How do we KNOW light is a wave?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 июн 2019
  • We might not have unified electrodynamics until 1865, but we've known light was a wave since the original double-slit experiment in 1801. Let's talk about diffraction and wave interference.
    ________________________________
    VIDEO ANNOTATIONS/CARDS
    Where Does Light Come From?
    • Where Does Light Come ...
    What the HECK is Energy?
    • What the HECK is Energy?
    The Color White Does NOT Exist:
    • The Color White Does N...
    ________________________________
    RELATED RUclips VIDEOS
    Veritasium on Double-Slit:
    • The Original Double Sl...
    ________________________________
    SUPPORT THE SCIENCE ASYLUM
    Patreon:
    / scienceasylum
    Advanced Theoretical Physics (eBook):
    gumroad.com/l/ubSc
    Merchandise:
    shop.spreadshirt.com/scienceas...
    ________________________________
    HUGE THANK YOU TO THESE PATRONS
    Asylum Orderlies:
    Daniel Bahr, William Morton
    Einsteinium Crazies:
    Albert B. Cannon, Tim Ruffles, LT Marshall Faulds, Ilya Yashin, Rick Finn
    Plutonium Crazies:
    JKLMN Anderson, Kevin MacLean
    Platinum Crazies:
    Vittorio Monaco, Al Davis, Stephen Blinn, Mikayla Eckel Cifrese, Evgeny Ivanov
    ________________________________
    OTHER SOURCES
    ________________________________
    LINKS TO COMMENTS
    Photon Questions:
    • Where Does Light Come ...
    • Where Does Light Come ...
    • Where Does Light Come ...
    • Where Does Light Come ...
    • Where Does Light Come ...
    Featured Comment:
    • The Color White Does N...
    ________________________________
    IMAGE CREDITS
    Christiaan Huygens:
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    Isaac Newton:
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    Thomas Young:
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...

Комментарии • 1,3 тыс.

  • @ScienceAsylum
    @ScienceAsylum  3 года назад +19

    For anyone trying to find the next video about how photons are also waves: ruclips.net/video/iyN27R7UDnI/видео.html (When videos are older like this, it's almost impossible to find their follow-up videos.)

    • @RoscoeDaMule
      @RoscoeDaMule 2 года назад +1

      i sort by date published and watch them a bunch

    • @sumansaha552
      @sumansaha552 2 года назад +2

      How do we get single photon..🙄

    • @aucklandnewzealand2023
      @aucklandnewzealand2023 10 месяцев назад

      Ocean waves with longer periods carry more energy and travel faster.
      In contrast, light maintains a constant speed; the shorter the period, the more energy it exhibits during collapse.
      Therefore, it cannot be described as a wave, but an alternative term may be utilized.

    • @user-ci9bg7rm3d
      @user-ci9bg7rm3d 2 месяца назад

      The ambiguïty of light and fotons and electrons bothers me..^>~ as if they create their own carrier like a train putting his own rails on the trail but at an incredible speed ! That's why i come up with that ocean, just beiing everywhere, nada travel, just the impuls racing through what ever medium... i'm maybe crazy, too 😊🍀🧡🌞👍👋FM

  • @JimmyFigueroa
    @JimmyFigueroa 5 лет назад +355

    I love how he states something....then he asks himself a question we are all thinking, and then he answers it! So awesome!

    • @En_theo
      @En_theo 5 лет назад +3

      Love the "Shush !" too, exactly when I was asking myself the question lol

    • @Lucky10279
      @Lucky10279 5 лет назад +9

      Yes, _exactly_! He's good at anticipating follow-up questions and asking them in a non-patronizing way. He has great communication skills.

    • @adhil8918
      @adhil8918 3 года назад

      I also . .

    • @tonyhakston536
      @tonyhakston536 2 года назад +2

      Don’t be silly, that’s Question Clone.

    • @sunhun
      @sunhun 27 дней назад

      Sign of a god teacher

  • @Aediwen
    @Aediwen 5 лет назад +86

    Being shushed has never made me laugh so hard.

    • @apple54345
      @apple54345 5 лет назад +1

      Never seen It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia?

