【WarThunder】12000 pound "Blockbuster" Bomb vs Battleships of each country

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 июл 2024
  • Created at the request of a viewer. This is a verification video that drops a 12000lb bomb against the main battleship currently implemented in WarThunder and sees if the battleship can withstand it. Although it is a normal bomb, the amount of explosive is so tremendous that fatal injury cannot be avoided.
    00:00 US Nevada-class battleship Nevada
    01:05 German Scharnhorst-class battleship Scharnhorst
    02:11 Soviet Type 69 Battle Cruiser Kronstadt
    03:09 British Admiral-class battlecruiser Hood
    04:21 Japan Fuso-class battleship Fuso
    05:30 Italy Caio Duilio class battleship Duilio
    06:38 end
    【Music】
    Mozart "Dies irae"
    bit.ly/3VBprcH
    andotowa.quu.cc/mozart.html
    Dvorak Symphony No. 9 "From the New World" 4th movement
    andotowa.quu.cc/dvorak.html
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 306

  • @WT_Wolf
    @WT_Wolf  Год назад +154

    使用している爆弾は"ブロックバスター"または"クッキー"と呼ばれるイギリス製の12000ポンド通常爆弾です(ゲーム内名称12000 lb H.C Mk.I)
    爆薬量は同等ですが貫通爆弾のトールボーイとはまた別物です。

    • @mrmcmoustache9615
      @mrmcmoustache9615 Год назад +7

      The cookie bomb is the 4000lb one mate

    • @glendescayno436
      @glendescayno436 Год назад +3

      ​@@mrmcmoustache9615 .
      Plml
      0

    • @user-ck1tm8je4k
      @user-ck1tm8je4k Год назад +6

      てっきりトールボーイでいじめているのかと思いました(笑)😱

    • @user-hb5uy4uw4v
      @user-hb5uy4uw4v 10 месяцев назад +1

      やっぱどこの船も耐えられないね

    • @ScienceChap
      @ScienceChap 7 месяцев назад +2

      4000lb bomb was the blockbuster, or cookie. 12000lb was the Tallboy. 22000lb was the Grand Slam.

  • @scpfoundationo5councilo5-12
    @scpfoundationo5councilo5-12 Год назад +200

    取り敢えずこのブロックバスターに狙われたら即逃げるのが良手。

    • @taka-xs4yl
      @taka-xs4yl 7 месяцев назад

      大和とかって、建造だけで凄まじい額が使われたんだよね?
      こんなのが有るって分かったら、そら動けないワナw
      ブリカスって、日本と違ってスマートなんだよね。
      日本だと回天や桜花でしょ?

    • @user-vb6fu5fj8w
      @user-vb6fu5fj8w 6 месяцев назад +11

      高高度水平爆撃で1発だけ。実際には当たらんよね。

    • @scpfoundationo5councilo5-12
      @scpfoundationo5councilo5-12 3 месяца назад +3

      @@taka-xs4yl なんか関係ない話してて草
      荒らしか

    • @ogawankodayo
      @ogawankodayo Месяц назад +2

      ​@@user-vb6fu5fj8wどこの話してんだ?

  • @mititdoll_sugarland
    @mititdoll_sugarland Год назад +56

    さすがブロックバスター…惑星ならこの程度で済むが実際は竜骨へし折れて戦/艦が宙を舞うレベルよなぁ…

  • @user-br1yz8wf9y
    @user-br1yz8wf9y Год назад +46

    船体構造は持ち堪えても、乗員は衝撃で即死だろうなあ。

    • @ManiaKanipan
      @ManiaKanipan 28 дней назад +3

      気絶やぞ

    • @user-br1yz8wf9y
      @user-br1yz8wf9y 27 дней назад +7

      @@ManiaKanipan あんだけ船体が跳ねてる中で、もし生きてたら奇跡だわ!

    • @entm-ypavj6es
      @entm-ypavj6es 26 дней назад

      @@user-br1yz8wf9y惑星ですので

    • @Sakajo-bz1ni
      @Sakajo-bz1ni 18 дней назад +1

      @@user-br1yz8wf9y人の死なないゲームです

    • @user-higurashi3105
      @user-higurashi3105 18 дней назад

      そしたら鹵獲出来る…?

