I Like Your Videos..... I Still Remember Today When You Posted Air India Express Flight 1344 And Other Simulations..... Keep Going. Always Do Your Best.....Have A Good Afternoon....
@palco22 yes sir , I most certainly do agree with u, &. I am so very glad that the a/c was able to be returned to the apron w/o any loss of equptmente, nor any loss of the life of the pilots, who, by the way, were not named 😂😂😂😂😅😅😊
I saw the Fedex MD-11 that pulled up to the runway hold line behind the accident aircraft. That was an interesting choice (or maybe the simulator software did that on its own?). I flew for Fedex from the mid 90s to 2021 and I don't think we had a service to Algiers. Still cool to see the Mad Dog in the video though. You do great work with these accident reviews.
@@paulmorris4656 I remember once or twice when a FedEx MD-11 landed at Algiers airport. But I don't know if it was for cargo or if it was just a technical stopover.
Thanks for yet another very well done accident analysis! There are two occurrences during a takeoff run that absolutely make an abortion mandatory: If the aircraft rotates on it's own before VR and if the aircraft doesn't rotate properly when pulling on the yoke. Both occurrences point to a wrong loading of an aircraft and a CG out of the envelope! Cudos to the crew - very well done!
@@Milesco Yes, you are absolutely right on that! Given that one should check the trim settings as part of the before take off checks, that should become obvious long before applying takeoff power.
MPC. Do You Don't Mind If I Suggested You An Recreation Of An Flight? If Yes. Well........ Can You Do *Ariana Afghan Airlines Flight 701* And *Trigana Air Flight 267?* Thank You. And I Appriciate Your Work And Channel..... Have A Good Day....
The video states that the plane was carrying several tons of cargo. The 737-800 can carry 23.9 tons of cargo and empty weighs 47 tons. I would have thought that 2.5 tons, wherever it was placed, would have a minimal effect on the COG.
@@BabyFruitBat That's not what "several" means. It means more than two, but less than "many". It's certainly not limited to three. (And as a practical matter, an airline isn't going to waste money flying a plane that's nearly empty. So if, as you say, it can carry 23.9 tons of cargo, there's no way it's taking off with less than 12.) (Indeed, the perennial problem with cargo planes is *_overloading._* (Just look at Aerosucre! 😁))
They were lucky that it didn't fly. If it had got off and airborne the nose light/tail heavy could have caused it to have control problems that might have proved fatal.
I've seen a number of videos involving crashes, some involving deaths' which were owing to improper loading of cargo and I wonder whether those responsible were ever prosecuted for manslaughter (depending on the country) by being totally incompetent?
Hello There. How Is Your Day? I Hope I'm Not Being Annoying But..... Did You See The News Of The *DHL Lithuania Boeing 737 Crash* And *The Total Linhas Aéreas Flight 5682 Incident?*
Would appreciate if you can cover 2 crashes that occurred at almost the exact spot on a hillside coming into greater Cincinnati airport back in the 1960’s. I think in 1965 then in 1967. 2 commercial airliners. A Boeing 727 and I think a Convair 880. Thanks
This is a simulation. The fact that the flaps aren't deployed in the simulation doesn't mean they weren't deployed in the actual incident. In fact, this ( and most modern commercial planes ) have an automated system that warns the crew if the plane isn't properly configured for take off - including flaps not deployed..
It's a simulation. Just because the flaps aren't shown deployed in the simulation, doesn't mean they weren't in the actual situation. that's not covered in the simulation so I guess if you really want to know, you'll have to research the official report on the incident. IT'S S SIMULATION.
Please excuse my naivety, but if there was after " push back ", an automatic weight reading recorded on the nose wheels that was corelated to that of the main undercarriage, the longitudinal fuselage centre of gravity should be able to be precisely located + even compared to the centre of lift produced by wings + elevator at point of rotation. This would be displayed alongside the PFD.+ automatically calculated by one of your clever computers. If the disparity was UNHEALTHY, a throttle stopper would be immediately deployed. Apart from the standard pre flight exercises a precautionary throttle opening immediately following push back disengagement, would save fuel, time + therefore money.
This airline ought to be banned from European airspace; that they can't get something as simple as loading done correctly suggests major flaws in their systems
Absolutely not. Mistakes will happen. These pilots acted like true bosses and cancelled everything. We have seen examples of pilots that try to take off in cases like this - those are the ones to be wary of.