  • @Sean-ll5cm
    @Sean-ll5cm 5 лет назад +144

    best explanation of this experiment I've ever seen

    • @thenasadude6878
      @thenasadude6878 5 лет назад +11

      Indeed. It's rich in details and it's clear to a level I didn't even think possible. Nick is the man for concise and precise explanations.
      Also animation quality went up again.

    • @danielalbornoz9081
      @danielalbornoz9081 5 лет назад +2

      @Johnny Doeboy the electromagnetic field is the does
      as a byproduct of electromagnetic radiation
      As for science being dumbed down Im pretty sure this show is for kids I mean he's a guy in a lab coat with a bat man shirt making youtube videos for free on the internet are you expecting to watch his video an then get a science degree?

    • @Sean-ll5cm
      @Sean-ll5cm 5 лет назад +4

      @Johnny Doeboy you're just being semantic. No one thinks it's a wave like in the ocean

    • @funkyflames7430
      @funkyflames7430 5 лет назад

      Steak Electron refers to a small wave in the electron field or a particle (particles are localized waves in the field).
      Fields are basically plains of existence for waves. The waves are energy.
      Fields do have their own energy called vacuum energy or zero-point energy.
      This energy is always there and cannot be taken away. If you try to, the field will make a lower vacuum energy.
      The vacuum energy is the baseline energy.
      There will be a little uncertainty in the energy (and everything else) in the field.
      Just a question but do the dump trucks move with the wave or do the dump trucks just go up and down?
      Btw I get that the field is waving and causing the action.

    • @funkyflames7430
      @funkyflames7430 5 лет назад

      Johnny Doeboy I get that you have a large emphasize on electrons aren’t hard balls but rather deformations of the electron field.
      You don’t need to call me out for being a random guy. We are all random guys learning about great discoveries together.
      Not everybody is right. And most likely our ideas will be seen as basic and outdated like the four giants.
      The four giants of electricity and magnetism and such were great at manipulating the microscopic world to create amazing inventions but their ideas are only stepping stones to the achievements we have now and we will be stepping stones for the next generation.

  • @yamansanghavi
    @yamansanghavi 5 лет назад +88

    Your animations are so beautiful. Thank you for these wonderful videos.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +25

      Thanks! I spend a lot of time on them.

    • @basitwani44
      @basitwani44 5 лет назад +1

      @@ScienceAsylum Understanding such phenomena has never been this easy...
      Love your work so much...

  • @halbeard2996
    @halbeard2996 5 лет назад +56

    By now it seems like you could fill up an entire beginners lecture or high school course with your videos and, even without covering every technical detail, students would learn more and understand it better than by listening to most teachers.
    Seriously, how is it that you manage to explain the essentials of a topic every time so on point

    • @power2go3
      @power2go3 4 года назад

      Beginners, definitely, but I would go even further with some videos. I studied some things in my second and even third year of uni.

  • @toosas
    @toosas 5 лет назад +81

    prize for best illustration showing how peaks and troughs form, also depiction of it in 3d space

    • @only1kingz
      @only1kingz 5 лет назад

      Honestly that's when the light bulb went off in my head. This was beautifully explained AND demonstrated!

    • @pghparkins
      @pghparkins 5 лет назад

      Definitely check this video out. It does a fantastic job of helping see how the pattern forms.
      ruclips.net/video/gRX-s0p4HpM/видео.html

  • @AaronFresh09
    @AaronFresh09 5 лет назад +14

    One thing I like about this channel is that you answer questions that are on my mind but other sources fail to because they seem like dumb questions. Like what happens to the energy of the wave? But it's not dumb it's just that you actually understand your audience. Great work. Keep it up, please.

  • @MidnighterClub
    @MidnighterClub 5 лет назад +24

    "I said 'shush'!" is now my new favorite phrase.