  • @TheGhostOfRazgriz23
    @TheGhostOfRazgriz23 7 месяцев назад +15

    I really find it funny how some people in this comment section are talking about how unrealistic it is that they are not moving ships and the flak is too low. Guys, this video was meant to demonstrate the power of the 12,000 lb bomb against ships. This wasn’t meant to simulate a battle.

  • @user-vj6ot6zw3d
    @user-vj6ot6zw3d Год назад +44

    米軍のBー2がゴジラにバンカーバスター投下してるシーンみたいで好き

  • @80fire71
    @80fire71 Год назад +116

    熾烈な対空砲火が無駄な足掻きって感じで嬉しくなる

    • @okiuto
      @okiuto 8 месяцев назад +22

      普通当たらないからなあ

    • @guillermoferraudi6093
      @guillermoferraudi6093 7 месяцев назад +5

      The pilots in the pacific during ww2 would disagree. AA fire eas very effective.

    • @80fire71
      @80fire71 7 месяцев назад +5

      対空砲火は効果があったのか、無かったのか、どちらが正なのか…?!
      例えばレーダーと組み合わせた統制機構やVT信管があれば効果的だったのかもしれない…

  • @takuyakoseki21
    @takuyakoseki21 11 месяцев назад +39

    フッドが吹っ飛んだ

  • @barbarybar
    @barbarybar Год назад +78

    The "Cookie" was a thin walled blast bomb used to flatten large areas of buildings. The Earthquake bombs of 12000lbs were used to sink the Tirpitz, the 22.000lb used to topple the Bielefeld viaduct. These were supersonic, deep penetration bombs, which would have easily destroyed a capital ship.

    • @ScienceChap
      @ScienceChap Год назад +10

      The 12000lb version was called Tallboy. The 22000lb bomb was called Grand Slam.

    • @christopherharmon2433
      @christopherharmon2433 7 месяцев назад +4

      @@ScienceChap The Tallboy turned the Tirpitz into Swiss Cheese.

    • @basilmcdonnell9807
      @basilmcdonnell9807 7 месяцев назад +10

      If you could hit it. Tirpitz was stationary. I don't see how you hit a moving ship with a free-fall unguided bomb from 20,000 feet.

    • @ianmacdonald9201
      @ianmacdonald9201 7 месяцев назад

      You can see the craters left after the attack on Tirpitz to this day. Google earth: 69.64748692138386, 18.80204208524721

    • @samuelhowie4543
      @samuelhowie4543 6 месяцев назад

      Agree. Especially from a level bomber. But I do think if you got within 75-100 feet of it you would do some serious damage just from the pressure wave hitting the side of the ship.​@@basilmcdonnell9807

  • @user-sk5mu3ti4m
    @user-sk5mu3ti4m Год назад +52

    この爆撃手、いい腕してやがるぜ。

  • @user-be3oq8yq2m
    @user-be3oq8yq2m Год назад +20

    7分でわかる航空主兵論

  • @corporal-aria
    @corporal-aria Год назад +54

    実際なら12000ポンド爆弾の直撃を受けたら、戦艦といえども船体が真っ二つに轟沈するのでは?
    大和型でも至近弾で艦橋や高角砲など上部構造物が破壊されて、沈没は免れても幹部全滅で実質的に沈没と変わらないと思う。

    • @user-st9sm5yw9c
      @user-st9sm5yw9c 2 месяца назад +5

      これは同じ重さのトールボーイ貫通爆弾じゃないからね
      外殻ペラペラ炸薬マシマシのブロックバスター爆弾だから
      それでも、弾薬庫が爆発すれば船体切断の可能性は高いけれども、惑星はそこまでシミュレーションしていないですので

  • @shaun4787
    @shaun4787 Год назад +55

    Interesting thing about all of those direct hits from a high altitude bunker buster is that none of the ships was split in half or capsized. With this much speed and payload, a 6 ton bomb would punch through at least 3 decks if not more and discharge near the keel which would split the ship in half. Another scenario would be igniting main magazines and resulting splitting the hull. Somehow this simulation is very formulated...

    • @StuartKoehl
      @StuartKoehl Год назад

      This bomb can't, because it isn't a Tallboy, it's just a standard Bomber Command 12000-lb high capacity "Blockbuster". These were designed to maximize blast, and were used to blow the roofs off of buildings, allowing 2-lb. incendiary sticks to penetrate deep into the interior, burning out the building.

    • @StuartKoehl
      @StuartKoehl Год назад +14

      But it isn't an armor piercing bomb.