I Like Your Videos..... I Still Remember Today When You Posted Air India Express Flight 1344 And Other Simulations..... Keep Going. Always Do Your Best.....Have A Good Afternoon....
Unfortunately, finding competent people today is becoming a difficult task.
@palco22 yes sir , I most certainly do agree with u, &. I am so very glad that the a/c was able to be returned to the apron w/o any loss of equptmente, nor any loss of the life of the pilots, who, by the way, were not named 😂😂😂😂😅😅😊
@@ronaldmessina4229 names reserved 😊😊😊😊
! ❤ !!!
I saw the Fedex MD-11 that pulled up to the runway hold line behind the accident aircraft. That was an interesting choice (or maybe the simulator software did that on its own?). I flew for Fedex from the mid 90s to 2021 and I don't think we had a service to Algiers. Still cool to see the Mad Dog in the video though. You do great work with these accident reviews.
As a senior ATC in Algiers ACC, I can confirm that no FedEx aircraft services to Algiers airport. Only DHL and UPS flights do
@@chemseddinekhyes. Last year. Weight imbalance
Indeed we have never operated to Algiers, even on a charter basis
@@paulmorris4656 I remember once or twice when a FedEx MD-11 landed at Algiers airport. But I don't know if it was for cargo or if it was just a technical stopover.
Umm, fellers, that's a DC-10.
Thanks for yet another very well done accident analysis!
There are two occurrences during a takeoff run that absolutely make an abortion mandatory:
If the aircraft rotates on it's own before VR and if the aircraft doesn't rotate properly when pulling on the yoke. Both occurrences point to a wrong loading of an aircraft and a CG out of the envelope!
Cudos to the crew - very well done!
Or a problem with the elevator or stabilizer trim.
@@Milesco Yes, you are absolutely right on that! Given that one should check the trim settings as part of the before take off checks, that should become obvious long before applying takeoff power.
Hey MPC. Do You Mind If You Do It *China Mandarian Airlines Flight 642?* Have An Wonderful Week........
MPC. Do You Don't Mind If I Suggested You An Recreation Of An Flight? If Yes. Well........ Can You Do *Ariana Afghan Airlines Flight 701* And *Trigana Air Flight 267?* Thank You. And I Appriciate Your Work And Channel..... Have A Good Day....
MPC Is Busy. But It Will Se Your Comment Suggestion And Put In His Projects..... (I Think........)
Mauricio. Could You Make a Vídeo Of *USAF 50-702 Crash* And *TransAsia Flight 510?* Thanks And Have An Amazing Afternoon.....
I Think Or I Guess Mauricio See It And Put It On Your *"Reconstruction List"* And Thinks You're A Bot Because You Say The Same Thing.....
Mauricio. I Wanted To Know If You Could Do It *Bangkok Airways Flight 125* And *AirlinesPNG Flight 1600?* Have An Good Morning....
Did Mauricio See Your Comment Or He Is Busy......?
MPC. Do You Mind If You Make The Recreation Of *Iran Aseman Airlines Flight 6895* And *TAAG Angola Flight 452?* If Yes...... Ok. I Appreciated.....
I Think That They Already Say These Ideas To MPC An Long Time Ago.....
MPC. Do *Gulf Air Flight 771* And *Cameroon Airlines Flight 3701* Please?.....
Bruh. I Think That Already Recomended This.... But I Don't Know If Already Sayed......
The video states that the plane was carrying several tons of cargo. The 737-800 can carry 23.9 tons of cargo and empty weighs 47 tons. I would have thought that 2.5 tons, wherever it was placed, would have a minimal effect on the COG.
Who said anything about 2.5 tons?
@@Milesco Watch the video from 1:50. It states "several tons". Several means more than 2 but not that much more, 3 maybe.
@@BabyFruitBat That's not what "several" means. It means more than two, but less than "many". It's certainly not limited to three.
(And as a practical matter, an airline isn't going to waste money flying a plane that's nearly empty. So if, as you say, it can carry 23.9 tons of cargo, there's no way it's taking off with less than 12.)
(Indeed, the perennial problem with cargo planes is *_overloading._* (Just look at Aerosucre! 😁))
Fake vidéo.report please.
if I am correct, it also says that the CG was outside the safety envelope...not just to the aft, but outside...
They were lucky that it didn't fly. If it had got off and airborne the nose light/tail heavy could have caused it to have control problems that might have proved fatal.
I've seen a number of videos involving crashes, some involving deaths' which were owing to improper loading of cargo and I wonder whether those responsible were ever prosecuted for manslaughter (depending on the country) by being totally incompetent?