  • @metametodo
    @metametodo 5 лет назад +39

    I'll make a compliment that I should've made a long time ago. I appreciate quite a lot your lessons, they're among the best I've seen in my life.
    The most impressive part of all this is that it's still common among the population to think that there isn't much skill involved in helping others, explaining something, teaching someone. And many think that expertise on the subject is the only skill needed to teach well, ignoring the deep needs of empathy skills, communication and linguistic flexibility, and many others. It's because of this common misconceptions that STEM teachers around federal universities here can be so bad at teaching sometimes. No matter how ingenious and great they are at research, they can still be dickheads with students.
    And consciously or unconsciously, you've proven to know all this and much more than me about teaching strategies and skills. Your empathetic skills and considerations towards the viewers interests and doubts are strong, and one of your best assets.
    The best part of this is that you also seem to go pretty deep on your knowledge of physics, enough for you go beyond the average teaching youtuber, and yet, you maintain your ability to teach properly that complex knowledge to your viewers, showing great skills to simplify and make concise extremely difficult concepts, enough for an interested student like me to understand.
    Thanks Nick, keep being great.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +5

      Thank you for the kind words :-)

    • @niloybhuiyan3374
      @niloybhuiyan3374 4 года назад

      @@ScienceAsylum sir why light just don't go straightly while passing the slit? Please sir explain me

    • @thomasradford9830
      @thomasradford9830 3 года назад +3

      @@niloybhuiyan3374 literally watch the video, it explains your question...
      sir

    • @brantdanger
      @brantdanger 7 месяцев назад +1

      Good point. One thing that students don't realize is that public school teachers are actually certified teachers (with buttloads of training). College professors/ instructors are not trained to teach (unless they were former public school teachers). That's the main reason they are so horrible.

    • @kingcosworth2643
      @kingcosworth2643 7 месяцев назад

      Unfortunately I don't feel it's common for the population to think, it occurs, but it's not common, uncommon potentially.

  • @Lucky-df8uz
    @Lucky-df8uz 5 лет назад +10

    I've watched probably 30 videos on the double slit experiment, and none of them, NOT ONE, explained how photons are just waves and how the field is one entity and that is why it can interfere with itself or that superposition and interference are linked. Instead they all seem to give into some sort of mysticism and woo factor. You rock dude.

    • @2010sourabh
      @2010sourabh 5 лет назад +2

      Yes dude the porpose of science is to dimistify something others are doing opposite..

    • @justinmallaiz4549
      @justinmallaiz4549 5 лет назад

      Dido.. hopefully Nick can also demystify the mechanism that causes wave collapse/ and our seemingly mysterious perception of particles ...

    • @marxk4rl
      @marxk4rl 5 лет назад

      Shooting other particles (electrons, atoms, molecules) through those slits creates the same interference pattern, so... you mean those particles are just waves?? The woo factor is still there, the quantum physics still has some mysticism.

    • @emrealper4847
      @emrealper4847 2 года назад

      @@marxk4rl that’s a legit point

  • @robson6285
    @robson6285 5 лет назад +22

    QuestionClones "but if the waves cancel, where does the energy go?" and Ha, again: if we think we already know the stuff then watching this video still improve the completeness and clearness of our insight! Such a short question but geni...Oh in short: I love these video's!

  • @codediporpal
    @codediporpal 5 лет назад +38

    Love these timelines. The history of science is just as fascinating as the science itself.

  • @urinater
    @urinater 5 лет назад +26

    I’ve been known to interfere with myself. I am a wave?

  • @chrismcgarry3160
    @chrismcgarry3160 3 года назад +4

    Those EM-Field & Wave-Interference Animations are so beautiful! And almost self-explanatory! Very nice work!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  3 года назад

      Thanks! I'm really proud of those animations. They're some of the best I've ever made.

  • @philipberthiaume2314
    @philipberthiaume2314 5 лет назад +14

    Really well done on the graphic work, very educational again. Thank you for this.

  • @nimmbuf
    @nimmbuf 5 лет назад +11

    Love how you animated the EM field at 4:33 :D
    Also, stay crazy like supercritical fluids (they just won`t stay inside the box ) XD

  • @constpegasus
    @constpegasus 5 лет назад +10

    This science channel is my favorite on RUclips. You are an incredible teacher Nick.