    • @aurorathearcticwolf4243
      @aurorathearcticwolf4243 Год назад +17

      War Thunder doesnt support all those fancy animations and mechanics on large ships, also it doesnt need to be an AP bomb to turn a ship into a million pieces

    • @julianlau5579
      @julianlau5579 Год назад +4

      I just wonder why the captain did not take evasive actions. As the bomber is known on its bomb run, evasive actions would at least minimize a direct hit.

    • @StuartKoehl
      @StuartKoehl Год назад +13

      @@aurorathearcticwolf4243 If it is an armored ship, like a battleship, it pretty much does. A light case bomb, like a 12,000-lb blockbuster, is impact fuzed, so it goes off on contact with the first solid thing it encounters--like the superstructure of a ship, or its upper deck. The explosion creates a blast wave and minimal fragmentation, which will rip up deckhouses, masts, exposed gun mounts, and so on. The shock effect might be transmitted through the hull, and dismount machinery and fixtures below deck; it can also start fires. But the ship's horizontal (deck) armor will protect its vitals--the machinery compartments, the magazines, and the turrets. Usually, horizontal armor schemes consist of two decks: a main deck, intended to stop the projectile from penetrating; and a thinner splinter deck, intended to catch any fragments, should the projectile actually penetrate the main deck. Sometimes the thinner deck is placed above the main deck, to initiate the fuze of an armor piercing projectile, which will then explode before penetrating the main armored deck. But, either way, unless the projectile penetrates the vitals, damage to the ship will be structurally superficial, but may result in a mission kill by disabling the fire control sensors.

  • @truthseeker9454
    @truthseeker9454 7 месяцев назад

    Interesting video - kudos for the choice of soundtrack!

  • @Official.ORIENTCAVALIER
    @Official.ORIENTCAVALIER Год назад +18

    The Lancaster's gonna have to do some explaining why it destroyed a Hood lol

    • @davidriadi7999
      @davidriadi7999 Год назад +4

      "The Hood shoots at us first." - The Lancaster Crews

  • @Wopstar-777
    @Wopstar-777 Год назад +3

    So cool!!! The music was fantastic!
    War Thunder I have played since 2014...Thank you

  • @f15-fa.k.a2
    @f15-fa.k.a2 Год назад +79

    マイティ・フッドが至近弾で一撃とは……!本当に凄まじい火力ですね

    • @user-cz1ev1vl5m
      @user-cz1ev1vl5m 8 месяцев назад +8

      フッドの上甲板の装甲は大した事無いからな。

    • @fnfal1690
      @fnfal1690 7 месяцев назад +9

      @@user-cz1ev1vl5m
      直撃してないから上甲板はあんまり関係ないと思うが

    • @user-vb6fu5fj8w
      @user-vb6fu5fj8w 6 месяцев назад

      76mmだったかな。@@user-cz1ev1vl5m

  • @user-ni3gv9sh2b
    @user-ni3gv9sh2b Год назад +9

    戦艦くらいなら確一なのはたまらんなぁ…
    しかしやはりアメリカは対空ガチ勢、弾幕も炸薬も全てパワー

  • @user-ov4vp3ce9z
    @user-ov4vp3ce9z Год назад +43

    各艦の火力の違いも面白かったです
    扶桑だけ露骨に弾幕薄いのは悲しい😭

    • @user-cz1ev1vl5m
      @user-cz1ev1vl5m 8 месяцев назад +7

      改修が間に合わなかったからな。

    • @shinpeikitajima7115
      @shinpeikitajima7115 6 месяцев назад +1

      三式弾があるじゃないか・・・・・アレ扶桑級で使えたっけ?

    • @user-cz1ev1vl5m
      @user-cz1ev1vl5m 6 месяцев назад +2

      @@shinpeikitajima7115 使えるよ。
      史実なら巡洋艦クラスまでは有る。

  • @DavidFMayerPhD
    @DavidFMayerPhD Год назад +29

    Problem: It is VERY DIFFICULT to hit a precise target (especially if it is maneuvering) without a guidance system for the bomb.That goes double from high altitude.

    • @dkneuer
      @dkneuer Год назад +7

      Without a guidance system, forget it. The Tirpitz was anchored and not moving and it took several missions to sink it, until getting a direct hit on a non moving target

    • @DavidFMayerPhD
      @DavidFMayerPhD Год назад +5

      @@dkneuer When attacks were made at "point targets" in WW2, the hit rate was somewhere about 1%. Hitting a city was easier.