Air Algerie Cargo Flight 1208 CVR Transcript
2:37 TWR:Algerie 1208‚ cleared for takeoff runway 05.
2:42 F.O: Cleared for takeoff runway 05. Algerie 1208.
2:48 CAPTAIN: Ready.
3:22 F.O:80 knots.
3:25 CAPTAIN:Check.
3:50 CAPTAIN: Aborting!
4:10 F.O:Tower ‚ Algerie 1208‚ aborting takeoff. We had a tailstrike.
Hello There. How Is Your Day? I Hope I'm Not Being Annoying But..... Did You See The News Of The *DHL Lithuania Boeing 737 Crash* And *The Total Linhas Aéreas Flight 5682 Incident?*
Watching the video, it didn’t seem to have any flaps down…?
Would appreciate if you can cover 2 crashes that occurred at almost the exact spot on a hillside coming into greater Cincinnati airport back in the 1960’s. I think in 1965 then in 1967. 2 commercial airliners. A Boeing 727 and I think a Convair 880. Thanks
In the actual 7t-vjj, the engines are painted gray not red
Ah... i See... Well... It Isn't Was Mauricio Blame.... He Didn't Know That Unitl You Tell.....
I would love to know what sim you use for your videos!
El fokker 50 de avianca que despegó de Cartagena por la pista 01 desde intersección B, en vez de la 19; casi se accidentan.
Log master should sent home or jailed, dangerous move. Captain 👨✈️ should be strict
We never got this incident report , I am well placed to know .. where did you get this crap from?
Uhhh, surely the bigger problem here was that he tried to take off without flaps deployed?
This is a simulation. The fact that the flaps aren't deployed in the simulation doesn't mean they weren't deployed in the actual incident. In fact, this ( and most modern commercial planes ) have an automated system that warns the crew if the plane isn't properly configured for take off - including flaps not deployed..
@@davidquinn6161 THen the simulation is poor. Thanx for the details.
Not really. Since the flaps had nothing to do with the problem, their position is irrelevant.
@@davidquinn6161 A fully laden 737 rotating at 111 knots without flaps?? And you think that's not an issue ???? LOL
It's a simulation. Just because the flaps aren't shown deployed in the simulation, doesn't mean they weren't in the actual situation. that's not covered in the simulation so I guess if you really want to know, you'll have to research the official report on the incident. IT'S S SIMULATION.
Swissair 306 when
Coming soon
Just Wait For It..... The Time Will Tell Us When......
Pilots Names reserved 😊😊😊😊
Actually it because they forgot to select flaps for departure, normally Flap 5.
I notice that too.
Please excuse my naivety, but if there was after " push back ", an automatic weight reading recorded on the nose wheels that was corelated to that of the main undercarriage, the longitudinal fuselage centre of gravity should be able to be precisely located + even compared to the centre of lift produced by wings + elevator at point of rotation. This would be displayed alongside the PFD.+ automatically calculated by one of your clever computers. If the disparity was UNHEALTHY, a throttle stopper would be immediately deployed. Apart from the standard pre flight exercises a precautionary throttle opening immediately following push back disengagement, would save fuel, time + therefore money.
So what happened to the geniuses that loaded the plane so poorly that it got damaged and could have killed the pilots?
Flaps not configured for takeoff.
Pilot error
SIM doesn't support slat or flap settings.
This is a Microsoft Flight simulator on a laptop computer ..
This airline ought to be banned from European airspace; that they can't get something as simple as loading done correctly suggests major flaws in their systems
Absolutely not. Mistakes will happen. These pilots acted like true bosses and cancelled everything. We have seen examples of pilots that try to take off in cases like this - those are the ones to be wary of.
Loadmaster at fault. If i was a freight dog id have to look at every load personally
It was unbalanced. The capitaine failed to check properly the weight placement
Et la fiche technique du pilote!
"whose names are reserved".....WTH, why?
Because of the laws and country's restricted policies..... Now you understand?
What IS the name of this game of flight simulator ?
Must bi over weight.. 😊
Yup.....
… be…
Nur wer englisch wirklich kann sollte es auch sprechen.
Der Deutsche gehört nicht dazu.
Is there trans over weight too?
Asking for a shy plus size friend ☺
Overloaded
STOP fooling people with fake news and false title !!! Please state clearly on your vids that all is SIMULATION !!!!
554
Please its a Fake news thats not Real its just a game called flight simulater
Fake vidéo.please report for misleading