  • @germaindrouet4754
    @germaindrouet4754 5 лет назад +22

    Thanks Nick another great video to chip away at the magic tricks 👍

  • @andreatriscari7447
    @andreatriscari7447 5 лет назад +2

    You have a very original way to talk about known physical experiment and models in your videos. Love them

  • @tooljack4439
    @tooljack4439 5 лет назад +2

    Great animations again. I've yet to see anyone do it they way you have.
    First the 2 red waves pivoting to show the interference (3:15), then the other field animation (4:33).
    Brilliant!

  • @huntingresonance
    @huntingresonance 5 лет назад +6

    Thanks Nick, as a high school teacher these latest videos are perfect for the classroom. I showed my 10th graders your video on colour and they loved it... it covered everything they need to know and they were hooked for every second... you've pitched these perfectly! This new one is perfect for my older students and I just wish I had it a couple of months ago when we covered this! I'm just glad to know I have it for next year! Cheers!!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад

      That's wonderful! Thanks for sharing with your students :-)

    • @DingbatToast
      @DingbatToast 5 лет назад

      Ah commercial use; hope you're paying Nick for doing your job 😋

  • @jamestackett290
    @jamestackett290 5 лет назад +1

    I was waiting on this video. Thanks for clearing that one up.

  • @jlpsinde
    @jlpsinde 5 лет назад +8

    Incredible explanation, great Nick! Please more about photons!

  • @MrMineHeads.
    @MrMineHeads. 5 лет назад +4

    0:53 I love this!

  • @TheMesomovie
    @TheMesomovie 5 лет назад +3

    Finally at 63, with 4 college physics courses in my distant past, I finally understand. Via RUclips. Did not see that coming...

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +1

      You're welcome :-) Glad I could help.

  • @yuutsu4232
    @yuutsu4232 5 лет назад +2

    Your work, explanations and animations are great. 140k subs are too little for such a quality channel :/ Keep up with the good job!

  • @Rafaga777
    @Rafaga777 5 лет назад +1

    Instant like as always. Please keep on the good work.

  • @protestant6258
    @protestant6258 5 лет назад +13

    Your video is more and more useful for me...

  • @inderjeetkaurgrewal1941
    @inderjeetkaurgrewal1941 5 лет назад +11

    your the best youtuber i have ever seen

  • @TheBrownBoy100
    @TheBrownBoy100 5 лет назад +2

    Amazing video. The visuals really helped a lot. Optics is still one of the most mysterious and interesting branches of physics to me, but your videos sure have _illuminated_ the field a lot. Your take is always the most digestable form of information I can find. Thank you for making science a little less complicated for us.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +2

      Glad you're getting something out of them :-)

  • @TheRealReTox
    @TheRealReTox 5 лет назад +2

    Best illustrative display of the fields I've ever seen. Top drawer animation!

  • @feynstein1004
    @feynstein1004 5 лет назад +15

    We know it, and we don't know it. Our knowledge is in a superposed state of existing and non-existing.

    • @Alejandro_87
      @Alejandro_87 5 лет назад

      The more i know, the more i know i don't know..

  • @LordOstrik
    @LordOstrik 5 лет назад +41

    Time to learn things. I am okay with this.

  • @haulin
    @haulin 5 лет назад +1

    I've never seen a visualisation of the interference like yours at 4:32 That helped a lot. Thanks!

  • @technicallittlemaster8793
    @technicallittlemaster8793 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks for another amazing video
    But it's the first time that I knew everything you said before.
    Eagerly waiting for the next one and I know that it will blow my mind as I will again discover something really awkward.
    Thanks again

  • @fletchy88
    @fletchy88 5 лет назад +4

    You are brilliant!! You're definitely like our very own, real life Professor Proton!!

  • @inderjeetkaurgrewal1941
    @inderjeetkaurgrewal1941 5 лет назад +16

    one question ''how the heck you only have 140k subs''

    • @aqimjulayhi8798
      @aqimjulayhi8798 5 лет назад +3

      "I said shush!"

    • @inderjeetkaurgrewal1941
      @inderjeetkaurgrewal1941 5 лет назад

      @@aqimjulayhi8798 you know i love this channel and you go ''shush''

    • @sweiland75
      @sweiland75 5 лет назад +2

      He doesn't upload regularly. The RUclips algorithm doesn't like that.