    • @yamatomushashi5583
      @yamatomushashi5583 7 месяцев назад +3

      ...especially when the ship is doing the zigzag maneuver, it is more difficult to hit the targeted ship, even in dive bombing.

    • @sztypettto
      @sztypettto 7 месяцев назад +2

      Most ships were damaged intentionally out at sea to get them to port if the submarines or other nearby ships couldn't finish them off. Port Strike was the primary way to get a ship written off. Level bombers created havoc for ships at most. Torpedo Bombers and Dive Bombers were the way to hit ships out at sea.

    • @wasylbakowsky5199
      @wasylbakowsky5199 7 месяцев назад +2

      No kidding, I would say IMPOSSIBLE. Plus, those ships in the video aren't even moving (sitting ducks). So it becomes yet more difficult if they are taking evasive action. But fun to watch

  • @user-qz6tv1kv6f
    @user-qz6tv1kv6f Год назад +46

    厚さ5メートルのコンクリを貫通する爆弾の直撃に耐えられる船は無いだろう

    • @user-st9sm5yw9c
      @user-st9sm5yw9c Год назад +24

      この12000ポンド爆弾は、地震爆弾であるトールボーイではなくて、炸薬量重視のブロックバスターの方です
      炸薬量重視の為に外殻はペラペラで、コンクリートを貫通するような強度は有りません

    • @user-kz7pc7nu1p
      @user-kz7pc7nu1p Год назад +5

      ウォーサンダーその爆弾だと普通に耐えられそう

    • @asika226
      @asika226 Год назад +3

      ​@@user-st9sm5yw9c トールボーイと爆薬料変わらんけどね

  • @JAPANESE-ARMY0310
    @JAPANESE-ARMY0310 7 месяцев назад +6

    新世界よりが流れる中のフッドの猛烈な対空砲火の絶望に抗う感がかっこよすぎるす

  • @user-dv3du9xo4s
    @user-dv3du9xo4s Год назад +1

    フッドの爆沈は芸術的ですらあるな

  • @joechang8696
    @joechang8696 Год назад +6

    Hitting a fast battleship from medium altitude is nearly impossible as a ship at 27kt+ can maneuver just enough in the 30 sec a free fall bomb dropped from 15k ft. However, a large bomb, mostly explosive, no armor piercing case, all weight in charge, should hit water near, set to detonate say about 100 ft should cause enough turbulence to damage the propeller shaft, forcing reduced speed to the point that it can be hit

  • @akizuki210
    @akizuki210 7 месяцев назад +2

    魔改装後のネバダがカッコよくてホント好き

    • @user-se7xx8fm3x
      @user-se7xx8fm3x Месяц назад +1

      メリーランドやウェストバージニアやペンシルベニアもマストが変な形してたり見た目はあまり好きじゃなかったけど太平洋戦争中に魔改造されて見た目がかっこよくなりましたね

  • @Admiral_United_
    @Admiral_United_ Год назад +22

    やはり英国面....!英国面は全てを解決する....!

    • @panzerkampfwagenvitigerii9942
      @panzerkampfwagenvitigerii9942 Год назад +7

      一体何杯の紅茶をキメたらこんな爆弾思いつくんだ?

    • @user-kz7pc7nu1p
      @user-kz7pc7nu1p Год назад +5

      ​@@panzerkampfwagenvitigerii9942 孫の世代までキメれば思いつくんじゃないか?

  • @michaeldennis6077
    @michaeldennis6077 6 месяцев назад

    Yeah right. The captains of those battleships always drop anchor and sit still when there's an air attack. The Tirpitz was sitting at the dock in Norway when they got her with one of those.

  • @LibraMiku271
    @LibraMiku271 7 месяцев назад

    Ship: Bomb drop? I got this.
    Bomber: We'll see about that. Bomb's away.
    *boom*
    Bomber: Your vote just got overruled.

  • @thukaji9156
    @thukaji9156 Год назад +7

    英国空軍機が英国海軍軍艦を攻撃すると言うシュールな画と、至近弾で吹っ飛ぶその威力に脱帽

  • @kirinr8871
    @kirinr8871 Год назад +1

    ドゥイリオにきて、ついに着弾前に撃破なるかと期待してしまった私がばかでした(笑)

  • @MS-xh7cw
    @MS-xh7cw Год назад +7

    The Iowa class battleships could reach 34 knots and wound engage in evasive maneuvers. It’s one thing to drop a bomb from a Lancaster on a moored ship and quite another on one weaving around at flank speed.

