po.
HOW TO GET AWAY WITH MURDER CAST IS COMING!!! PAVE WAY!!!
tegan price, htgawm! hahaha
Hi Sir, about po sa contingent liab and assets, yung percentage po ng possible -exacly 50% po ba or between 5%-50% po?
Thank you sir!!