    • @islabonita4193
      @islabonita4193 5 лет назад +2

      I know right..lets share this amazing knowledge with our friends. The world needs it.

    • @islabonita4193
      @islabonita4193 5 лет назад

      @@sweiland75 🤔😮ooowwwwhh..

  • @macbuff81
    @macbuff81 5 лет назад +1

    Great illustration! ;)

  • @da4733
    @da4733 5 лет назад +1

    great video keep up the amazing work

  • @lokendojsjsx3672
    @lokendojsjsx3672 5 лет назад +3

    I was expecting you to talk about what fact made us first suspect that light is a wave, all the way to the confirmation that it is indeed a wave. But this was really a good video too.

  • @ibanix2
    @ibanix2 5 лет назад +5

    Students every where: "So light is a wave and a particle?"
    Nick: LIGHT IS A WAVE. FULL STOP.

    • @somabhisek4165
      @somabhisek4165 5 лет назад

      Some say "A Wavicle".

    • @BitcoinmeetupsOrg123
      @BitcoinmeetupsOrg123 4 года назад

      I think it's wrong though. As far as I know light is a particle when it's observed but a wave if it's not observed.

  • @ebhojayejuliet9728
    @ebhojayejuliet9728 Год назад +1

    The shush gets me everytime 😂😂😭😭I love your channel

  • @josephcarland
    @josephcarland 5 лет назад +1

    Great video. Great explanation on a theory most people struggle with.

  • @lucidmoses
    @lucidmoses 5 лет назад +9

    You missed it entirely. We know light is a wave because if we wave at it, it waves back. :p

    • @tiagol8200
      @tiagol8200 5 лет назад +4

      Right! I often do that with my shadow bro

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +3

      Ha!

    • @_Arminius
      @_Arminius 5 лет назад +2

      @@tiagol8200 Damn, mine only gives me the finger.

  • @twobrothersgamingcankat8152
    @twobrothersgamingcankat8152 5 лет назад +5

    Science Asylum's next video is going to be about how we know that photons are particles. You'll see.

  • @TheJohnblyth
    @TheJohnblyth 5 лет назад +1

    Your description of superposition in a field is rather mind-blowing. Wow. Thank you.

  • @The_Omegaman
    @The_Omegaman 5 лет назад +1

    Great work again!

  • @stevedixon9734
    @stevedixon9734 5 лет назад +6

    What about the probability-wave collapse during measurement? I thought they acted like particles if measured

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +4

      Not really. They only _appear_ to. We'll talk about it in the next video.

    • @PeterMorganQF
      @PeterMorganQF 5 лет назад +2

      Steve Dixon If one puts an Avalanche PhotoDiode in a place where there’s an EM field, occasionally there will be an "avalanche" of current: the device was designed to do that occasionally, so it does it occasionally. If you put the APD in a different place, you get more or fewer avalanche events, but what causes that? Was it because there are photons or was it because the APD was designed to do that? If you look at the electrical signal much more closely, it’s not really an absolutely sudden event on the signal line: it ramps up very fast, but it’s not instantaneous. All modern experimental apparatus is the same: signal lines into computers, attached to exotic materials that are driven by exotic electronics.
      Quantum theory doesn’t necessarily talk about "collapse" during measurement, it can also be taken to describe and predict the statistics one will see of everything that happens on a signal line, and jumps are only the first level of detail about what the signal level does picosecond by picosecond. Sorry: you asked a good question and I’ve given you my very idiosyncratic answer (and compressed enough, as well, that it’s likely incomprehensible.)

    • @taragnor
      @taragnor 5 лет назад +1

      Yeah he left that bit out of the explanation of the double-slit, which is honestly one of the main points of the experiment, and opened the door to the whole field of quantum physics. Unless we figured out quantum physics over the last year or so, I always thought the door was still open as far as what light is, depending on what interpretation you used. In most, it seems to be that light is both. The most-accepted Copenhagen interpretation states that light is essentially a wave that becomes a particle. The pilot wave theory believes that light is essentially a particle that is pushed by a wave, so in effect, it's both. That being stated, we still haven't figured out which quantum theory is the correct one, so it's still largely up in the air. It is clear it exhibits behavior of both though.