    • @tjh44961
      @tjh44961 Год назад +2

      Likelihood of hitting a moving, maneuvering ship from that kind of altitude with a single bomb approaches that of hitting the lotto successfully 3 times in a row, IMO.

    • @simonbarber5440
      @simonbarber5440 Год назад +1

      @@tjh44961 More chance with a Fritz X - those really did steer their way onto manoevering targets!

    • @plymouth5714
      @plymouth5714 7 месяцев назад

      @@simonbarber5440 I think if the war had carried on for longer than it did, eventually even the 22,000lbs earthquakers would have been equipped with some form of controlled guidance, either radio or even tv cameras. A lot of the 'modern' ordnance was well under development by the end of WW2. Only strange thing is why is a British bomber dropping a bloody big bomb on a British warship!😃

  • @agricolacastelgrosso1933
    @agricolacastelgrosso1933 9 месяцев назад +2

    Lesson to be learned, in war you stand still you die. If those ships were at full speed and manouvering, they would have avoided such an high altitude drop

  • @T_Kazahaya
    @T_Kazahaya Год назад +5

    銀英伝で「直撃、来ます!」のあとの戦艦のごとく一撃で……BGM的にも銀英伝っぽさが。

  • @YUKIHIRODARUMA
    @YUKIHIRODARUMA Год назад +6

    ドボルザーク聴くと思い出す。
    「よーし、全艦総力戦用~意! 総司令部、及び 第13艦隊に連絡、
     我、敵と遭遇せり、とな!」

  • @jonathanpanlaqui1855
    @jonathanpanlaqui1855 7 месяцев назад +2

    Blockbuster bombs were used in air raids against Germany in WW2, but they can also use to destroy mighty warships when it dropped from a four-engined Avro Lancaster bombers.

  • @user-uc3bf7nq8b
    @user-uc3bf7nq8b 10 месяцев назад +15

    扶桑の艦側の砲も、けっこう仰角取れるんですね。

  • @davidlang4442
    @davidlang4442 7 месяцев назад

    This just shows how the battleship anti aircraft fire power never kept up with bomber development. Aim and shoot and hope for a hit...now there are rockets guided by tracking radars. No need for huge battleships anymore.

  • @user-be5km7lg2b
    @user-be5km7lg2b Месяц назад +1

    水平爆撃の命中率が100%だ!

  • @madmedic92
    @madmedic92 Год назад +15

    The main problem is that Midway and Guadalcanal proved very decisively that high-level bombing didn't work. If you wanted to use land based bombers it was found B-25 or like type medium bomber flying at mast height and skipping bombs across the water was the only way to hit shipping. Had the target been moving there's next to no way you could have hit it at a safe altitude

    • @OneHitWonder383
      @OneHitWonder383 7 месяцев назад +1

      Yes, that is true. However, if a 12,000 pound bomb just does a near miss, it will buckle the hull and may even have an effect on the keel. Though I think even getting a near miss from high altitude would be a stroke of luck.

  • @gru6755
    @gru6755 8 месяцев назад

    大変美しいですね。

  • @865samson
    @865samson Год назад +3

    事實上太重的炸彈會直接貫穿,只要沒傷到龍骨,而且沒有引爆,可能就是大破而已

  • @stevelenox152
    @stevelenox152 Год назад +2

    Just a couple of questions why wasn't the Iowa, Bismarck and Yamato not part of this video and how come there were cruisers and Battlecruisers in it when it is a video about battleships?

    • @tucker1012
      @tucker1012 Год назад +1

      Because they’re not in the game buddy

    • @stevelenox152
      @stevelenox152 Год назад +1

      @@tucker1012 ahh that would explain it lol

  • @Copuzzz
    @Copuzzz Год назад +5

    Imagine if the USS Nevada survived like in reality

  • @poplarhardtack1776
    @poplarhardtack1776 8 месяцев назад

    やっぱ上から重い物落とすのが一番つええや

  • @user-rr4kl5wh9s
    @user-rr4kl5wh9s Год назад +15

    さすがビスマルク級を吹っ飛ばしただけの威力だぁ

    • @satootto
      @satootto Год назад +21

      「ティルピッツ」の攻撃に使用されたのは「トールボーイ」の方で、「クッキー」ではないです。炸薬量は同じくらいだけど。ちなみに1発では沈まなくて、追加で3発お見舞いしてようやく大破・転覆したとのこと。
      また、ポケット戦艦「リュッツォ」の攻撃にも使用され、1発で着底させたものの砲塔が1基残り、迫り来るソ連軍との間で「戦艦VS戦車」という前代未聞の戦いを繰り広げた。
      なお、「リュッツォ」を攻撃した時に1発だけ不発になり、3、4年前に発見されてポーランド軍が爆破処理しました。

