I have shot it at 100 and then pulled it one stop in development for a less crunchy look and very acceptable results. Not bad for an experimental film at all. Nothing wrong with your results. (Not being a PITA but your title says harNan instead of harMan😉).
Another XLNT video and film test James. I just don't see any reason to buy or use this film. Looks terrible for any portrait ideas... Thanks for the test! Jim in Las Vegas
The best channel on RUclips! I wish you a million subscribers! Great photos as always. The film is contrasting, probably has 4 stops of dynamic range
Thank you for the kind words & ongoing support. It really means a lot and made my day! :)
I have shot it at 100 and then pulled it one stop in development for a less crunchy look and very acceptable results. Not bad for an experimental film at all. Nothing wrong with your results. (Not being a PITA but your title says harNan instead of harMan😉).
Yeah it’s a good experiment film and if it helps fun me them to make more film. It’s what we need!
@@jamesjuranke Exactly
100% agree. I did this recently and really changed the results. Nothing was blown out or crushed like my previous rolls. Give it a go sometime.
Another XLNT video and film test James. I just don't see any reason to buy or use this film. Looks terrible for any portrait ideas... Thanks for the test! Jim in Las Vegas
Hey Jim, totally agree! Appreciate the support :)
did you try it at 100iso?
No unfortunately. This was my first roll so just shot it at box speed. Next roll I will.
Yep, you have confirmed it ! This film is not suitable for me. Dark is dark no details at all! Maybe shoot AT ISO 25.
Yep! 120 looks a lot better of this film