    • @manishaashwinayyappan5253
      @manishaashwinayyappan5253 3 года назад

      @@taragnor nope.its only wave.if doesn't say in one video means doesn't mean he doesn't know it or he believes in what u say.

  • @xthe_moonx
    @xthe_moonx 5 лет назад +3

    a photon interfering with itself, that took me a long time to really wrap my head around it.

    • @addajjalsonofallah6217
      @addajjalsonofallah6217 5 лет назад +2

      Welcome to the world of quantum physics

    • @xthe_moonx
      @xthe_moonx 5 лет назад

      @@addajjalsonofallah6217 i been at it for 15 years :(

    • @addajjalsonofallah6217
      @addajjalsonofallah6217 5 лет назад

      @@xthe_moonx
      Me not as long but it never stops being confusing and weird

  • @zombiefelice
    @zombiefelice 2 года назад +1

    where have you been all this time? Im just glad i found this channel :D

  • @harshshitole6293
    @harshshitole6293 5 лет назад +2

    Wow,those animations are rad!

  • @prajwalburude5383
    @prajwalburude5383 5 лет назад +3

    Make some videos about relativity.
    BTW You are awesome dude😍😍😍

    • @michaelmichael9952
      @michaelmichael9952 5 лет назад +1

      Subscribe to the channel, you're a bit late.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад

      Playlist! ruclips.net/p/PLOVL_fPox2K_vPTkNljpO0qG_H--J_frW

  • @inderjeetkaurgrewal1941
    @inderjeetkaurgrewal1941 5 лет назад +4

    make a video on the standard model

  • @KokoRicky
    @KokoRicky 5 лет назад +1

    Honestly the best explanation for the double slit experiment I've seen thus far.

  • @fendigamer8977
    @fendigamer8977 5 лет назад +2

    Love ur vids Nick!

  • @FreeFireFull
    @FreeFireFull 5 лет назад +3

    I'm guessing the next video will mention the photoelectric effect

    • @funkyflames7430
      @funkyflames7430 5 лет назад

      And the blackbody radiation equation with the addition of the planck constant

  • @unknownnepali772
    @unknownnepali772 5 лет назад +4

    First...always loved ur videos...❤

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +2

      *Fourth 😉

    • @unknownnepali772
      @unknownnepali772 5 лет назад

      @@ScienceAsylum thank you for your reply...i have lots of question in physics but noone tends to answer. even my teachers say don't ask silly question.i am obsessed.....i have cleared various doubts through this channel...thank you very much🤗

  • @tabassumorina5424
    @tabassumorina5424 5 лет назад +1

    I had this confusing regarding photons for so long !! TYSM Nick !! You are the best !!

  • @we3s508
    @we3s508 4 года назад +1

    such a beautiful explanation sir, thanks

  • @navidak
    @navidak 5 лет назад +4

    Thanks as always. Is that a probability wave or an actual wave?

    • @robson6285
      @robson6285 5 лет назад

      An actual wave. In the E.M. field. That screen with points and crosses animates that field while the wave is passing throug it.

    • @robson6285
      @robson6285 5 лет назад +1

      An actual wave. A wave in the e.m. field. That animationscreen with all the points and crosses, that animates the e.m.field while a wave is passing through it.

  • @DrRulRul
    @DrRulRul 5 лет назад +3

    Thanks again for another great explanation
    I wonder how I would have to place 2 light bulbs to darken my room thanks to interference :P

    • @danfg7215
      @danfg7215 5 лет назад

      that’s what i was thinking, a flashlight that emits two destructively interfering laser beams, what would it look like?

    • @haulin
      @haulin 5 лет назад

      You will never get less light than what already is there. But i suppose they could cancel out in some places.

    • @danfg7215
      @danfg7215 5 лет назад +1

      Luke Haulin but lasers!

  • @doBobro
    @doBobro 5 лет назад +1

    Amazing work with 3D animations Nick!

  • @samk6042
    @samk6042 5 лет назад +2

    Best video just in time for my physics exam! Love this channel

  • @VejmR
    @VejmR 5 лет назад +8

    Only 141k subs?
    RUclips is weird😒

  • @LuisAldamiz
    @LuisAldamiz 5 лет назад +3

    Next: how do we know light is a particle? That's the really hard part IMO.