    • @cliveburt2638
      @cliveburt2638 Год назад +1

      Lutzow (aka Deutschlsnd).

  • @user-fk3fu5jx4h
    @user-fk3fu5jx4h 8 месяцев назад +1

    これより確か一回り小さいけどトールボーイ2,3発で沈まなかったティルピッツとは…。

  • @gregking7926
    @gregking7926 7 месяцев назад

    The bomb actually missed HMS Hood and exploded a short distance off the port side. The concussive effect would have caused severe shock damage and caused flooding in the engine rooms, but I doubt it would caused the ship to explode. It may not have even sunk from the near miss if DC efforts were successful.

  • @theltlexay
    @theltlexay 8 месяцев назад +1

    imagine telling an officer in the 1940's that eighty years in the future we use complex, photorealistic computer simulations of the most powerful contemporary ships in the world being destroyed by precision bombing for entertainment purposes

  • @Chameleon_Effect74
    @Chameleon_Effect74 7 месяцев назад

    I imagine that's what the HMS Hood looked like blowing up anyways

  • @maysourcebewithyou
    @maysourcebewithyou Год назад +44

    この質量の暴力に耐えられる水平防御を持つ戦艦なんていない説

    • @fubuki1115
      @fubuki1115 9 месяцев назад +4

      大和ならワンチャン…
      無理かなぁ…

    • @user-ij2dj7ed8e
      @user-ij2dj7ed8e 9 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@fubuki1115
      大和くんは雛壇型を改善してもろうて

    • @user-vb6fu5fj8w
      @user-vb6fu5fj8w 6 месяцев назад

      260mmあるからね。。。@@fubuki1115

  • @MrToracyan
    @MrToracyan 8 месяцев назад

    これで誘導版化されたら、無敵ですね。

  • @yuukixyz3473
    @yuukixyz3473 Год назад +1

    革命爆弾との差が顕著に出るのは海だったか

  • @gohibniugoh1668
    @gohibniugoh1668 Год назад

    "That one bounced!:

  • @jeffingram9916
    @jeffingram9916 Год назад +1

    High altitude bombing against shipping was extremely inaccurate. Dive bombing and torpedo bombing was the way to go capital ships.

  • @yuukixyz3473
    @yuukixyz3473 Год назад +1

    というか革命爆弾も究極紅茶爆弾もこのサイズだと普通にレーダーに写りそうな気もせんでもない

  • @user-fw3zk4cj9h
    @user-fw3zk4cj9h 5 месяцев назад

    さすが紅茶爆弾...紅茶をキメてるだけあるぜ

  • @user-tv5bx4ku9hcodcito
    @user-tv5bx4ku9hcodcito Год назад +1

    Chido el video

  • @masanof_1jz
    @masanof_1jz 8 месяцев назад

    フッドが吹っ飛んだ!

  • @cel728
    @cel728 Год назад +1

    フッドが一発でふっどんだ・・・

  • @YO-HOSSAN
    @YO-HOSSAN Год назад +2

    スゴク…大きいです。

  • @in_silver_river_galaxy
    @in_silver_river_galaxy Год назад +3

    フッドの対空砲だけが当たってる。フッドだけたぶん引き分けに持ち込める。

  • @Grunt0369USMC
    @Grunt0369USMC Год назад +1

    stationary target possible not a single flak burst from the 5 inch guns that could reach the bomber most ships would have turned away

  • @typu1088
    @typu1088 Год назад +5

    フッドがフッドんだ!

  • @traviswillams5739
    @traviswillams5739 7 месяцев назад

    KA-BOOM! i think we are going to need a new boat.

  • @crisespinoza1979
    @crisespinoza1979 Год назад

    Ships aren't even trying to evade. And the flack isn't going high enough. 😮

    • @yamatomushashi5583
      @yamatomushashi5583 7 месяцев назад

      Because the bomber was flying at an altitude that's is out of the ship's antiaircraft firing range.