  • @StudBud2007
    @StudBud2007 Год назад

    This is amazing!!!!
    The video's really gooood!!!
    You make things simple even for a beginner like mee....

  • @santoshkumar-gj5gh
    @santoshkumar-gj5gh 5 лет назад +2

    Wow crazy scientist explaining much better than normal man.

  • @varunnrao3276
    @varunnrao3276 5 лет назад +3

    So light is not a photon? Nick what are you doing??🤔🤔

    • @danbodine7754
      @danbodine7754 5 лет назад +1

      He said a photon is a wave. Light is always a wave, just sometimes its wave properties don't matter so we can treat it like a particle.

    • @varunnrao3276
      @varunnrao3276 5 лет назад

      @@danbodine7754 shhhh😂

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +1

      Light is made of photons, but photons are not what most people _think_ they are.

  • @richardpanebianco4125
    @richardpanebianco4125 2 года назад

    Thank you for your videos.. your the one of a few that makes these things understandable 😃😃😃😃😃

  • @olafdilios9047
    @olafdilios9047 5 лет назад +1

    love your work

  • @alwayscurious413
    @alwayscurious413 5 лет назад +1

    Wonderful demonstration - bravo.

  • @SrmthfgRockLee
    @SrmthfgRockLee 5 лет назад +1

    this guy works for his money nicely

  • @Superdoof30
    @Superdoof30 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you for this great video, love your channel! Could you please explain the pilot wave theory or Bohemian mechanics in one of your next videos?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +1

      I will... as soon as I'm comfortable enough with it to explain it. 👍

  • @piratekingluffy6430
    @piratekingluffy6430 5 лет назад +1

    Seriously!! That's the lesson I never liked in my physics book. If u made this video 3 months back it would have been a huge help for my exam

  • @souhailbibih1591
    @souhailbibih1591 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you for the gret work ! Love it

  • @ADITYASHARMA-ll7mx
    @ADITYASHARMA-ll7mx 5 лет назад +1

    Awesome !! As always.

  • @willtothewong
    @willtothewong 5 лет назад +1

    Another great video!

  • @shayanmoosavi9139
    @shayanmoosavi9139 5 лет назад +2

    Nice video. I hope you continue about photons in later videos.

  • @williamcollins6705
    @williamcollins6705 5 лет назад +1

    Finally someone explains this so it can be clear! Thanks Nick.

  • @richardeadon6396
    @richardeadon6396 5 лет назад +1

    I love you, you deserve far more subs than you have

  • @Nikhilbt-sq5hf
    @Nikhilbt-sq5hf 3 года назад +1

    Very informative , good make more videos

  • @ShauryaSingh-ts2oc
    @ShauryaSingh-ts2oc 5 лет назад +2

    What a coincidence!
    This question was lurking inside my head all day as I started learning more about quantum mechanics and the nature of light. And just when I thought I could never get it, this remarkable video changed it all! Thanks Mr. Lucid!!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад

      We'll get more into quantum mechanics next time :-)

  • @democrito9922
    @democrito9922 5 лет назад +1

    Dude, awesome animations

  • @tmdrake
    @tmdrake 5 лет назад +2

    The best Animation By FAR!

  • @irlandesjr
    @irlandesjr 5 лет назад +1

    Brigadão para o sujeito que traduziu, belo trabalho!

  • @user-ox2up1yl2g
    @user-ox2up1yl2g 5 лет назад +2

    I've finally found some time to translate this video into Hebrew.
    In my opinion, the double-slit experiment is one of the most intriguing & fascinating science experiments ever. I've done it myself few times & it's mind-boggling!
    This experiment is not just about waves or photons, but about our very own human fallibility of grasping intellectually such phenomenon in nature. So much so, that there are still scientists who try to disprove the duality of particles(Including photons).
    I could have lectured for hours - just on this experiment.
    Great video & cheers! Keep up the good work! You and your twin-dimensional body ^_^

  • @thejohnstonzoo
    @thejohnstonzoo 5 лет назад +1

    I can't wait for next time. I love this guy.