  • @akirakajiwara9478
    @akirakajiwara9478 Год назад +6

    この動画に登場する12,000ポンド爆弾、なんだか500ポンド爆弾をそのまま大型化した感じ。
    ランカスターが投下する12,000ポンド爆弾は、もっと細長いイメージがあったのだが…

    • @WT_Wolf
      @WT_Wolf  Год назад +14

      良く言われる貫通爆弾のトールボーイとは別種の通常の12000ポンド爆弾ですね。正式名称は12000 lb HC, Mk 2でブロックバスター等とも呼ばれています

    • @akirakajiwara9478
      @akirakajiwara9478 Год назад +3

      @@WT_Wolf
      概要欄に『12000lb爆弾(バンカーバスター)』と記載があったので間違えてしまった。
      バンカーバスターの仲間に入るランカスターが投下する12000ポンド爆弾は『トールボーイ』なもので。

  • @alba1708
    @alba1708 10 часов назад

    まともに直撃させられるなら不発でも重さとスピードだけで船真っ二つになりそう

  • @nsjxjidjatakdyx2
    @nsjxjidjatakdyx2 8 месяцев назад

    至近弾でも船隊引き裂けそう…

  • @SG-vw2ni
    @SG-vw2ni 7 месяцев назад

    水平爆撃でこんなに当たったらいいね

  • @user-yf9te9db5s
    @user-yf9te9db5s Год назад +1

    戦艦にこの音楽、銀英伝思いつくw

  • @7782-x4t
    @7782-x4t 13 дней назад

    実際にあったらすーんごい戦果やな。こんな高度から

  • @malcolmmacdougall
    @malcolmmacdougall 7 месяцев назад

    you'd need Tallboy or Grand Slam instead............with a quick fuse, but very hard to hit a ship at 30 knots, but a near miss will still sink it...... you'd need to release the bomb maybe 3 hull lengths ahead of the ship

  • @T-my3sc
    @T-my3sc 17 дней назад +2

    今の船に原爆が落ちたらどうなるんだろ

  • @traviswillams5739
    @traviswillams5739 7 месяцев назад

    see, this is what happens when you eat to many cookies. you just might blow up like this! [LOL]

  • @smilyboi9847
    @smilyboi9847 7 месяцев назад +1

    “Enemy battleship sunk!” (US)
    “feindliches Schlachtschiff versenkt” (German)
    “вражеский линкор затонул!” (Russian)
    “We sank an enemy Battelship!” (British)
    “敵戦艦沈没!” (Japanese)
    “affondata la corazzata nemica!” (Italian)
    Note: these were copied from google translate so might not be accurate, apologies if they aren’t!

  • @kumakumachannnnnnn
    @kumakumachannnnnnn Год назад

    こりゃーやべえpe8以上だな

  • @user-sj1qm3sj6h
    @user-sj1qm3sj6h 7 месяцев назад

    約5400㎏の爆弾を運搬出来る爆撃機ありますか?

  • @MegaTakaki
    @MegaTakaki Год назад +3

    この爆弾だと、大和型もひとたまりもないな。

  • @user-tenkei10k
    @user-tenkei10k Месяц назад

    あんな高高度から無誘導爆弾を全弾命中させるとか凄すぎる
    どうやって当ててるんだろう?

  • @nu-one2758
    @nu-one2758 Год назад +8

    原子力空母でも沈みそうですねw

  • @envitech02
    @envitech02 Год назад +3

    Wierd to see a Lancaster bombing a RN ship.

  • @yamaproxima8648
    @yamaproxima8648 Год назад

    background music tittle, please

  • @user-pj6ws6vq3b
    @user-pj6ws6vq3b 7 месяцев назад

    自由落下する爆弾が、こんなに正確に着弾するのだろうか?

  • @nghnino
    @nghnino 7 месяцев назад

    what about karl morser vs battleships?

  • @fubuki1115
    @fubuki1115 Год назад +2

    12.000ポンドの火の玉を食いやがれ!

  • @Nitramrec
    @Nitramrec 7 месяцев назад

    Why do all the ships explode along their whole length, when the bomb hits at only one point? 🤔

  • @SitouIru
    @SitouIru 7 месяцев назад +1

    水平爆撃で百発百中は草なんだ

  • @user-dq9gd3pr7p
    @user-dq9gd3pr7p 16 дней назад

    ランカスターくんすき

  • @raymondyee2008
    @raymondyee2008 Год назад +4

    Be careful of the 12,000 lbs cylindrical “Cookie” bombs. Of course with only one bomb the aiming and timing must be perfect.