  • @klausedwin
    @klausedwin 5 лет назад +1

    Can't wait for next time. 😃

  • @flav6350
    @flav6350 5 лет назад +1

    3:12 This animation is very well done

  • @krille0o
    @krille0o 5 лет назад

    Looking forward to the next video sinse my professors insist that there is a wave particle duality which you have covered before. Is it posible to describe radiation pressure which is calculated in statisical mechanics in terms of waves? Or is it because pressure, in general like temperature, only makes sense as a statistical property? Keep up the great work! The attention to detail is superb! Edited to fix gammatical error that I spotted.

  • @physicsbymak8355
    @physicsbymak8355 5 лет назад +1

    Great man

  • @SebastiansFacts
    @SebastiansFacts 5 лет назад +1

    I think my brain shorted. Need to watch it again.

  • @aaron6807
    @aaron6807 5 лет назад +1

    Hey Nick , love your videos man
    Can you make a video about why atoms/matter block light from passing through ?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад

      Yep! I'm working on some quantum optics stuff right now actually :-)

  • @floydnelson92
    @floydnelson92 5 лет назад +1

    that animation of how light travels in straight lines after the double slit to produce a wave pattern was helpful.

  • @karthikps4268
    @karthikps4268 5 лет назад +1

    you quench the thirst of mine in how to imagine light waves !!! now I can sleep peacefully

  • @StarkTMA
    @StarkTMA 5 лет назад +2

    Hello, I'm a telecommunications Engineering student so basically anything wave related is what I know.
    I understand how electromagnetic field work and all. But the question I keep asking that I never get an answer for is: what is the electromagnetic field exactly?
    I know all the math and how it works but what is it EXACTLY? Like physically? What is the nature of the field that can be disturbed by a photon? Those arrow we represent coming out or in a charged particle, what do they represent physically?
    I got into some quantum mechanics stuff to help me understand but nope, It made it complicated even more.

    • @cloudpoint0
      @cloudpoint0 5 лет назад +2

      You ask a difficult question. What is the electromagnetic field exactly? It’s difficult to answer questions about something that is considered a fundamental fact of the universe.
      First, a field is just a name we use for the collection of all points in space that we can associate some number to, like temperature or pressure or electric push/pull, usually more than one number and sometimes with a direction. It’s an abstract mathematical entity.
      The electromagnetic field has numbers like energy, momentum (with a direction), amplitude, wavelength, and frequency. This field can be viewed as a combination of a stronger electric field and a weaker magnetic field that both have magnitudes and directions of influence (the arrows). Oscillating charges produce variations in the electric and magnetic fields that may be regarded as waves, the aforementioned numbers change from moment to moment and place to place in a self-replicating fashion influenced by its neighbors. At a quantum level, the numbers exist only in a superposition and do not change (or don’t have values at all), they have probabilities that change instead. Energy is quantized as well.
      What exactly underlies a quantum field if anything, such that it can have probabilities at each point in space, isn’t clear. I think it is just about geometric relationships between things, or places where things could be. So a field just isn’t physical. It’s a background description of how interactions can play out.
      Sorry that’s the best I can do.
      Edit: The electromagnetic field isn’t caused by a photon. The field is an independent thing. A photon is just a persistent wave-like disturbance in some part of the field.

  • @CodepageNet
    @CodepageNet 5 лет назад +2

    "the same interference pattern emerges" ummmmm what?? you REALLY should have mentioned that still, as soon as we have a detector on the slits to see where the photon passes, the pattern changes to conforming a particle nature. Without that, you make it sound confusing IMO.
    Otherwise: a FANTASTIC explanation and visualization. i just had a moment where i felt a little bit smarter than before.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 лет назад +1

      I'm saving all that weirdness for the next video :-)

  • @JustMe-ui9bv
    @JustMe-ui9bv 5 лет назад +1

    This video had to take inconceivable amount of time to make. I really appreciate your work and effort. I'm buying the E-book at least, cuz I can't support you monthly :/

  • @iamborg3of9
    @iamborg3of9 5 лет назад +2

    "I said SHHHH" lol