    • @warrendesonia7924
      @warrendesonia7924 Год назад +1

      It also helps immensely if the target is not moving.........If it is, the chances of a hit are almost zero..........

    • @stewartmillen7708
      @stewartmillen7708 Год назад +1

      Yes, in this portrayal the bomber is above the range of AA fire, and when land bombers tried to hit moving ships, they almost always missed.

    • @anthonysherry2628
      @anthonysherry2628 Год назад +1

      None of the ships are moving, its very hard to hit a moving ship when a bomber is at high altitude

  • @mjlotus
    @mjlotus 6 месяцев назад

    They see a bomber which can carry a large payload, but no evasive maneuvering?

  • @user-gr_towarin
    @user-gr_towarin Год назад +6

    さーんぷーんさんぷん♪

  • @catuzura1303
    @catuzura1303 7 месяцев назад

    あまり関係ないケド、子供の頃、プラモで作った軍艦や、ガミラス艦などを花火や爆竹で痛めつけて遊んだのを思い出した。嗚呼リアリティ!。

  • @kinokomajin
    @kinokomajin 8 месяцев назад +2

    対空防火がキレイすぎて泣く😂

  • @baileystack1486
    @baileystack1486 Год назад +2

    Hood was not a direct hit, missed to the port bow

  • @user-qb2go5sw3x
    @user-qb2go5sw3x Год назад +8

    大和も実装されたら標的にされるんやろうなぁ
    (大和ならギリ耐えれる…?)

    • @Kikka315
      @Kikka315 Год назад +5

      どんな船でも甲板はペラペラだから…

    • @Drizzle_United
      @Drizzle_United Год назад +4

      砲塔天板に直撃しても船体折れそう

    • @babymagnam
      @babymagnam Год назад +2

      ​@@Drizzle_Unitedや、大和型の砲塔装甲は46cm砲の至近射撃に耐えられるから…(目を逸らしながら)

    • @Drizzle_United
      @Drizzle_United Год назад +2

      @@babymagnam ユゴニオ弾性限界「それはどうかな」

    • @naha2262
      @naha2262 Год назад +2

      無理やろな・・・耐えれて1000ポンドくらいか

  • @paull8678
    @paull8678 Год назад

    The music made me giggle

  • @TsucaPon40
    @TsucaPon40 7 месяцев назад

    すげえ!立派な戦艦が一発でガタガタだぜ!近衛の弓にN2爆弾矢をつがえて、ゼロ距離でやって即爆死するようなものだぜ!
    ハートの器が20個でも一発で即爆死するので、次世代のN2兵器を組み合わせた武装で自爆すると危険。
    N2地雷をマスターソードにスクラビルドして、木箱や鉄箱をぶっ叩くものなら一発で即爆死してゲームオーバーになるのは目に見えてわかる。

  • @yamabetoyomu
    @yamabetoyomu Год назад +10

    艦船のように動いている標的だと命中どころか至近着弾さえ難しいのでは。とはいえ、実戦例↓にあるような空中爆発だったら、少なくとも艦上の構造物には相当のダメージを与えて、戦闘不能に陥らせることができそう。以下、Wikipedia(en)より。
    617 Squadron developed a technique of dropping a 1,000lb MC bomb just before a 12,000lb HC bomb; the shock wave from the 1,000lb explosion fired the pistols on the 12,000lb bomb to give an "air burst";

    • @alfredomartinez544
      @alfredomartinez544 Год назад +1

      ほぼすべての戦艦が戦闘機に妨害されました 彼らは空母を出航した

    • @takana4381
      @takana4381 7 месяцев назад +1

      セイロン沖海戦の赤城艦爆隊の投弾17発中命中16発(1機投弾不能)って、当時の特に第一航空戦隊員の技量が神技の域に達していたのだな。

  • @user-kd1wj8ml6j
    @user-kd1wj8ml6j 6 месяцев назад +1

    こういう見て感じるのはやっぱり戦艦は時代遅れなんだな…と
    戦艦の対空放火が全く無意味で…

  • @revolverocelot7772
    @revolverocelot7772 Год назад +2

    看完后血压高了